Re: [Openstack] Nova-Glance Query

Amit, For Glance, all the user-specified image metadata must be String data type. You can see this in the image schema [0], where "additionalProperties": {"type": "string"} (The only image properties that are *not* strings are those assigned non-string types in the schema.) So for your

Re: [Openstack] [heat] Fwd: newton heat stack glance error

Adding "heat" to the subject line. Heat people, I've responded to Ignazio on the operators' list [0], but you may have some helpful info. [0] (would link here, but can't find the April 2017 page in pipermail) Thread starts here:

Re: [Openstack] migrate instances to another openstack environment

On 3/1/17 6:25 PM, Manuel Sopena Ballesteros wrote: > Hi, > > I am having a hard time trying to migrate my instances to another openstack > installation. > > My understanding is that I could do instance --> snapshot --> image and then > migrate this image to another openstack > > I started

Re: [Openstack] [glance] task in pending state, image in uploading state

that happen to my statement about this issue in the Queens release notes [0]; the situation described there still stands. [0] https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/glance/queens.html#relnotes-16-0-0-stable-queens-known-issues > Bernd > > On 11/12/2018 11:27 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: &g

Re: [Openstack] [glance] Rocky image import stuck

On 11/7/18 8:46 AM, Bernd Bausch wrote: > Does the new image import process work? Am I missing something? Uploaded > images stay in an intermediate state, either /uploading/ or /importing/, > and never become /active.///Where should I look? Apologies for the late reply to your question. For

Re: [Openstack] [glance] task in pending state, image in uploading state

On 11/12/18 5:07 AM, Bernd Bausch wrote: > Trying Glance's new import process, my images are all stuck in status > uploading (both methods glance-direct and web-download). > > I can see that there are tasks for those images; they are pending. The > Glance API log doesn't contain anything that

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Where are the docs updated

The Glance where are the docs? wiki page has been updated: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-where-are-the-docs By the way, the Docs Team is having a bug-squash day on 9th September 2014 if you feel like writing prose instead of python:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy

I am really sorry to see you step down, but congratulations! cheers, brian From: Mark Washenberger [mark.washenber...@markwash.net] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 12:22 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Glance] PTL Non-Candidacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][mistral] scheduled tasks

Greg, This might be useful: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Qonos-scheduling-service There's a link to the code repository at the bottom of the document. It might be kind of overkill for what you want, though. cheers, brian From: Greg Hill

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core

+1 From: Kuvaja, Erno [kuv...@hp.com] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core +1 From: Alex Meade

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unifying configuration file

I agree with Erno. I think that the glance registry service being optional is a good argument for keeping its config separate rather than munging it into the API config. rosmaita From: Kuvaja, Erno [kuv...@hp.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:29 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance] Update volume-image-metadata proposal

Hi Facundo, Can you attend the Glance meeting this week at 20:00 UTC on Thursday in #openstack-meeting-alt ? I may be misunderstanding what's at stake, but it looks like: - Glance holds the image metadata (some user-modifiable, some not) - Cinder copies the image metadata to use as volume

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Juno mid-cycle meetup topic proposals

The Glance Mid-Cycle Meeting will be held July 24-25 at VMware, Inc, in Palo Alto, CA, USA. Info is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-juno-mid-cycle-meeting Please add proposals for discussion topics to the bottom of that etherpad, or just add your name so we can guage interest, or

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack VM Import/Export

There's been some work in Glance on this already. In addition to the BP Mark mentioned for import, please take a look at these so we don't duplicate efforts: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-tasks-import https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/new-download-workflow

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC] Glance Functional API and Cross-project API Consistency

That said, I prefer to have resources actually be things that the software creates. An action isn't created. It is performed. I would prefer to replace the term action(s) with the term task(s), as is proposed for Nova [1]. Glance already uses tasks in the v2 URL for creating resources

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tags] - What is the purpose of tags?

