Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-07 Thread Lu, Lianhao
n chung > Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer > API > > On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote: > > > so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples > > (and events?). i

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-06 Thread Yarko Tymciurak
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, gordon chung wrote: > > > On 04/10/2016 12:04 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: > > I won't be at Barcelona, but would like to participate in the telemetry > > sessions, and particularly this one. > > Are there plans to enable remote participants (beyond

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
Le 2016-10-04 18:09, gordon chung a écrit : On 04/10/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Bell wrote: What would be the impact for Heat users who are using the Ceilometer scaling in their templates? Tim pretty big. :/ The use-case itself is still supported. Using Ceilometer alarming or Aodh alarming is

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread gordon chung
On 04/10/2016 12:35 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote: > >> so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples >> (and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature. > > That's debatable. > > Pushing events is IMHO out of

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Hague, Darren
] Sent: 04 October 2016 17:12 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API > we removed the API and storage containers from our Kubernetes deployment of > Ceilometer some time ago. > We use the collector's HTTP Dispatche

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote: > so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples > (and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature. That's debatable. Pushing events is IMHO out of scope of Ceilometer – it's related to oslo.messaging

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Oct 04 2016, gordon chung wrote: > i think the main issue right now is, no one is maintaining the storage > solutions (for a while now if we're talking about metric storage) but > people are using it. many people have figured it out and bailed on the > storage for their own solutions

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread gordon chung
On 04/10/2016 12:04 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: > I won't be at Barcelona, but would like to participate in the telemetry > sessions, and particularly this one. > Are there plans to enable remote participants (beyond just etherpad), > i.e. hangouts or skype, or something similar? we can try

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread gordon chung
so one thing we probably do need to keep is the ability push samples (and events?). i know previously people were actually using this feature. On 04/10/2016 11:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko) > during those last cycles,

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Jay Pipes
On 10/04/2016 11:53 AM, Hague, Darren wrote: On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote: Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko) during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am starting to wonder if it makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread gordon chung
On 04/10/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > What would be the impact for Heat users who are using the Ceilometer scaling > in their templates? > > Tim pretty big. :/ i don't really have anything else to add to this answer. jd__, add it to discussion :P i think the main issue right now is, no

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Yarko Tymciurak
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko) > during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am > starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer >

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Tim Bell
> On 4 Oct 2016, at 17:36, Chris Dent wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko) >> during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am >> starting to wonder if it makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Hague, Darren
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote: > > > Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko) > > during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am > > starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Deprecating the Ceilometer API

2016-10-04 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Julien Danjou wrote: Considering the split of Ceilometer in subprojects (Aodh and Panko) during those last cycles, and the increasing usage of Gnocchi, I am starting to wonder if it makes sense to maintain the legacy Ceilometer API. No surprise, as I've been saying this