Re: [openstack-dev] [picasso] Picasso (FaaS) project release!

Derek, I think Serverless is a great idea. I had considered starting a new project in October around Serverless. During my analysis I of course saw iron.io’s work and OpenWhisk. I thought OpenWhisk would be a better community to join as it was open. Iron.io and OpenWhisk should join

Re: [openstack-dev] [FaaS] Function as a service in OpenStack

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Derek Schultz wrote: > Hi all, > > We just released Picasso[1][2], an OpenStack API for Functions as a > Service. I think it may be of particular interest to those in this thread, > as it's based on IronFunctions, an open-source

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:41:31PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Hey Tony, > > > > Could we also EOL tripleo-incubator and tripleo-image-elements > > stable/icehouse please? > > Yup, No problem. > I have retired

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Removal of a core reviewer from the kolla-kubernetes-core team

Hey peeps, David Wang asked that we remove him from the kolla-kubernetes-core team because he is involved in other activities and he isn’t sure if or when he will be able to begin reviewing again. In our earlier cleanup of the kolla-kubernetes-core review team, the core reviewer team was on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] December 28th weekly meeting cancelled

Happy christmas & new year 2017. Thanks & Regards Kanagaraj M On Dec 21, 2016 1:18 PM, "Sridhar Ramaswamy" wrote: We are skipping next week's Tacker meeting, on Dec 28th [1]. We will resume on Jan 4th. Happy Holidays!! [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tacker/

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] no IRC meeting next week

Hi, The next IRC meeting on December 28 will be canceled due to the holidays. We will meet again on Wednesday, January 4th. Best Regards, Ifat. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

Hey everyone, It seems a contributor has written a script to add CONTRIBUTING.rst files to each OpenStack project that exists. [1] As a community we've struggled with new contributors creating tonnes of patches like this at once, and that is emphatically not the purpose of this email. Instead,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Vitrage] [aodh] Generig alarm help

Thanks Julien (I thought that this may be the problem, but wasn't sure). I have pushed some changes to gerrit for aodh and the client. If you could take a look and give some feedback that would be great :) BR, Alexey > -Original Message- > From: Julien Danjou

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > Hey everyone, > > It seems a contributor has written a script to add CONTRIBUTING.rst > files to each OpenStack project that exists. [1] Thanks Ian for starting this discussion, it's very appreciated. It would have

[openstack-dev] [heat] No IRC meeting next week

Hi All, As discussed in the meeting today, I'm cancelling the next IRC meeting on 28th Dec. We'll meet again on 4th Jan 2017. Wish you all merry Christmas and happy new year. -- Regards, Rabi Misra __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

On 2016-12-21 16:22, Ian Cordasco wrote: > [...] > That said, I think there are two better places for this information > that are already standards in OpenStack: > > * README.rst > * HACKING.rst > > Most projects include links to the contributing documentation in at > least one of these files. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [picasso] Picasso (FaaS) project release!

Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > [...] > If you do plan to enter the big tent with this code base, I’d have a > read of: > > https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/new-projects-requirements.rst You can use the direct link:

Re: [openstack-dev] [osc][openstackclient][zun] Collision on the keyword 'container'

On 20/12/16 05:09 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > This was my initial thought when discussing the problem with Hongbin > last night. > > We have three main "swift" resources in OSC -- "object store account", > "container" and "object". I think renaming "container" to "object store > container" is

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Atlanta PTG

General infos about PTG: https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ Some useful informations about PTG/TripleO: * When? We have a room between Wednesday and Friday included. Important sessions will happen on Wednesday and Thursday. We'll probably have sessions on Friday, but it might be more hands-on and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > > > > On Dec 19, 2016, at 14:31, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 09:18:20AM -0800, Samuel Cassiba wrote: > > > >> The Chef OpenStack cookbooks team is way late to the party.

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

On 2016-12-21 11:11 AM, Matt Kassawara wrote: Howdy! After several years of contributing to OpenStack documentation, a significant change in my career path warrants resigning from my role as a core reviewer. Working with the OpenStack community was a great experience and I hope it continues to

[openstack-dev] [keystone] office hours starting January 6th

Hi folks! If you remember, last year we started a weekly bug day [0]. The idea was to dedicate one day a week to managing keystone's bug queue by triaging, fixing, and reviewing bugs. This was otherwise known as keystone's office hours. I'd like to remind everyone that we are starting up this

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

On 12/21/2016 05:11 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote: > Howdy! > > After several years of contributing to OpenStack documentation, a > significant change in my career path warrants resigning from my role as > a core reviewer. Working with the OpenStack community was a great > experience and I hope it

[openstack-dev] [kolla] kolla-kubernetes needs to sort out what to call our k8s objects

Hello folks, In our team meeting today, I took an action to begin a mailing list discussion around what to call our k8s objects in the kolla-kubernetes deliverable. At present, we are calling them “pods”. The general consensus on the team meeting is this is a hard concept for people new to

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] office hours starting January 6th

Thanks for setting this up Lance! You can count on me to join and smash some bugs. On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hi folks! > > If you remember, last year we started a weekly bug day [0]. The idea was > to dedicate one day a week to managing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

For those who would like to know exactly what this set of changes cost in the CI, the answer is approximately 1050 jobs which consumed 190 compute hours of CI time. -amrith -Original Message- From: Amrith Kumar [mailto:amr...@tesora.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 11:13 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

Hi Matt, Thanks for all your efforts in documenting. It was pleasure working with you. Looking forward to see you contribute back to OpenStack. Thanks Swami From: Matt Kassawara [mailto:mkassaw...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 8:11 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

On 12/21/16, 4:11 PM, "Matt Kassawara" wrote: >Howdy! > > >After several years of contributing to OpenStack documentation, a >significant change in my career path warrants resigning from my role as a >core reviewer. Working with the OpenStack community was a great

[openstack-dev] Fwd: Dive into Live Migration-Query-Reg

-- Forwarded message -- From: "yamini jaya naga Malliswari" Date: Dec 21, 2016 13:39 Subject: Dive into Live Migration-Query-Reg To: Cc: Sir I am research scholar in SRM University, Chennai, working on live migration in

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

Thanks for all your hard work - I remember the Bad Old Days when there was little to no documentation on anything in OpenStack. We are in a much better place, thanks to your work. -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [craton] [api] Pagination Specification

Hey all, As promised I've worked out a tiny, but hopefully informative, pagination specification for Craton. It's available at https://review.openstack.org/413735 and I might update it to include more information as I go along today. Regardless, nothing is decided in that. Following the spirit of

[openstack-dev] [keystone] 2016-12-21 policy meeting

Sending a note to summarize the policy meeting we had today [0]. Also to remind folks that our next policy meeting will be Wednesday, January 4th. Hope everyone has a safe and happy holiday season! [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/policy/2016/policy.2016-12-21-16.01.log.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [osc][openstackclient][zun] Collision on the keyword 'container'

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > This is exactly how it should work. I do want to make an additional > important but subtle point: while it looks like those are namespaced > commands, we used 'server' not 'compute' because it is not a >

[openstack-dev] [Gluon] IRC Meeting cancelled on Dec 28, 2016 and Re-convene on Jan 4, 2017

Hello folks, Many thanks to all of contributors to Gluon project, and we have had great progress in 2016. Thank you. For those of you who are interested in joining and contributing to our work, please get all information from our wiki [1] and past meeting agenda and minutes [2]. We just

[openstack-dev] Storyboard Lives!

Hello All, As you may or may not have heard, we are still working on moving towards Storyboard as our task tracker. In an effort to spread awareness about Storyboard and its capabilities, we’ve decided to write some blog posts about how it works and how it will be different from Launchpad. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

Hi Matt, It was a pleasure working with you and all the help you volunteered. All the best. Regards, Martin From: Matt Kassawara To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: 21/12/2016

[openstack-dev] [release] reno 2.0.0

This new version of reno is a major rewrite of the repository scanner logic and includes some breaking changes to the internal API (the command line remains the same). Those changes broke the release announcement job, and we're working on getting that fixed. In the mean time, I wanted to make sure

Re: [openstack-dev] Storyboard Lives!

Hi! It looks really promising. I like the idea of abandoning launchpad (it is inconvenient at all) and I like "boards" for tasks. But I have one feature request, before I can think seriously about switching to it from my trello board - ability to change colors of UI. Generally I like red and

Re: [openstack-dev] FW: FW: No Relevant flows in br-int after SFC Creation

Hi Anirudh, Please share q-svc.log Thanks., Mohankumar.N On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Anirudh Gupta wrote: > Hi Mohan, > > > > Thanks a lot for your help and support on IRC yesterday. > > > > As per your suggestion, we have upgraded our OVS version to 2.5.0, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

On 12/21/2016 10:11 AM, Matt Kassawara wrote: > Howdy! > > After several years of contributing to OpenStack documentation, a > significant change in my career path warrants resigning from my role as > a core reviewer. Working with the OpenStack community was a great > experience and I hope it

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

Sorry to see you go Matt. Thanks for everything you've done with in the docs project, and thank you for always taking the time to field all the setup questions in #openstack and #openstack-dev from the newcomers, it was invaluable. Hoping your new opportunity brings you much success. On Wed, Dec

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

Agreed with Amrith, it might be useful and maybe also good for new contributors to learn how to have a commit to OpenStack. BUT over 130 identical patches to 130 different projects from one company/person in one run? I don't think this is going to help OpenStack growing. We should not let this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-*] Attention for upcoming refactoring

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Anna Taraday wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I've got two changes with refactor of TypeDriver [1] and segments db [2] > which is needed for implementation new engine facade [3]. > > Reviewers of networking-cisco, networking-arista,

[openstack-dev] Retire the radar project?

Hi, radar was an antique effort to import some outside-OpenStack code that did CI reliability dashboarding. It was never really a thing, and has been abandoned over time. The last commit that wasn't part of a project wide change series was in January 2015. Does anyone object to me following the

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

- Original Message - > From: "Neil Jerram" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Cc: "Steve Gordon" > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 5:53:02 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] office hours starting January 6th

Thanks for the initiative! This is something that both keystone and the community will benefit! :) On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > Thanks for setting this up Lance! > > You can count on me to join and smash some bugs. > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] Retire the radar project?

On 2016-12-21 07:02 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi, radar was an antique effort to import some outside-OpenStack code that did CI reliability dashboarding. It was never really a thing, and has been abandoned over time. The last commit that wasn't part of a project wide change series was in

[openstack-dev] [Congress] no meeting on December 29, 2016

No congress team meeting on December 29, 2016. Regular meeting resumes on January 5, 2016. Happy holidays all! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [searchlight] No Searchlight IRC meeting today

Hi everyone, As Travis sent out last week, most of the contributor will be on holiday this week and the next, so we decide not to hold the Searchlight IRC meeting today. The only remaining topic from last meeting was the pipeline patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359972/ We have discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Retiring ironic-webclient

Thanks Julia. --ruby From: Julia Kreger Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Monday, December 19, 2016 at 2:34 PM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org"

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla-k8s core nominations

It seems like we have 2 new core team members:) Cheers guys! Congrats:) On 16 December 2016 at 15:31, Ken Wronkiewicz (kewronki) wrote: > + srwilkers > + portdirect > > :) > > On 12/14/16, 9:06 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: > > I'm happy to start

Re: [openstack-dev] [Vitrage] [aodh] Generig alarm help

On Wed, Dec 21 2016, Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL) wrote: > I encountered an error there in py27 which I don't quite understand > why it happens because I have changed all the correct places in the > client (maybe I need to have some appropriate code for this in the > aodh project itself as well?)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

Hi stackers! On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Ian Cordasco > wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > It seems a contributor has written a script to add CONTRIBUTING.rst > > files to each OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

-Original Message- From: Andrey Kurilin Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: December 21, 2016 at 10:13:09 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer]

Hi ceilometer contributors, I am so excited because this is my first mail on openstack-dev since I started to read ceilometer code and make contributions to ceilmeter. So wonderful it is that ceilometer architecture is being updated in this cycle. One of these changes is we are going to remove

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

Ian, Andreas, Emilien, My sentiments on the subject of these kinds of "production line" changes is unchanged from [1] and [2]. A complete list of these changes is at [3]. I've updated all of the changes in this thread with a block comment and a -1. My apologies to other reviewers (and active

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer]Taskflow of removing collector

Hi ceilometer contributors, I am so excited because this is my first mail on openstack-dev since I started to read ceilometer code and make contributions to ceilmeter. So wonderful it is that ceilometer architecture is being updated in this cycle. One of these changes is we are going to remove

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-*] Attention for upcoming refactoring

Hello everyone! I've got two changes with refactor of TypeDriver [1] and segments db [2] which is needed for implementation new engine facade [3]. Reviewers of networking-cisco, networking-arista, networking-nec

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

  -Original Message- From: Andreas Jaeger Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: December 21, 2016 at 09:48:20 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-12-21 16:22, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > [...] > > That said, I think there are two better places for this information > > that are already standards in OpenStack: > > > > * README.rst > > * HACKING.rst > > > > Most

[openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core

Howdy! After several years of contributing to OpenStack documentation, a significant change in my career path warrants resigning from my role as a core reviewer. Working with the OpenStack community was a great experience and I hope it continues to grow... with sufficient documentation, of

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2016.12.21 Agenda

Hi all, Thanks for attending the last team meeting in year 2016 :) Please find the meeting notes at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cyborg/MeetingLogs#2016-12-21 . Our next meeting will be held at Jan 4th, 2017. At the meantime, could you indicate whether you would attend Atlanta PTG by

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

-Original Message- From: Andrey Kurilin Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: December 21, 2016 at 10:11:42 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer]

On Thu, Dec 22 2016, 刘瀚檄 wrote: Hi Hanxi! > Third, I have taken some questions into consideration: > (1) > Previous gnocchi configure: > > > [dispatcher_gnocchi] > filter_service_activity = False > archive_policy = low > > > I want to make sure whether we still need configure in ceilometer.conf