Ihar Hrachyshka writes:
> I just saw the plan merged in master:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451492/ That's cool! Can we also
> backport the change to Ocata and maybe Newton so that we don't hit the
> same bug there? The backport is already up:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456506/
For
I just saw the plan merged in master:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451492/ That's cool! Can we also
backport the change to Ocata and maybe Newton so that we don't hit the
same bug there? The backport is already up:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456506/
Thanks,
Ihar
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4
Hi Clark
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 00:08 Clark Boylan wrote:
> One of the major sets of issues currently affecting gate testing is
> Libvirt stability. Elastic-recheck is tracking Libvirt crashes for us
> and they happen frequently [0][1][2]. These issues appear to only affect
> Ubuntu Xenial (and n
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 14:38 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > One of the major sets of issues currently affecting gate testing is
> > Libvirt stability. Elastic-recheck is tracking Libvirt crashes for us
> > and they happe
On 04/04/2017 12:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:21:27AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, at 06:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
I have pushed a change to devstack [3] to enable using UCA w
On 04/04/2017 12:05 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
I mentioned that in a meeting today but for greater visibility...
This change in how we gate against LTS raises a question whether what
we claim in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402940/4/reference/project-testing-interface.rst
is still valid. T
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 09:21:27AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, at 06:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > > I have pushed a change to devstack [3] to enable using UCA which pulls
> > > in new Libvirt and mostly
I mentioned that in a meeting today but for greater visibility...
This change in how we gate against LTS raises a question whether what
we claim in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402940/4/reference/project-testing-interface.rst
is still valid. The wording of the document is such that suggests
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017, at 06:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > I have pushed a change to devstack [3] to enable using UCA which pulls
> > in new Libvirt and mostly seems to work. I think we should consider
> > switching to UCA as this
On 4/4/17, 12:06 AM, "Clark Boylan" wrote:
> After some thought I think my preferred method of rolling this out would
> be to blacklist libvirt-python from our wheel mirror building entirely
> and force installs to happen from source so that we are base Xenial and
> $UCA_version independent (loca
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 07:16:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> This is definitely a trade off, I know the last time we tried UCA we had
> such a high failure rate we had to revert. But, that was a much younger
> libvirt that was only just starting to get heavy testing in OpenStack.
> So it feels lik
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:06:53PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the major sets of issues currently affecting gate testing is
> Libvirt stability. Elastic-recheck is tracking Libvirt crashes for us
> and they happen frequently [0][1][2]. These issues appear to only affect
> Ubuntu
On 04/03/2017 06:06 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
Hello,
One of the major sets of issues currently affecting gate testing is
Libvirt stability. Elastic-recheck is tracking Libvirt crashes for us
and they happen frequently [0][1][2]. These issues appear to only affect
Ubuntu Xenial (and not Trusty or C
This is definitely a trade off, I know the last time we tried UCA we had
such a high failure rate we had to revert. But, that was a much younger
libvirt that was only just starting to get heavy testing in OpenStack.
So it feels like it's worth a shot. It will at least be interesting to
see if it ma
On 04/04/2017 09:06 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> I have pushed a change to devstack [3] to enable using UCA which pulls
> in new Libvirt and mostly seems to work. I think we should consider
> switching to UCA as this may fix our Libvirt problems and if it doesn't,
> we will be closer to a version of L
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017, at 04:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Are we going to keep some job not using the archive, to make sure we
> don't
> break people using packages from LTS? Maybe just periodic/non-voting
> would
> be enough to keep it working on older packages.
Old stable branches will continue
Are we going to keep some job not using the archive, to make sure we don't
break people using packages from LTS? Maybe just periodic/non-voting would
be enough to keep it working on older packages.
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:07 PM Clark Boylan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the major sets of issues cu
Hello,
One of the major sets of issues currently affecting gate testing is
Libvirt stability. Elastic-recheck is tracking Libvirt crashes for us
and they happen frequently [0][1][2]. These issues appear to only affect
Ubuntu Xenial (and not Trusty or CentOS or Fedora) and after talking in
#opensta
18 matches
Mail list logo
