Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Service chain node creation fails

[NareshA kumar]

Hi Sumit,
As you mentioned I used the AWS template format and now able to create a
service chain successfully. But I dont see any firewall and lb created in
my network. Am I missing anything here?

Regards,
Naresh.

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:42 PM, NareshA kumar 
wrote:

> Hi Sumit,
> Thanks for your response. I am just trying to create a VM as a dumb
> firewall. Attached the template file for your reference.
>
> Regards,
> Naresh
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Sumit Naiksatam 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Naresh,
>>
>> Please send me the your template file in response to this email, I can
>> take look.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ~Sumit.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 10:26 PM, NareshA kumar
>>  wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > When I try to create a Service chain node by giving the yaml file as
>> heat
>> > template it says "Invalid file format". But with the same file I am
>> able to
>> > create a stack using "heat stack-create"  command.
>> >
>> > What am I missing here?
>> > Is there is any log file that can provide me the details of my error?
>> >
>> > Anyone please help me . I am stuck here for a long time.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Naresh.
>> >
>> >
>> __
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC Use Case

[NareshA kumar]

Hi Sumit,
Thanks for your quick help. I think I am almost done. I am able to
successfully create sfc chain spec with aws template. I have also created
group members and able to ping between them. But I dont see any firewall or
loadbalancer namespaces created.
Am I missing something here? Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Naresh.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC Use Case

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi Naresh, I believe you are hitting this bug:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/group-based-policy/+bug/1418839

Try an AWS-type template [1] and it should work. Alternatively, you
can get the HOT template to work in your local environment by applying
this small fix:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160629/1/gbpservice/neutron/db/servicechain_db.py

Thanks,
~Sumit.

[1] 
https://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/blob/master/gbpservice/tests/contrib/devstack/gbp-templates/firewall-lb-servicechain/fw.template

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:28 PM, NareshA kumar
 wrote:
> Hi Sumit,
> Can you kindly share an example yaml file for firewall. With my yaml file I
> am able to create vm through heat but while creating service node it says
> "Invalid file format".
>
> Regards.
> Naresh
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Sumit Naiksatam 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Naresh, You should be able to use the same heat templates.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ~Sumit.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:06 AM, NareshA kumar
>>  wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I have tried GBP in Kilo. Now I want to try GBP+SFC integration in Kilo.
>> > Regarding which i have few questions,
>> >
>> > Is GBP+SFC supported now in Kilo?
>> > If yes, please suggest me some links to follow.
>> > For creating SFC in kilo where can I find heat templates?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Naresh.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > __
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC Use Case

[NareshA kumar]

Hi Sumit,
Can you kindly share an example yaml file for firewall. With my yaml file I
am able to create vm through heat but while creating service node it says
"Invalid file format".

Regards.
Naresh

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Sumit Naiksatam 
wrote:

> Hi Naresh, You should be able to use the same heat templates.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sumit.
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:06 AM, NareshA kumar
>  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have tried GBP in Kilo. Now I want to try GBP+SFC integration in Kilo.
> > Regarding which i have few questions,
> >
> > Is GBP+SFC supported now in Kilo?
> > If yes, please suggest me some links to follow.
> > For creating SFC in kilo where can I find heat templates?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Naresh.
> >
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Service chain node creation fails

[NareshA kumar]

Hi Sumit,
Thanks for your response. I am just trying to create a VM as a dumb
firewall. Attached the template file for your reference.

Regards,
Naresh

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Sumit Naiksatam 
wrote:

> Hi Naresh,
>
> Please send me the your template file in response to this email, I can
> take look.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sumit.
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 10:26 PM, NareshA kumar
>  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > When I try to create a Service chain node by giving the yaml file as heat
> > template it says "Invalid file format". But with the same file I am able
> to
> > create a stack using "heat stack-create"  command.
> >
> > What am I missing here?
> > Is there is any log file that can provide me the details of my error?
> >
> > Anyone please help me . I am stuck here for a long time.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Naresh.
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>


fw.yaml
Description: application/yaml
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Service chain node creation fails

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi Naresh, I can try and help you with this. Can you unicast the file to me?

