Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-11 Thread Ben Swartzlander
@lists.openstack.org, ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila ... Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Gregory Farnum
...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:26:52 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila Am 04.03.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Csaba Henk: - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila ... Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still supported in some way

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila ... For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS via p9 and NFS would not perform that well I guess). The second solution, to use Can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Csaba Henk
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila ... Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still supported in some way (and the question if not: why?). That only seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
Am 04.03.2015 um 05:19 schrieb Deepak Shetty: On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de wrote: Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty: [...] [...] I was curious to understand. IIUC Neutron provides private and public networks and for VMs to access external

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Csaba Henk
Hi Danny, - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 3:07:36 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Csaba Henk
: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila Am 04.03.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Csaba Henk: - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, ceph-de

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-03 Thread Deepak Shetty
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 9:07:36 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil: [sorry for ceph-devel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-03 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty: [...] For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS via p9 and NFS would not perform that well I guess). The second solution, to use CephFS directly to the VM would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-03 Thread Deepak Shetty
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de wrote: Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty: [...] For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS via p9 and NFS would not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-02 Thread Luis Pabon
...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 9:07:36 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil: [sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include openstack-dev] Hi everyone, The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-01 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil: [sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include openstack-dev] Hi everyone, The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1] and among other things we'll be talking about how to support CephFS in Manila. At a high level, there are basically

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-02-26 Thread Sage Weil
[sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include openstack-dev] Hi everyone, The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1] and among other things we'll be talking about how to support CephFS in Manila. At a high level, there are basically two paths: 1) Ganesha + the CephFS FSAL driver