Re: [PATCH] kernel: of: add DT MAC address bitwise operation support

2023-11-10 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 2023-11-10 10:41, Shiji Yang wrote: From: Shiji Yang This patch allow user to perform basic bitwise clear/set operation on OF DT MAC address. We use two new added dt-bindings to specific the MAC address bits clear/set mask. "mac-address-bitwise-set" can be used to set bit. And "mac-address-b

Re: [PATCH] kernel: of: remove "mac-address-ascii" support hack

2023-11-10 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 2023-11-10 10:28, Shiji Yang wrote: From: Shiji Yang ASCII MAC address can be handled by nvmem "fixed-layout" now. And all related devices were converted to the new "mac-base" layout format. It's time to remove this hack. Oh, I was hoping for that for a long time. Looks great. -- Rafał Mi

Re: netifd issue

2023-11-09 Thread Hannu Nyman
e9hack kirjoitti 9.11.2023 klo 17.32: I face a strange behaviour since commit 516ab774cc16d4b04b3b17a067cbf2649f1adaeb (system-linux: fix race condition on bringing up wireless devices). After a reboot or a full restart of hostapd via 'wifi down; sleep 30; killall hostapd; sleep 5; wifi', only

Re: [PATCH] kernel: provide better control & help for SLUB configuration

2023-11-08 Thread Thibaut
Hi, > