Re: [openstack-dev] [all] setuptools 6.0 ruins the world - SOLVED

On 09/27/2014 10:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote: setuptools 6.0.1 has been released - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools/6.0.1#id1 - hopefully addressing this issue. -Sean Thanks for taking care of this, Sean! Though it was kinda interesting to see my little 8GB stinkpad totally

[openstack-dev] [cinder] ratio: created to attached

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone have real world experience, even data, to speak to the question: in an OpenStack cloud, what is the likely ratio of (created) cinder volumes to attached cinder volumes? Thanks, Tom Barron -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] ratio: created to attached

On 12/22/14 4:48 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Tom Barron t...@dyncloud.net wrote: Does anyone have real world experience, even data, to speak to the question: in an OpenStack cloud, what is the likely ratio of (created) cinder volumes to attached cinder volumes

[openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup

merged. If this FFE is granted, I will give the required rebase my immediate attention. Thanks. - -- Tom Barron t...@dyncloud.net [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149726 [2] - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/nfs-backup [3] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149725 -BEGIN

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][tempest] Data-driven testing (DDT) samples

On 5/4/15 3:05 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: Among the OpenStack project of which I have some knowledge, none of them uses any DDT library. FYI, manila uses DDT for unit tests. If you think there might be a library from which lbaas, neutron, or any other openstack project might take

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Clinton Knight for core team

On 4/2/15 9:16 AM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: Clinton Knight (cknight on IRC) has been working on OpenStack for the better part of the year, and starting in February, he shifted his focus from Cinder to Manila. I think everyone is already aware of his high quality contributions and code reviews.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Rebranded Volume Drivers

On 6/3/15 6:16 PM, Bruns, Curt E wrote: -Original Message- From: Eric Harney [mailto:ehar...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 12:54 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Rebranded Volume Drivers On

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

Well deserved, and hope you had a nice break. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests

On 7/6/15 10:28 PM, sean.mcgin...@gmx.com wrote: I support moving it to non-voting from the experimental queue. It will be much more visible that way if something breaks. That makes sense to me. - Reply message - From: Ivan Kolodyazhny e...@e0ne.info To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

On 8/13/15 3:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openstack/cinder,p,0035b6410002dd11 60/90 day

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] NFS mount as cinder user instead of root

On 10/14/15 6:31 AM, Francesc Pinyol Margalef wrote: > Hi, > Yes, that worked! Thanks! :) > > But the process is very slow (about half an hour to create a volume). > I think the problem is the execution of "du -sb --apparent-size > --exclude *snapshot* >

[openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

would be for the 11 core reviewers to devote a day or two to cleaning up this backlog of 10 outstanding reviews rather than punting all of them out to Mitaka. Thanks for your time and consideration. Respectfully, -- Tom Barron [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-liberty-3-reviews [2] At

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

On 9/2/15 5:19 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:30:26AM -0600, John Griffith wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron <t...@dyncloud.net> wrote: >> >>> [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

On 9/14/15 12:15 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Thanks for helping make me feel welcome as I started up, for your example of gutsy and consistent leadership, and for some really good coffee! -- Tom

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

On 03/11/2016 01:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Wow, how six months flies! I'd like to announce my candidacy to continue on as > Cinder PTL for the Newton release cycle. > > A lot has been accomplished in the Mitaka cycle. After a lot of work by many > folks, over a couple

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

On 04/08/2016 05:16 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 04/08/2016 05:10 PM, gordon chung wrote: >> >> >> On 08/04/2016 1:26 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>> Team, >>> >>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics: >>> https://twitter.com/stevebot/status/718185667709267969 >>> >>> It's pretty clear

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Status of cinder-list bug delay with 1000's of volumes

On 03/03/2016 06:38 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > Adam, > As the bug shows, it was fixed in the Juno release. The icehouse > release is no longer supported. I would recommend upgrading your > deployment if possible or looking at the patch and see if it can work > against your Icehouse

Re: [openstack-dev] More on the topic of DELIMITER, the Quota Management Library proposal

On 04/23/2016 03:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/23/2016 03:18 PM, Mike Perez wrote: >> On 14:54 Apr 18, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> On 04/16/2016 05:51 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: - update_resource(id or resource, newsize) >>> >>> Resizing resources is a bad idea, IMHO. Resources are easier