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 10:26 PM, NareshA kumar
 wrote:
> Hi,
> When I try to create a Service chain node by giving the yaml file as heat
> template it says "Invalid file format". But with the same file I am able to
> create a stack using "heat stack-create"  command.
>
> What am I missing here?
> Is there is any log file that can provide me the details of my error?
>
> Anyone please help me . I am stuck here for a long time.
>
> Regards,
> Naresh.
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC Use Case

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi Naresh, You should be able to use the same heat templates.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:06 AM, NareshA kumar
 wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tried GBP in Kilo. Now I want to try GBP+SFC integration in Kilo.
> Regarding which i have few questions,
>
> Is GBP+SFC supported now in Kilo?
> If yes, please suggest me some links to follow.
> For creating SFC in kilo where can I find heat templates?
>
> Regards,
>
> Naresh.
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Service chain node creation fails

[NareshA kumar]

Hi,
When I try to create a Service chain node by giving the yaml file as heat
template it says "Invalid file format". But with the same file I am able to
create a stack using "heat stack-create"  command.


   1. What am I missing here?
   2. Is there is any log file that can provide me the details of my error?

Anyone please help me . I am stuck here for a long time.

Regards,
Naresh.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC Use Case

[NareshA kumar]

Hi,
I have tried GBP in Kilo. Now I want to try GBP+SFC integration in Kilo.
Regarding which i have few questions,


   1. Is GBP+SFC supported now in Kilo?
   2. If yes, please suggest me some links to follow.
   3. For creating SFC in kilo where can I find heat templates?

Regards,

Naresh.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy]

[Sagar Pradhan]

Thanks Sumit.
Actually I also did the same thing using --debug option with CLI to find
the REST requests and responses.
Thanks for the help . Will get back to you if required.

Regards,
Sagar
On Sep 15, 2015 11:59 PM, "Sumit Naiksatam" 
wrote:

> Hi Sagar,
>
> GBP has a single REST API interface. The CLI, Horizon and Heat are
> merely clients of the same REST API.
>
> There was a similar question on this which I had responded to in a
> different mailer:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2015-September/013952.html
>
> and I believe you are cc'ed on that thread. I have provided more
> information on how you can run the CLI in the verbose mode to explore
> the REST request and responses. Hope that will be helpful, and we are
> happy to guide you through this exercise (catch us on #openstack-gbp
> for real time help).
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sumit.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Sagar Pradhan 
> wrote:
> >
> >  Hello ,
> >
> > We were exploring group based policy for some project.We could find CLI
> and
> > REST API documentation for GBP.
> > Do we have separate REST API for GBP which can be called separately ?
> > From documentation it seems that we can only use CLI , Horizon and Heat.
> > Please point us to CLI or REST API documentation for GBP.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sagar
> >
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy]

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi Sagar,

GBP has a single REST API interface. The CLI, Horizon and Heat are
merely clients of the same REST API.

There was a similar question on this which I had responded to in a
different mailer:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2015-September/013952.html

and I believe you are cc'ed on that thread. I have provided more
information on how you can run the CLI in the verbose mode to explore
the REST request and responses. Hope that will be helpful, and we are
happy to guide you through this exercise (catch us on #openstack-gbp
for real time help).

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Sagar Pradhan  wrote:
>
>  Hello ,
>
> We were exploring group based policy for some project.We could find CLI and
> REST API documentation for GBP.
> Do we have separate REST API for GBP which can be called separately ?
> From documentation it seems that we can only use CLI , Horizon and Heat.
> Please point us to CLI or REST API documentation for GBP.
>
>
> Regards,
> Sagar
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy]

[Sagar Pradhan]

 Hello ,

We were exploring group based policy for some project.We could find CLI and
REST API documentation for GBP.
Do we have separate REST API for GBP which can be called separately ?
>From documentation it seems that we can only use CLI , Horizon and Heat.
Please point us to CLI or REST API documentation for GBP.


Regards,
Sagar
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC USe Case

[Yapeng Wu]

Venkat,

Service Function chaining ("redirect" action) is not supported right now.

Yapeng


From: groupbasedpolicy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org 
[mailto:groupbasedpolicy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of 
Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:38 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: groupbasedpolicy-...@lists.opendaylight.org
Subject: [groupbasedpolicy-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC USe Case

Hi,
 I am trying out the procedure listed in this page 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy/InstallODLIntegrationDevstack. 
I was looking for  an use case with Service Function chaining i.e. to use 
redirect with gbp command.
Can you please point me to some link that can help me out to try the same with 
GBP?

Regards,
Venkat G.



::DISCLAIMER::

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.
E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information 
could be intercepted, corrupted,
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in 
transmission. The e mail and its contents
(with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on 
the originator or HCL or its affiliates.
Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the 
author and may not necessarily reflect the
views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, 
dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of
HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
delete it and notify the sender immediately.
Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and 
other defects.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Bug squashing day

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Thanks to the entire team for participating today, we made very good
progress with knocking off a number of long standing bugs. We will
also be cutting a new stable/juno release towards the end of this week
since we ended up back porting quite a few fixes.

