Christian Hesse on Mon, 2017/02/20 16:02:
> Emmanuel Deloget on Mon, 2017/02/20 15:52:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Emmanuel Deloget
> > wrote:
> > > Hi again,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Emmanuel Deloget
Emmanuel Deloget on Mon, 2017/02/20 15:52:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Emmanuel Deloget
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Christian,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:29
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
>>> That matches my findings. Built
Hi again,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
>> That matches my findings. Built against openssl 1.1.0e (Arch Linux package
>> openssl 1.1.0.e-1 [0]) the build itself
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> Interesting. Anything useful in openvpn's logs?
>
Mon Feb 20 11:57:56 2017 us=371715 OpenSSL: error:0607B083:digital
envelope routines:EVP_CipherInit_ex:no cipher set
Mon Feb 20 11:57:56 2017 us=371746 EVP cipher
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> That matches my findings. Built against openssl 1.1.0e (Arch Linux package
> openssl 1.1.0.e-1 [0]) the build itself succeeds, but 'make check' reports
> lots of cipher failures.
>
> Are your patches available
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:45:24PM +0100, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> * 0.9.8zh --> EVP_PKEY_id() is not defined. I'm adding this to
> openssl_compat.h and will provide a v2 patch with the change. Once
> added, OpenVPN compiled successfully and was able to connect to my
> /2.3 server.
If
Emmanuel Deloget on Mon, 2017/02/20 12:45:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 01:03:45PM +0100, Steffan Karger wrote:
> >> Thank you very much. You approach looks good to me, and quite
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 01:03:45PM +0100, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> Thank you very much. You approach looks good to me, and quite closely
>> matches what I had in mind for when I would find the time to
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 01:03:45PM +0100, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Thank you very much. You approach looks good to me, and quite closely
> matches what I had in mind for when I would find the time to tackle
> this. (Which might have taken me a while, so really happy to see these
> patches!)
On 19-02-17 15:58, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 19/02/17 13:03, Steffan Karger wrote:
>
>> As discussed in other threads, we do want to support building on RHEL6,
>> which is why we would prefer to be compatible with (patched) OpenSSL
>> 0.9.8. I haven't tested anything yet, but looking at the
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Steffan Karger wrote:
>
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Thank you very much. You approach looks good to me, and quite closely
> matches what I had in mind for when I would find the time to tackle
> this. (Which might have taken me a while, so
On 19/02/17 13:03, Steffan Karger wrote:
> As discussed in other threads, we do want to support building on RHEL6,
> which is why we would prefer to be compatible with (patched) OpenSSL
> 0.9.8. I haven't tested anything yet, but looking at the patches this
> might very well just work, or
Hi Emmanuel,
On 17-02-17 23:00, log...@free.fr wrote:
> From: Emmanuel Deloget
>
> The purpose of this RFC series is to make the latest master of OpenVPN
> (2.5-git) linkable with OpenSSL v1.1.x. It may not be complete (I may
> have missed something due to my work environment,
14 matches
Mail list logo