n chung
> Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer
> API
>
> On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
>
> > so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
> > (and events?). i
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, gordon chung wrote:
>
>
> On 04/10/2016 12:04 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> > I won't be at Barcelona, but would like to participate in the telemetry
> > sessions, and particularly this one.
> > Are there plans to enable remote participants (beyond
Le 2016-10-04 18:09, gordon chung a écrit :
On 04/10/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
What would be the impact for Heat users who are using the Ceilometer
scaling in their templates?
Tim
pretty big. :/
The use-case itself is still supported.
Using Ceilometer alarming or Aodh alarming is
On 04/10/2016 12:35 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
>
>> so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
>> (and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature.
>
> That's debatable.
>
> Pushing events is IMHO out of
]
Sent: 04 October 2016 17:12
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API
> we removed the API and storage containers from our Kubernetes deployment of
> Ceilometer some time ago.
> We use the collector's HTTP Dispatche
On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
> so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
> (and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature.
That's debatable.
Pushing events is IMHO out of scope of Ceilometer – it's related to
oslo.messaging
On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote:
> i think the main issue right now is, no one is maintaining the storage
> solutions (for a while now if we're talking about metric storage) but
> people are using it. many people have figured it out and bailed on the
> storage for their own solutions
On 04/10/2016 12:04 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote:
> I won't be at Barcelona, but would like to participate in the telemetry
> sessions, and particularly this one.
> Are there plans to enable remote participants (beyond just etherpad),
> i.e. hangouts or skype, or something similar?
we can try
so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples
(and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature.
On 04/10/2016 11:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
> during those last cycles,
On 10/04/2016 11:53 AM, Hague, Darren wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
starting to wonder if it makes
On 04/10/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
> What would be the impact for Heat users who are using the Ceilometer scaling
> in their templates?
>
> Tim
pretty big. :/
i don't really have anything else to add to this answer. jd__, add it to
discussion :P
i think the main issue right now is, no
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
> during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
> starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer
>
> On 4 Oct 2016, at 17:36, Chris Dent wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
>
>> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
>> during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
>> starting to wonder if it makes
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
>
> > Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
> > during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
> > starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote:
Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko)
during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am
starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer
API.
No surprise, as I've been saying this
15 matches
Mail list logo