Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2016, 18:35:04 schrieb LeBlanc Benjamin-Hugo:
> We are seriously considering deploying OpenVAS in our organisation, and we
> will most certainly opt for a distributed architecture that matches our
> network segmentation. We understand so far that a Master-Slave
> configura
That chatty communication between manager and scanner is probably the
status and intermediate results messages but i would have to analyse these
interaction to be sure.
Em 19/08/2016 16:00, "Tyler Sable" escreveu:
> Ben,
>
> I have built the master-scanner architecture, and it works. But, I have
> Now we wonder, though, how the NVT/SCAP/CERT Feed updates are managed on each
> scanner; in other words, when we click the "Synchronize with Feed now"
> button, in the web interface, does the Manager remotely call a syncing action
> with feed on *each scanner* defined in the Configuration/Scan
Thank you Tyler and Fabio for your answers.
We experimented with the Manager -> n Scanners architecture, and it actually
works well (we launch physically distant scanners directly from one manager),
as long as the right Scanner IPs are provided and proper certificates are
loaded in the Scanner
Ben,
I have built the master-scanner architecture, and it works. But, I have been
disappointed in its performance. The scans run on the external scanner seem to
take a lot longer than scans run on the same machine. I think the communication
between the manager and scanner is probably too chatty
t;
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Fábio Fernandes [mailto:fabiogfernan...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : 18 août 2016 16:37
> À : LeBlanc Benjamin-Hugo (EXT)
> Cc : openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
> Objet : Re: [Openvas-discuss] Managing many scanners instead of a
: LeBlanc Benjamin-Hugo (EXT)
Cc : openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
Objet : Re: [Openvas-discuss] Managing many scanners instead of a master-slave
architecture?
I have never had the need or tested an distributed OpenVAS architecture but i
think that it is possible. If you go to the menu Co
Of course that you have to manually configure what scanner to use for each
Task. And in terms of performance i don’t know since i never used it
distributed but it makes sense that it will increase the performance for each
scan you add.
> No dia 18/08/2016, às 21:36, Fábio Fernandes
> escreveu:
I have never had the need or tested an distributed OpenVAS architecture but i
think that it is possible. If you go to the menu Configuration->Slaves you will
see that you can add remote slaves. In the Greenbone Manual you can see that
you can setup an appliance as Sensor which i think it has the
Hello,
We are seriously considering deploying OpenVAS in our organisation, and we will
most certainly opt for a distributed architecture that matches our network
segmentation. We understand so far that a Master-Slave configuration involves
two instances of OpenVAS, each slave running on its own
10 matches
Mail list logo
