Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

On Mon, Sep 19 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: > No performance numbers. Do you have a test in mind so I can compare. Is there > a > standard way to test this? Gnocchi client has a "benchmark" tool that you can use to have some basic numbers. It's not perfect because it's in Python and it is often

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

Hi Julien, > On 16 Sep 2016, at 7:46 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> I could push it up to gerrit but I think something will need to change >> for it to run the influxdb tests? > > You can use pifpaf like we do for the indexer, InfluxDB is supported. > That should make it

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

On 16/09/16 05:46 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: > > >> Currently it is failing one test [1] and that is to do with retention. >> This is because influxDB does retention based on the current time, e.g. a 1 >> day retention policy will be from the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

On Fri, Sep 16 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: Hi Sam, > Been working a bit on this and have a patch based on master that is > working at: > > https://github.com/NeCTAR-RC/gnocchi/tree/influxdb-driver Great! > I could push it up to gerrit but I think something will need to change > for it to run the

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

Hi Julien, Been working a bit on this and have a patch based on master that is working at: https://github.com/NeCTAR-RC/gnocchi/tree/influxdb-driver I could push it up to gerrit but I think something will need to change for it to run the influxdb tests? It should act more like the carbonara

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

ing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb > > Hi Julien, > > > On 5 Sep 2016, at 5:36 PM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 05 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

Julien Danjou Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb Hi Julien, > On 5 Sep 2016, at 5:36 PM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

Hi Julien, > On 5 Sep 2016, at 5:36 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: > > Hi Sam, > >> The issue I’m having are with the tests. Because the continuous queries are >> asynchronous and there is no current way in influxdb to force them to

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

On Mon, Sep 05 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: Hi Sam, > The issue I’m having are with the tests. Because the continuous queries are > asynchronous and there is no current way in influxdb to force them to run I > get > tests failing due to > them not having run yet. > > I’m not sure how to get around

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

Hi Julien, I’ve been working on the influx driver and have been re designing it to use continuous queries and retention policies so it acts more like the carbonara based drivers. Basically the continuous queries down sample the data. All metrics are stored in the same influx measurement with

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

OK thanks Julien, I’m about to go on holiday for a month so I’ll pick this up when I return. One of our devs is playing with this and thinking of ways to support the things currently not implemented/working. Cheers, Sam > On 2 Aug 2016, at 8:35 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

On Tue, Aug 02 2016, Sam Morrison wrote: Hi Sam! > We have been using gnocchi for a while now with the influxDB driver > and are keen to get the influxdb driver back into upstream. > > However looking into the code and how it’s arranged it looks like > there are a lot of assumptions that the

[openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Support for other drivers - influxdb

Hi Gnocchi Devs, We have been using gnocchi for a while now with the influxDB driver and are keen to get the influxdb driver back into upstream. However looking into the code and how it’s arranged it looks like there are a lot of assumptions that the backend storage driver is carbonara based.