Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
I'm good for either time Tuesday. ~sean On Feb 16, 2015, at 15:45, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Lets default to 3p/7a if we don't hear from Bryan. Tim P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. On Feb 15, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: 2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's see if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :) On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday? I'm happy to try out gotomeeting. Looks like I don't need an account, right? Tim P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tim, Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout? On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Zhipeng, Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue. If you come up with some times the Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team. We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday. If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do my best to make it there. Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to talk with. Tim On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: THX Tim! I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific questions. Would this be ok for everyone ? On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Bryan and Zhipeng, Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa. Sean’s definitely there on Wed. Less clear about Thu/Fri. I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if I can. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault management, resource management, resource scheduler) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copper, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit? Thanks a lot
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's see if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :) On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday? I'm happy to try out gotomeeting. Looks like I don't need an account, right? Tim P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tim, Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout? On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Zhipeng, Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue. If you come up with some times the Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team. We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday. If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do my best to make it there. Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to talk with. Tim On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: THX Tim! I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific questions. Would this be ok for everyone ? On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Bryan and Zhipeng, Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa. Sean’s definitely there on Wed. Less clear about Thu/Fri. I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if I can. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe= I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault management https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=, resource management https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=, resource scheduler https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com thinri...@vmware.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday? I'm happy to try out gotomeeting. Looks like I don't need an account, right? Tim P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile. On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tim, Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout? On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Zhipeng, Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue. If you come up with some times the Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team. We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday. If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do my best to make it there. Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to talk with. Tim On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: THX Tim! I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific questions. Would this be ok for everyone ? On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Bryan and Zhipeng, Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa. Sean’s definitely there on Wed. Less clear about Thu/Fri. I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if I can. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.commailto:bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_caseshttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe= I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=, resource managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=, resource schedulerhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
Hi Zhipeng, Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue. If you come up with some times the Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team. We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday. If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do my best to make it there. Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to talk with. Tim On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: THX Tim! I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific questions. Would this be ok for everyone ? On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.commailto:thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Bryan and Zhipeng, Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa. Sean’s definitely there on Wed. Less clear about Thu/Fri. I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if I can. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.commailto:bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_caseshttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe= I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=, resource managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=, resource schedulerhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
Hi Tim, Monday 9am PST should be ok for me, it is better if u guys could do 4 - 5 pm, but let's settle on 9 am for now, see if Bryan and others would be ok. Regarding meeting tools, in opnfv we use GoToMeeting a lot, would u guys be ok with that? Or should we have a Google Hangout? On Feb 14, 2015 8:04 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Zhipeng, Sure we can talk online Mon/Tue. If you come up with some times the Copper team is available, I’ll do the same for a few of the Congress team. We’re usually available 9-4p Pacific, and for me Monday looks better than Tuesday. If we schedule an hour meeting in Santa Rosa for Wed at say 1:30 or 2p, I’ll do my best to make it there. Even if I can’t make it, you’ll always have Sean to talk with. Tim On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: THX Tim! I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific questions. Would this be ok for everyone ? On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Bryan and Zhipeng, Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa. Sean’s definitely there on Wed. Less clear about Thu/Fri. I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if I can. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe= I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault management https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=, resource management https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=, resource scheduler https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com thinri...@vmware.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copper https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