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Sumit Naiksatam
 wrote:
> Hi, Per our discussion in the last weekly IRC meeting, we will have
> the bug squashing day for GBP on Tuesday, March 3rd. We will
> coordinate activities over the #openstack-gbp channel. Please join and
> participate.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sumit.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Bug squashing day

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi, Per our discussion in the last weekly IRC meeting, we will have
the bug squashing day for GBP on Tuesday, March 3rd. We will
coordinate activities over the #openstack-gbp channel. Please join and
participate.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Policy violations investigation

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi Ariel,

This is indeed one of the use cases that is very relevant to, and can
be supported, with the GBP model. The GBP policy actions provide a way
to “redirect” to a service-instance/chain on matching a traffic
classifier. If you are able to represent the “honeypot” functionality
as a Neutron advanced service, or wrap it in an implemented service,
then you can integrate it with today’s implementation. The GBP team
will be happy to provide you with more information on how you can
propose and implement any changes that you may need to make for this
integration. Also, feel free to catch us in #openstack-gbp and/or
during the GBP weekly IRC meeting [1].

Thanks,
~Sumit.

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron_Group_Policy

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Ariel Zeitlin  wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to propose an idea of investigation of policy violations (for
> white-list policies defined by GBP) by, for instance, redirecting the
> violating sessions to a HoneyPot.
> Meaning, that if the only communication between Group A and Group B is by
> port 80 (as described in the GPB) then an access to port 22 from Group A to
> Group B will be redirected to and answered by a HoneyPot that will
> investigate the real reason for policy violation, or simply log and drop the
> violating connection attempt.
>
> In tightly defined policies world as achieved through GBP an attacker trying
> to propagate inside the network is more likely to hit a wall and then
> actually create a "golden lead" for his detection.
>
> Do you think this concept can/should to be part of GBP and what would be the
> best way to promote it (sorry, I am pretty new to OpenStack and GBP
> specifically).
>
> Thanks,
> Ariel
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Policy violations investigation

[Ariel Zeitlin]

Hi,
I want to propose an idea of investigation of policy violations (for
white-list policies defined by GBP) by, for instance, redirecting the
violating sessions to a HoneyPot.
Meaning, that if the only communication between Group A and Group B is by
port 80 (as described in the GPB) then an access to port 22 from Group A to
Group B will be redirected to and answered by a HoneyPot that will
investigate the real reason for policy violation, or simply log and drop
the violating connection attempt.

In tightly defined policies world as achieved through GBP an attacker
trying to propagate inside the network is more likely to hit a wall and
then actually create a "golden lead" for his detection.

Do you think this concept can/should to be part of GBP and what would be
the best way to promote it (sorry, I am pretty new to OpenStack and GBP
specifically).

