On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:55:50PM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
[snip]
I also put an informational spec about this change up in the
ironic-specs repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185171/. My goal was
to discuss this in the spec, but the mailing list is fine too. There are
some
On 28 May 2015 at 15:55, Jim Rollenhagen j...@jimrollenhagen.com wrote:
...
I also put an informational spec about this change up in the
ironic-specs repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185171/. My goal was
to discuss this in the spec, but the mailing list is fine too. There are
some
On 05/28/2015 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with Doug and Thierry, but I'd
like this to be
Hi
Note, that will need some scheduling anyway, so that we can slow down a week
before. So probably still some milestone process required, wdyt?
We can cut a release and establish it one or two weeks before the
official OpenStack release. But prior to that we can just cut a
release whenever
On 2015-05-29 11:47:36 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
As far as vulnerability management goes, we already publish the
master fix as part of the advisory, so people can easily find
that. The only thing the VMT might want to reconsider is: when an
issue is /only/ present in the
Devananda van der Veen wrote:
[...]
The alternative we discussed:
- use feature branches for risky / large work, keeping total # of
branches small, and rebasing them regularly on master
- keep trunk moving quickly for smaller / less risky / refactoring changes
- slow down for a week or two
Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
- OpenStack coordinated releases are taken from latest independent release
- that release will then get backports stable maintenance, other
independent releases don't
So no stable branch for other independent releases? What if serious security
issue is found in
On 05/28/2015 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with Doug and Thierry, but I'd
like this
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-05-29 12:12:51 +0200:
Devananda van der Veen wrote:
[...]
The alternative we discussed:
- use feature branches for risky / large work, keeping total # of
branches small, and rebasing them regularly on master
- keep trunk moving quickly for
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 05/28/2015 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-05-29 15:11:25 +0200:
On 05/28/2015 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 05/28/2015 12:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with
On Thursday, May 28, 2015, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with Doug and
On May 28, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 05/28/2015 12:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I
On 05/28/2015 12:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with Doug and Thierry, but I'd
like this
16 matches
Mail list logo