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][lbaas] gunicorn to g-r

On 10/18/2016 03:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-10-18 12:53:18 -0600: >> >>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> >>> I expect you could take over a corner of the dev lounge or some >>> other space to hold a

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][release] Final releases for stable/liberty and liberty-eol

On 11/21/2016 06:38 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: >> 1. Final stable/liberty releases should happen next week, probably by >> Thursday 11/17. > > I see only Cinder did it https://review.openstack.org/397282 > and Nova is under review https://review.openstack.org/397841 > > Is that all or other project

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila][cinder] [api] API and entity naming consistency

On 11/17/2016 04:03 AM, Ravi, Goutham wrote: > > > On> 11/16/16, 8:22 PM, "Ben Swartzlander" wrote: > > > > On 11/16/2016 11:28 AM, Ravi, Goutham wrote: > > > + [api] in the subject to attract API-WG attention. > > > > > > > > > > > > We

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] Relation of share types and share protocols

On 11/02/2016 06:23 AM, Arne Wiebalck wrote: > Hi Valeriy, > > I wasn’t aware, thanks! > > So, if each driver exposes the storage_protocols it supports, would it > be sensible to have > manila-ui check the extra_specs for this key and limit the protocol > choice for a given > share type to

[openstack-dev] [manila] propose adding gouthamr to manila core

need the additional bandwidth for the project. He's treated as a de facto core by the community already. Let's make it official! -- Tom Barron __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] Access key via the UI?

On 11/03/2016 10:33 AM, Ravi, Goutham wrote: > Ah. I’d let Tom or Ramana weigh in on that. IIRC, the access key is > plaintext, so, I thought it can be displayed; that’s what the CLI is doing. > > Reading the spec though, this was an intended part of the feature: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Translations removal

On 03/22/2017 11:44 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:42:42AM -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 22:10 +, Taryma, Joanna wrote: >>> However, pep8 does not accept passing variable to translation >>> functions, so this results in ‘H701 Empty

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] share server frameworks for DHSS=False case

Thanks, Ben. One somewhat tangential remark inline ... On 04/03/2017 03:00 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 04/03/2017 02:24 PM, Tom Barron wrote: >> We're building an NFS frontend onto the CephFS driver and >> are considering the relative merits, for the DHSS=False case, >

[openstack-dev] [manila] share server frameworks for DHSS=False case

We're building an NFS frontend onto the CephFS driver and are considering the relative merits, for the DHSS=False case, of following (1) the lvm driver model, and (2) the generic driver model. With #1 export locations use a configured address in the backend, e.g. lvm_share_export_ip and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] share server frameworks for DHSS=False case

question below, not just for Ben. If you know, please respond. On 04/03/2017 03:00 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 04/03/2017 02:24 PM, Tom Barron wrote: ... ... > While Manila doesn't care about 2 backends potentially sharing an IP, > you do have to consider how the m-shr services

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Proposing TommyLikeHu for Cinder core

On 07/25/2017 04:07 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > I am proposing we add TommyLike as a Cinder core. > > DISCLAIMER: We work for the same company. > > I have held back on proposing him for some time because of this conflict. But > I think from his number of reviews [1] and code contributions [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Feature proposal freeze exception request for change

On 07/18/2017 04:33 PM, Ravi, Goutham wrote: > Hello Manila reviewers, > > > > It has been a few days past the feature proposal freeze, but I would > like to request an extension for an enhancement to the NetApp driver in > Manila. [1] implements a low-impact blueprint [2] that was approved

Re: [openstack-dev] All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Rocky

On 04/28/2017 05:54 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey everybody! > > There isn't a ton more to say past the subject. The "R" release of > OpenStack shall henceforth be known as "Rocky". > > I believe it's the first time we've managed to name a release after a > community member - so please

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 09/22/2017 08:34 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Unfortunately I know better on this matter and it is not the matter of > topic dispute as many people on this thread who has been disturbed and > annoyed by the padding/trolling. > > So yes I'm sticking with stupid because it hurts