Thanks,
Ariel
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi Sachi,

This refers to a Neutron Network UUID. This option is available with
the Neutron Resource Mapping Driver. I do not believe it is currently
functional with the ODL driver.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
> Hi Yapeng, Sumit,
>
> In Openstack GBP command line, for l2policy help, there is an argument
> --network that can be passed. Can you please elaborate on which network do
> we need to pass here and what is the use of the same.
>
> gbp l2policy-create --help
> usage: gbp l2policy-create [-h] [-f {html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
>[-c COLUMN] [--max-width ]
>[--prefix PREFIX] [--request-format {json,xml}]
>[--tenant-id TENANT_ID] [--description
> DESCRIPTION]
>[--network NETWORK] [--l3-policy L3_POLICY]
>NAME
>
> Create a L2 Policy for a given tenant.
>
> positional arguments:
>   NAME  Name of L2 Policy to create
>
> optional arguments:
>   -h, --helpshow this help message and exit
>   --request-format {json,xml}
> The XML or JSON request format.
>   --tenant-id TENANT_ID
> The owner tenant ID.
>   --description DESCRIPTION
> Description of the L2 Policy
>   --network NETWORK Network to map the L2 Policy
>   --l3-policy L3_POLICY
> L3 Policy uuid
>
>
> Also, the PTG help includes an additional subnet parameter. Please also
> provide inputs on it.
>
> stack@tcs-ThinkCentre-M58p:/home/tcs/JUNIPER/gbp_openstack_odl/devstack$ gbp
> policy-target-group-create --help
> usage: gbp policy-target-group-create [-h]
>   [-f
> {html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}]
>   [-c COLUMN] [--max-width ]
>   [--prefix PREFIX]
>   [--request-format {json,xml}]
>   [--tenant-id TENANT_ID]
>   [--description DESCRIPTION]
>   [--l2-policy L2_POLICY]
>   [--provided-policy-rule-sets
> PROVIDED_POLICY_RULE_SETS]
>   [--consumed-policy-rule-sets
> CONSUMED_POLICY_RULE_SETS]
>   [--network-service-policy
> NETWORK_SERVICE_POLICY]
>   [--subnets SUBNETS]
>   NAME
> Create a Policy Target Group for a given tenant.
> positional arguments:
>   NAME  Name of Policy Target Group to create
>
> optional arguments:
>   -h, --helpshow this help message and exit
>   --request-format {json,xml}
> The XML or JSON request format.
>   --tenant-id TENANT_ID
> The owner tenant ID.
>   --description DESCRIPTION
> Description of the Policy Target Group
>   --l2-policy L2_POLICY
> L2 policy uuid
>
>   --provided-policy-rule-sets PROVIDED_POLICY_RULE_SETS
> Dictionary of provided policy rule set uuids
>   --consumed-policy-rule-sets CONSUMED_POLICY_RULE_SETS
> Dictionary of consumed policy rule set uuids
>   --network-service-policy NETWORK_SERVICE_POLICY
> Network service policy uuid
>   --subnets SUBNETS List of neutron subnet uuids
>
> output formatters:
>   output formatter options
>
>   -f {html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}, --format
> {html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}
> the output format, defaults to table
>   -c COLUMN, --column COLUMN
> specify the column(s) to include, can be repeated
>
> table formatter:
>   --max-width 
> Maximum display width, 0 to disable
>
> shell formatter:
>   a format a UNIX shell can parse (variable="value")
>
>   --prefix PREFIX   add a prefix to all variable names
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sachi Gupta
>
>
>
> From:Yapeng Wu 
> To:Sachi Gupta , "OpenStack Development Mailing
> List (not for usage questions)" ,
> "groupbasedpolicy-...@lists.opendaylight.org"
> 
> Cc:"bu...@noironetworks.com" 
> Date:01/13/2015 11:48 PM
> Subject:RE: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL
> PolicyDriverSpecs
> 
>
>
>
> Hi, Sachi,
&

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Sachi Gupta]

Hi Yapeng, Sumit,

In Openstack GBP command line, for l2policy help, there is an argument 
--network that can be passed. Can you please elaborate on which network do 
we need to pass here and what is the use of the same.

gbp l2policy-create --help 
usage: gbp l2policy-create [-h] [-f {html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}] 
   [-c COLUMN] [--max-width ] 
   [--prefix PREFIX] [--request-format {json,xml}] 

   [--tenant-id TENANT_ID] [--description 
DESCRIPTION] 
   [--network NETWORK] [--l3-policy L3_POLICY] 
   NAME 

Create a L2 Policy for a given tenant. 

positional arguments: 
  NAME  Name of L2 Policy to create 

optional arguments: 
  -h, --helpshow this help message and exit 
  --request-format {json,xml} 
The XML or JSON request format. 
  --tenant-id TENANT_ID 
The owner tenant ID. 
  --description DESCRIPTION 
Description of the L2 Policy 
  --network NETWORK Network to map the L2 Policy 
  --l3-policy L3_POLICY 
L3 Policy uuid 


Also, the PTG help includes an additional subnet parameter. Please also 
provide inputs on it.

stack@tcs-ThinkCentre-M58p:/home/tcs/JUNIPER/gbp_openstack_odl/devstack$ 
gbp policy-target-group-create --help 
usage: gbp policy-target-group-create [-h] 
  [-f 
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}] 
  [-c COLUMN] [--max-width ] 
  [--prefix PREFIX] 
  [--request-format {json,xml}] 
  [--tenant-id TENANT_ID] 
  [--description DESCRIPTION] 
  [--l2-policy L2_POLICY] 
  [--provided-policy-rule-sets 
PROVIDED_POLICY_RULE_SETS] 
  [--consumed-policy-rule-sets 
CONSUMED_POLICY_RULE_SETS] 
  [--network-service-policy 
NETWORK_SERVICE_POLICY] 
  [--subnets SUBNETS] 
  NAME 
Create a Policy Target Group for a given tenant. 
positional arguments: 
  NAME  Name of Policy Target Group to create 

optional arguments: 
  -h, --helpshow this help message and exit 
  --request-format {json,xml} 
The XML or JSON request format. 
  --tenant-id TENANT_ID 
The owner tenant ID. 
  --description DESCRIPTION 
Description of the Policy Target Group 
  --l2-policy L2_POLICY 
L2 policy uuid 

