Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Recent issues with our review workflow

2015-03-11 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
It's really fine to create backports, even of other people's commits,
as long as you don't do it too early (and thus make it possible to
forget to update backports in line with newer patch sets of the master
commit and land inconsistent implementations to different release
series) and don't mangle Change-Id and Author (and turn git history
examination into an IT archaeology excercise).

Nothing personal: I've seen the same mistakes done by many people, so
I want to clarify why it's important.

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Bartlomiej Piotrowski
 wrote:
> I'll keep it in mind not to create unnecessary backports, although I really
> find it more convenient to do them once I submit changes to master for
> review. I apologize for [4], it indeed was wrong and it won't happen again.
>
> Regards,
> Bartłomiej
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Ryan Moe  wrote:
>>
>> Here are some examples of proposing changes prior to being merged in
>> master [0][1][2][3][4]. [0] is a perfect example of why this isn't a good
>> process. A change was proposed to stable/6.0 before master was merged, and
>> now the change to master needs to be reworked based on review feedback.
>> Premature backporting just creates unnecessary additional work. I'd also
>> like to give a friendly reminder to make sure we maintain the Change-Id and
>> author of any change we backport.
>>
>> The wiki [5] has also been updated to make this explicit.
>>
>> [0]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ief8186006386af8ae7e40cffeeaeef5a5c0f3c70,n,z
>> [1]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4c94bb03501f4238ead2378cf504485b7d67b236,n,z
>> [2]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ic15a3bfb6238e4281b06aae0a3f9fe4abf96590d,n,z
>> [3]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I7ab6dc2341821c3b82ef3d3ac63b64a5a9958fa9,n,z
>> [4]
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Iff947f0053577f19441c04101e5a35a7820e40a0,n,z
>> [5]
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Tomasz Napierala
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 09 Mar 2015, at 18:21, Ryan Moe  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by
>>> > people who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days old
>>> > and there was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and
>>> > discouraging to contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed 
>>> > on
>>> > the review and/or in email before any action is taken.
>>>
>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>
>>> I was trying to find any examples, and the only one I see is:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152674/
>>>
>>> I spoke to Bogdan and he agreed it was not proper way to do it, but they
>>> were in a rush - I know, it does not explain anything really.
>>>
>>> Do you have any other examples? I’d like to clarify them
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
>>> Sr. OpenStack Engineer
>>> tnapier...@mirantis.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Dmitry Borodaenko

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Recent issues with our review workflow

2015-03-11 Thread Bartlomiej Piotrowski
I'll keep it in mind not to create unnecessary backports, although I really
find it more convenient to do them once I submit changes to master for
review. I apologize for [4], it indeed was wrong and it won't happen again.

Regards,
Bartłomiej

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Ryan Moe  wrote:

> Here are some examples of proposing changes prior to being merged in
> master [0][1][2][3][4]. [0] is a perfect example of why this isn't a good
> process. A change was proposed to stable/6.0 before master was merged, and
> now the change to master needs to be reworked based on review feedback.
> Premature backporting just creates unnecessary additional work. I'd also
> like to give a friendly reminder to make sure we maintain the Change-Id and
> author of any change we backport.
>
> The wiki [5] has also been updated to make this explicit.
>
> [0]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ief8186006386af8ae7e40cffeeaeef5a5c0f3c70,n,z
> [1]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4c94bb03501f4238ead2378cf504485b7d67b236,n,z
> [2]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ic15a3bfb6238e4281b06aae0a3f9fe4abf96590d,n,z
> [3]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I7ab6dc2341821c3b82ef3d3ac63b64a5a9958fa9,n,z
> [4]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Iff947f0053577f19441c04101e5a35a7820e40a0,n,z
> [5]
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Tomasz Napierala  > wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 09 Mar 2015, at 18:21, Ryan Moe  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by
>> people who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days old
>> and there was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and
>> discouraging to contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed on
>> the review and/or in email before any action is taken.
>>
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> I was trying to find any examples, and the only one I see is:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152674/
>>
>> I spoke to Bogdan and he agreed it was not proper way to do it, but they
>> were in a rush - I know, it does not explain anything really.
>>
>> Do you have any other examples? I’d like to clarify them
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
>> Sr. OpenStack Engineer
>> tnapier...@mirantis.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Recent issues with our review workflow

2015-03-10 Thread Ryan Moe
Here are some examples of proposing changes prior to being merged in master
[0][1][2][3][4]. [0] is a perfect example of why this isn't a good process.
A change was proposed to stable/6.0 before master was merged, and now the
change to master needs to be reworked based on review feedback. Premature
backporting just creates unnecessary additional work. I'd also like to give
a friendly reminder to make sure we maintain the Change-Id and author of
any change we backport.