Bryan and Zhipeng, Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa. Sean’s definitely there on Wed. Less clear about Thu/Fri. I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if I can. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.commailto:bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_caseshttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe= I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=, resource managementhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=, resource schedulerhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit? Thanks a lot :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edumailto:zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
THX Tim! I think It'd be great if we could have some online discussion ahead of F2F LFC summit.We could have the crash course early next week (Monday or Tuesday), and then Bryan could discuss with Sean in detail when they met, with specific questions. Would this be ok for everyone ? On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Bryan and Zhipeng, Sean Roberts (CCed) is planning to be in Santa Rosa. Sean’s definitely there on Wed. Less clear about Thu/Fri. I don’t know if I’ll make the trip yet, but I’m guessing Wed early afternoon if I can. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:04 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote: Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copper_use-5Fcasesd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=d4pb7BHqqZMj3oOoJBwixcr4VsTM0B4JwHe_JHRQ_VUe= I would be doing the same with ODL but I’m not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault management https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_doctord=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=Wq56oTQYc1glpCeJ6wfL60x0AdyAphZeL55R7Kc7TvUe=, resource management https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_promised=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=69Ak90Xh9biVNpWyCeLW8_7I0CoX0WrcDuFwlHQmM30e=, resource scheduler https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_requirements-5Fprojects_resource-5Fschedulerd=AwMFAgc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=79iOYd5evGtBk2y36AKWDlDGaxiAbtt-Aago3I-8XcUs=haq_oYTeYW7TkZp-eJrCx33KJjCg_tQlWTwiH_4OO9Ie=) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT *From:* Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com thinri...@vmware.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Cc:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copper https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit? Thanks a lot :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit? Thanks a lot :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edumailto:zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
Hi Tim, Thanks for the quick reply！I also think we should probably have a google hangout or irc meeting ahead of F2F, do you guys have time before 2/17, let's have a short session of crash course : ) On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Zhipeng, We’d be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don’t know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it’s the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copper https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit? Thanks a lot :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
Hi Tim, See one issue I had when installing congress, below. I'm not sure where to report this as it seems just a bug in the readme.rst at https://github.com/stackforge/congresshttps://github.com/stackforge/congress%20and%20in%20the%20prepare_devstack.sh and in the prepare_devstack.sh script. The readme references creating a localrc and adding the line below to it: ENABLED_SERVICES=congress,g-api,g-reg,key,n-api,n-crt,n-obj,n-cpu,n-sch,n-cauth,horizon,mysql,rabbit,sysstat,cinder,c-api,c-vol,c-sch,n-cond,quantum,q-svc,q-agt,q-dhcp,q-l3,q-meta,n-novnc,n-xvnc,q-lbaas,ceilometer-acompute,ceilometer-acentral,ceilometer-anotification,ceilometer-collector,ceilometer-alarm-evaluator,ceilometer-alarm-notifier,ceilometer-api,s-proxy,s-object,s-container,s-account But localrc has been deprecated for local.conf AFAICT, and stack.sh failed with errors (urllib3:... connection pool is full, discarding connection...) until I: - Moved enable_service congress into the [local|localrc] section of local.conf - Did not include the ENABLED_SERVICES line above (it seems to be redundant, not necessary if you are only enabling the default services, and I think caused the errors in stack.sh) I think prepare_devstack.sh needs to be updated to put enable_service congress into the [local|localrc] section of local.conf rather than creating localrc (at least when there is a local.conf in the devstack directory). Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 9:04 PM To: 'Tim Hinrichs'; 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' Cc: HU, BIN; 'Rodriguez, Iben'; 'Howard Huang' Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases I would be doing the same with ODL but I'm not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/doctor, resource managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/promise, resource schedulerhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_scheduler) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We'd be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don't know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it's the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit? Thanks a lot :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University
Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper
Hi Tim, It would be great to meet with members of the Congress project if possible at our meetup in Santa Rosa. I plan by then to have a basic understanding of Congress and some test driver apps / use cases to demo at the meetup. The goal is to assess the current state of Congress support for the use cases on the OPNFV wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/copper/use_cases I would be doing the same with ODL but I'm not as far on getting ready with it. So the opportunity to discuss the use cases under Copper and the other policy-related projects (fault managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/doctor, resource managementhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/promise, resource schedulerhttps://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_scheduler) with Congress experts would be great. Once we understand the gaps in what we are trying to build in OPNFV, the goal for our first OPNFV release is to create blueprints for new work in Congress. We might also just find some bugs and get directly involved in Congress to address them, or start a collaborative development project in OPNFV for that. TBD Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | Service Standards | ATT From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L; HU, BIN; Rodriguez, Iben; Howard Huang Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper Hi Zhipeng, We'd be happy to meet. Sounds like fun! I don't know of anyone on the Congress team who is planning to attend the LF collaboration summit. But we might be able to send a couple of people if it's the only real chance to have a face-to-face. Otherwise, there are a bunch of us in and around Palo Alto. And of course, phone/google hangout/irc are fine options as well. Tim On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Zhipeng Huang zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copperhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_copperd=AwMFaQc=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEsr=B6BWd4kFfgOzAREgThxkmTZKy7dDXE2-eBAmL0PBK7sm=R1ER1wU47Knv6PaOiamDwCm76pwx5uuE47mpn_03mzYs=S7VfJALm_Pmzb2S-o3NUlcNzLAy9yYceGzcyKX3CA-we=, in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple openstack environment with congress integrated that could demo simple use cases for policy deployment. Would it possible for you guys and our team to find a time do an Copper/Congress interlock meeting, during which Congress Team could introduce how to best integrate congress with vanilla openstack? Will some of you attend LF Collaboration Summit? Thanks a lot :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.commailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edumailto:zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
