I added an agenda item for this for today's Glance meeting: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
I'd prefer to hold my vote until after the meeting. cheers, brian On 9/3/15, 6:14 AM, "Kuvaja, Erno" <[email protected]> wrote: >Malini, all, > >My current opinion is -1 for FFE based on the concerns in the spec and >implementation. > >I'm more than happy to realign my stand after we have updated spec and a) >it's agreed to be the approach as of now and b) we can evaluate how much >work the implementation needs to meet with the revisited spec. > >If we end up to the unfortunate situation that this functionality does >not merge in time for Liberty, I'm confident that this is one of the >first things in Mitaka. I really don't think there is too much to go, we >just might run out of time. > >Thanks for your patience and endless effort to get this done. > >Best, >Erno > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bhandaru, Malini K [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:10 AM >> To: Flavio Percoco; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >> questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal >> >> Flavio, first thing in the morning Kent will upload a new BP that >>addresses the >> comments. We would very much appreciate a +1 on the FFE. >> >> Regards >> Malini >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 1:52 AM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal >> >> On 02/09/15 22:11 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >I wanted to propose 'Single disk image OVA import' [1] feature proposal >> >for exception. This looks like a decently safe proposal that should be >> >able to adjust in the extended time period of Liberty. It has been >> >discussed at the Vancouver summit during a work session and the >> >proposal has been trimmed down as per the suggestions then; has been >> >overall accepted by those present during the discussions (barring a few >> >changes needed on the spec itself). It being a addition to already >> >existing import task, doesn't involve API change or change to any of >> >the core Image functionality as of now. >> > >> >Please give your vote: +1 or -1 . >> > >> >[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194868/ >> >> I'd like to see support for OVF being, finally, implemented in Glance. >> Unfortunately, I think there are too many open questions in the spec >>right >> now to make this FFE worthy. >> >> Could those questions be answered to before the EOW? >> >> With those questions answered, we'll be able to provide a more, >>realistic, >> vote. >> >> Also, I'd like us to evaluate how mature the implementation[0] is and >>the >> likelihood of it addressing the concerns/comments in time. >> >> For now, it's a -1 from me. >> >> Thanks all for working on this, this has been a long time requested >>format to >> have in Glance. >> Flavio >> >> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214810/ >> >> >> -- >> @flaper87 >> Flavio Percoco >> __________________________________________________________ >> ________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