Just to add some more to what Fei Long said: There's some mention of tags in the regular API docs [1, 2]. Various OpenStack vendors also have support docs explaining them [3]. Tags are sort of informal metadata, and support for tags (and they way you use them) varies widely among OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Glance] property protections -- final call for comments

After lots of discussion, I think we've come to a consensus on what property protections should look like in Glance. Please reply with comments! The blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/api-v2-property-protection The full specification:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] property protections -- final call for comments

Stuart, I agree with Mark's comments, wanted to address this: 3) we could potentially link roles to the regex eg this could allow role1_xxx to be writable only if you have 'role1'. By assigning appropriate roles (com.provider/com.partner/nova?) you could provide the ability to write to that

[openstack-dev] [Glance] images tasks API -- final call for comments

After lots of discussion, here are the image import/export/cloning blueprints unified as a tasks API. Please reply with comments! Take a look at this doc first: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-tasks-api It's got a related documents section with links to the previous proposals and

[openstack-dev] [Glance] async worker design meeting

asynchronous worker meeting 2 Aug 2013 14:00 UTC in #openstack-glance please look at https://etherpad.openstack.org/havana-glance-requirements before the meeting cheers, brian ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] images tasks API -- final call for comments

images API. This view seems to be shared and well highlighted by Jay in this thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-May/009527.html Was there any follow up to that mail? (sorry if I missed it!) Thanks, -Paul On 30 July 2013 19:36, Brian Rosmaita brian.rosma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] async worker design meeting tomorrow!

] [Glance] async worker design meeting tomorrow! On 08/05/2013 04:34 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: Well, it's tomorrow as I write this, maybe it's today as you read this. Anyway: - asynchronous worker meeting Tuesday 6 Aug 2013 14:00 UTC in #openstack-glance - the etherpad https

[openstack-dev] [Glance] import task update

In light of today's IRC meeting in #openstack-glance (notes in etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/LG39UnQA7z), I've updated the tasks api document and the import document: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-tasks-api https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-tasks-import cheers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] import task update

...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:18 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List; Brian Rosmaita Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] import task update Very cool, would u consider trying to use taskflow for some of this. It seems to fit (or could fit) part of the bill nicely. I'd

[openstack-dev] [Glance] import task meeting 15:00 UTC Monday 26 August

We're shooting for 15:00 UTC Monday 26 August. (Let me know ASAP if you really want to be in on this and can't make it, but this is probably the best time available.) Topics: (1) taskflow seam for integration (2) tasks api and executor interface (3) indexable column in db for tasks to be

[openstack-dev] [Glance] import task meeting moved to 15:00 UTC Tues 27 August

We'll now be holding the below meeting at 15:00 UTC Tuesday 27 August in #openstack-glance on Freenode. From: Brian Rosmaita [brian.rosma...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:33 PM To: Joshua Harlow; OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] import task meeting 15:00 UTC Monday 26 August

This thread continued past the announcement that the meeting was moved to Tuesday ... so, no task meeting today (Monday), we will be meeting at 15:00 UTC Tuesday 27 August in #openstack-glance on Freenode. Topics: (1) taskflow seam for integration (2) tasks api and executor interface (3)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] import task meeting moved to 15:00 UTC Tues 27 August

Sorry for the repost, just want to make sure everyone is aware that the meeting was moved. From: Brian Rosmaita [brian.rosma...@rackspace.com] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:48 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List; Joshua Harlow; Jessica Lucci

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Optional Properties in an Entity

From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:54 PM When we look at consistency, we look at everything else in OpenStack. From the standpoint of the nova API (with which I am the most familiar), I am not aware of any property that is ever omitted from

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Optional Properties in an Entity

On 2/9/15, 8:44 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.commailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.commailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/20/2015 10:54 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [glance] conclusion needed on functional API

On 2/15/15, 2:35 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/15/2015 01:13 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: On 2/15/15, 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting [1] concerning

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

The response on the review is overwhelmingly positive (or, strictly speaking, unanimously non-negative). If anyone has an objection, could you please register it before 12:00 UTC on Monday, January 12? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145025/ thanks, brian

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Metadef-tags create api change request.

On 2/12/15, 9:57 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 2/11/15, 11:10, Okuma, Wayne wayne.ok...@hp.com wrote: Hello, I would like to change the metadef-tags create API which was checked into Kilo (cycle 1). The python-glanceclient that would support metadef-tags has not been

[openstack-dev] [api] [glance] conclusion needed on functional API

This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting [1] concerning functional API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but need to close this off so the spec can be implemented in Kilo. I believe this is where we left off: 1. The general consensus was that POST is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [glance] conclusion needed on functional API

On 2/15/15, 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting [1] concerning functional API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but need to close this off so the spec can

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [glance] conclusion needed on functional API

request to this URI to obtain status info, such as whether the task completed or not. And since tasks are now real resources, they should have a documented representation as well. Miguel On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Brian Rosmaita brian.rosma...@rackspace.commailto:brian.rosma...@rackspace.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Experimental API

I don't know how elaborate we want to get here, but Everett Toews had an interesting suggestion in the openstack-api channel. It would go something like this: (1) User gets /x1/search endpoint from service catalog (2) User does some request against /x1/search (3) User receives 400 with an error

