Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

> On 05 Aug 2016, at 01:02, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 08/04/2016 06:40 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: >> Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2016-08-04 18:14:46 -0400: >>> On 08/04/2016 05:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2016-08-04 19:20:43

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] entity graph layout

Hi, all, I'm building a demo of vitrage. The dynamic entity graph looks interesting. But when more entities are added, things becomes crowded and the links screw over each other. Dragging the items will not help much. Is it possible to adjust the layout so I can get a more regular/stable tree

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

2016-08-05 0:43 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016, at 11:40 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > > On 4 August 2016 at 16:28, Edward Leafe wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2016, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > > >> This gets to the point

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] entity graph layout

forgot to attach a screenshot. See below[image: Screen Shot 2016-08-05 at 2.28.56 PM.png] × On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:32 PM Yujun Zhang wrote: > Hi, all, > > I'm building a demo of vitrage. The dynamic entity graph looks > interesting. > > But when more entities are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

On 04/08/16 15:46 +, Alexander Tivelkov wrote: I am the one who started the initiative 2.5 years ago, and was always advocating the "let's stay in Glance" approach during numerous discussions on "where should it belong" for all these years. Now I believe that it is time to move forward

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

On 04/08/16 13:47 -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote:   -Original Message- From: Tim Bell Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: August 4, 2016 at 13:19:02 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [docker] [magnum] Magnum account on Docker Hub

Tango, Sorry to hear that, but glad I could help clarify things :) Regards -steve From: Ton Ngo > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date:

[openstack-dev] [api][os-api-ref] openstackdocstheme integration

Hey, We look like we are getting close to merging the os-api-ref integration with openstackdocstheme. Unfortunately, there is no "phased" approach available - the version released with compatibility for openstackdocstheme will not work with oslo.sphinx. So, we need a way to use oslosphinx until

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Needing volunteers for Geography Coordinators for making use of OSIC cluster

Typo is subject tag - please see inside :) From: Steven Dake > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 6:52 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] devstack magnum.conf

Hi, better follow the quickstart guide [1]. Cheers, Spyros [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/magnum/dev/quickstart.html On 5 August 2016 at 06:22, Yasemin DEMİRAL (BİLGEM BTE) < yasemin.demi...@tubitak.gov.tr> wrote: > > Hi > > I try to magnum on devstack, in the manual Configure

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] stable/liberty busted

On 08/05/2016 02:52 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: Sorry I didn't elaborate a bit more, I was replying from my phone. The agent has logic that calculates the required flows for ports when it starts up and then reconciles that with the current flows in OVS so it doesn't disrupt traffic on every restart.

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Let's restructure murano-apps repo

Hi, all! As you probably know we use murano-app repository to store there the ready to deploy applications. But at the moment we can say that the complexity and the level of production use of applications there are quite different. A number of apps are absolutely simple and may be used only as

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][heat] 2 million requests / sec, 100s of nodes

Add [heat] to the title to get more feedback. Best regards, Hongbin From: Ricardo Rocha [mailto:rocha.po...@gmail.com] Sent: August-05-16 5:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] 2 million requests / sec, 100s of nodes Hi.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Abandoning specs without recent updates

They're available in review.openstack.org, if you filter by ironic-specs, and status:open. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/ironic-specs+status:open Since six months ago would be 2/5/2016, pretty much you're looking at the specs older than that.

[openstack-dev] [kolla][osic] OSIC cluster status

Hi Kolla, Thought it will be helpful to send a status mail once we hit checkpoints in the osic cluster work, so people can keep up to speed without having to trawl IRC. Reference: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-N-midcycle-osic Work began on the cluster Wed Aug 3rd, item 1) from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Abandoning specs without recent updates

Good idea Jay, it has been bugging me too :) New link with the 6 months constraint: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/ironic-specs+status:open+age:6months As you said, they're not deleted, just abandoned. Mathieu On 2016-08-05 12:25 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: They're available

[openstack-dev] [new][openstack] os-client-config 1.19.1 release (newton)

We are delighted to announce the release of: os-client-config 1.19.1: OpenStack Client Configuation Library This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-client-config With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-capabilities library created

>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 10:48, Jay Pipes wrote: >> >>> On 08/04/2016 10:31 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:47:37PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> Hi Novas and anyone interested in how to represent capabilities in a >>> consistent fashion. >>> >>> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I called in composable undercloud. There is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the > > recent "composable services" work

[openstack-dev] [magnum] devstack magnum.conf

Hi I try to magnum on devstack, in the manual Configure magnum: section has sudo cp etc/magnum/magnum.conf.sample /etc/magnum/magnum.conf command, but there is no magnum.conf. What should i do ? Thanks Yasemin __

[openstack-dev] [magnum]

Hi I try to magnum on devstack, in the manual Configure magnum: section has sudo cp etc/magnum/magnum.conf.sample /etc/magnum/magnum.conf command, but there is no magnum.conf. What should i do ? Thanks Yasemin __

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] 2 million requests / sec, 100s of nodes

Hi. Quick update is 1000 nodes and 7 million reqs/sec :) - and the number of requests should be higher but we had some internal issues. We have a submission for barcelona to provide a lot more details. But a couple questions came during the exercise: 1. Do we really need a volume in the VMs? On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:31:00PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/04/2016 01:17 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > >On 08/04/2016 09:28 AM, Edward Leafe wrote: > > > >>The idea that by specifying a distinct microversion would somehow > >>guarantee > >>an immutable behavior, though, is simply not the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some thoughts on API microversions

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 08:54:07PM -0400, Andrew Laski wrote: > I've brought some of these thoughts up a few times in conversations > where the Nova team is trying to decide if a particular change warrants > a microversion. I'm sure I've annoyed some people by this point because > it wasn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the > recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I > called

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] stable/liberty busted

Sorry I didn't elaborate a bit more, I was replying from my phone. The agent has logic that calculates the required flows for ports when it starts up and then reconciles that with the current flows in OVS so it doesn't disrupt traffic on every restart. The tests for that run constant pings in the

[openstack-dev] [new][keystone] keystoneauth1 2.11.0 release (newton)

We are eager to announce the release of: keystoneauth1 2.11.0: Authentication Library for OpenStack Identity This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/keystoneauth With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way > > to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of > > the > > recent "composable services"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

Thank you all for your responses! >From my side I can add that our separation is a deliberate step. We pre-weighed all pros and cons and our final decision was that moving forward as a new project is the lesser of two evils. Undoubtedly, in the short term it will be painful, but I believe that in

[openstack-dev] [third-party] [ci] Please PIN your 3rd party ci setup to JJB 1.6.1

All, In case you're still using JJB master branch, it is highly recommended that you pin to 1.6.1. There are recent/upcoming changes that could break your CI setup. You can do this by updating your puppet hiera file (/etc/puppet/environments/common.yaml [1]) as shown here [2][3] Re-run puppet

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 5 August 2016 at 11:25, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 5 August 2016 at 10:21, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 08/05/2016 11:34 AM, Armando M. wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 5 August 2016 at 05:59, Sean Dague > > > wrote: >> > >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job that test > upgrades and update. > Until now, I'm doing baby steps. I bootstrapped the work to upgrade > undercloud, see https>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 5 August 2016 at 10:21, Sean Dague wrote: > On 08/05/2016 11:34 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > > > On 5 August 2016 at 05:59, Sean Dague > > wrote: > > > > On 08/04/2016 09:15 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > So glad we are finally

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 08/05/2016 11:34 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 5 August 2016 at 05:59, Sean Dague > wrote: > > On 08/04/2016 09:15 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > So glad we are finally within the grasp of this! > > > > I posted [1], just to err on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][os-api-ref] openstackdocstheme integration

Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-08-05 17:04:35 +: > Hey, > > We look like we are getting close to merging the os-api-ref integration > with openstackdocstheme. > > Unfortunately, there is no "phased" approach available - the version > released with compatibility for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [yaql] Evaluate YAQL expressions in the yaqluator

Hi and thanks for your continued support for yaql =)  Please take note, that we’re currently have a big effort in updating and writing yaql documentation (I hope we’ll get it done and ready for barcelona). Feel free to propose a short article to official yaql docs about yaqluator ;) --  Kirill

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] Use ResourceProviderTags instead of ResourceClass?