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 09/21/2017 10:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I just wanted to highlight to people that there seems to be a series of > garbage patches in various projects [1] which are basically doing things > like fixing a single typo in a code comment, or very narrowly changing > http to https in links

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 09/22/2017 09:26 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/22/2017 7:10 AM, Tom Barron wrote: >> FWIW I think it is better not to attribute motivation in these cases. >> Perhaps the code submitter is trying to pad stats, but perhaps they are >> just a new contributor trying

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] Nominating Zhong Jun (zhongjun) for Manila core

A big plus 1 from me! Zhong as core is well deserved and exactly what our project needs! On Nov 19, 2017 6:31 PM, "Ravi, Goutham" wrote: > Hello Manila developers, > > > > I would like to nominate Zhong Jun (zhongjun on irc, zhongjun2 on gerrit) > to be part of

[openstack-dev] [manila] proposal to remove glusterfs-native job from check queue

and have a fix in mind! -- Tom Barron __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[openstack-dev] [manila] proposal to remove hdfs job from check queue

! -- Tom Barron __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [manila] no community meeting Thurs 24 May 2018

There will be no Manila weekly meeting, Thursday May 24, given the Vancouver Summit is going on that week. -- Tom Barron __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

[openstack-dev] [manila] manila operator's feedback forum etherpad available

you there! -- Tom Barron Manila PTL irc: tbarron [1] https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule/events/21780/manila-ops-feedback-running-at-scale-overcoming-barriers-to-deployment [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR18-manila-forum-ops-feedback

Re: [openstack-dev] use of storyboard (was [TC] Stein Goal Selection)

On 12/06/18 10:57 +0200, Kendall Nelson wrote: Another option for playing around things- I am happy to do a test migration and populate our storyboard-dev instance with your real data from lp. The last half a dozen teams we have migrated have been handled this way. Can we do this for manila?

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [summary] Organizational diversity tag

On 12/06/18 11:44 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi! We had a decently-sized thread on how to better track organizational diversity, which I think would benefit from a summary. The issue is that the current method (which uses a formula to apply single-vendor and diverse-affiliation tags) is

Re: [openstack-dev] use of storyboard (was [TC] Stein Goal Selection)

On 12/06/18 15:25 +0200, Kendall Nelson wrote: Yes! I can definitely set Manila up in storyboard-dev. I'll get the imports done before the end of the week :) -Kendall (diablo_rojo) Thanks much! On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, 2:53 pm Tom Barron, wrote: On 12/06/18 10:57 +0200, Kendall Nelson wrote

[openstack-dev] [manila] No meeting 31 May 2018

We don't have anything on the agenda yet for this week's manila meeting and my travel plans just got shuffled so I'm in the air at our regular time so let's cancel this week's meeting and start up again the following week. We'll have a summary of relevant Summit events then. -- Tom Barron

Re: [openstack-dev] Ceph multiattach support

(file share infrastructure as a service) with CephFS native or CephFS-NFS backends would (as Erik McCormick also suggested) meet your needs. -- Tom Barron __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Organizational diversity tag

On 04/06/18 17:52 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-06-04 17:41:10 -0400: On 02/06/18 13:23, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-06-01 15:19:46 -0400: >> On 01/06/18 12:18, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [snip] > >>> Is that rule a

[openstack-dev] [manila] Core team updates

Hi all, Clinton Knight and Valeriy Ponomaryov have been focusing on projects outside Manila for some time so I'm removing them from the core team. Valeriy and Clinton made great contributions to Manila over the years both as reviewers and as contributors. We are fortunate to have been able

[openstack-dev] [manila] Rocky Review Focus

. Please take a look and add your name to the etherpad next to particular reviews so that we can all see where we need more reviewers. Please don't feel like you need to be a current core reviewer or established in the manila community to add your name to the etherpad or to do reviews! -- Tom

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

Jimmy, Also can we 's/barriers/overcoming barriers/' in the title of the manila session? Thanks! -- Tom On 26/04/18 15:27 -0500, Jimmy McArthur wrote: No problem. Done :) Colleen Murphy April 26, 2018 at 1:23 PM Hi Jimmy, I have a conflict on Thursday

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE nfs_ganesha integration

://review.openstack.org/533767 All said, this one seems to be a good poster child for composable roles + composable networks! -- Tom Barron On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > I agree this would be a great addition but I'm worried about the > patches whi

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][python3] python3 readiness?

python 3 and for this reason RDO has decided [2] to begin work to run with *stabilized* Fedora repositories in the Rocky cycle, aiming to be ready on time to migrate to Python 3 and support its use in downstream and upstream CI pipelines. -- Tom Barron [1] https://pythonclock.org/ [2] https://lists.rdop

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][python3] python3 readiness?

