Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-02-05 22:17:50 -0800:
From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 02:16 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress
Steve Clint
That should work. We will look at implementing a resource that spins
up a shortlived VM for bootstrapping a service VM and informing
configuration server for further configuration.
thanks
prasadv
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7
@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 02:16 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress
Steve Clint
That should work. We will look at implementing a resource that spins
up a shortlived VM for bootstrapping a service VM and informing
configuration server for further
From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com
...
The crux of the problem is how do you obtain critical mass for
custom one-off solutions? Lets assume two possible solutions to
this problem that these vendors could take. If there are more,
please feel free to explain them:
1) Implement a ReST
From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 02:16 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress
Steve Clint
That should work. We
Steve Clint
That should work. We will look at implementing a resource that spins up a
shortlived VM for bootstrapping a service VM and informing configuration
server for further configuration.
thanks
prasadv
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/14/2014
On 01/14/2014 09:27 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-14 18:41:46 -0800:
Steve
I did not mean to have custom solution at all. In fact that would be
terrible. I think Heat model of software config and deployment is really
good. That allows configurators
On 01/14/2014 12:23 AM, Prasad Vellanki wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com
mailto:sd...@redhat.com wrote:
that
Steve
Thanks for detailed email. Apologize for the delayed response but we
have been thinking about how does software config fit into
Hey Steve, it has taken me about a month to get enough time to go
through this. Thanks for doing it, comments in-line.
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2013-12-13 15:46:48 -0800:
I've been working on a POC in heat for resources which perform software
configuration, with the aim of
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-13 23:23:15 -0800:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
that
Steve
Thanks for detailed email. Apologize for the delayed response but we have
been thinking about how does software config fit into
Steve
I did not mean to have custom solution at all. In fact that would be
terrible. I think Heat model of software config and deployment is really
good. That allows configurators such as Chef, Puppet, Salt or Ansible to be
plugged into it and all users need to write are modules for those.
What
Excerpts from Prasad Vellanki's message of 2014-01-14 18:41:46 -0800:
Steve
I did not mean to have custom solution at all. In fact that would be
terrible. I think Heat model of software config and deployment is really
good. That allows configurators such as Chef, Puppet, Salt or Ansible to
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
that
Steve
Thanks for detailed email. Apologize for the delayed response but we have
been thinking about how does software config fit into configuring network
and service function devices. I agree with you that in general it
On 01/08/2014 06:57 PM, Prasad Vellanki wrote:
Clint Steve
One scenario we are trying to see is whether and how Heat
software-config enables deployment of images available from third
party as virtual appliances, providing network, security or
acceleration capabilities. The vendor in some
Clint Steve
One scenario we are trying to see is whether and how Heat software-config
enables deployment of images available from third party as virtual
appliances, providing network, security or acceleration capabilities. The
vendor in some cases might not allow rebuilding and/or may not
We work with images provided by vendors over which we do not always have
control. So we are considering the cases where vendor image does not come
installed with cloud-init. Is there a way to support heat software config
in such scenarios?
Thanks
Susaant
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Steve
I'd say it isn't so much cloud-init that you need, but some kind
of bootstrapper. The point of hot-software-config is to help with
in-instance orchestration. That's not going to happen without some way
to push the desired configuration into the instance.
Excerpts from Susaant Kondapaneni's
Hi Steve,
I am trying to understand the software config implementation. Can you
clarify the following:
i. To use Software config and deploy in a template, instance resource MUST
always be accompanied by user_data. User_data should specify how to
bootstrap CM tool and signal it. Is that correct?
Excerpts from Susaant Kondapaneni's message of 2014-01-06 09:25:08 -0800:
Hi Steve,
I am trying to understand the software config implementation. Can you
clarify the following:
i. To use Software config and deploy in a template, instance resource MUST
always be accompanied by user_data.
On 07/01/14 06:25, Susaant Kondapaneni wrote:
Hi Steve,
I am trying to understand the software config implementation. Can you
clarify the following:
i. To use Software config and deploy in a template, instance resource
MUST always be accompanied by user_data. User_data should specify how
20 matches
Mail list logo