On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Alex Xu wrote: Chris have a thought about using ResourceClass to describe Capabilities with an infinite inventory. In the beginning we brain storming the idea of Tags, Tan Lin have same thought, but we say no very quickly, due to the ResourceClass is really about

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum]

Hi, You can run `tox -egenconfig` under magnum directory, to generate sample conf. #Chinmay On 5 August 2016 at 16:51, Yasemin DEMİRAL (BİLGEM BTE) < yasemin.demi...@tubitak.gov.tr> wrote: > Hi > > I try to magnum on devstack, in the manual Configure magnum: section > has sudo cp

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On 08/05/2016 01:34 PM, Dan Prince wrote: On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the recent

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 13:39 +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Dan Prince > wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way > > to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of > > the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

Hi, On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Ideally, I would love to see: > > for node in nodes: >ssh $node puppet apply blah-blah > > Maybe we're not there, but it only means we have to improve our puppet > modules. This is the same thought I had,

[openstack-dev] [storlets] Towards becoming an official project team

Hi All, Before making the motion we need to pick a PTL. I would like to propose myself for the coming period, that is until the October Summit and for the cycle that begins in October. If there are any objections / other volunteers please speak up :-) Otherwise, 1. We now have an independent

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 16-07-27 09:41 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug Hellmann). We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote next week.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 08/04/2016 09:15 PM, Armando M. wrote: > So glad we are finally within the grasp of this! > > I posted [1], just to err on the side of caution and get the opportunity > to see how other gate jobs for Neutron might be affected by this change. > > Are there any devstack-gate changes lined up

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

On 04/08/16 23:00, joehuang wrote: I think all the problem is caused by the definition "official OpenStack project" for one big-tent project. I understand that each OpenStack vendor wants some differentiation in their solution, while also would like to collaborate with common core projects.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

> The only functional difference in the new code that happens in > the gate > is the iptables rule: > > local default_dev="" > default_dev=$(ip route | grep ^default | awk '{print $5}') > sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] devstack magnum.conf

I follow this page but when I run ./stack command, it gives error. It didnt create openstack user, the error about rabbitmq connection. I didnt work successfully :/ - Orijinal Mesaj - Kimden: "Spyros Trigazis" Kime: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][osic] OSIC cluster status

And we finished our first deployment We had some hurdles due to misconfiguration, you can see it in along with a fix. After these fixes and cleanups performed (we don't want to affect resulting time now do we?), we deployed functional openstack successfully within 20min:) More videos and tests to

Re: [openstack-dev] [storlets] Towards becoming an official project team

Hi All, I support Eran's proposal to be PTL. Good luck to us all in turning storlets into an official project. Doron From: e...@itsonlyme.name To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 05/08/2016 03:32 PM Subject:[openstack-dev] [storlets] Towards becoming an official project

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][osic] OSIC cluster status

W0t Great work so far everyone! =) On 8/5/16, 2:53 PM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: >And we finished our first deployment >We had some hurdles due to misconfiguration, you can see it in along >with a fix. After these fixes and cleanups performed (we

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 08/05/2016 02:32 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > Looking at the health trend for DVR [1], the test hasn't failed in a > while, so I wonder if this is induced by the proposed switch, even > though I can't correlate it just yet (still waiting for caffeine to kick

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 13:56 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > > > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

Well, except for you need some non-openstack starting point, because unlike with e.g. ansible installing any openstack service(s) does not end at "dnf install ". You might like to watch Dan's demo again. It goes something like: yum install python-tripleoclient openstack undercloud deploy

[openstack-dev] [Openstack][Group-based-policy]

Hi Team, This is Kiruthiga from Infosys limited. I have few queries on GBP installation and configuration. I have a two node Openstack liberty set up. All the documents which I could find on internet was related to GBP with devstack installation. And I could not find any common repository

