Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware][qa] vmware nsx CI appears gone

Hi, We have an infra issue - seems related to https://review.openstack.org/190047 - we are investigating. Thanks Gary On 9/1/15, 5:58 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: >I haven't seen the vmware nsx CI reporting on anything in awhile but >don't see any outage events here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Use block_device_mapping_v2 for swap?

Rabi Mishra +91-7757924167 - Original Message - > On 31/08/15 11:19, TIANTIAN wrote: > > > > > > At 2015-08-28 21:48:11, "marios" wrote: > >> I am working with the OS::Nova::Server resource and looking at the tests > >> [1], it should be possible to just define

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Displaying wf hierarchy in CLI

> On 01 Sep 2015, at 22:21, Lingxian Kong wrote: > > To achieve that, we should record the execution/task-execution relationship > during an execution is running, because we have no such info currently. Well, in DB model we, in fact, have a field pointing to parent task

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering

Dolph, Ignore these arbitrary query string is what we did in keystone, current implementation did something deliberately to ignore them instead of passing them into the backend driver (If these parameter go to backend driver we will get nothing for sure), there might be no model answer for

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Un-addressed Port spec and implementation

Hello All, The un-addressed port spec [1] was approved for Liberty. I think this spec has good potential to provide very interesting solutions for NFV use cases but also for multi site connectivity and i would really want to see it move forward with the community. There are some issues we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Displaying wf hierarchy in CLI

> On 31 Aug 2015, at 23:47, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > Would u guys have any use for the following being split out into its own > library? > > https://github.com/openstack/taskflow/blob/master/taskflow/types/tree.py Do you mean we could move this, for instance, into oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Displaying wf hierarchy in CLI

Hi, Renat, I want to make it clear. Then, what you want to see is dependencies between workflow executions? or task executions in one workflow? We know that we could use a separate task or a workflow as a 'task'. On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > >

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-Library] Nominating Alex Schultz to Fuel-Library Core

Hi, I would like to nominate Alex Schultz to Fuel-Library Core team. He’s been doing a great job in writing patches. At the same time his reviews are solid with comments for further improvements. He’s #3 reviewer and #1 contributor with 46 commits for last 90 days [1]. Additionally, Alex has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On 2 September 2015 at 11:53, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > > 1. limit the number of resource actions in parallel (maybe base on the > > number of cores) > > I'm having trouble mapping that back to 'and

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port forwarding

Hello All, I have searched and found many past efforts to implement port forwarding in Neutron. I have found two incomplete blueprints [1], [2] and an abandoned patch [3]. There is even a project in Stackforge [4], [5] that claims to implement this, but the L3 parts in it seems older then

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Code review process in Fuel and related issues

It won't work that way. You either busy on writing code / leading feature or doing review. It couldn't be combined effectively. Any context switch between activities requires an extra time to focus on. On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Tomasz Napierala wrote: >> On 01 Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

Hi, Trying to get more attention to this ... We had our driver removed by commit: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/f0ab819732d77a8a6dd1a91422ac183ac4894419 due to no CI. Pls let me know if there is something wrong so we can fix it asap so we can have the driver back in Liberty (if

[openstack-dev] [Swift] ObjectController::async_update() latest change

Hi, Regarding https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/2289137164231d7872731c2cf3d81b86f34f01a4 I am profiling each section of the swift code. Notice ObjectController::async_update()has high latency, and tried to use threads to parallelize the container_update. Noticed the above changes, and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Blazar] Anyone interested?

Le 02/09/2015 17:50, Pierre Riteau a écrit : On 1 Sep 2015, at 23:15, Sylvain Bauza > wrote: Le 01/09/2015 22:31, Ildikó Váncsa a écrit : Hi, I'm glad to see the interest and I also support the idea of using the IRC channel that is already set

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] image-create --is-public removed?

Thanks, Nikhil. I've been (repeatedly) cloning and using devstack from scratch, on a fresh VM. So 'the version of your glanceclient' is whatever the latest devstack uses. In case anyone is hitting this, it seems the correct replacement for '--is-public=true' is '--visibility public'. Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Blazar] Anyone interested?

On 1 Sep 2015, at 23:15, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Le 01/09/2015 22:31, Ildikó Váncsa a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> I'm glad to see the interest and I also support the idea of using the IRC >> channel that is already set up for further communication. Should we aim for >> a

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][horizon][neutron][L3][dvr][fwaas] FWaaS

Hi, Horizon seems to be broken. When i try to add new firewall rule , horizon broken with "'NoneType' object has no attribute 'id'" Error. This was fine about 10 hours back. Seems one of the latest commit broken it. Traceback in horizon: 2015-09-02 16:15:35.337872 return

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

On 9/1/15, 11:31 AM, "gord chung" wrote: > > >On 28/08/2015 5:18 PM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 8/28/15, 11:39 AM, "gord chung" wrote: >> >>> i should start by saying i re-read my subject line and it arguably comes >>> off aggressive -- i

Re: [openstack-dev] How to run fw testcases which are recently moved from tempest to neutron.

I just go to the Neutron dir and use: tox -e api. On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:37 AM, bharath wrote: > Hi , > > How to run FW testcases which are under neutron using tempest? > > If i am trying to list cases from tempest(sudo -u stack -H testr > list-tests neutron.api > ), its

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] [heat] Multi region support

On 01/09/15 19:47, Angus Salkeld wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:30 AM Lowery, Mathew > wrote: Thank you Zane for the clarifications! I misunderstood #2 and that led to the other misunderstandings. Further questions: * Are nested

[openstack-dev] How to run fw testcases which are recently moved from tempest to neutron.

Hi , How to run FW testcases which are under neutron using tempest? If i am trying to list cases from tempest(sudo -u stack -H testr list-tests neutron.api ), its resulting to empty list Thanks, bharath __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Code review process in Fuel and related issues

On 09/02/2015 08:45 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: I think there's plenty of examples of people in OpenStack projects that both submit code (and lead features) that also do code review on a daily basis. * Do these features huge? Yes. * Is their code contribution huge or just small patches?

[openstack-dev] [neutron] pushing changes through the gate

Hi, By now you may have seen that I have taken out your change from the gate and given it a -2: don't despair! I am only doing it to give priority to the stuff that needs to merge in order to get [1] into a much better shape. If you have an important fix, please target it for RC1 or talk to me

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Criteria for applying vulnerability:managed tag

Thanks you Jeremy for starting this discussion :-) Proposed criteria works for me and they concurs with what have been discussed in Vancouver. My comments on the open-question below. On 09/01/2015 06:56 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > A. Can the VMT accept deliverables in any programming language?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence rally test results (so far)

On 02/09/15 04:55, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:33:36PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: On 2 September 2015 at 11:53, Angus Salkeld wrote: 1. limit the number of resource actions in parallel (maybe base on the number of cores) I'm having trouble

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Command structure for OSC plugin

> -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > Sent: 02 September 2015 16:21 > To: openstack-dev > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Command structure for OSC plugin > > Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2015-09-02

[openstack-dev] [ CloudKitty ] New release

We are really pleased to announce that a few days ago the latest CloudKitty's version (0.4.1) has been released. For those of you who don't know CloudKitty, it is an additionnal component for OpenStack that tackles the pricing and chargeback aspects. It is fully OpenSource (Apache 2.0),

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

On 02/09/2015 11:25 AM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 9/1/15, 11:31 AM, "gord chung" wrote: re: serialisation, that probably isn't the biggest concern for Ceilometer performance. the main items are storage -- to be addressed by Gnocchi/tsdb, and polling load. i just

Re: [openstack-dev] subunit2html location on images changing

On 8/26/2015 5:22 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: Hi Everyone, There is a pending change up for review that will move the location subunit2html jenkins slave script: https://review.openstack.org/212864/ It switches from a locally installed copy to using the version packaged in os-testr which is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-Library] Nominating Alex Schultz to Fuel-Library Core

