Am 01.04.13 19:03, schrieb Jonathan K. Bullard:
Thanks; now that I understand the patch, I support it.
This is the first I've heard of 'utun' -- can you tell me how to load it?
There is no need for any extra kextload. Using the socket magic my patch
does is enough and you need to be root.
Thanks; now that I understand the patch, I support it.
This is the first I've heard of 'utun' -- can you tell me how to load it?
(I assume via "sudo kextload xxx", but what is xxx -- that is, where is the
kext located?)
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
Am 01.04.13 17:18, schrieb Jonathan K. Bullard:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
The "standard" utun.ko driver is sometimes problematic (e.g. VmWare Fusion 5
and tun.ko do not work together).
If it is the other way around (use tun if it is available
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
>
>> The "standard" utun.ko driver is sometimes problematic (e.g. VmWare
>> Fusion 5 and tun.ko do not work together).
>>
>> If it is the other way around (use tun if it is available and if not,
>> try utun) then
The "standard" utun.ko driver is sometimes problematic (e.g. VmWare Fusion 5
and tun.ko do not work together).
If it is the other way around (use tun if it is available and if not,
try utun) then anybody who has loaded tun will continue to work with
that tun, and anybody who hasn't loaded tun
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
> Am 01.04.13 15:26, schrieb Jonathan K. Bullard:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
Mac
Am 01.04.13 15:26, schrieb Jonathan K. Bullard:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
Mac OS X 10.7+ natively supports tun devices (called utun). The "standard"
utun.ko driver is sometimes
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>> Mac OS X 10.7+ natively supports tun devices (called utun). The "standard"
>> utun.ko driver is sometimes problematic (e.g. VmWare Fusion 5 and
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Mac OS X 10.7+ natively supports tun devices (called utun). The "standard"
> utun.ko driver is sometimes problematic (e.g. VmWare Fusion 5 and tun.ko do
> not work together).
>
> When OpenVPN is compiled with utun support it
Mac OS X 10.7+ natively supports tun devices (called utun). The "standard"
utun.ko driver is sometimes problematic (e.g. VmWare Fusion 5 and tun.ko do not
work together).
When OpenVPN is compiled with utun support it will if no dev-node is given
first try to use utun and if that is not
10 matches
Mail list logo