On 13-Sep-10, at 3:14 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Toby Thain wrote:
So we have stuff for VC6, VS2005, VS2008, DDK/WDK, MinGW and
Cygwin. :)
I consider diversity of working build environments a net benefit to
the project. It's another useful axis of portability and helps rub
off non-portable
On 13-Sep-10, at 3:10 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Toby Thain
<t...@telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
NMAKE is convenient for Windows builds as it will also happily run
under Linux/WINE, targeting both 32 and 64 bit Windows runtimes with
the 'freely downlo
On 13-Sep-10, at 2:25 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
The whole build environment of openvpn is malformed, using two
separate build systems for windows and posix,
Only two? Oh that's nothing. We're having lots of fun with build
systems in libusb-1.0, where each contributing
On 30-Jun-10, at 5:00 AM, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you may know, I've been building a Buildbot
(http://buildbot.net/trac) instance for us. In a nutshell, Buildbot
provides several services:
- continous integration: inform devs about build failures with
arbitrary
number of
On 6-Jun-10, at 9:58 AM, Davide Brini wrote:
On Sunday 06 June 2010, Toby Thain wrote:
Most of the common GNU utilities (including gcc) are in the
standard
Solaris install, either via /usr/sfw/ or by using g prefix (e.g.
gawk,
gmake).
Possibly, but it still means that either scripts
On 6-Jun-10, at 8:36 AM, Davide Brini wrote:
On Saturday 05 June 2010, Toby Thain wrote:
I'm not sure why Solaris has been insisting for ages now in shipping
default tools that are either old, with less features or downright
broken.
It's not just about sh; other popular tools like awk
On 6-Jun-10, at 7:52 AM, Davide Brini wrote:
On Saturday 05 June 2010, David Sommerseth wrote:
Yes, that can be seen as a solution for some people. But then it
would
be better for us to explicitly require the needed shell rather to
tell
them to (w)hack their system "because easy-rsa
On 6-Jun-10, at 6:25 AM, Davide Brini wrote:
On Saturday 05 June 2010, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 05/06/10 00:49, Matthias Andree wrote:
Note that some parts of the scripts may be Solaris /bin/sh
unfriendly,
for instance, Solaris's sh doesn't support test -e or [ -e. My patch
does not
On 1-May-10, at 4:18 PM, Brian Raderman wrote:
Hi David,
...
* Removed the dummy1() function from keychain.c. Keychain.c/.h are
based on cryptoapi.c/.h in the openvpn source tree. When editing
the original file to work with the Keychain services libraries
instead of the Windows Crypto
On 27-Apr-10, at 1:54 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 09:46:06 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is
why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:46 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I agree, because the Apple development kit is shipped
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I agree, because the Apple development kit is shipped,
if not installed, on every Mac.
It ships
On 27-Apr-10, at 5:11 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
the project is already releasing unpackaged Linux
binaries
Really?
They seem to have stopped sometime after July 30 2008.
On 27-Apr-10, at 1:58 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 10:23:21 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/10 16:47, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Speaking of the standard release process there is still this
thread:
Re: [Openvpn-devel] Unpackged Windows
On 26-Apr-10, at 9:34 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/10 01:47, Toby Thain wrote:
Hi,
I have put together a generic packaging script for OS X (pkg/dmg),
and
created basic binary Installer packages for PowerPC and Intel. It's
meant only
Hi,
I have put together a generic packaging script for OS X (pkg/dmg), and
created basic binary Installer packages for PowerPC and Intel. It's
meant only for distributing the generic binary distribution, analogous
to any other UNIX binary package. A small addition is a script which
On 22-Apr-10, at 12:49 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/21/2010 09:13:35 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 21-Apr-10, at 11:49 PM, Richard Monk wrote:
I had an issue come up where the clients were getting DNS entries
in
the
reverse order the server sends them when using the client.up
contrib
On 22-Apr-10, at 12:49 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/21/2010 09:13:35 AM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 21-Apr-10, at 11:49 PM, Richard Monk wrote:
I had an issue come up where the clients were getting DNS entries
in
the
reverse order the server sends them when using the client.up
contrib
On 21-Apr-10, at 11:49 PM, Richard Monk wrote:
I had an issue come up where the clients were getting DNS entries in
the
reverse order the server sends them when using the client.up contrib
script. Since the DNS servers on our system are in order from
closest->farthest network wise from the
19 matches
Mail list logo
