for your nice support patch!
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:16:34PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Thus, while OpenWrt itself perhaps does not have much use for udev-based
auto loading of modules (I guess modules usually are installed per-package,
and then probably also registered for mechanical loading each),
I'd deem
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr and...@users.sf.net
---
package/network/config/swconfig/src/cli.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reason: standard switch device name changed from eth0 to switch0,
see e.g.
http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/buffalo/wbmr-hp-g300h
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Nicolas Cavallari wrote:
On 06/01/2014 20:18, Andreas Mohr wrote:
Can someone else confirm and/or elaborate on this improper visibility
problem
which seems to be specific to OpenWrt's kernel configuration management?
(which does do certain config
, round robin, but...
(admittedly once every 5 minutes ought to be low enough,
but certain people might want to keep down flash wear as much as possible).
bye, bastian
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https
Hi,
[CC openwrt-devel, remove linux-kernel]
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:09:27PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 15:01 +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
config LIB80211
tristate
config LIB80211_CRYPT_WEP
tristate
config LIB80211_CRYPT_CCMP
already.
Also, what kind of space savings are we talking about here anyway?
I cannot imagine these measly strings to constitute a sufficiently high
percentage of module size...
(except for drastic candidates such as VID/PID of pl2303 or ftdi_sio driver)
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
,
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
be considered weird at a minimum.
So the best design would perhaps be
-F|--force)
FORCE=${FORCE:-0}
export FORCE=$(($FORCE + 1))
;;
Thank you for your participation in this lovely project!
Andreas Mohr
--
GNU/Linux. It's not the software that's free
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 01:49:47AM -0800, Cody P Schafer wrote:
We already initialize FORCE to 0 at the top of the 'sysupgrade' script.
export HELP=0
export FORCE=0
export TEST=0
Ah ok, nevermind then :)
(didn't have ready access to sources ATM)
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
-defaults/02_network
2013-07-17 23:48:00.407189000 +0800
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@
;;
rt-n13u | \
+hg256d| \
fonera20n)
??
Doesn't seem all too right to me...
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
(or why not) a certain CPU is thought to be (non-)coherent
(with a most authoritative reference added each if available, ideally!).
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman
mikewilec...@yahoo.com
Cc: stable sta...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de
might be a good example of where to find and how to treat such issues.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
whether there would be any effect at such scale, but without
trying there's no knowledge...)
Given that the PCB's layout is completely broken already,
matters probably cannot get worse :)
Disclaimer: _not_ an experienced EDA engineer here :)
Andreas Mohr
will always remain 32bit, %u is fully
sufficient and thus the exactly adapted and proper solution.
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
close() due to these
missing cleanup callbacks. Works with that fix.
I wanted to get this ticket nailed, but it got delayed due to working on a
(even more relevant) resume issue on my (current) main machine.
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 12:02:06PM -0700, Steve Brown wrote:
On 12/23/2009 01:57 AM, Andreas Mohr wrote:
And I would be very pleased if ehci-ssb.c could find its way into mainline
pretty soon,
Yeah. Care to do so?
Huh what me? :)
I'll get this nailed. I wouldn't want
this entire matter simply was a trivial but sadly effectful out-of-sync
with mainline issue.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
to 2.6.28.10 now (would anyone by chance know my odds
there?), but I'll first submit some 2.6.30 quilt stuff.
Working on brcm47xx (ASUS WL-500gP v2, external USB boot).
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hi,
first post. Please yell if something is awkward.
Acked-by: Andreas Mohr a...@lisas.de
--- /dev/null 2009-05-14 19:20:59.0 +0200
+++
target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.30/695-b44_netconsole_poll_bogus-irq-enable_fix.patch
2009-11-24 22:27:52.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,67
More stuff to follow later.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr a...@lisas.de
--- /dev/null 2009-05-14 19:20:59.0 +0200
+++
target/linux/generic-2.6/patches-2.6.30/696-b44_fix-wedge-when-using-netconsole.patch
2009-11-30 20:12:53.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+From patchwork Mon Nov
21 matches
Mail list logo
