Has there been any thinking around only using eventlet/greenlet for webserver
endpoints and using something like multiprocessing for everything else?
I was already beginning to think that this would be a good blueprint/discussion
topic for the design summit ;-)
We've seen a number of issues
Hi Alexey,
It's my understanding that patches are only accepted via Gerrit -
http://review.openstack.org/
Gerrit is responsible for managing, among other things, code review and the
CLA that is required before signing.
https://rackspace.echosign.com/public/hostedForm?formid=3G7VVC397N783J --
2012/2/28 Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com:
There is always progress to be made, but while we are toiling away working
on testing, technical debt, and code smell, we have to keep our users in
mind.
This part of your e-mail really sticks out, along with this one:
I disagree with this
Yes, patches are accepted only through Gerrit. I've written up a
First time contributors section here:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Documentation/HowTo#First-time_Contributors
The Starter Guide is housed in Launchpad at:
https://launchpad.net/openstackbook
It is reviewed and merged through Launchpad
Hi Doude,
I was dealing with another issue caused by this NULL 'host', and Dan told
me that has been fixed:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/43f2492175d11a3f8ea4198e65b2a6a6b38cbbb6
I haven't verified, though. Good luck.
Best,
Tomoe
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Doude
Hi,
I'd like to ask: Who is eligible for vote ?
I have submitted half-a-dozen patches to openstack-manuals (on
launchpad), and I wanted to ask if I'm eligible ?
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post
Alexey,
This depends on which election you're talking about (the PPB elections
or the individual project PTL elections). The attached email from
Stefano a couple of weeks ago should answer your questions. In a
nutshell, if you are a member of the OpenStack group on Launchpad you're
eligible to
LLoyd and others,
The blog post announcement for this event [1] mentions working on
resolving high priority bugs -- I'm assuming that the following list
is what identifies them? (I have filtered on essex-4 and rc1)
http://goo.gl/Qe17g
That includes In Progress ones. This one excludes those, so
Sure -"How to register to vote for Project Policy BoardAny registered member of the OpenStack Launchpad group is eligible to vote for the Project Policy Board. If you want to vote you need to register to Launchpad and add yourself to the public OpenStack group
Alexey Eromenko wrote:
I'd like to ask: Who is eligible for vote ?
I have submitted half-a-dozen patches to openstack-manuals (on
launchpad), and I wanted to ask if I'm eligible ?
The process was explained by the election officials there:
Hi Alexey -
To be eligible to vote you must follow the OpenStack election
guidelines. [1] Your timing and the method you named are not enough to
qualify you for this voting season.
These are the guidelines for voting for members of the Project Policy
Board, or PPB.
Any registered member of the
This is a great milestone and I was wondering about upgrade. At the last
design summit there was a discussion about how hard/easy it would be to
upgrade to Essex. What is the final answer? Are their (going to be)
instructions on how to upgrade an operating diablo cluster to essex? And
is the
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 09:45 -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On March 1st access to the summit will be open to anybody interested
on a first come first served basis. I'm confident we'll be able to
accommodate the demand.
As promised: anyone can now register for the OpenStack Spring 2012
For keystone, we are writing migration docs from Diablo - both with and without
keystone configurations. We've implemented export and import mechanisms to
bring in data to the new keystone instance, so it's mostly a matter of just
explaining how to use it.
-joe
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM,
Has anyone else had trouble registering for the Design Summit for Free?
We have not been able to 'register for the Design Summit only for
free.' Any one been able to without paying the $500 for the conference?
-BillF
On 3/1/12 8:39 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 09:45
When I try reboot a VM, the nova-compute fails and the daemon stop.
It fails on unpluging VIF interface of the rebooted VM. I use Nova
with Quantum and OVS.
2012-03-01 18:12:31 DEBUG nova.rpc.common [-] Making asynchronous call
on network ... from (pid=21485) multicall
Stef, et al,
I never announced the OpenStack Colorado group on the list. We're
already listed in the Global Hack In (and were underway today :^)
I'll subscribe to the Int'l User Groups.
-dave
http://meetup.com/OpenStack-Colorado/
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 10:51 -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Woo!
/me high-fives the Colorado team!
d
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:23 PM, David Medberry
david.medbe...@canonical.com wrote:
Stef, et al,
I never announced the OpenStack Colorado group on the list. We're
already listed in the Global Hack In (and were underway today :^)
I'll subscribe to
Hi Doude,
At a glance, it seems that unplug() being called twice, with the second
call failing because the first call successfully unplugged the vif already.
The unplug() action on the bridge does nothing, so there's no harm in
calling it twice, which may explain why this is only seen with OVS.
yeah likewise.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:14 AM, William L. Franklin
w...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
Has anyone else had trouble registering for the Design Summit for Free?
We have not been able to 'register for the Design Summit only for free.'
Any one been able to without paying the $500 for
I don't know if there is a specific list yet. I just noticed a few new bugs
reported by rajalakshmi ganesan that probably could be looked into.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/~rajalakshmi-ganesan/+bugs
(specifically the nova ones)
On Mar 1, 2012, at 6:51 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
LLoyd and
On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2012/2/28 Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com:
There is always progress to be made, but while we are toiling away working
on testing, technical debt, and code smell, we have to keep our users in
mind.
This part of your e-mail really
I wrote up why I think that, at least for Keystone, we should move the
front end over to Apache HTTPD.
http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/03/keystone-should-move-to-apache-httpd/
I've reposted it below.
Keystone and the other Openstack components run in an a
I wrote up why I think that, at least for Keystone, we should move the
front end over to Apache HTTPD.
http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/03/keystone-should-move-to-apache-httpd/
I've reposted it below.
Keystone and the other Openstack components run in an a
I like the recommendation. Particularly with regards to using PKI
authentication.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote up why I think that, at least for Keystone, we should move the front
end over to Apache HTTPD.
This seems like it could also be done for every other WSGI endpoint right?
It seems like it should be possible for all WS endpoints to be hosted in apache
(or other server) without problems happening.
This might be connected to extracting/abstractig out eventlet (since a
pre-forked apache
There are plenty eventlet discussion recently but I'll stick my
question to this thread, although it's pretty much a separate
question. :)
How is MySQL access handled in eventlet? Presumably it's external C
library so it's not going to be monkey patched. Does that make every
db access call a
On 03/01/2012 02:48 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Adam Young wrote:
What would the drawbacks be? Probably the first thing people would look to from
Eventlet is performance. I don't have the hard numbers to compare Eventlet to
Apache HTTPD, but I do know that
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 14:05 -0500, Adam Young wrote:
The traffic in an Openstack deployment to a Keystone server is going
to be about two orders of magnitude less than any other traffic, and
is highly unlikely to be the bottleneck.
Not quite. I wrote this up, back in November:
Hi Jay,
The steps you have taken so far seem correct. Have you spun up any VMs
yet? The current output from the OVS agent implies you may not have.
Quantum networks are logical entities, so you won't see the result of
creating a network until you actually spin up a VM that uses that network.
On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 03/01/2012 02:45 PM, Yun Mao wrote:
There are plenty eventlet discussion recently but I'll stick my
question to this thread, although it's pretty much a separate
question. :)
How is MySQL access handled in eventlet? Presumably it's
On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Yes it does. We actually tried to use a pool at diablo release and it was
very broken. There was discussion about moving over to a pure-python mysql
library, but it hasn't been tried yet.
I know some people have tried this... and
How is MySQL access handled in eventlet? Presumably it's external C
library so it's not going to be monkey patched. Does that make every
db access call a blocking call? Thanks,
Nope, it goes through a thread pool.
I feel like this might be an over-simplification. If the question is:
How is
Just because MySQL is a C library doesn't necessarily mean it can't be made to
work with coroutines. ZeroMQ is supported through eventlet.green.zmq and there
exists geventmysql (although it appears to me as more a proof-of-concept).
