Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-11-06 Thread Felix Kronlage
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:24:51AM -0700, James Yonan wrote: Hi Yonan, > It's a good question that deserves a full answer. [...] thanks Yonan for taking the time to answer and clarify! Much appreciated! felix pgpAjFMnP59Ni.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-11-04 Thread James Yonan
Felix Kronlage wrote: On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:24:39AM -0600, James Yonan wrote: Hi Yonan, Changelog: 2008.10.07 -- Version 2.1_rc13 * Bundled OpenSSL 0.9.8i with Windows installer. * Management interface can now listen on a unix domain socket, for example: management /tmp/openvpn u

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-10-28 Thread Felix Kronlage
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 02:19:39PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > The objection for me would be because it makes no difference if you > change a RC or a release. Features in point releases are usually frowned > upon as well... so this is a null arguement. What does the word "release candidate" m

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Andree
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Nejc Skoberne wrote: > The last feature added - "feature missing for deployment/integration"? > I don't think so. I am deploying the development version since beta_7 and > I never *needed* to use any of those new features except Vista compatibility > feature, which is not pres

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-10-28 Thread Matthias Andree
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Felix Kronlage wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 08:36:56AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > > > This particular change looks a lot like "feature missing for > > deployment/integration/...". > > but why add features in a 'release candidate'? what speaks > against releasing sma

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-10-28 Thread Nejc Skoberne
Hello, > If the RC is good enough to have features added, why not get > it out of the door? For us, we're still stuck with 2.0.9 regarding > what we can ship to customers, since they will confront us with > the question "why are you deploying not-released-software" if > shit hits the fan... > It i

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-10-27 Thread Felix Kronlage
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 08:36:56AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > This particular change looks a lot like "feature missing for > deployment/integration/...". but why add features in a 'release candidate'? what speaks against releasing small releases with stuff like this? 2.1.x ? If the RC is go

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-10-24 Thread Matthias Andree
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Felix Kronlage wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:24:39AM -0600, James Yonan wrote: > > Hi Yonan, > > > Changelog: > > 2008.10.07 -- Version 2.1_rc13 > > * Bundled OpenSSL 0.9.8i with Windows installer. > > * Management interface can now listen on a unix > >domain socke

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.1_rc13 released

2008-10-17 Thread Felix Kronlage
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 02:24:39AM -0600, James Yonan wrote: Hi Yonan, > Changelog: > 2008.10.07 -- Version 2.1_rc13 > * Bundled OpenSSL 0.9.8i with Windows installer. > * Management interface can now listen on a unix >domain socket, for example: > > management /tmp/openvpn unix > >