[openstack-dev] [kollla] Needing volunteers for Geography Coordinators for making use of OSIC cluster

Hey folks, The kind folks at OSIC have granted the Kolla team access to 132 nodes of super high powered gear for scale testing Kolla. The objectives are 3 fold: 1. Determine if Kolla can scale to 132 nodes for a variety of test cases - if not fix bugs around those problems 2. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

I think this makes sense. "Should Artifacts be part of Glance?" is something folks have been debating for several years now, with seemingly equal numbers on each side. Even though it was far from unanimous, several summits ago it was decided to aim for a a v3 Glance API which would support all

[openstack-dev] [requirements][elections] requirements PTL election now open

The OpenStack Requirements PTL election is now open. The poll will close after 13:00 utc August 11, 2016. The electorate has been sent ballots to the gerrit Preferred Email. If you have patches returned when you issue this gerrit query, you are part of the Requirements electorate:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

I don't have a strong opinion on the split vs stay discussion. It does seem there's been sustained if ineffective attempts to keep this together so I lean toward supporting the divorce. But let's not pretend there are no costs for this. On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:02:48PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

> I haven't been able to reproduce it either, but it's unclear how packets > would get into a VM on an island since there is no router interface, and > the VM can't respond even if it did get it. > > I do see outbound pings from the connected VM get to eth0, hit the > masquerade rule, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job that test >> upgrades and update. >> Until now, I'm doing baby steps. I bootstrapped

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

Replied inline. From: Mikhail Fedosin [mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com] Sent: August-05-16 2:10 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project Thank you all for your responses!

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 5 August 2016 at 13:05, Dan Smith wrote: > > I haven't been able to reproduce it either, but it's unclear how packets > > would get into a VM on an island since there is no router interface, and > > the VM can't respond even if it did get it. > > > > I do see outbound

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On 08/05/2016 12:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job that test >> upgrades and update. >> Until now, I'm doing baby steps. I bootstrapped the work to upgrade >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][osic][bifrost] OSIC cluster status

Hey folks, Thanks for the video, those are great - if not a little hard for the casual observer to follow. That said, benchmark results of scale testing can be a dangerous game to play, so lets not play games about it. I'd like to see a full characterization of the hardware gear and topology

[openstack-dev] [infra][neutron] - best way to load 8021q kernel module into cirros

Hi, In neutron there is a new feature under active development to allow a VM to attach to many networks via its single interface using VLAN tags. We would like this to be tested in a scenario test in the gate, but in order to do that the guest instance must have support for VLAN tags (the 8021q

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] devstack magnum.conf

Perhaps it is better to append details, what error you hit ? and check devstack irc channel if it is not magnum part, and if something like magnum error message, check magnum IRC channel or open a bug. Sounds OK ? On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Yasemin DEMİRAL (BİLGEM BTE) <

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Needing volunteers for Geography Coordinators for making use of OSIC cluster

+1 for APAC On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Typo is subject tag – please see inside :) > > From: Steven Dake > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat][Horizon] Glance v2 and custom locations

Sorry guys, I'm a little late responding to this topic. >From a Horizon perspective, it would help if there were an API to discover whether custom locations are off or on in a Glance v2 installation. We could then expose it to the user only if it's enabled. What we've done to prevent this from

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] Taas can not capture the packet, if the two VM on the same host. Is it a Bug?

Hi Jimmy, I am working on a fix for this problem. I'll send out a patch for code-review next week. Best regards, Anil -Original Message- From: SUZUKI, Kazuhiro [mailto:k...@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 5:26 AM To: gmzhan...@gmail.com Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo] Federation, mod_mellon, and HA Proxy

On 08/05/2016 04:54 PM, Adam Young wrote: On 08/05/2016 04:52 PM, Adam Young wrote: Today I discovered that we need to modify the HA proxy config to tell it to rewrite redirects. Otherwise, I get a link to http://openstack.ayoung-dell-t1700.test:5000/v3/mellon/postResponse Which should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPAM] Pluggable IPAM rollback issue

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: > On Aug 2, 2016 6:52 PM, "Kevin Benton" wrote: > > If we decide to just fix the exception handler inside of ipam itself for > rollbacks (which would be a quick fix), I would be okay with that but we >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo] Federation, mod_mellon, and HA Proxy

rewriting is more expensive then getting the web server to return the right prefix. Is that an option? Usually its just a bug that needs a minor patch to fix. Thanks, Kevin From: Adam Young [ayo...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 3:06 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi

[openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo] Federation, mod_mellon, and HA Proxy

Today I discovered that we need to modify the HA proxy config to tell it to rewrite redirects. Otherwise, I get a link to http://openstack.ayoung-dell-t1700.test:5000/v3/mellon/postResponse Which should be https, not http. I mimicked the lines in the horizon config so that the keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo] Federation, mod_mellon, and HA Proxy

On 08/05/2016 04:52 PM, Adam Young wrote: Today I discovered that we need to modify the HA proxy config to tell it to rewrite redirects. Otherwise, I get a link to http://openstack.ayoung-dell-t1700.test:5000/v3/mellon/postResponse Which should be https, not http. I mimicked the lines in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 08/05/2016 04:32 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 5 August 2016 at 13:05, Dan Smith > wrote: > > > I haven't been able to reproduce it either, but it's unclear how packets > > would get into a VM on an island since there is no router

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

If glare was docker repo api compatible though, I think it would be quite useful. then each tenant doesn't have to set one up themselves. Thanks, Kevin From: Hongbin Lu [hongbin...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 1:29 PM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo] Federation, mod_mellon, and HA Proxy

On 08/05/2016 06:40 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: *From:* Adam Young [ayo...@redhat.com] *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2016 3:06 PM *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][tripleo]

Re: [openstack-dev] [docker] [magnum] Magnum account on Docker Hub

Thanks Steve, Spyros. I checked with Docker Hub support and the "magnum" account is not registered to Steve, so we will just use the new account "openstackmagnum". Ton, From: Spyros Trigazis To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 08/05/2016 08:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/04/2016 09:15 PM, Armando M. wrote: So glad we are finally within the grasp of this! I posted [1], just to err on the side of caution and get the opportunity to see how other gate jobs for Neutron might be affected by this change. Are there any

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 17:09 +1000, Mike Carden wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < > toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > > > > > It would be really awesome if, in true OSt and OSS spirit this work > > happened in an OpenStack repository with an open, text based

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] 2 million requests / sec, 100s of nodes

Hi Ricardo, For your question 1, you can modify the Heat template to not create the Cinder volume and tweak the call to configure-docker-storage.sh to use local storage. It should be fairly straightforward. You just need to make sure the local storage of the flavor is sufficient to host

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominate Vladimir Khlyunev for fuel-qa core

Vladimir, congrats On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Alexey Stepanov wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Artem Panchenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko > > wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Abandoning specs without recent updates

Hi Jay, I think it might be useful to share the list of those specs in here. Cheers, milan čt 4. 8. 2016 v 21:41 odesílatel Jay Faulkner napsal: > Hi all, > > I'd like to abandon any ironic-specs reviews that haven't had any updates > in 6 months or more. This works out to about

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

On 05/08/2016 16:04, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 17:09 +1000, Mike Carden wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < >> toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> It would be really awesome if, in true OSt and OSS spirit this work >>> happened in an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 5 August 2016 at 05:59, Sean Dague wrote: > On 08/04/2016 09:15 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > So glad we are finally within the grasp of this! > > > > I posted [1], just to err on the side of caution and get the opportunity > > to see how other gate jobs for Neutron might be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] devstack changing to neutron by default RSN

On 5 August 2016 at 07:39, Brian Haley wrote: > On 08/05/2016 08:59 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 08/04/2016 09:15 PM, Armando M. wrote: >> >>> So glad we are finally within the grasp of this! >>> >>> I posted [1], just to err on the side of caution and get the opportunity