On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift,
ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 03:01:30PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in
swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
I just created a session for Heat:
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/247
Historically Heat sessions have been quite
It would be incredibly useful to get some of the packagers into this
conversation too.
Matt
On 4/8/14 4:51 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On
. The Telco services is
something Openstack clearly need help in understanding.
/Alan
-Original Message-
From: Steven Hardy [mailto:sha...@redhat.com]
Sent: April-08-14 5:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Operators Design
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Operators Design Summit ideas for Atlanta
So far, there's been no comment from anyone working on nova, so there's been no
session proposed.
I can, of course, propose a session ... but without buy-in from the project
team it's unlikely to be accepted.
Regards
Based on some off-list chatter with Michael, Tom and others, I went ahead
and submitted a proposal for a nova session -
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/245 - and used Tom's wording from
those submitted to other products. This will hold a place while the Nova
PTL election finishes and
So far, there's been no comment from anyone working on nova, so there's
been no session proposed.
I can, of course, propose a session ... but without buy-in from the
project team it's unlikely to be accepted.
Regards,
Tom
On 01/04/14 22:44, Matt Van Winkle wrote:
So, I've been watching
It might be that this is happening because there is no clear incumbent
for the Nova PTL position. Is it ok to hold off on this until after
the outcome of the election is known?
Michael
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
So far, there's been no comment from
If the timing works, that seems fine :)
Regards,
Tom
On 07/04/14 10:32, Michael Still wrote:
It might be that this is happening because there is no clear incumbent
for the Nova PTL position. Is it ok to hold off on this until after
the outcome of the election is known?
Michael
On Mon, Apr
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift,
ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
Keystone would also be interested in user feedback, of course.
So, I've been watching the etherpad and the summit submissions and I
noticed that there isn't anything for nova. Maybe I'm off base, but it
seems like we'd be missing the mark to not have a Developer/Operator's
exchange on the key product. Is there anything we can do to get a session
slotted
Tom,
This is a great idea! Feel free to reach out to the user experience folks, as
they’ll be interested both in attending and helping coordinate.
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/questions/
openstack-perso...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-perso...@lists.openstack.org
Best,
Jacki
On
On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in
swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
Keystone would also be interested in user feedback, of course.
On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote:
All,
Many times we've heard a desire
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in
swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote:
All,
Many times we've heard a desire for more feedback and interaction from
users. However, their attendance at design summit sessions is met with
14 matches
Mail list logo
