RE: [OS-webwork] New version of XWork editor posted

2003-09-09 Thread Jason Carreira
Title: Message That sounds useful.. also, I don't know if you pick up the default parameter name for each of the result types... this is a static constant field in each result class (optional) which lets the framework know what name it should give unnamed params. i.e. result

Re: [OS-webwork] New version of XWork editor posted

2003-09-09 Thread Jon Lipsky
September 09, 2003 7:09 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] New version of XWork editor posted That sounds useful.. also, I don't know if you pick up the default parameter name for each of the result types... this is a static constant field in each result class (optional) which let

Re: [OS-webwork] New version of XWork editor posted

2003-09-09 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
Title: Re: [OS-webwork] New version of XWork editor posted Jon, The view backwards references do sound useful (what action+result combinations point to this view) - .vm or .jsp :) Another thing that might be useful is preview XML which shows you the actual XML that will be generated? People

Re: [OS-webwork] New version of XWork editor posted

2003-09-09 Thread Bernard Choi
Title: Re: [OS-webwork] New version of XWork editor posted Greetings, Along the same lines, perhaps we can make this "reference view" more generic.Conceptually, the result view is just another component in the chain. The chain might consist of several actions. In which cas