Renaud Deraison wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
Anyone has pointers for any email, archived web page, or otherwise,
that made it clear that scripts released, for example, in the 2.1.0
timeframe, or scripts that were updated via the GPL-feed update
On Jul 26, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
These plugins where included in the 2.2.4 release, which IIRC, was
GPLd
(exclusively) since this was released before the Nessus plugins
license
change.
We announced the plugin feed alongside the release of Nessus
We should contact folks with SPI and FSF to determine the best way forward.
I've sent a copy of the thread to the FSF here in Boston asking for help.
Anyone else with contacts knowledgeable in this field would be advised to do
the same.
Oliver
___
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:05:29PM +0200, Renaud Deraison (lists) wrote:
We announced the plugin feed alongside the release of Nessus 2.2.1,
Ok. I stand corrected, it was 2.2.1, not 2.2.4. Still some of the NASL
plugins we're talking about were including even in 2.0.9.
and we made clear at
On Thursday 26 July 2007 00:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In any case, they do not have proper GPL (or any other license) headers
(nor do many other NASL plugins, BTW).
Once we clear up the legal status of these plugins we should
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
Hi,
I've had a closer look at openvas-plugins.
As Renaud suggested, I applied
$ grep -i script_copyright.*Tenable.* scripts/*
and got these hits:
(...)
These plugins where included in the 2.2.4 release, which IIRC, was
