On 19.09.16 13:21, Dirk Müller wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> 2016-09-19 10:32 GMT+02:00 Alexander Graf :
>
>> Yes, but it's a can of worms that we have to open anyway unfortunately.
>> Systems are growing and I doubt 42 bits are going to get us very far.
>
> sure, I still prefer to have tests, and eve
Hi Alex,
2016-09-19 10:32 GMT+02:00 Alexander Graf :
> Yes, but it's a can of worms that we have to open anyway unfortunately.
> Systems are growing and I doubt 42 bits are going to get us very far.
sure, I still prefer to have tests, and even tests that are passing
over just enablign something
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:49:33PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > We could have a patch like the one below in the kernel pre-install
> > script, preventing people from breaking their systems, add notes on
> > the wiki, maybe ask SoftIron to send emails to people who bought
> > systems with Tumble
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:47:11PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> However, because we have people who have Leap 42.1 and current
> Tumbleweed installed, we can’t just switch from 64k to 4k PAGE_SIZE,
> because our friend btrfs embeds the page size into its on-disk format
> and can only read it when
On 16.09.16 17:35, Dirk Müller wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> 2016-09-15 13:47 GMT+02:00 Alexander Graf :
>
>> However, because we have people who have Leap 42.1 and current Tumbleweed
>> installed, we can’t just switch from 64k to 4k PAGE_SIZE, because our friend
>> btrfs embeds the page size into it
Hi Alex,
2016-09-15 13:47 GMT+02:00 Alexander Graf :
> However, because we have people who have Leap 42.1 and current Tumbleweed
> installed, we can’t just switch from 64k to 4k PAGE_SIZE, because our friend
> btrfs embeds the page size into its on-disk format and can only read it when
> they’
> On 16 Sep 2016, at 07:51, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:25:42 +0200,
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
[...] How many "customers" does Leap 42.1 aarch64 have? I thought
it's a tech preview, experiment, unsupported port, whatever? [...]
>>>
>>> If someone opts for a st
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 17:41, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> Am 15.09.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>> On 15 Sep 2016, at 15:49, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 15.09.2016 um 13:47 schrieb Alexander Graf:
[...] because we have people who have Leap 42.1 and current Tumbleweed
installed,
Am 15.09.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Alexander Graf:
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 15:49, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 15.09.2016 um 13:47 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>> [...] because we have people who have Leap 42.1 and current Tumbleweed
>>> installed, we can’t just switch from 64k to 4k PAGE_SIZE, because our
On 15 September 2016 at 13:47, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hello fellow openSUSE ARM developers,
>
> As you might have realized, we haven’t published openSUSE Tumbleweed in quite
> some time. The biggest reason for that (among minor hickups) is that we’re
> using btrfs on 64k PAGE_SIZE, which starte
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 15:49, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Am 15.09.2016 um 13:47 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>> [...] because we have people who have Leap 42.1 and current Tumbleweed
>> installed, we can’t just switch from 64k to 4k PAGE_SIZE, because our friend
>> btrfs embeds the page
Hi Alex,
Am 15.09.2016 um 13:47 schrieb Alexander Graf:
> [...] because we have people who have Leap 42.1 and current Tumbleweed
> installed, we can’t just switch from 64k to 4k PAGE_SIZE, because our friend
> btrfs embeds the page size into its on-disk format and can only read it when
> they’r
12 matches
Mail list logo