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] a question regarding the current status of image community visibility support

Su, The patch you are referring to is a work-in-progress patch. It only partially implements the feature, and as one of the comments in the patch indicates, it's defining an Integer column in the database that might be replaced by an enum. So even if it were a full implementation, it would

[openstack-dev] [Glance] glance social event at Vancouver summit

Greetings to all Glance people, kragniz has proposed that we have an informal social event for Glance and Glance-related people attending the summit next week. Please keep your calendars open for about 2 hours or so starting at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, May 20. Neither kragniz nor I are familiar

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

On 8/7/15, 1:07 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: So, here's the crux of the issue. Nova and Cinder **do not want to speak the Glance REST API** to either upload or download image bits from storage. Streaming image bits through the Glance API endpoint is a needless and inefficient step, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

On 8/13/15, 11:32 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: * Role based properties [5] (who is asking for this, and why is Glance enforcing roles?) I can answer this one. Property protections have been available in Glance since Havana [6]. The feature was requested by deployers. In general,

[openstack-dev] [glance][nova][cinder][horizon][searchlight][cross-project] image property protections design session

tl;dr Word on the street is that image property protections are a pain point for some projects (e.g., Nova, Cinder). We'd like to find out from some other projects (and deployers) how they interact with Glance with respect to property protections and how we can improve this process. The Glance

[openstack-dev] [all][glance][api][infra][defcore] last call for feedback on image import

There was a lot of great pre-summit discussion on the Glance spec for image import refactoring, and more lively discussion at the summit, but it's been very quiet since I posted patch set 5 last week. Please take a few minutes to look over the revised spec and let the Glance community know

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Glance] Feedback on the proposed refactor to the image import process required

On 10/20/15, 1:06 PM, "Brian Rosmaita" <brian.rosma...@rackspace.com> wrote: >Hello, > >I've updated the image import spec [4] to incorporate the discussion thus >far. > >The fishbowl session [5] is scheduled for Thursday, October 29, >2:40pm-3:

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Glance] Feedback on the proposed refactor to the image import process required

s >between v1 and v2 and how this is making some pandas sad. > >The above served as a starting point for a discussion around the >current API, how it can be improved, etc. This discussions happened on >IRC[1], on a call (sorry, I forgot to record this call, this is entirely >my fault) a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal

I added an agenda item for this for today's Glance meeting: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda I'd prefer to hold my vote until after the meeting. cheers, brian On 9/3/15, 6:14 AM, "Kuvaja, Erno" wrote: >Malini, all, > >My current opinion is -1 for

[openstack-dev] [glance] tasks (following "proposed priorities for Mitaka")

Apologies for forking the thread, but there was way too much in Doug's email (and Flavio's response) and I only want to make a few points about tasks. Please read Doug's original email and Flavio's reply at some point, preferably before you read this. I'm going to limit myself to 4 points.

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][nova] how to upgrade from v1 to v2?

I'd like to clarify something. On 9/25/15, 12:16 PM, "Mark Voelker" wrote: [big snip] >Also worth pointing out here: when we talk about ³doing the same thing² >from a DefCore perspective, we¹re essentially talking about what¹s >exposed to the end user, not how that¹s

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Add Ian Cordasco back into glance-core

+1 from me! Glad to have Ian back. On 12/7/15, 11:36 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >Greetings, > >Not long ago, Ian Cordasco, sent an email out stepping down from his >core roles as he didn't have the time to dedicate to the project >team's he was part of. > >Ian has contacted

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][keystone][artifacts] Service Catalog name for Glance Artifact Repository API

On 12/11/15, 3:13 PM, "Ian Cordasco" wrote: >On 12/11/15, 12:25, "Alexander Tivelkov" wrote: > >>Hi folks! >> >> >>As it was decided during the Mitaka design summit, we are separating the >>experimental Artifact Repository API from the main

[openstack-dev] [all][glance][api][infra][defcore] last call for feedback on image import (again)

Thanks to all the OpenStackers who have participated so far. A major revision is now available for your reading pleasure. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232371/ I realize a USA holiday is coming up very soon this week ... the Glance community would be thankful to get some comments before

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [stable] Proposal to add Ian Cordasco to glance-stable-maint

I am definitely +1 on this! Thanks for volunteering, Ian. On 5/26/16, 2:42 AM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: >On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:12:56PM -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> I would like to propose adding Ian to glance-stable-maint team. The >> interest is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

Fei Long and I have followed up on our action item from the glance/ops mid-cycle sync, namely, to start a discussion among the operators and product working group so that the Glance team can get a better understanding of what "Better image lifecycle support" means. Please leave comments on this

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][ironic][cinder][nova] 'tar' as an image disk_format

-lite, https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1535900 If you have an opinion, please leave a comment in the appropriate place. thanks, brian On 1/23/16, 9:54 AM, "Brian Rosmaita" <brian.rosma...@rackspace.com> wrote: >Please provide feedback about a proposal to add 't

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]one more use case for Image Import Refactor from OPNFV

Hello everyone, Joe, I think you are proposing a perfectly legitimate use case, but it's not what the Glance community is calling "image import", and that's leading to some confusion. The Glance community has defined "image import" as: "A cloud end-user has a bunch of bits that they want to give

[openstack-dev] [glance][nova] images v1-v2 property name asymmetry

Here's the situation: image property set: - Images v1 API: all image property names are converted to lowercase before they're stored - Compute v2 API: all image property names are converted to lowercase before they're stored - Images v2 API: image properties are stored in the case specified when

[openstack-dev] [glance][ironic][cinder][nova] 'tar' as an image disk_format

Please provide feedback about a proposal to add 'tar' as a new Glance disk_format.[0] The Ironic team is adding support for "OS tarball images" in Mitaka. This is a compressed tar archive of a / (root filesystem). These tarballs are created by first installing the OS packages in a chroot and

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] Nominating Li Yingjun to Searchlight Core

+1 On 1/22/16, 7:09 PM, "Tripp, Travis S" wrote: >I am nominating Li Yingjun (yingjun on IRC) to join the Searchlight core >reviewers team. We are a young project and he has already made a >noticeable impact with his contributions. You may review his Searchlight >[0] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Newton virtual pre-summit sync

Tuesday, April 12 1400-1800 UTC works for me, I will attend. On 3/31/16, 5:34 PM, "Nikhil Komawar" wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm excited to see you all Glancers at the Austin summit and discuss >more on our project. > >Nevertheless, I feel that our summit conversations will have

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

+1 On 5/24/16, 11:11 AM, "Chris Hoge" wrote: >+1 > >> On May 23, 2016, at 8:25 PM, Mike Perez wrote: >> >>> On 18:00 May 20, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> >>> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday >>>May

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] [glance] Answers to some questions about Glance

Subject was: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] [glance] On operating a high throughput or otherwise team Un-hijacking the thread. Here are some answers to John's questions, hope they are helpful. On 5/16/16, 9:06 PM, "John Griffith" >

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] Searchlight Core Nomination - Lei Zhang

+1 I second the motion! On 5/17/16, 3:42 PM, "Tripp, Travis S" wrote: >I am nominating Lei Zhang from Intel (lei-zh on IRC) to join the >Searchlight core reviewers team. He has been actively participating with >thoughtful patches and reviews demonstrating his depth of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] [glance] Answers to some questions about Glance

On 5/18/16, 2:15 AM, "Clint Byrum" <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote: >Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2016-05-18 14:57:05 +1200: >> On 18 May 2016 at 00:54, Brian Rosmaita <brian.rosma...@rackspace.com> >>wrote: >> >> >> Coup

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] Rick Aulino core nomination

+1 from me, Rick has been doing great work and will be a good addition to the Searchlight core team. On 7/25/16, 5:01 PM, "Tripp, Travis S" wrote: >Hello! > >I am nominating Rick Aulino for Searchlight core. Rick has been working >on the core indexing engine throughout

[openstack-dev] [all] versioning the api-ref?

I have a question about the api-ref. Right now, for example, the new images v1/v2 api-refs are accurate for Mitaka. But DocImpact bugs are being generated as we speak for changes in master that won't be available to consumers until Newton is released (unless they build from source). If those bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

On 2/6/17 4:28 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > 2017-02-06 6:45 GMT-08:00 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com>: >> On 2/6/17 5:51 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: >> [super-enormous snip -- Chris, Ken, and Jordan make good points, I >> encourage you to read the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

On 2/6/17 5:51 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: [super-enormous snip -- Chris, Ken, and Jordan make good points, I encourage you to read the entire thread; I just want to concentrate on one point] > > I would say we should make compromise, not solve dilemma. I can live in a > world where we sometimes

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (02/03-02/09)

Congratulations to the Glance team for delivering Ocata RC-1! As discussed at yesterday's Glance meeting, here are the weekly priorities: 1. RC-1 Testing Glance Ocata RC-1 (14.0.0.0rc1) is available and the stable/ocata branch has been created. Please test and create bugs for any anomalies

[openstack-dev] Sabari Murugesan stepping down from Glance core

Sabari Murugesan has communicated to me that he's no longer able to commit time to working on Glance, and he's stepping down from the core reviewers' team. This message isn't all bad news, however: I'm particularly grateful that Sabari has agreed to continue as the VMware driver maintainer for

Re: [Openstack-operators] Glance image 'visibility' migration in Ocata

, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Hello Operators, > > Here are the results of the recent operators' poll concerning the > upcoming image visibility changes in Glance and the direction we plan to > take. Thanks to all participants for helping us come to a data-driven > decision on a

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request

Update: The FFE for the Rolling Upgrades work was discussed at today's Glance meeting, and an FFE was granted. On 1/26/17 8:58 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > On 1/26/17 8:52 AM, Steve Lewis wrote: >> I'm requesting a FFE to enable us to complete the work described as the >> &q

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar for Glance core

Having heard only affirmative responses, I've added Dharini Chandrasekar to the Glance core group, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto. Welcome to the Glance core team, Dharini! On 1/24/17 8:36 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'd like to propose Dharini Chandrasekar (dhari

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE Request

On 1/26/17 8:52 AM, Steve Lewis wrote: > I'm requesting a FFE to enable us to complete the work described as the > "Rolling Upgrades" priority [0]. > Thanks, Steve. FFE exception requests are on the agenda for today's Glance meeting at 14:00 UTC. cheers, brian > > [0] >

[openstack-dev] [glance] new draft logo of the Glance mascot

Hello Glancers, Attached is the new draft logo of the Glance mascot. It looks to me like this draft captures the key features we requested (and is much more personable than the previous version). If you have a contrary opinion, please reply quickly as Heidi Joy's team wants to have all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [osc][openstackclient][glance] broken image functional test

/17 11:46 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Brian Rosmaita > <rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We've approved the revert to get the OSC unblocked, though it may be a >> while before jenkins gets around to processing it, as (of course) the &g

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (01/20-01/26)

As discussed in the weekly meeting yesterday, here are our priorities for the week: (1) final release for client libraries is next week, so glanceclient patches need attention. This list is in priority order (first one is the highest): - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352892/ -

[openstack-dev] [glance] PTL candidacy for Pike

u for your consideration, Brian Rosmaita __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (01/27-02/02)

First, please read the email from Ian (our release czar) about the feature freeze: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/111067.html We have three priorities this week. The first is an all-hands-on-deck super priority, namely, reviewing (and re-reviewing, as

[openstack-dev] [glance] user survey question results

The responses to the Glance user survey question are in the following etherpad to make it easy to record reactions and/or suggestions for follow-up: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-user-survey-q-feb-2017 This was the question we asked: "As you're aware, the Images API v1 supplied by

[openstack-dev] artifacts code removed from the glance codebase in Pike

If you've never deployed, packaged, or used the Artifacts API supplied by Glance or Glare, you can safely disregard this message. There's a patch up [0] to remove the legacy EXPERIMENTAL Artifacts API code from the Glance code repository. (This is an entirely separate issue from the question of

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (02/17-02/23)

Hello Glancers, Here are the weekly priorities: 1. RC-1 Testing It's still looking like RC-1 is going to be the real thing. If you have some free time, give it a workout. 2. PTG Here are some key URLs for your convenience: - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-pike-ptg-planning -

[openstack-dev] [glance] PTG summary, Thursday Feb 23

The Glance PTG schedule etherpad contains links to the etherpads for each of the sessions discussed below: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-pike-ptg-schedule 1. glance/glare/artifacts/images The tldr; is Glance needs to complete image import before taking on anything else, and the Glare

[openstack-dev] [glance] PTG summary, Wednesday, Feb 22

The Glance PTG schedule etherpad contains links to the etherpads for each of the sessions discussed below: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-pike-ptg-schedule 1. Short topics dharinic led a discussion of a three recent items she's been looking into. First up was how the Glance limited JSON

[openstack-dev] [glance] revising the core list

Following Doug's suggestion in [0], I'm revising the Glance core list before next week's PTG. First, I'd again like to thank the following former Glance cores, who stepped down during the Ocata cycle, for their past service to Glance: - Sabari Murugesan - Stuart McLaren Second, I'd like to

[openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning (February 23). Here's what we need to discuss. This is from my perspective as Glance PTL, so it's going to be Glance-centric. This is a quick narrative

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (02/10-02/16)

Hello Glancers, Here are the weekly priorities: 1. RC-1 Testing It's looking like there won't be an RC-2, so no need to wait, do some testing on RC-1 now. If you do find an issue, please create a bug, tag it as 'ocata-rc-potential' and give a shout in #openstack-glance for rosmaita or

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance mascot/logo available

Hello Glancers, Heidi Joy Tretheway at the Foundation has released the Glance mascot logo files for full use as you see fit: "Inside this folder, you’ll find full-color and one-color versions of the logo, plus a mascot-only version, in EPS, JPG and PNG formats. You can use them on presentations

[Openstack-operators] Glance swift multi-user storage backend survey

Hello operators, The Glance team is conducting another survey about Glance usage. This one is for operators who are currently using (or contemplating using) the swift multi-tenant storage backend for Glance, a feature which is *not* enabled by default. The survey is only 5 questions long, so it

[openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar for Glance core

I'd like to propose Dharini Chandrasekar (dharinic on IRC) for Glance core. She has been an active reviewer and contributor to the Glance project during the Newton and Ocata cycles, has contributed to other OpenStack projects, and has represented Glance in some interactions with other project

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][glance] gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph-plugin-src-glance_store-ubuntu-xenial failures

bled in that patch and should not block > gate etc. > > Also if any CI failing due to that they can quickly disable that flag and > skip the tests which not meant to be run on their CI. > > > ​-gmann > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Brian Rosmaita <rosmai

Re: [openstack-dev] [osc][openstackclient][glance] broken image functional test

On 1/20/17 9:05 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Steve Martinelli > wrote: >> it seems the OSC gate is broken, several patches are failing the same way: > > [...] > >> did something break? at first glance (hehe), it seems this patch may be to >>

[openstack-dev] [infra][qa][glance] gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph-plugin-src-glance_store-ubuntu-xenial failures

I need some help troubleshooting a glance_store gate failure that I think is due to a recent change in a tempest test and a configuration problem (or it could be something else entirely). I'd appreciate some help solving this as it appears to be blocking all merges into glance_store, which, as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Gerrit is blocking the workflow with -2 for reason

On 9/1/16, 7:31 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >On 01/09/16 08:50 +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like >>[0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by >>abandoning, reproposing and

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

Nikhil, Thank you for all your hard work as Glance PTL (3 times!). Glad to hear that you will be continuing to work in OpenStack, and especially that you plan to continue working with Glance. cheers, brian On 9/12/16, 2:08 AM, "Nikhil Komawar" wrote: >Hi team, > >

[openstack-dev] [glance] PTL candidacy

lot of the ideas presented above come from those conversations. Thank you for your consideration, Brian Rosmaita [0] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/commit/?id=0b1da15253d50 d6486bf60d87205e5c796662646 [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance/commit/?id=63e6dbb

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the next two weeks

I'd like to reiterate what we discussed during the "Core Awareness" topic at yesterday's Glance weekly meeting for those who weren't able to attend or read through the meeting logs yet. Three Ocata priorities have already been determined: (1) image import refactor (2) community images (including

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] Matt Borland Searchlight UI Core Nomination

+ 1 on both issues. Great work, Matt! On 9/19/16, 1:13 PM, "Tripp, Travis S" wrote: >Hello! > >I am nominating Matt Borland for Searchlight UI core. Matt has been >working on searchlight UI since we started it and he is the primary >author of the angular registration

[openstack-dev] [glance] newton rc-2 deadline

We're going to need to cut rc-2 for Glance to accommodate some new translations, so there is an opportunity to include some conservative bugfixes. Any such must be merged before 16:00 UTC on Wed 28 Sept, so I am setting a deadline of 12:00 UTC on Tue 27 Sept for approval. If you have a bugfix

[openstack-dev] [glance] design summit proposal deadline approaching

Quick reminder to Glancers and People Interested in Glance that the Glance Ocata design summit session proposals close at 14:00 UTC Wednesday Sept 28 and voting closes at 13:59 UTC Thursday Sept 29 (that is, just before next week's Glance meeting). We'll have final discussion during the Glance

[openstack-dev] [glance] image import sync - Tuesdays 14:00 UTC

The voting has closed. By acclamation the weekly image import sync will occur as follows: when: Tuesdays, 14:00 UTC where: #openstack-glance duration: 20 minutes I realize this time isn't great for everyone. Since #openstack-glance is logged, I'll use "#startmeeting image import sync" and

  1   2   3   >