Hi, +1 from me. Regards, Alex On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > +1 and also he is in US timezone, which should help us cover the globe > with Continuous Review process. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko < >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat] instance_user fallout, keeping the 'heat-admin' user working

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:32 -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dan Prince > wrote: > > We had an IRC discussion today about the 'heat-admin' user in > > #tripleo. > > > > Upstream Heat recently reverted the 'instance_user' config file > > option > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

+1 On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to > something like http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack > > (Look at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/ for example). > > For

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

On 09/02/2015 02:48 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 09/02/2015 02:09 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to >> something like >> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack > >> (Look at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] IRC Meeting Thursday September 3rd at 17:00UTC

Greetings! Our next OpenStack App Catalog meeting will take place this Thursday September 3rd at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 The agenda can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to discuss (or

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

Mike, Brocade OpenStack CI is now complying with requirements mentioned in your mail. 1. Reporting success/failure. (FYI, we had been doing this prior to your email, but the results were not visible using lastcomment script unless use the –m option) 2. Link is now posted for logs

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat] instance_user fallout, keeping the 'heat-admin' user working

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > We had an IRC discussion today about the 'heat-admin' user in #tripleo. > > Upstream Heat recently reverted the 'instance_user' config file option > which we relied on in TripleO to standardize the default (admin) user > on

Re: [openstack-dev] [kosmos][designate][lbaas] Intial Kosmos source files for review in gerrit

A gentle reminder to please take a look at the code review and provide feedback. Regards Kunal > On Aug 30, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Gandhi, Kunal wrote: > > Hi All > > I have checked in the initial source files to gerrit for review. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Un-addressed Port spec and implementation

That patch was reverted because it relied on a non-obvious corner case to work. A port would not get any spoofing prevention if it had no IP addresses. At first we reasoned that this would be okay since the only way to create a port without IPs was if the network has no subnets and it doesn't

[openstack-dev] [nova] [docs] Are cells still 'experimental'?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi John, I noticed while looking through some Nova docs bugs that the Config Ref lists cells as experimental: http://docs.openstack.org/kilo/config-reference/content/section_compute- cells.html Is this still true? Thanks, Lana - -- Lana Brindley

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal

+1 It would be nice to have it. On 03/09/15 14:11, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to propose 'Single disk image OVA import' [1] feature proposal > for exception. This looks like a decently safe proposal that should be > able to adjust in the extended time period of Liberty. It has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Evgeniy Konstantinov for fuel-docs core

+1 On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > +1, Evgeny has been a #1 committer in fuel-docs for a while, it's great to > see him pick up on the reviews, too. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:24 PM Irina Povolotskaya < > ipovolotsk...@mirantis.com> wrote:

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal

Hi, I wanted to propose 'Single disk image OVA import' [1] feature proposal for exception. This looks like a decently safe proposal that should be able to adjust in the extended time period of Liberty. It has been discussed at the Vancouver summit during a work session and the proposal has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][db] reviewers: please mind the branch a script belongs to

Thanks for sharing this Ihar! Thanks Vikram On Sep 3, 2015 2:13 AM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: > Thanks, I learned a thing or two from the document that you linked. > Thanks for reminding us of that. > > Carl > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-Library] Nominating Alex Schultz to Fuel-Library Core

+1 On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Aleksandr Didenko wrote: > Hi, > > +1 from me. > > Regards, > Alex > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Vladimir Kuklin > wrote: > >> +1 and also he is in US timezone, which should help us cover the globe >> with

[openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to something like http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack (Look at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/ for example). For now, most of our documentation is on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Puppet but I think it

[openstack-dev] [kolla][announce] Announcing release of Liberty-3 Milestone!