On 13/02/18 16:53 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote: On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Tom Barron wrote: Since python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 [1] it is a reasonable conjecture that downstream distributions will drop support for python 2 between now and then, perhaps as early as next year. I'm

[openstack-dev] [manila] [ptl] announcing PTL candidacy for manila

others working on manila to come to PTG and the Rocky cycle with their own initiatives. Also, if you haven't been working in manila and any of the above seems interesting (or just nuts) come on over! Manila is a great place to contribute and innovate! Thanks for listening. -- Tom Barron (tbarron

[openstack-dev] [manila] queens retrospective as we kickoff Rocky

We'll start the manila meetings Tuesday with a retrospective on the Queens cycle. Whether you'll be at the PTG or not, please add your thoughts to the retrospective etherpad [1] so we can discuss them and figure out how to continuously improve. Please tag items with your nick. We'll make

[openstack-dev] [manila] PTG schedule and social event

e planning a social event for Tuesday evening, so stay tuned for more details. If you think you can join us, please add your name to the etherpad above under the "Team Dinner Planned" section. -- Tom Barron signature.asc Descri

[openstack-dev] [manila][PTL][Election] PTL candidacy for the Stein cycle

manila back ends exposed in production-quality deployment tools like tripleo, kolla-*, and juju. * continue to fix bugs, improve our CI, run more stuff in gate with python 3 These are the things that will drive me if you choose me as manila PTL. Thanks for listening, -- Tom Barron (tbarron

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

On 15/08/18 10:43 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: On 08/14/2018 10:33 AM, Tobias Urdin wrote: My goal is that we will be able to swap to Storyboard during the Stein cycle but considering that we have a low activity on bugs my opinion is that we could do this swap very easily anything soon as long

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] migrating to storyboard

e the PTG.  :-) +1 - Tom Barron (tbarron) See you in Denver.  :-) Jay Bryant - (jungleboyj) On 8/16/2018 2:22 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Hey :) Yes, I know attachments are important to a few projects. They are on our todo list and we plan to talk about how to imple

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

ives where there is a desire to be able to run cinder by itself (with no-auth) or just with keystone (where OpenStack style multi-tenancy is desired)? Tom Barron (tbarron) -- Ed Leafe __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

th no-auth) or just with keystone (where OpenStack style multi-tenancy is desired)? Tom Barron (tbarron) A little bit. That would be one of the pieces that needs to be done if we were to adopt it. Just high level brainstorming, but I think we would need something like we have now with using

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [nova] [placement] placement below or beside compute after extraction?

tack style multi-tenancy is desired)? Tom Barron (tbarron) A little bit. That would be one of the pieces that needs to be done if we were to adopt it. Just high level brainstorming, but I think we would need something like we have now with using tooz where if it is configured for it, it wil

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTL non-candidacy

I don't do enough in TripleO to chime in on the list, but I can't think of a more helpful PTL! Thank you for your service. On 25/07/18 10:31 -0700, Wesley Hayutin wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:24 AM Alex Schultz wrote: Hey folks, So it's been great fun and we've accomplished much over

[openstack-dev] [manila] initial schedule for PTG

a framework for decisions about what work we can fit into the Stein cycle. Also, we have remote attendees participating, I think all to the east of Denver, so I tried to shift topics known to be of interest to those folks earlier in the day. -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://www.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [manila] retrospective and forum brainstorm etherpads

Wednesday) to brainstorm topics for Berlin Forum. Please record these here [2]. We'll discuss this subject at the PTG as well. Thanks! -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-rocky-retrospective [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-berlin-forum-brainstorm

