Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy

It would be great if we can get approval for the Hierachical Quota handling in Nova too (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129420/). Tim From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 December 2014 01:22 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Canceling lbaas meeting 12/16

Thanks Brandon -Original Message- From: Brandon Logan [mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com] Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 7:50 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Canceling lbaas meeting 12/16 The extensions are remaining in neutron unt

[openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt]How to customize cpu features in nova

Dear Developers, Sorry for interrupting if i sent to wrong email group, but i got a problem on running Solaris 10 on icehouse openstack. I found it is need to disable CPU feature x2apic so that solaris 10 NIC could work in KVM as following code in libvirt.xml SandyBridge Intel

[openstack-dev] [nova][ThirdPartyCI][PCI CI] comments to Nova

Hi, Joe Gordon and all recently Intel is setting up a HW based Third Part CI. it's already running a set of basic PCI test cases for several weeks, but do not sent out comments, just log the result. the log server and these test cases seems stable. here is one sample log: http://192.55.

Re: [openstack-dev] Our idea for SFC using OpenFlow. RE: [NFV][Telco] Service VM v/s its basic framework

Hi Keshava, Please find my answer inline… From: A, Keshava [mailto:keshav...@hp.com] Sent: 22 December 2014 20:10 To: Vikram Choudhary; Murali B Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; yuriy.babe...@telekom.de; stephen.kf.w...@gmail.com; Dhruv Dhody; Dongfeng (C); Kalyankumar Asangi; A, Keshava

[openstack-dev] #PERSONAL# : Horizon -- File permission error in Horizon

Hi All, I am getting this error when I run horizon- "horizon.utils.secret_key.FilePermissionError: Insecure key file permissions!" Can you please guide me to debug this? Thnaks and Regards, Swati Shukla Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: swati.shuk...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com ___

[openstack-dev] [Heat] cancel the next 2 weekly meetings

Hi Lets cancel the next 2 weekly meetings as they neatly fall on Christmas eve and new years day. Happy holidays! Regards Angus ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] Cross distribution talks on Friday

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 23/12/14 08:17, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/19/2014 11:55 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> Note that OSLO_PACKAGE_VERSION is not public. > > Well, it used to be public, it has been added and discussed a few > years ago because of issues I had wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] host aggregate's availability zone

Hi Danny, check this link out. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scheduler_Filters Add the following into your /etc/nova/nova.conf before starting the nova service. scheduler_default_filters = RetryFilter, AvailabilityZoneFilter, RamFilter, ComputeFilter, ComputeCapabilitiesFilter, ImageProperti

Re: [openstack-dev] Cross distribution talks on Friday

On Dec 23, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/19/2014 11:55 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> Note that OSLO_PACKAGE_VERSION is not public. > > Well, it used to be public, it has been added and discussed a few years > ago because of issues I had with packaging. > >> Instead, we should

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] host aggregate's availability zone

Le 23/12/2014 15:42, Robert Li (baoli) a écrit : Hi Danny, check this link out. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scheduler_Filters Add the following into your /etc/nova/nova.conf before starting the nova service. scheduler_default_filters = RetryFilter, AvailabilityZoneFilter, RamFilter, Co

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt]How to customize cpu features in nova

- Original Message - > From: "CloudBeyond" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Dear Developers, > > Sorry for interrupting if i sent to wrong email group, but i got a problem on > running Solaris 10 on icehouse openstack. > I found it is need to disable CPU feature x2apic so tha

Re: [openstack-dev] No meetings on Christmas or New Year's Days

Two reasons to celebrate. Its Elvis¹s birthday! On 12/22/14, 10:46 PM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: >The L3 sub team meeting [1] will not be held until the 8th of January, >2015. Enjoy your time off. I will try to move some of the >refactoring patches along as I can but will be down to minimal hours.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [ThirdPartyCI] Need help setting up CI

You should use 14.04 for the slave. The limitation for using 12.04 is only for the master since zuul’s apache configuration is WIP on 14.04 [1], and zuul does not run on the slave. Ramy [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141518/ From: Punith S [mailto:punit...@cloudbyte.com] Sent: Monday, Decem

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Evacuate instance which in server group with affinity policy

2014-12-22 21:50 GMT+08:00 Sylvain Bauza : > > Le 22/12/2014 13:37, Alex Xu a écrit : > > > > 2014-12-22 10:36 GMT+08:00 Lingxian Kong : > >> 2014-12-22 9:21 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : >> > >> > >> > 2014-12-22 9:01 GMT+08:00 Lingxian Kong : >> >> >> >> >> >> >> but what if the compute node is back to no

[openstack-dev] Hyper-V meeting

Hi All, With the pending holidays we have a lack of quorum for today. We'll resume meetings after the New Year. p Peter J. Pouliot CISSP Microsoft Enterprise Cloud Solutions C:\OpenStack New England Research & Development Center 1 Memorial Drive Cambridge, MA 02142 P: 1.(857).4536436 E: ppoul.

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Cancelling next week's meeting

With the winter break coming up (or already here, for some folks) I am cancelling next week's meeting on Dec 29. I had not cancelled last night's meeting ahead of time, but very few people attended, and with so few core reviewers present there wasn't much we could get done. We did not have a forma

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Bug in federation

Hi guys we now have the ABFAB federation protocol working with Keystone, using a modified mod_auth_kerb plugin for Apache (available from the project Moonshot web site). However, we did not change Keystone configuration from its original SAML federation configuration, when it was talking to SAML I

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy

On Dec 23, 2014 12:26 AM, "Tim Bell" wrote: > > > > It would be great if we can get approval for the Hierachical Quota handling in Nova too (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129420/). Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for an exception. We will announce the pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Murano Agent

Hi, murano python client allows to work with Murano API from the console interface (instead of Web UI). To install Murano python client on Ubuntu you can execute the following commands: apt-get update apt-get install python-pip pip install -U pip setuptools pip install python-muranoclient On Tu

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Docs] Move fuel-web/docs to fuel-docs

Blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-dev-docs-merge-fuel-docs suggests us to move all documentation from fuel-web to fuel-docs repository. While I agree that moving Developer Guide to fuel-docs is a good idea, there is an issue with autodocs which currently blocks the whole

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Bug in federation

On 12/23/2014 11:34 AM, David Chadwick wrote: Hi guys we now have the ABFAB federation protocol working with Keystone, using a modified mod_auth_kerb plugin for Apache (available from the project Moonshot web site). However, we did not change Keystone configuration from its original SAML federat

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy

Joe, Thanks… there seems to be good agreement on the spec and the matching implementation is well advanced with BARC so the risk is not too high. Launching HMT with quota in Nova in the same release cycle would also provide a more complete end user experience. For CERN, this functionality is v

[openstack-dev] [3rd-party-ci] Cinder CI and CI accounts

Hi All, In IBM we have several cinder drivers, with a number of CI accounts. In order to improve the CI management and maintenance, we decided to build a single Jenkins master that will run several jobs for the drivers we own. Adding the jobs to the jenkins master went ok, but we encountered a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Bug in federation

Hi Adam On 23/12/2014 17:34, Adam Young wrote: > On 12/23/2014 11:34 AM, David Chadwick wrote: >> Hi guys >> >> we now have the ABFAB federation protocol working with Keystone, using a >> modified mod_auth_kerb plugin for Apache (available from the project >> Moonshot web site). However, we did no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] simulate examples

Here's a description. We need to get this added to the docs. Below is a full description of how you might utilize the Action-centric version of simulate. The idea is that if you describe the effects that an action/API-call will have on the basic tables of nova/neutron/etc. (below called an A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Bug in federation

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM, David Chadwick wrote: > Hi Adam > > On 23/12/2014 17:34, Adam Young wrote: > > On 12/23/2014 11:34 AM, David Chadwick wrote: > >> Hi guys > >> > >> we now have the ABFAB federation protocol working with Keystone, using a > >> modified mod_auth_kerb plugin for Apac

[openstack-dev] [Glance] No meetings for two weeks.

Hi all, In the spirit of the holiday season, the next two meetings for Glance have been cancelled i.e. the ones on Dec 25th and Jan 1st [0]. Let's meet back on the 7th. Of couse, please feel free to ping me on IRC/email if you've any questions, concerns or suggestions. Happy holidays! [0] htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Bug in federation

> On Dec 23, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM, David Chadwick > wrote: > Hi Adam > > On 23/12/2014 17:34, Adam Young wrote: > > On 12/23/2014 11:34 AM, David Chadwick wrote: > >> Hi guys > >> > >> we now have the ABFA

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Next IRC Meeting January 6th

The Keystone IRC meetings will be on hiatus over the holidays. They will resume as per normal on January 6th. Have a good end of the year! Cheers, Morgan ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bi

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Converging discussions on WF context and WF/task/action inputs

After some online discussions with Renat, the following is a revision of the proposal to address the following related blueprints. * https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-execution-environment * https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-global-context * https://bluepri

[openstack-dev] [infra] [storyboard] Nominating Yolanda Robla for StoryBoard Core

Hello everyone! StoryBoard is the much anticipated successor to Launchpad, and is a component of the Infrastructure Program. The storyboard-core group is intended to be a superset of the infra-core group, with additional reviewers who specialize in the field. Yolanda has been working on StoryBoar

Re: [openstack-dev] [3rd-party-ci] Cinder CI and CI accounts

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Alon Marx wrote: > Hi All, > > In IBM we have several cinder drivers, with a number of CI accounts. In > order to improve the CI management and maintenance, we decided to build a > single Jenkins master that will run several jobs for the drivers we own. > Adding t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Feature delivery rules and automated tests

Igor, would that be possible? On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > > Mike, Dmitry, team, > let me add 5 cents - tests per feature have to run on CI before SCF, it is > mean that jobs configuration also should be implemented. > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Mike Scherb

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Feature delivery rules and automated tests

I believe yes. With jenkins job builder we could create jobs faster, QA can be involved in that or even create jobs on their own. I think we have to try it during next release cycle, currently I can’t see blockers/problems here. -- Igor Shishkin DevOps > On 24 Dec 2014, at 2:20 am GMT+3, Mi

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [storyboard] Nominating Yolanda Robla for StoryBoard Core

+1 On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote: > Hello everyone! > > StoryBoard is the much anticipated successor to Launchpad, and is a > component of the Infrastructure Program. The storyboard-core group is > intended to be a superset of the infra-core group, with additional > r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Relocation of freshly deployed OpenStack by Fuel

Pawel, I'm not sure that it's common at all to move the deployed cloud. Hopefully fuel made it easy enough to deploy that you could simply reset the cluster and re-deploy with the new network settings. I'd be interested in understanding why this would be more painful than re-configuring the public

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] How can I write at milestone section of blueprint?

> Its been discussed at several summits. We have settled on a general solution > using Zaqar, > but no work has been done that I know of. I was just pointing out that > similar blueprints/specs > exist and you may want to look through those to get some ideas about writing > your own and/or > b

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy

+1 to Nova support for this getting in to Kilo. We have a similar use case. I’d really like to doll out quota on a department level, and let individual departments manage sub projects and quotas on their own. I agree that HMT has limited value without Nova support. Thanks! Mike From: Tim Be

Re: [openstack-dev] [3rd-party-ci] Cinder CI and CI accounts

I agree with John. Option 4: one ci account for all drivers. The only valid reasons I'm aware of to use multiple accounts for a single vendor is if the hardware required to run the tests are not accessible from a 'central' ci system, or if the ci systems are managed by different teams. Otherwis

Re: [openstack-dev] [3rd-party-ci] Cinder CI and CI accounts

John and Ramy, Thanks for the feedback. So, we will create an IBM Storage CI Check account and slowly deprecate the multiple accounts as we consolidate the hardware. Jay On 12/23/2014 08:11 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: I agree with John. Option 4: one ci account for all drivers. The only val

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy

On Dec 23, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Michael Dorman wrote: > +1 to Nova support for this getting in to Kilo. > > We have a similar use case. I’d really like to doll out quota on a > department level, and let individual departments manage sub projects and > quotas on their own. I agree that HMT has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Converging discussions on WF context and WF/task/action inputs

Thanks Winson, Since we discussed all this already I just want to confirm that I fully support this model, it will significantly help us make much more concise, readable and maintainable workflows. I spent a lot of time thinking about it and don’t see any problems with it. Nice job! However, a