The Kolla community is pleased to announce the release of the Kolla Liberty 3 milestone. This release fixes 90 bugs and implements 16 blueprints! During Liberty 3, Kolla joined the big tent governance! Our project can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to > something like http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack > > (Look at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/ for example). > > For

[openstack-dev] [Security] Weekly meeting cancelled due to Mid-Cycle

Security folks, Tomorrow’s mid-cycle is cancelled due to many of us attending the Mid-cycle. -Rob __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [kolla] Possible to support multiple compute drivers?

Hi folks, I'm currently looking at supporting Ironic in the Kolla project [1], but was unsure if it would be possible to run separate instances of nova compute and controller (and scheduler too?) to enable both baremetal and libvirt type deployments. I found this mailing list post from two years

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][db] reviewers: please mind the branch a script belongs to

Thanks, I learned a thing or two from the document that you linked. Thanks for reminding us of that. Carl On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi reviewers, > > several days ago, a semantically expand-only migration script was merged into > contract

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat] instance_user fallout, keeping the 'heat-admin' user working

We had an IRC discussion today about the 'heat-admin' user in #tripleo. Upstream Heat recently reverted the 'instance_user' config file option which we relied on in TripleO to standardize the default (admin) user on our nodes. It is my understanding that Heat would prefer not to maintain this

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Feedback on distributed architecture

I ran the basics of our new distributed architecture by Shawn from Twitter. Here's his response. We just held a Congress mid-cycle meet-up to discuss its distributed architecture. We decided on an architecture where the policy engine runs in its own process; each datasource driver runs in its

Re: [openstack-dev] [Blazar] Anyone interested?

Pierre, thanks for explanation. However it's great. I agree with Sylvain. Let's switch to #openstack-blazar channel in IRC. Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-09-02 19:04 GMT+03:00 Sylvain Bauza : > > > Le 02/09/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/02/2015 02:09 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to > something like > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack > > (Look at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/ for

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [release][nova] python-novaclient release 2.27.0 (liberty)

On 2015-09-02 10:55:56 -0400 (-0400), d...@doughellmann.com wrote: > We are thrilled to announce the release of: > > python-novaclient 2.27.0: Client library for OpenStack Compute API [...] Just as a heads up, there's some indication that this release is currently broken by many popular service

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

On 09/02/2015 02:53 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Emilien Macchi > wrote: > > TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to > something like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Command structure for OSC plugin

Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2015-09-02 18:50:57 +: > > -Original Message- > > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > > Sent: 02 September 2015 16:21 > > To: openstack-dev > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Command

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

I liked the idea (+1) 2015-09-02 15:09 GMT-03:00 Emilien Macchi : > TL;DR, I propose to move our developer documentation from wiki to > something like http://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack > > (Look at http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/ for example).

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] hosting developer documentation on http://docs.openstack.org/developer/

I loved the idea. This could also aim the good practices of puppet workflow development, like setting up an rspec environment, using beaker to deploy an test it's own code, an stuff like this. +1 On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Iury Gregory wrote: > I liked the idea (+1)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Command structure for OSC plugin

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2015-09-02 18:50:57 +: > > I think the difference are in the options rather than the prefixes. > Thus, if I want to create a bare metal server, I should be able to use >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][horizon][neutron][L3][dvr][fwaas] FWaaS

Hi Bharath, I am wondering if you can file this as a launchpad bug, please. Thanks, German From: bharath > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [nfv][telcowg] Issues with vIMS and SBC submissions

Hi Calum, After the discussion at the end of the meeting I *believe* I have fixed the issues with these two - please review and check I didn't accidentally drop any of your changes: * SBC: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176301/ - Removed the erroneously included

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][horizon][neutron][L3][dvr][fwaas] FWaaS

Opened a launchpad bug for tracking: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1491637 -Lin On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Eichberger, German wrote: > Hi Bharath, > > I am wondering if you can file this as a launchpad bug, please. > > Thanks, > German > > From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-announce] [release][nova] python-novaclient release 2.27.0 (liberty)

