Re: [Openstack-operators] How are you handling billing/chargeback?

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:18:34PM -0500, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > The good folks at SuperUser are intrigued > by this topic and interested in writing a feature. That would be an interesting read, especially if they're able to incorporate information or commentary

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

I've submitted a couple of session ideas that relate to things we've been discussing in the past that still need more work - the meetups team, and the community documents on the wiki. Chris On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:19 PM, David Medberry wrote: > Dropped in 2¢ worth. >

Re: [Openstack-operators] How are you handling billing/chargeback?

Hi all - The good folks at SuperUser are intrigued by this topic and interested in writing a feature. I've compiled the feedback so far in this etherpad . If there are any final thoughts please free to

[Openstack-operators] [freezer][horizont] try restore instance from storage local backup

Hi When i try to restore an instance from a local storage backup, through horizon freezer plugin (... / horizon / disaster_recovery / backups /), and appears the form for setting the restore operation, the "Destination Path" field is a path in the host where the freezer agent runs (Hostname).

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

Dropped in 2¢ worth. ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:31:55AM -0400, Erik McCormick wrote: :On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: :> :> Thanks for getting this kicked off Erik. The two things you have up :> to start (fast forward upgrades, and extended maintenance) are the :> exact

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > > Thanks for getting this kicked off Erik. The two things you have up > to start (fast forward upgrades, and extended maintenance) are the > exact two things I want out of my trip to YVR. At least understanding >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

Thanks for getting this kicked off Erik. The two things you have up to start (fast forward upgrades, and extended maintenance) are the exact two things I want out of my trip to YVR. At least understanding current 'state of the art' and helping advance that in the right directions best I can.

[Openstack-operators] Ops Session Proposals for Vancouver Forum

Greetings Ops, We are rapidly approaching the deadline for Forum session proposals (This coming Sunday, 4/15) and we have been rather lax in getting the process started from our side. I've created an etherpad here for everyone to put up session ideas.

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" release

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:24:06PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/9/2018 4:58 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > Keep in mind that Matt has a tendency to sometimes unfairly > > over-simplify others views;-). More seriously, c'mon Matt; I went out > > of my way to spend time learning about