  --provided-policy-rule-sets PROVIDED_POLICY_RULE_SETS 
Dictionary of provided policy rule set uuids 
  --consumed-policy-rule-sets CONSUMED_POLICY_RULE_SETS 
Dictionary of consumed policy rule set uuids 
  --network-service-policy NETWORK_SERVICE_POLICY 
Network service policy uuid 
  --subnets SUBNETS List of neutron subnet uuids 

output formatters: 
  output formatter options 

  -f {html,json,shell,table,value,yaml}, --format 
{html,json,shell,table,value,yaml} 
the output format, defaults to table 
  -c COLUMN, --column COLUMN 
specify the column(s) to include, can be repeated 

table formatter: 
  --max-width  
Maximum display width, 0 to disable 

shell formatter: 
  a format a UNIX shell can parse (variable="value") 

  --prefix PREFIX   add a prefix to all variable names 




Thanks & Regards
Sachi Gupta



From:   Yapeng Wu 
To: Sachi Gupta , "OpenStack Development Mailing 
List (not for usage questions)" , 
"groupbasedpolicy-...@lists.opendaylight.org" 

Cc: "bu...@noironetworks.com" 
Date:   01/13/2015 11:48 PM
Subject:    RE: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL 
Policy  Driver  Specs



Hi, Sachi,
 
Please see my inlined replies.
 
Also, please refer to this link when you try to integrate OpenStack GBP 
and ODL GBP:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy/InstallODLIntegrationDevstack
 
 
Yapeng
 
From: Sachi Gupta [mailto:sachi.gu...@tcs.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); 
groupbasedpolicy-...@lists.opendaylight.org; Yapeng Wu
Cc: bu...@noironetworks.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy 
Driver Specs
 
Hi, 

While working on the integration of Openstack With ODL GBP, I have the 
below queries: 
1.  Endpoint-group Create: When I create a new policy-target-group 
from Openstack say "gbp target-policy-group-create group1", it internally 
creates a l2.policy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Yapeng Wu]

Hi, Sachi,

Please see my inlined replies.

Also, please refer to this link when you try to integrate OpenStack GBP and ODL 
GBP:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy/InstallODLIntegrationDevstack


Yapeng

From: Sachi Gupta [mailto:sachi.gu...@tcs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:02 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); 
groupbasedpolicy-...@lists.opendaylight.org; Yapeng Wu
Cc: bu...@noironetworks.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver 
Specs

Hi,

While working on the integration of Openstack With ODL GBP, I have the below 
queries:

  1.  Endpoint-group Create: When I create a new policy-target-group from 
Openstack say "gbp target-policy-group-create group1", it internally creates a 
l2.policy which includes the creation of the network and subnet. Meaning 
creation of EPG will create Network and subnet implicitly in Openstack and also 
the corresponding EPG, subnet, l3-context, l2-flood-domain, l2-bridge-domain 
will be created in the ODL GBP. So during the above EPG creation, neutron 
network and subnet call will come to the neutron northbound of ODL or only to 
ODL GBP??
[Yapeng] First, when creating policy-target-group, you need to give 
“provided-policy-rule-sets” or “consumed-policy-rule-sets” parameter. Currently 
we don’t support policy-target-group update. Second, neutron network and subnet 
call won’t go to ODL.

  1.

  1.  In ODL, there is no Endpoint create API, instead there is an API to 
register the endpoints. So what is the sync between the OS and ODL for Endpoint 
create and register.?
[Yapeng] The current working scheme is as follow: ODL GBP has new APIs for 
openstack-endpoint register and unregister supports.[1][2] When Openstack GBP 
creates policy-target, a neutron port will be created by implicit driver, 
openstack-endpoint register API will be invoked and the OVS tap-port-id will be 
passed as parameter to ODL GBP. Later when VM is booted, the OVS tap-port-id 
will be populated on openvswitch, this will trigger ODL to update ovs flow 
tables.

[1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/13554/
[2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/13896/


Thanks & Regards
Sachi Gupta



From:Yapeng Wu 
To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Date:01/12/2015 09:01 PM
Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL
PolicyDriverSpecs




Hello, Sachi,

They both works. “End point group” has been renamed to “policy target group”. 
It is recommended to use “gbp policy-target-group-create”.

