l.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
...
Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem
passthrough ... the only critical question is if virtfs/p9 is still
supported in some way (and the quest
: "OpenStack
>> >> Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> >> , ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
>> >> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 3:07:36 PM Subject: Re:
>> >> [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
>> > ...
- Original Message -
> From: "Danny Al-Gaaf"
> To: "Csaba Henk" , "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
> for usage questions)"
>
> Cc: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:26:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [op
rch 1, 2015 3:07:36 PM Subject: Re:
>> [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
> ...
>> For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The
>> first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS
>> via p9 and NFS would not perform that we
ph-de...@vger.kernel.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
>>
> ...
>> Another level of indirection. I really like the approach of filesystem
>> passthrough ... the only critical question is if
Hi Danny,
- Original Message -
> From: "Danny Al-Gaaf"
> To: "Deepak Shetty"
> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> ,
> ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 3:05:46 PM
> Subject:
Hi Danny,
- Original Message -
> From: "Danny Al-Gaaf"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> ,
> ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 3:07:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph
Am 04.03.2015 um 05:19 schrieb Deepak Shetty:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf
> wrote:
>> Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty: [...]
[...]
>>
>>> I was curious to understand. IIUC Neutron provides private and
>>> public networks and for VMs to access external CephFS netw
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf
wrote:
> Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty:
> [...]
> >> For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The
> >> first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS
> >> via p9 and NFS would not perform that well I
Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty:
[...]
>> For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The
>> first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS
>> via p9 and NFS would not perform that well I guess). The second
>> solution, to use CephFS directly to the VM
;
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 9:07:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
>
> Am 27.
5 9:07:36 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila
Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil:
> [sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include
> openstack-dev]
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1] and among other
Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil:
> [sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include
> openstack-dev]
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1] and among other
> things we'll be talking about how to support CephFS in Manila. At
> a high level, there are ba
13 matches
Mail list logo