Moving to a pure-python mysql library might be the path of
Someone might have already said this (sure wish the listserv sent me mail
faster), but we tried out PyMysql and it was exceptionally slow, even under
almost no load.
I have a branch in my github that I was using to test out unblocking the
database access. For my cases I found that it was
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Yapeng Wu yapen...@me.com wrote:
In the multi-host quantum OVS plugin case, I am not clear how and when
this 'host' in the 'network' table should be updated.
From the code update, I doubt this would work in multi-host case.
It is documented that Quantum does
On 03/01/2012 03:52 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 14:05 -0500, Adam Young wrote:
The traffic in an Openstack deployment to a Keystone server is going
to be about two orders of magnitude less than any other traffic, and
is highly unlikely to be the bottleneck.
Not quite. I
On 03/01/2012 02:48 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Adam Young wrote:
What would the drawbacks be? Probably the first thing people would look to from
Eventlet is performance. I don't have the hard numbers to compare Eventlet to
Apache HTTPD, but I do know that
Hi all,
The Essex-4 milestone for Quantum and updated documentation is available
at: https://launchpad.net/quantum/essex/essex-4
Lots of great improvements in this release, including three new plugins
(Linux Bridge, Nicira NVP, and Ryu Controller) as well as significant
updates to the OVS
Sad, especially since so much is using the database :-(
On 3/1/12 2:43 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/01/2012 02:48 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Mar 1, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Adam Young wrote:
What would the drawbacks be? Probably the first thing people would look to
from
I agree. It would be awesome if someone could actually make it work. We had a
totally broken version using the eventlet db pool 6 months ago.
Vish
On Mar 1, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Sad, especially since so much is using the database :-(
On 3/1/12 2:43 PM, Adam Young
Is there any interest in adding unittest2 to the test dependencies for
openstack projects? I have found its enhanced assertions and 'with
self.assertRaises' very useful in writing tests. I see there have been past
bugs that mentioned unittest2, and am wondering if the reasons for not adopting
As long as we allocate a thread in the eventlet thread pool for the number of
mysql connections we want to actually maintain in our connection pool, we
shouldn't have problems getting the results we want even with the blocking
mysql c drivers.
Devin
On Thursday, March 1, 2012 at 5:23 PM,
Hi
Now the Dashboard whether can manage the Quantum?
And whether the Devstack script can let dashbaord and Quantum working?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Dan Wendlandt d...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi all,
The Essex-4 milestone for Quantum and updated documentation is available
at:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Shake Chen shake.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Now the Dashboard whether can manage the Quantum?
And whether the Devstack script can let dashbaord and Quantum working?
Hi Shake,
Unfortunately, the Horizon + Quantum integration is still in bad shape.
Devin
Did you mean network creation using the dash. Quantum manager works with nova
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Shake Chen shake.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Now the Dashboard whether can manage the Quantum?
And whether the Devstack script can let dashbaord and Quantum working?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) dedu...@cisco.comwrote:
Did you mean network creation using the dash. Quantum manager works with
nova
yes, I hope the quantum can manage in Dashboard.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Shake Chen shake.c...@gmail.com
Hi
In ubuntu 12.04, pool seem not update .
the package still is old, like keystone:
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/k/keystone/
# apt-cache policy keystone
keystone:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2012.1~e4~20120203.1574-0ubuntu2
Version table:
Apologies to Maru for the double-email. Left out the list by mistake.
When you say non-replay mocking, are you talking about ensuring that a
particular function is not called, or replacing a function/whatever with a
lambda that doesn't care if it gets called or how often it gets called but
still
Mark:
I think Maru is talking about the distinction between record/replay mocking and
action/assertion mocking.
In record/replay mocking (e.g., mox) you define the expected behavior *before*
executing the code under test (i.e., I expect A, B, and C to happen, now go
execute the code under
50 matches
Mail list logo