Yapeng


From: Sachi Gupta [mailto:sachi.gu...@tcs.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver 
Specs

Hi,

Can anyone explain the difference between gbp group-create and gbp 
policy-target-group-create??

I think both these are working same.

Thanks & Regards
Sachi Gupta




From:Sumit Naiksatam 
To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Date:11/26/2014 01:35 PM
Subject:    Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy 
DriverSpecs





Hi, This GBP spec is currently being worked on:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134285/

It will be helpful if you can add "[Policy][Group-based-policy]" in
the subject of your emails, so that the email gets characterized
correctly.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I need to understand the interaction between the Openstack GBP and the
> Opendaylight GBP project which will be done by ODL Policy driver.
>
> Can someone provide me with specs of ODL Policy driver for making my
> understanding on call flow.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sachi Gupta
>
> =-=-=
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Sachi Gupta]

Hi,

While working on the integration of Openstack With ODL GBP, I have the 
below queries:

Endpoint-group Create: When I create a new policy-target-group from 
Openstack say "gbp target-policy-group-create group1", it internally 
creates a l2.policy which includes the creation of the network and subnet. 
Meaning creation of EPG will create Network and subnet implicitly in 
Openstack and also the corresponding EPG, subnet, l3-context, 
l2-flood-domain, l2-bridge-domain will be created in the ODL GBP. So 
during the above EPG creation, neutron network and subnet call will come 
to the neutron northbound of ODL or only to ODL GBP??

In ODL, there is no Endpoint create API, instead there is an API to 
register the endpoints. So what is the sync between the OS and ODL for 
Endpoint create and register.?


Thanks & Regards
Sachi Gupta



From:   Yapeng Wu 
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Date:   01/12/2015 09:01 PM
Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL 
Policy  Driver  Specs



Hello, Sachi,
 
They both works. “End point group” has been renamed to “policy target 
group”. It is recommended to use “gbp policy-target-group-create”.
 
Yapeng
 
 
From: Sachi Gupta [mailto:sachi.gu...@tcs.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy 
Driver Specs
 
Hi, 

Can anyone explain the difference between gbp group-create and gbp 
policy-target-group-create?? 

I think both these are working same. 

Thanks & Regards
Sachi Gupta




From:Sumit Naiksatam  
To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
 
Date:11/26/2014 01:35 PM 
Subject:    Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL 
Policy DriverSpecs 




Hi, This GBP spec is currently being worked on:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134285/

It will be helpful if you can add "[Policy][Group-based-policy]" in
the subject of your emails, so that the email gets characterized
correctly.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I need to understand the interaction between the Openstack GBP and the
> Opendaylight GBP project which will be done by ODL Policy driver.
>
> Can someone provide me with specs of ODL Policy driver for making my
> understanding on call flow.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sachi Gupta
>
> =-=-=
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi, The 'group' CLI commands are an alias to the 'policy-target-group'
commands and are provided for convenience of use. Per your
observation, both are equally functional and supported.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone explain the difference between gbp group-create and gbp
> policy-target-group-create??
>
> I think both these are working same.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sachi Gupta
>
>
>
>
> From:Sumit Naiksatam 
> To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> 
> Date:    11/26/2014 01:35 PM
> Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy
> DriverSpecs
> 
>
>
>
> Hi, This GBP spec is currently being worked on:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134285/
>
> It will be helpful if you can add "[Policy][Group-based-policy]" in
> the subject of your emails, so that the email gets characterized
> correctly.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sumit.
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I need to understand the interaction between the Openstack GBP and the
>> Opendaylight GBP project which will be done by ODL Policy driver.
>>
>> Can someone provide me with specs of ODL Policy driver for making my
>> understanding on call flow.
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Sachi Gupta
>>
>> =-=-=
>> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
>> message and/or attachments to it may contain
>> confidential or privileged information. If you are
>> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
>> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
>> information contained in this e-mail message
>> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
>> you have received this communication in error,
>> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
>> immediately and permanently delete the message
>> and any attachments. Thank you
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Yapeng Wu]

Hello, Sachi,

They both works. "End point group" has been renamed to "policy target group". 
It is recommended to use "gbp policy-target-group-create".

Yapeng


From: Sachi Gupta [mailto:sachi.gu...@tcs.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:03 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver 
Specs

Hi,

Can anyone explain the difference between gbp group-create and gbp 
policy-target-group-create??

I think both these are working same.

Thanks & Regards
Sachi Gupta




From:Sumit Naiksatam 
To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Date:    11/26/2014 01:35 PM
Subject:    Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy 
DriverSpecs




Hi, This GBP spec is currently being worked on:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134285/

It will be helpful if you can add "[Policy][Group-based-policy]" in
the subject of your emails, so that the email gets characterized
correctly.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I need to understand the interaction between the Openstack GBP and the
> Opendaylight GBP project which will be done by ODL Policy driver.
>
> Can someone provide me with specs of ODL Policy driver for making my
> understanding on call flow.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sachi Gupta
>
> =-=-=
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Sachi Gupta]

Hi,

Can anyone explain the difference between gbp group-create and gbp 
policy-target-group-create??

I think both these are working same.

Thanks & Regards
Sachi Gupta




From:   Sumit Naiksatam 
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Date:   11/26/2014 01:35 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL 
Policy Driver   Specs



Hi, This GBP spec is currently being worked on:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134285/

It will be helpful if you can add "[Policy][Group-based-policy]" in
the subject of your emails, so that the email gets characterized
correctly.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I need to understand the interaction between the Openstack GBP and the
> Opendaylight GBP project which will be done by ODL Policy driver.
>
> Can someone provide me with specs of ODL Policy driver for making my
> understanding on call flow.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sachi Gupta
>
> =-=-=
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] ODL Policy Driver Specs

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi, This GBP spec is currently being worked on:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134285/

It will be helpful if you can add "[Policy][Group-based-policy]" in
the subject of your emails, so that the email gets characterized
correctly.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Sachi Gupta  wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I need to understand the interaction between the Openstack GBP and the
> Opendaylight GBP project which will be done by ODL Policy driver.
>
> Can someone provide me with specs of ODL Policy driver for making my
> understanding on call flow.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Sachi Gupta
>
> =-=-=
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] GBP Juno/Kilo next steps meeting

[Sumit Naiksatam]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Gregory Lebovitz
 wrote:
> +1, summary?
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Igor Cardoso  wrote:
>>
>> Hello Sumit.
>> Unfortunately I could not go to the round table meeting, sorry for the
>> absence.
>> Did you talk about traffic steering? Is there some place or etherpad with
>> a summary of what was discussed/outlined?
>>

The breakout session used the same etherpad as the design summit session:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-gbp-design-summit-topics

Thanks,
~Sumit.

>> Cheers,
>>
>> On 5 November 2014 17:22, Sumit Naiksatam 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We had a productive design session discussion on Tuesday. However, we
>>> could not get to the point where we discussed all the next steps and
>>> specific action items for Juno/Kilo GBP releases. We will be meeting
>>> tomorrow (Thursday) morning from in the Le Meridian to cover these.
>>>
>>> Time: 10 to 11 AM (before the Neutron sessions start)
>>> Location: Round tables (just outside the design session rooms), Floor
>>> -1, Le Meridian.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ~Sumit.
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Igor Duarte Cardoso.
>> http://igordcard.com
>> @igordcard
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 
> Open industry-related email from
> Gregory M. Lebovitz
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] GBP Juno/Kilo next steps meeting

[Gregory Lebovitz]

+1, summary?

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Igor Cardoso  wrote:

> Hello Sumit.
> Unfortunately I could not go to the round table meeting, sorry for the
> absence.
> Did you talk about traffic steering? Is there some place or etherpad with
> a summary of what was discussed/outlined?
>
> Cheers,
>
> On 5 November 2014 17:22, Sumit Naiksatam 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We had a productive design session discussion on Tuesday. However, we
>> could not get to the point where we discussed all the next steps and
>> specific action items for Juno/Kilo GBP releases. We will be meeting
>> tomorrow (Thursday) morning from in the Le Meridian to cover these.
>>
>> Time: 10 to 11 AM (before the Neutron sessions start)
>> Location: Round tables (just outside the design session rooms), Floor
>> -1, Le Meridian.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ~Sumit.
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Igor Duarte Cardoso.
> http://igordcard.com
> @igordcard 
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 

Open industry-related email from
Gregory M. Lebovitz
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] GBP Juno/Kilo next steps meeting

[Igor Cardoso]

Hello Sumit.
Unfortunately I could not go to the round table meeting, sorry for the
absence.
Did you talk about traffic steering? Is there some place or etherpad with a
summary of what was discussed/outlined?