On 9/2/2015 3:40 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-09-02 10:55:56 -0400 (-0400), d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We are thrilled to announce the release of: python-novaclient 2.27.0: Client library for OpenStack Compute API [...] Just as a heads up, there's some indication that this release

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral][yaql] Addressing task result using YAQL function

Hi, I also thought about that recently. So, I absolutely agree with this proposal. It would be nice to see this feature in Liberty. On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > FYI > > Renat Akhmerov > @ Mirantis Inc. > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >

[openstack-dev] [cinder] FFE Request - capacity-headroom

Hi, I would like to request feature freeze exception for the implementation of capacity-headroom. It calculates virtual free memory and send notifications to the ceilometer together with other storage capacity stats. Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/capacity-headroom

[openstack-dev] [mistral][yaql] Addressing task result using YAQL function

Hi, I’d like to propose a few changes after transition to yaql 1.0: We already moved from using “$.__execution” in DSL to "execution()” and from “$.__env” to “env()” where “execution()” and “env()" are registered yaql functions. We had to do it because double underscored are prohibited in the

[openstack-dev] [cinder] How to link a change to the completed cinder-python3 blueprint?

Hi, I'm porting Cinder to Python 3. There are discussions on my patches to decide how to link my changes to the cinder-python3 blueprint (syntax of the "Blueprint cinder-python3" line). Mike Perez completed the blueprint on 2015-08-15. I don't understand why, the port is incomplete. I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Anyone using containers?

On 02/09/15 17:36, Thierry Carrez wrote: Lowery, Mathew wrote: Just curious if anyone is using containers in their deployments. If so, in what capacity? What are the advantages, gotchas, and pain points? This might trigger more responses on the openstack-operators mailing-list. +1 :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Displaying wf hierarchy in CLI

> On 02 Sep 2015, at 14:56, Lingxian Kong wrote: > > I want to make it clear. Then, what you want to see is dependencies between > workflow executions? or task executions in one workflow? We know that we > could use a separate task or a workflow as a 'task'.

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [gate] gate-heat-dsvm-functional-orig-mysql fails 100%

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:07:57AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > Today's gate firedrill #2 is the fact that in the last 12 hours heat's > functional tests went to 100% failure - http://goo.gl/YeVrD0 > > There are current 14 heat changes in the gate, each will add 30 - 40 > minutes of delay as they

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-Library] Nominating Alex Schultz to Fuel-Library Core

+1 and also he is in US timezone, which should help us cover the globe with Continuous Review process. On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > Huge +1 from me, Alex has all the best qualities of a core reviewer: great > engineer, great communicator,

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [gate] gate-heat-dsvm-functional-orig-mysql fails 100%

Sean, thank you for the raising it. We know about this issue. It was related with glanceclient: There is a fix, which fixes this issue - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219533/ If it's possible may you abandon changes in queue before this patch? Regards, Sergey. On 2 September 2015 at 16:07,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

On 2015-09-01 15:45:22 -0700 (-0700), Vahid S Hashemian wrote: [...] > What is your advice on debugging a PyPi package? I'm modifying the code > for python-muranoclient and would like to be able to debug using eclipse > (in which I'm coding) or any other convenient means. There are possibly

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [gate] gate-heat-dsvm-functional-orig-mysql fails 100%

On 2015-09-02 14:26:13 +0100 (+0100), Steven Hardy wrote: > I think this is the change we need to land to fix it: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219533/ > > Can it be bumped to the head of the queue? It's there now with an ETA of ~25 minutes (barring any unforeseen job failures). --

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] URL Sanity

Yeah, the “legacy” thought is what’s making me second guess the effort. We’re still in limbo with the language focus, IMO. Are we nearing a change in routing? I remember work being demo’d at the last summit, but I haven’t seen any of it since. From: Richard Jones

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

On 9/2/15 5:19 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:30:26AM -0600, John Griffith wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron wrote: >> >>> [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith >>> suggested that I post to the dev list in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

2015-09-02 17:19 GMT+08:00 Gorka Eguileor : > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:30:26AM -0600, John Griffith wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron wrote: >> >> > [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith >> > suggested that I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:30:26AM -0600, John Griffith wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron wrote: > > > [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith > > suggested that I post to the dev list in preparation for a discussion in > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Anyone using containers?