[openstack-dev] [manila] No meeting 13 September 2018

Manila folks, You likely already know, but we won't have our regular community meeting on irc next week because we'll be doing the PTG. See you there! -- Tom Barron (tbarron) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [manila] No meeting today July 5

on outstanding work that needs to complete by Milestone 3: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-rocky-review-focus Thanks! -- Tom Barron (tbarron) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [manila] Planning Etherpad for Denver 2018 PTG

Here's an etherpad we can use for planning for the Denver PTG in September [1]. Please add topics as they occur to you! -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-ptg-planning-denver-2018

[openstack-dev] [manila] no weekly meeting March 8

here [1]. Cheers, -- Tom Barron [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] [quotas] [cyborg]Dublin Rocky PTG Summary

] there probably is not yet agreement on the degree of performance impact but there does seem to be agreement that we need first to get a quota system that is correct and reliable, then optimize for performance as needed. Best regards, -- Tom Barron [0] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-

[openstack-dev] [manila] [summit] Forum topic proposal etherpad

Please add proposed topics for manila to this etherpad [1] for the Vancouver Forum. In a couple weeks we'll use this list to submit abstracts for the next stage of the process [2] As a reminder, the Forum is the part of the Summit conference dedicated to open discourse among operators,

[openstack-dev] [manila] [ptg] queens retrospective at the rocky ptg

rpad to collaborate on reviewer/contributor checklists - Tom will check how Cinder fixed log filtering problem -- Tom Barron [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-ptg-rocky-retro [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenStack-Bug-Smash-Queens-Wuhan [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila

[openstack-dev] [manila][ptg] Rocky PTG summary

We had a good showing [1] at the Rocky PTG in Dublin. Most of us see each other face-to-face rarely and we had some (even long time) contributors come to the PTG for the first time or join manila from other projects! We had a good time together [2], took on some tough subjects, and planned out

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Queens packages for Debian Sid/Buster and Stretch backports

real collateral damage is: - manila-ui (no Py3 support upstream) Just a note of thanks for calling our attention to this issue. manila-ui had been rather neglected and is getting TLC now. We'll certainly get back to you when we've got it working with Python 3. -- Tom Barron As the Horizon

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLS] Project Updates & Project Onboarding

Would you be so kind as to add Victoria Martinez de la Cruz and Dustin Schoenbrun to the manila project Onboarding session [1] ? They are confirmed for conference attendance. Thanks much! -- Tom Barron [1] https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule/events/21637/manila

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLS] Project Updates & Project Onboarding

Many apologies for sending this to the openstack-dev list; I thought I had removed the list from my address list but clearly did not. On 28/03/18 14:34 -0400, Tom Barron wrote: Would you be so kind as to add <... snip ...> signature.asc Description: PGP sig

[openstack-dev] [manila] no meeting March 1

Just a quick reminder that there will be *no* weekly manila team meeting Thursday March 1 since many folks are busy at PTG. Cheers, -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [manila] [infra] remove driverfixes/ocata branch [was: Re: [cinder][infra] Remove driverfixes/ocata branch]

Clark, would you be so kind, at your conveniencew, as to remove the manila driverfixes/ocata branch? There are no open changes on the branch and `git log origin/driverfixes/ocata ^origin/stable/ocata --no-merges --oneline` reveals no commits that we need to preserve. Thanks much! -- Tom

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] [infra] remove driverfixes/ocata branch [was: Re: [cinder][infra] Remove driverfixes/ocata branch]

On 05/10/18 13:06 -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Tom Barron wrote: Clark, would you be so kind, at your conveniencew, as to remove the manila driverfixes/ocata branch? There are no open changes on the branch and `git log origin/driverfixes/ocata ^origin/stable

[openstack-dev] [manila] Stein mid-cycle and bug smash dates

-smashes in the last few years, we are planning an Americas-timezone-friendly bug-smash as well, aiming for 13-14 March 2019, the week after the Stein-3 milestone and Feature Freeze. Please respond to the list if you have objections or counter-proposals to these proposed dates. Thanks! -- Tom

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] [contribute]

for the other openstack components you need and the savings from shallow clones won't be that significant relative to the total needed. Happy developing! -- Tom Barron (Manila PTL) irc: tbarron [1] https://docs.openstack.org/manila/rocky/contributor/index.html [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila

[openstack-dev] Next Manila meeting cancelled

We have a number of manila cores and regular participants who cannot attend the regular Thursday Manila meeting this coming week so it is cancelled. We will meet as normal the following Thursday, 1 November, at 1500 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt [1]. Cheers, -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila][tc] Seeking feedback on the OpenStack cloud vision

On 24/10/18 11:14 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: Greetings, Manila team! As you may be aware, I've been working with other folks in the community on documenting a vision for OpenStack clouds (formerly known as the 'Technical Vision') - essentially to interpret the mission statement in long-form,

Re: [openstack-dev] manila community meeting this week is *on*

a bit. Cheers, -- Tom (tbarron) On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 10:11 PM Tom Barron As we discussed last week, we *will* have our normal weekly manila community meeting this week, at the regular time and place Thursday, 15 November, 1500 UTC, #openstack-meetings-alt on freenode Some of us

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] [contribute]

] #openstack-manila any time. Ask even if no one is responding right then, most of us have bouncers and will see and get back to you. -- Tom Barron [4] https://github.com/tombarron/vagrant-libvirt-devstack [5] https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/irc.html [6] https://docs.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] manila community meeting this week is *on*

for which can be found in our next meeting agenda [1]. It was great meeting new folks at the project onboarding and project update sessions at Summit this week -- please feel free to join the IRC meeting tomorrow! Cheers, -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php

[openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

Amit Oren has contributed high quality reviews in the last couple of cycles so I would like to nominated him for manila core. Please respond with your +1 or -1 votes. We'll hold voting open for 7 days. Thanks, -- Tom Barron (tbarron

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

On 02/10/18 13:58 -0400, Tom Barron wrote: Amit Oren has contributed high quality reviews in the last couple of cycles so I would like to nominated him for manila core. Please respond with your +1 or -1 votes. We'll hold voting open for 7 days. Thanks, -- Tom Barron (tbarron) We've

[openstack-dev] [Manila] no meeting today

than two weeks away! -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-ptg-planning-denver-2018 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

[openstack-dev] [manila] Stein PTG summary

We've summarized the manila PTG sessions in this etherpad [1] and I've included its contents below. Please feel free to supplement/correct as appropriate, or to follow up on this mailing list. -- Tom Barron (tbarron) We'll use this etherpad to distill AIs, focus areas, etc. from the Stein

Re: [openstack-dev] [storyboard] why use different "bug" tags per project?

Storyboard. I don't know if everyone would want that, but if this is the recommended practice I would want it for Oslo. I would think this is a common want at least for the projects in the central box in the project map [1] -- Tom Barron (tba

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

uver Forum. At the recent Manila PTG we set addressing this technical debt as a Stein cycle goal, as well as OpenStack SDK integration for Manila. -- Tom Barron (tbarron) In other cases, there are subsets of the function which require the native project client. I would strongly support a goal whi

[openstack-dev] [manila] manila core team cleanup

. -- Tom Barron (tbarron) signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

[openstack-dev] [manila] Team Photos

Manila team photos from the recent Stein PTG in Denver [1]. -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2pmvfkstudih2wf/AADI7Yo-wuJ2nmAIuYFEun5Ea/Manila?dl=0_nav_tracking=1 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[openstack-dev] [manila] User Survey Results

ssed to me by the Foundation, the second tabulates these, and the third summarizes with a bar chart. Do let me know if you see any errors :) -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J83vnnuuADVwACeJq1g8snxMRM5VAfTbBD6svVeH4yg/edit?usp=sharing signature.asc Descri

[openstack-dev] [k8s] [manila] Manila CSI driver plan

work plan: * Write master host multiplexing controller and node proxy plugins. * Use CephFS node-only plugin from [5] * Write NFS node-only plugin NFS and CephFS are immediate priorities - other file system protocols supported by manila can be added over time if there is interest. -- Tom Barron

[openstack-dev] [manila] no meeting this week

Just a reminder that there will be no manila community meeting this week. Next manila meeting will be Thursday, 29 November, at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt on freenode. Agenda here [1] - Feel free to add ... -- Tom Barron (tbarron) [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings