condition, and
> kexec-tools will not be built. Look at the OpenSSL Makefile for an example
> (taking it from memory).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eneas
>
>> Em 6 de mai. de 2024, à(s) 17:09, Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel
>> escreveu:
>>
>> The sender
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
Sorry, had to add filters to
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I fetched/rebased recently
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I fetched/rebased recently
4, at 6:03 PM, Paul D wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-09 23:30, Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel wrote:
>> I'm trying to modify a script generates a list of filenames one per
>> line, but should be filtered against a blacklist of file globs.
>>
>> Something like:
>&
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I'm trying to modify a
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I'm trying to modify a
> On Dec 11, 2023, at 5:49 AM, Paul D wrote:
>
> On 2023-12-09 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm working on a drop-in for Kea that will parse existing ISC-DHCP
>> configurations in UCI and crank out the derivative JSON config files for
>>
Hi all,
I'm working on a drop-in for Kea that will parse existing ISC-DHCP
configurations in UCI and crank out the derivative JSON config files for Kea,
but I have a couple of PR's that are necessary to making this happen that have
been pending for several weeks:
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out what best practices are for shell libraries, as I'm
working on changes to a pretty significant library which I envision being
leveraged in a lot of places.
My questions are these:
* should a good library do error-checking for the caller, or expect the caller
> On Nov 13, 2023, at 10:44 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 03:44:57AM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:26:04PM -0800, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:48:14PM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at
> On Nov 13, 2023, at 7:26 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 12:48:14PM +, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 01:30:10PM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
>>>
>>> How about we follow the approach of Alpine Linux[1] and offer a standard,
>>> an extended and a
> On Sep 14, 2023, at 5:19 PM, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 2023-09-14, Paul Spooren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’d like to merge the PR which adds the Mellanox Spectrum SN2100 to
>> OpenWrt[1]. In its current state a new x86 image would be added next
>> to the generic x86 image.
That’s a question for a core maintainer. I’m just a lowly package maintainer.
> On Oct 29, 2023, at 10:29 PM, Xiaojun Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> Thank you! Do you know when it will be merged to Openwrt main thread ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phi
> On Oct 30, 2023, at 11:17 AM, Paul Spooren wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We kind of don’t add image just to contain extra drivers. Extra UCI defaults
> for eth ordering are fine but please don’t add an extra image if it just
> contains 1-2 extra packages, installable via the ImageBuilder or OPKG.
>
LGTM
> On Oct 23, 2023, at 8:52 PM, Xiaojun Liu wrote:
>
> Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform
> Device name:Cordoba Edge Platform
> hardware specifications: CPU - Intel Atom C3000
> WiFi - mt7915e
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaojun Liu mailto:xiaojun@silicom.co.il
>
gen-6.4.0/ipkg-install/usr/lib
strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file
`/builder/build_dir/target-powerpc_8548_musl/cligen-6.4.0/ipkg-install/usr/lib/libcligen.so.6.4'
/builder/staging_dir/host/bin/install: strip process terminated abnormally
make[3]: *** [Makefile:158: install-lib
Hi,
I'm seeing the following:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/actions/runs/6621741418/job/17986176198?pr=22362
Specifically:
mips-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -shared -o libcligen.so.6.4 cligen_object.o
cligen_callback.o cligen_parsetree.o cligen_pt_head.o cligen_handle.o
cligen_cv.o
Doesn't this just have ixgbe and igc NIC's? And the mt7915e of course.
Don't think we need the amd-xgbe, bnx2, e1000e, e1000, r8169, tg3 drivers.
The BIOS we've been using has some odd enumeration of the PCI bus, so you might
want to include a patch for
Hi all,
I know we've talked about replacing OpenWRT's native configuration
representation with something more flexible... and things like NETCONF and
OpenConfig come up from time to time.
To that end, I've two PR's open:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/22359
Hi all,
I was reading through some of the online documentations as I try to bring up a
5G modem w/ Verizon and modemmanager, and bounced between various settings
(it's a Quectel EM120R-GL modem for the moment until something better arrives),
trying to decide if I wanted to use QMI or MBIM, if
Hi all,
As we work on the 23.05 release, I was stunned to receive a Mofi
MOFI4500-4GXeLTE-V3 router with 14.07 installed on it as part of my
Unlimitedville enrollment.
I thought, "wow, this must have been sitting in a warehouse a while! I'd
better update it." So I went to the company's
Hi,
I was looking at a way to address
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/13329 by leveraging hotplug instead
(per Gorki's suggestion).
Then it wouldn't matter if the drivers were loaded at preinit time (marked as
"required to boot" in netdevices.mk) or not.
But when I went to look
t;e1000", "ixgbe", "i40e", and
"igc" aren't.
Wha.aaat?
So name assignments can only be done for a select few devices? Why can't
renumbering also be handled for devices that get loaded later?
Can boot() in /etc/init.d/boot be modified to finish
(board_name)"
case "$(board_name)" in
But best as I can tell that line isn't being hit... or rather, the whole file
isn't.
What would prevent that from happening? I'm not very familiar with the preinit
logic.
Thanks
> On Aug 21, 2023, at 11:34 AM, Philip Prindeville
&g
I have a new x86 prototype box I'm working with, and it doesn't have a DTSI
file (obviously) or a platform driver... and given my experiences with getting
APU platform drivers upstream last time, I'm hesitant to do that all over again.
Anyway, is there an easy way to do GPIO assignments for
> On Aug 11, 2023, at 10:02 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
> On 11.08.23 17:58, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> I'm seeing the following breakage in hostapd:
>> ../src/ap/ucode.c: In function 'uc_hostapd_iface_start':
>> ../src/ap/ucode.c:337:23: error: 'struct hostapd_
> On Aug 11, 2023, at 10:11 AM, Paul Spooren wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Is explicit better or not? And if it is better, how do I go about reserving
>> values that won't get stepped on? Who is our Numbers Czar, who is our IANA?
>
> I always used Gentoos numbers[1] whenever I added something.
I'm seeing the following breakage in hostapd:
../src/ap/ucode.c: In function 'uc_hostapd_iface_start':
../src/ap/ucode.c:337:23: error: 'struct hostapd_config' has no member named
'he_oper_centr_freq_seg0_idx'; did you mean 'vht_oper_centr_freq_seg0_idx'?
337 |
Hi,
I'm working on an updated release of Clixon for OpenWRT, and I want it to stop
running as "root".
Looking at all of the Makefiles, I see some packages reserve an explicit
uid/gid associated with the user and group names, like ntp and ubus and
network... while others don't (like docker and
> On Aug 10, 2023, at 11:49 AM, Torbjörn Jansson wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-06 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a 4TB
>> NVMe stick that would make a decent file server/NAS...
>>> On Aug 6, 20
> On Aug 8, 2023, at 3:14 PM, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Alberto. I'm wondering how much work making it cross-build packages
>> is going to be...
>>
>> Digging into it now...
>>
>
> You should take a look at ksmbd package. It does compile an out-of-tree
> module.
>
have been using ZFS on Raspberry Pis and on
> some Rockchip boards (in Debian/Ubuntu/Armbian/RaspberryOS) for years at this
> point.
>
> -Alberto
>
> On 06/08/23 21:39, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> I don't know... I have a Xeon D-1548 based 1U Supermicro server with a
on (devices with) smaller flash drives. Other FS
> better suited to such env.
>
> No ZFS is in available software packages today, in any case.
>
>
> On 2023-08-06 00:53, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > Has anyone tried to package ZFS (more correctly, OpenZFS) for OpenWRT? Is
Has anyone tried to package ZFS (more correctly, OpenZFS) for OpenWRT? Is
there any interest in doing so?
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
I'm the maintainer of ISC-DHCP which will be sunsetting soon. I'd like to take
the UCI wrappers that I wrote to handle quite a few configuration options and
port those to Kea since this makes the most sense as a migration path for
people wishing to retain their configurations.
That said, it
Hi,
I'm working on a wrapper for using xt_asn and xt_geoip in xtables-addons, and
was wondering about how best to solve certain problems.
Since, for now, I'll be using shell and UCI, I'm not going to maintain state
(old/current vs. new/desired state) of the firewall so I won't be able to
> On Jun 9, 2023, at 1:23 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> FYI there is an ongoing effort[1] to rename armvirt target to armsr (Arm
> SystemReady)
>
> armvirt/32 becomes armsr/armv7 (title: 32-bit (armv7) machines)
> armvirt/64 becomes armsr/armv8 (title: 64-bit (armv8) machines)
>
>
> On May 28, 2023, at 2:09 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>
> Mathew McBride [2023-05-26 16:16:31]:
>
> Hi Mathew,
>
>> I am just wondering if anyone has any significant objections that would
>> stop this pull from being merged? (after I fix any current conflicts)
>
> we should support it, so we
> On Jun 1, 2023, at 1:18 PM, Tomasz Maciej Nowak wrote:
>
> W dniu 1.06.2023 o 18:58, Philip Prindeville pisze:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi.
>
>> I'm thinking about the utility of being able to build a generalized ARM64
>> image (not "armvirt&qu
Hi,
I'm thinking about the utility of being able to build a generalized ARM64 image
(not "armvirt") for bring up on new platforms for testing.
There are a lot of generalized computing platforms like the Ampere Altra
servers that you might want to use as in inbound Apache proxy server, a load
> On May 12, 2023, at 12:25 PM, Mark Thurston wrote:
>
>> I've got a simple question. I'm in the US, and I'm looking for a VPN
>> provider that uses IPsec and can provide an rDNS record for my public IPv4
>> pointing back to my domain. I've asked several VPN providers and they don't
>>
Hi,
I've got a simple question. I'm in the US, and I'm looking for a VPN provider
that uses IPsec and can provide an rDNS record for my public IPv4 pointing back
to my domain. I've asked several VPN providers and they don't seem to
understand what I'm asking (NordVPN, ProtonVPN, NordLayer,
> On May 1, 2023, at 6:59 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/05/23 06:40, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> On Apr 28, 2023, at 11:18 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:04:15PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
> On May 1, 2023, at 9:32 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 09:01:29AM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On May 1, 2023, at 8:12 AM, Joseph Mullally wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:43 AM Philip Prindevill
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 9:45 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:21:28AM +0200, Thibaut wrote:
>>
>>> Le 27 avr. 2023 à 02:11, Elliott Mitchell a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:50:52AM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
On 2023-04-19, Elliott
> On May 1, 2023, at 8:12 AM, Joseph Mullally wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 5:43 AM Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>> On Apr 28, 2023, at 11:18 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:04:15PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
&g
> On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:08 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:29:29AM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Why isn't this migrating upwards into target/linux/generic/config-5.15 and
>> target/linux/generic/config-5.10 in that case?
>>
>
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 11:18 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:04:15PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>> [snip]
>
>> See above: the radios and antennae I can get as add-ons for a Xeon-D 1U
>> pizza box or even an APU6 mPC
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 25, 2023, at 5:23 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> I don't know what version of Linux this option disappeared at, but
> it is clearly gone now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Mitchell
> ---
> target/linux/generic/config-5.10 | 1
> On Apr 26, 2023, at 2:17 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> Well, was a specific objective ever chosen for the x86 version of
> OpenWRT?
Does it need one? As the most ubiquitous hardware out there for many users,
why would we need to box it in?
Someone might want to throw a generic image
> On Apr 27, 2023, at 3:21 AM, Thibaut wrote:
>
>
>
>> Le 27 avr. 2023 à 02:11, Elliott Mitchell a écrit :
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:50:52AM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>>> On 2023-04-19, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
Direct Rendering Manager is mainly for running X
> On Apr 26, 2023, at 6:00 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 12:46:49AM +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-03-30, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>> Full amd64 support isn't really appropriate for most situations
>>> OpenWRT is deployed. Whereas x86-x32 seems
My own experience disagrees.
I spent 17 months bringing up a Xeon-D based traffic shaper for 40Gb/s of
traffic in a radio base station.
And yes, when collected crunched traffic statistics, it did use more than 4GB
of address space to do so.
> On Mar 30, 2023, at 5:30 PM, Elliott Mitchell
> On Apr 26, 2023, at 2:11 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> Now we come to the item I've mentioned. The X32 ABI. This is running an
> amd64 processor in amd64 mode, but truncating all pointers to 32 bits
> (ILP32 mode). This shrinks the runtime size of programs in exchange for
> limiting
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 12, 2023, at 11:47 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> OpenWRT is not a graphics-oriented Linux distribution. There is no
> need for AGP support in any standard OpenWRT kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Mitchell
> ---
> target/
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 12, 2023, at 11:47 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> OpenWRT is not a graphics-oriented Linux distribution. There is no
> need for AGP support in any standard OpenWRT kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Mitchell
> ---
> target/
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 13, 2023, at 9:58 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> While some older PCI motherboard might emulate some functions via
> ISA, actual ISA is absent from anything non-legacy. Move ISA DMA
> enabling to Geode and Legacy.
>
> S
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 17, 2023, at 9:21 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> All of the sublevels choose their own values, so there is no point
> in the common file having anything. This also removes a warning from
> the kernel build process.
>
> S
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 13, 2023, at 6:07 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> The SCx200 is part of the Geode platform. As such generic x86
> doesn't need the driver, but Geode does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Mitchell
> ---
> target/linux/x
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 19, 2023, at 3:07 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> Quite reasonable to have support for the Geode HW random number
> generator. On the Geode kernel.
>
> Support for the VIA HWRNG has been enabled in common. Pull that
>
Why isn't this migrating upwards into target/linux/generic/config-5.15 and
target/linux/generic/config-5.10 in that case?
And for the platforms where it was turned off, like
target/linux/armvirt/32/config-5.15, why isn't that staying unchanged?
> On Apr 22, 2023, at 11:46 AM, Elliott
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 13, 2023, at 6:07 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>
> The SCx200 is part of the Geode platform. As such generic x86
> doesn't need the driver, but Geode does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elliott Mitchell
> ---
> target/linux/x
I'm not sure you want it to be unconditional.
When I wrote the option for netlink and iproute2, it was for some very
specialized scenarios.
> On Apr 24, 2023, at 3:14 AM, Stefan Hellermann wrote:
>
> I have an easier patch in my private repo, maybe it's enough without a new
> configuration
Hi,
I built an image today for x86_64/generic with a recent sync to master on
openwrt and packages.
I dd'd the image (squashfs-combined) to the raw disk, zero padded the disk to
grow it, and booted.
The VM comes up with the following devices:
1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
I don't know if it's related, but syslog-ng-3.38.1 and now -4.1.1 keep crashing
in libssl.so.
[ 7263.710130] syslog-ng[6648]: segfault at 180 ip 7fe55725dd43 sp
7de33ed8 error 6 in libssl.so.3[7fe557252000+45000]
[ 7263.715174] Code: e8 03 00 ff 15 8e dc 05 00 31 d2 31 c0 be 11 01
Reviewed-by: Philip Prindeville
> On Apr 23, 2023, at 7:40 AM, Sebastian Schaper
> wrote:
>
> It was found this device uses a single tri-color power/status LED
> rather than individual red/orange LEDs, which also supports green.
>
> Add GPIO for green color and use wit
Hi,
This question is for Jo-Philipp or whomever else wants to take a stab at it.
I'm looking at this commit:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/f3a5085903f770bf0b569d3b94ca1cc4d7bab53f#diff-327b383b4b87cd4627eea84a61ada9688b7438baf11536eb74951e4479adb84dR116-R129
And specifically this
From: Philip Prindeville
Minor improvements in efficiency and portability to libubox's
jshn and its wrapper.
Philip Prindeville (2):
jshn.sh: Add pretty-printing to json_dump
blobmsg: Don't do at run-time what can be done at compile-time
blobmsg_json.c | 6 +++---
sh/jshn.sh | 12
From: Philip Prindeville
If a JSON file might be read by a human, say for debugging, it
could be useful to pretty-print it. We do this in places by
calling "json_dump -i" but it shouldn't be necessary to know the
arguments to "jshn" (and indeed, that's not portable if we r
From: Philip Prindeville
Repeatedly calling a run-time function like strlen() on an
invariant value is inefficient, especially if that value can be
computed once (at initialization) or better yet, computed at
compile-time.
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
blobmsg_json.c | 6 +++---
1
Hi,
Hoping to get a little guidance from my peers. I'm trying to create a
meta-package that can be selected and it will include all of the
subordinate/dependent packages, but in this case one of the subordinate
packages comes in two variants (IPv4-only or IPv4/v6):
Hi,
Couple of questions about partition tables on x86 hardware.
Do most x86 machines (an APUv6 w/ Coreboot in my case, and a Qemu/KVM VM with
Bochs as well) support GPT in BIOS (CGM or whatever)?
And what are the steps on a live system to (1) convert the MBR partition table
to MBR, and (2)
Looks good to me.
> On Jan 13, 2023, at 7:30 AM, Florian Eckert wrote:
>
> Fix typo for KernelPackage w83627hf-wdt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Eckert
> ---
> target/linux/x86/modules.mk | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/linux/x86/modules.mk
Hi Florian. What is it you're asking for from me? Does apica-unix need to be
bumped?
> On Jan 13, 2023, at 5:41 AM, Florian Eckert wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an APU3. This has an I2C bus (SMBUS) to which additional devices can
> be connected. On my APU3 board, an IO expander mcp23s08
Please follow-up there with any suggestions.
Thanks
> On Dec 28, 2022, at 12:45 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> From: Philip Prindeville
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
> ---
> target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds| 2 +-
> target/linux
If you are using Bind9 then you should upgrade to the latest (9.18.10-1)
package. No, it's not a CVE. It's a glitch where, if Bind comes up before
your WAN port has stabilized, then you'll end up with bogus SOA and NS records
for your root server keys because of a problem in how the journaled
> On Dec 28, 2022, at 1:14 PM, Robert Marko wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 01:01, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 27, 2022, at 4:50 PM, Robert Marko wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 00:48, Philip Prindevil
From: Philip Prindeville
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds| 2 +-
target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
b
From: Philip Prindeville
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville
---
target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
b/target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
index
> On Dec 27, 2022, at 4:50 PM, Robert Marko wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 00:48, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I originally set up my env/kernel-config a long time ago (like 2018) by
>> hand, and since then the kernel has gone t
Hi,
I originally set up my env/kernel-config a long time ago (like 2018) by hand,
and since then the kernel has gone through several bumps. How do I easily
refresh it to pick up new stuff from target/linux/x86/64/config-${KVER} (where
KVER=5.15 currently)? Is there a handy script or make
Hi all,
Is there some state available in init.d scripts for detecting if we have IPv6
on the publicly facing Internet? Or do I have to read the network config, look
for wan* interfaces, and see if any of them have IPv6 addresses configured, etc?
Was hoping that this was already neatly done
Hi,
I'm the maintainer for a few packages, and I could use a little help from
someone who has time to do some shell scripting and UCI integration for some of
these packages.
For instance, I'd like to add remote dynamic DNS updates when using isc-dhcpd
on remote sites but having a single
Hi,
A couple of firewall questions. I'll start with something easy. If I'm ssh'd
into my router and I restart the firewall (I'm using firewall3 and iptables),
then on one router I get dropped from my shell after a timeout... but on
another router, I stay connected.
In both cases, I'll be
> On Aug 12, 2022, at 11:54 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> One aspect I could see is take for instance a device that is widely popular
> amongst our user base as was TI's ar7 for instance a while back, and for
> which we might have done a Linux 5.4, or 5.10 version at the time but we do
>
> On Aug 12, 2022, at 11:53 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> OK, the 3-4 years time frame is not something that we currently have with
> Linux kernels, it is either 2 years or 6 years, since 6 > 4, it sounds like
> we still have some interest in having 6 LTS kernels, but maybe not have every
2 13:32, Robert Marko wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 22:30, Philip Prindeville
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not to play the devil's advocate but... do we want old kernels hanging
>>>>>> out that long?
>>
> On Aug 10, 2022, at 5:46 PM, Mathew McBride wrote:
>
> (resend as plain text)
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022, at 5:24 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> What was the conclusion about VDSL2 PCIe cards? I'm looking for a VDS
Not to play the devil's advocate but... do we want old kernels hanging out that
long?
Besides not encouraging people to update to new releases that mitigate
discovered CVE's, we'd also not pick up David Taht's excellent improvements in
Buffer Bloat.
> On Aug 8, 2022, at 5:15 PM, Florian
Hi all (and Daniel and Stijn especially),
How do I build a system (or an image to install on a system) that's x86_64 and
has an SSD, which I want to have a squashfs image and a 2nd partition with an
ext4 filesystem for /var.
I'd like the first boot to resize the 2nd partition to use all
Anyone have any luck getting one of these running with OpenWRT?
https://www.draytek.co.uk/download/VigorNIC132_Datasheet.pdf
I emailed them but haven't heard back...
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> On Jan 9, 2022, at 5:46 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 10:41 +1100, Mathew McBride wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022, at 10:14 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 18:05 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>> H
Hi all,
I've got a series of reviews upstream in Asterisk to build against Openssl
1.1.x and 3.x without OPENSSL_SUPPRESS_DEPRECATED being required, if anyone is
curious or wants to track that:
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18533
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18525
Er, *haven't started*
> On Mar 13, 2022, at 9:54 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I disable CONFIG_IPV6, since most American ISP's have started rolling
> out residential IPv6. My local pop & pop ILEC hasn't deployed it. There's
> not even an announced date f
Yeah, I disable CONFIG_IPV6, since most American ISP's have started rolling out
residential IPv6. My local pop & pop ILEC hasn't deployed it. There's not
even an announced date for it on their roadmap.
I suspect that if everyone had an IPv6 address, which would be both routable
and
Hi,
Anyone have an idea what's involved in adding support for WiFi-6 certified
location services to OpenWRT? And where would it fit in? In the radio driver,
or in hostapd?
Thanks,
-Philip
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
> On Jan 12, 2022, at 10:53 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:50:41AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 11, 2022, at 11:56 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>>
>>> Sadly the falcon didn't really make it to f
> On Jan 11, 2022, at 11:56 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> Sadly the falcon didn't really make it to fly with OpenWrt (yet).
> It's used in a couple of GPON SFP modules, so would sure be an
> interesting target...
G.PON SFP modules? Tell me about those!!!
> On Dec 7, 2021, at 5:26 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have now taken a look at your suggestion.
>> Unfortunately, I found that not all network interfaces have set the DEVTYPE
>> attribute set in their uevent file. I have not yet found any information
>> who sets this value.
1 - 100 of 816 matches
Mail list logo