Lowery, Mathew wrote: > Just curious if anyone is using containers in their deployments. If so, > in what capacity? What are the advantages, gotchas, and pain points? This might trigger more responses on the openstack-operators mailing-list. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Criteria for applying vulnerability:managed tag

Some out-of-context quotes and comments below: Jeremy Stanley wrote: > [...] > 1. Since the vulnerability:managed governance tag applies to > deliverables, all repos within a given deliverable must meet the > qualifying criteria. This means that if some repos in a deliverable > are in good enough

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Fuel-Library] Nominating Alex Schultz to Fuel-Library Core

I'm not a Fuel core or anything, but +1 from me. Alex has been very visible in the community and his work on librarian-puppet was a great step forward for the project. Best, -jay On 09/02/2015 04:31 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: Hi, I would like to nominate Alex Schultz to Fuel-Library Core

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Evgeniy Konstantinov for fuel-docs core

Fuelers, I'd like to nominate Evgeniy Konstantinov for the fuel-docs-core team. He has contributed thousands of lines of documentation to Fuel over the past several months, and has been a diligent reviewer: http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=evkonstantinov=all_type=all=fuel-docs I believe it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Code review process in Fuel and related issues

On 09/02/2015 03:00 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: It won't work that way. You either busy on writing code / leading feature or doing review. It couldn't be combined effectively. Any context switch between activities requires an extra time to focus on. I don't agree with the above, Igor. I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Code review process in Fuel and related issues

> I think there's plenty of examples of people in OpenStack projects > that both submit code (and lead features) that also do code review > on a daily basis. * Do these features huge? * Is their code contribution huge or just small patches? * Did they get to master before FF? * How many

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Evgeniy Konstantinov for fuel-docs core

+1, Evgeny has been a #1 committer in fuel-docs for a while, it's great to see him pick up on the reviews, too. On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:24 PM Irina Povolotskaya < ipovolotsk...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Evgeniy Konstantinov for the fuel-docs-core team. > He has

[openstack-dev] [heat] [gate] gate-heat-dsvm-functional-orig-mysql fails 100%

Today's gate firedrill #2 is the fact that in the last 12 hours heat's functional tests went to 100% failure - http://goo.gl/YeVrD0 There are current 14 heat changes in the gate, each will add 30 - 40 minutes of delay as they fail and reset things behind them. So 7 - 10 hours of gate delay for

[openstack-dev] [glance] image-create --is-public removed?

Was the --is-public option to 'glance image-create ...' just removed? I've been running Devstack successfully during the last week, but now see this: glance: error: unrecognized arguments: --is-public=true from running this: wget

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] image-create --is-public removed?

You should check the version of your glanceclient. `glance help` will give you help on most commands. Seems like you may have upgraded your client and now it defaults to v2 of the server API. You can track updates using the release on pypi and related documentation on [1]; announcements are on

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral][yaql] Addressing task result using YAQL function

Agree, with one detail: make it explicit - task(task_name). res - we often see folks confused by result of what (action, task, workflow) although we cleaned up our lingo: action-output, task-result, workflow-output…. but still worth being explicit. And full result is being thought as the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-09-02 11:19:02 +0200: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:30:26AM -0600, John Griffith wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron wrote: > > > > > [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging]

I believe in oslo.messaging routing_key is a topic. Here is an example for ceilometer: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/meter/notifications.py#L212 And here is an oslo code for rabbitMQ driver:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Command structure for OSC plugin

Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2015-09-02 05:15:35 +: > That would be great to have plugins on the commands which are relevant to > multiple projects… avoiding exposing all of the underlying projects as > prefixes and getting more consistency would be very appreciated by the users.