Cheers,

On 5 November 2014 17:22, Sumit Naiksatam  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We had a productive design session discussion on Tuesday. However, we
> could not get to the point where we discussed all the next steps and
> specific action items for Juno/Kilo GBP releases. We will be meeting
> tomorrow (Thursday) morning from in the Le Meridian to cover these.
>
> Time: 10 to 11 AM (before the Neutron sessions start)
> Location: Round tables (just outside the design session rooms), Floor
> -1, Le Meridian.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sumit.
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Igor Duarte Cardoso.
http://igordcard.com
@igordcard 
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] GBP Juno/Kilo next steps meeting

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi,

We had a productive design session discussion on Tuesday. However, we
could not get to the point where we discussed all the next steps and
specific action items for Juno/Kilo GBP releases. We will be meeting
tomorrow (Thursday) morning from in the Le Meridian to cover these.

Time: 10 to 11 AM (before the Neutron sessions start)
Location: Round tables (just outside the design session rooms), Floor
-1, Le Meridian.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based Policy] Audio stream for GBP Design Session in Paris

[Gregory Lebovitz]

Mandeep,
thanks a ton for setting it up. I just didn't see the email before I went
to sleep, so I didn't bother to get up for the session. Now I wish I had!

To affirm the attempt, Yi Sun opened up a google hangout for me today in
the split meeting. Even as crappy as the audio was from the mic on his
laptop, it was S helpful to have an audio stream to go along with the
ether pad.

Think that could happen for the advanced services meetup later today at
2:30pm?

Thanks again for going out of your way for me. I really appreciate it!! -
Gregory

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Mandeep Dhami 
wrote:

>
> As no one was online, I closed the webex session.
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Mandeep Dhami 
> wrote:
>
>> Use this webex meeting for Audio streaming:
>>
>> https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/j.php?MTID=m210c77f6f51a6f313a7d130d19ee3e4d
>>
>>
>> Topic: GBP Design Session
>>
>> Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014
>>
>> Time: 12:15 pm, Europe Time (Amsterdam, GMT+01:00)
>>
>> Meeting Number: 205 658 563
>>
>> Meeting Password: gbp
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Gregory Lebovitz 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I'm participating remotely this session. Any plan for audio stream of
>>> Tuesday's session? I'll happily offer a GoToMeeting, if needed.
>>>
>>> Would someone be willing to scribe discussion in #openstack-gbp channel?
>>>
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Open industry-related email from
>>> Gregory M. Lebovitz
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 

Open industry-related email from
Gregory M. Lebovitz
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based Policy] Audio stream for GBP Design Session in Paris

[Mandeep Dhami]

As no one was online, I closed the webex session.

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Mandeep Dhami 
wrote:

> Use this webex meeting for Audio streaming:
>
> https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/j.php?MTID=m210c77f6f51a6f313a7d130d19ee3e4d
>
>
> Topic: GBP Design Session
>
> Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014
>
> Time: 12:15 pm, Europe Time (Amsterdam, GMT+01:00)
>
> Meeting Number: 205 658 563
>
> Meeting Password: gbp
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Gregory Lebovitz 
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm participating remotely this session. Any plan for audio stream of
>> Tuesday's session? I'll happily offer a GoToMeeting, if needed.
>>
>> Would someone be willing to scribe discussion in #openstack-gbp channel?
>>
>> --
>> 
>> Open industry-related email from
>> Gregory M. Lebovitz
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based Policy] Audio stream for GBP Design Session in Paris

[Mandeep Dhami]

Use this webex meeting for Audio streaming:

https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/j.php?MTID=m210c77f6f51a6f313a7d130d19ee3e4d


Topic: GBP Design Session

Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Time: 12:15 pm, Europe Time (Amsterdam, GMT+01:00)

Meeting Number: 205 658 563

Meeting Password: gbp

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Gregory Lebovitz 
wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I'm participating remotely this session. Any plan for audio stream of
> Tuesday's session? I'll happily offer a GoToMeeting, if needed.
>
> Would someone be willing to scribe discussion in #openstack-gbp channel?
>
> --
> 
> Open industry-related email from
> Gregory M. Lebovitz
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based Policy] Audio stream for GBP Design Session in Paris

[Gregory Lebovitz]

Hey all,

I'm participating remotely this session. Any plan for audio stream of
Tuesday's session? I'll happily offer a GoToMeeting, if needed.

Would someone be willing to scribe discussion in #openstack-gbp channel?

-- 

Open industry-related email from
Gregory M. Lebovitz
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based Policy] Review meeting for service redirect/chain patches

[Sumit Naiksatam]

Hi, We will be meeting in the #openstack-gbp channel on 10/28 at 16.00
UTC to jointly review some of the pending patches:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128559/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128551/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128552/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128555/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128556/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130004/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129545
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130920/

Please join if you would like to provide feedback.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev