On 08/18/2014 03:38 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14 2014, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>
> Hi Yuriy,
>
> […]
>
>> Looking forward to your opinions.
>
> This looks like a good summary of the situation.
>
> I've added a solution E based on pthread, but didn't get very far about
> it for now.
On 09/04/2014 01:42 PM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to request a FFE for 4 changesets to complete the
> blueprint serial-ports.
>
> Topic on gerrit:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/serial-ports,n,z
>
On 09/04/2014 12:58 PM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
> specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
>
> Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
>
> First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost th
On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes”
> I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/ is
> reverted because:
>
>
>
> - It causes inconsistent behaviour
On 12/30/2013 12:39 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes”
>> I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/632
On 12/26/2013 07:56 AM, cosmos cosmos wrote:
> Hello.
>
> My name is Rucia for Samsung SDS.
>
>
> I had in truouble in volume deleting.
>
> I am developing for supporting big data storage such as hadoop in lvm.
>
>
> it use as a full disk io for deleting of cinder lvm volume because of dd th
On 01/15/2014 02:42 PM, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
> If you are working on linux system following can help you:
>
> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda bs=4k
That's going to be slow.
The shred tool should be already installed on most Linux systems,
and uses an internal PRNG to write either zeros or rando
On 19/01/15 20:41, Michael Still wrote:
> Mostly.
>
> qcow2 can do a copy on write layer, although it can be disabled IIRC.
> So if COW is turned on, you get only the delta in the instance
> directory when using qcow2.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Dmitry Guryanov
>
On 05/28/2014 08:16 AM, Martin Geisler wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm trying to get my feet wet with OpenStack development, so I recently
> tried to submit some small patches. One small thing I noticed was that
> some files used
>
> # -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-
>
> to specify the file encoding fo
On 06/13/2014 02:22 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
> I guess the question I’m really asking here is: “Since we know resize down
> won’t work in all cases,
> and the failure if it does occur will be hard for the user to detect,
> should we just block it at the API layer and be consistent across all
> Hyper
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/20/2013 10:47 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> Before https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46867/ if file injection of a
> mandatory file fails, nova just silently ignores the failure, which is
> clearly wrong.
For reference, the original code you're adjusting is
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/1890
On 09/23/2013 03:36 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 05:43 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Since we now have at least some integration testing on our global
requirements list, I uploaded https://review.openstack.org/47745 to
see what breaks (though unit tests for individual projects
On 09/23/2013 06:48 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 01:36 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 09/23/2013 11:04 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> OpenStack should be compatible with sqlalchemy 0.8.x at this stage,
>>> or should be easily tweaked to be so.
>>
>
On 10/16/2013 02:05 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> It appears that in Debian, python-coverage provides the wrapper in
> /usr/bin/python-coverage. I tried to push the current maintainer to
> provide /usr/bin/coverage, but he doesn't agree. He believes that
> "coverage" is just too generi
On 10/17/2013 04:54 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 10/17/2013 09:11 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> I understand what you are saying and I also understand your frustration.
>>> However, OpenStack does not, as of yet, support SQLAlchemy 0.8, and
I notice on some projects like nova and quantum (I presume with milestone
proposed commits)
that the 2013.2.b1 tag was created on the now removed milestone-proposed branch.
Therefore `git describe` and `git log --decorate` etc. on master, ignore the
latest tag.
I was wondering if it would be bett
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 07/08/2013 08:53 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since python-sqlalchemy 0.8.2 has been uploaded to Sid, Quantum is
> uninstallable there right now (see #715294).
>
> I am wondering: what's wrong with sqlalchemy >= 0.8, so that it is
> written explicitly in the requirements that we shouldn
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 08/07/2013 06:54 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2013 12:53 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>> I agree triple-o will help a lot here although I would disagree that
>> package rollback is an illusion. I would call it more of a hard
>> problem instead since nothing is really impossible :)
>
> i
On 08/08/2013 02:10 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>
> On 08/05/2013 02:03 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>> [Moving a discussion from https://review.openstack.org/40019 to the ML
>> to get a wider audience]
>>
>> We've been around this block more than once so let's get it all
>> documented in one place and s
On 21/04/15 21:37, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> Also, isn’t sqlalchemy-migrate something we currently maintain (or a group
> of OpenStack developers do it for OpenStack. Can’t we work with them to
> add support for Python 3?
There seems to have been some work on that already:
https://github.com/stackforg
23 matches
Mail list logo