The wiki [5] has also been updated to make this explicit.

[0]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ief8186006386af8ae7e40cffeeaeef5a5c0f3c70,n,z
[1]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4c94bb03501f4238ead2378cf504485b7d67b236,n,z
[2]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ic15a3bfb6238e4281b06aae0a3f9fe4abf96590d,n,z
[3]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I7ab6dc2341821c3b82ef3d3ac63b64a5a9958fa9,n,z
[4]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Iff947f0053577f19441c04101e5a35a7820e40a0,n,z
[5]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series

Thanks,
Ryan

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Tomasz Napierala 
wrote:

>
> > On 09 Mar 2015, at 18:21, Ryan Moe  wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by
> people who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days old
> and there was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and
> discouraging to contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed on
> the review and/or in email before any action is taken.
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I was trying to find any examples, and the only one I see is:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152674/
>
> I spoke to Bogdan and he agreed it was not proper way to do it, but they
> were in a rush - I know, it does not explain anything really.
>
> Do you have any other examples? I’d like to clarify them
>
> Regards,
> --
> Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
> Sr. OpenStack Engineer
> tnapier...@mirantis.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Recent issues with our review workflow

2015-03-10 Thread Tomasz Napierala

> On 09 Mar 2015, at 18:21, Ryan Moe  wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by people 
> who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days old and there 
> was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and discouraging to 
> contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed on the review and/or 
> in email before any action is taken.

Hi Ryan,

I was trying to find any examples, and the only one I see is:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152674/

I spoke to Bogdan and he agreed it was not proper way to do it, but they were 
in a rush - I know, it does not explain anything really.

Do you have any other examples? I’d like to clarify them

Regards,
-- 
Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
Sr. OpenStack Engineer
tnapier...@mirantis.com







__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Recent issues with our review workflow

2015-03-10 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 03/09/2015 06:21 PM, Ryan Moe wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by
> people who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days
> old and there was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and
> discouraging to contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed
> on the review and/or in email before any action is taken.
> 
> I would also like to talk about issues with our backporting procedure
> [0]. Over the past few weeks I've seen changes proposed to stable
> branches before the change in master was merged. This serves no purpose
> other than to increase our workload. We also run the risk of
> inconsistency between the same commit on master and stable branches.
> Please, do not propose backports until the change has been merged to master.
> 
> [0] 
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series
> 
> Thanks,
> Ryan
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

Could we avoid beating around the bush and talk about exact examples of
said behavior?

Best regards,
Bartłomiej

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Recent issues with our review workflow

2015-03-09 Thread Jay Pipes

+1 on both points, Ryan.

On 03/09/2015 01:21 PM, Ryan Moe wrote:

Hi All,

I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by
people who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days
old and there was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and
discouraging to contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed
on the review and/or in email before any action is taken.

I would also like to talk about issues with our backporting procedure
[0]. Over the past few weeks I've seen changes proposed to stable
branches before the change in master was merged. This serves no purpose
other than to increase our workload. We also run the risk of
inconsistency between the same commit on master and stable branches.
Please, do not propose backports until the change has been merged to master.

[0]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series

Thanks,
Ryan


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Recent issues with our review workflow

2015-03-09 Thread Ryan Moe
Hi All,

I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by
people who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days old
and there was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and
discouraging to contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed on
the review and/or in email before any action is taken.

I would also like to talk about issues with our backporting procedure [0].
Over the past few weeks I've seen changes proposed to stable branches
before the change in master was merged. This serves no purpose other than
to increase our workload. We also run the risk of inconsistency between the
same commit on master and stable branches. Please, do not propose backports
until the change has been merged to master.

[0]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series

Thanks,
Ryan
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev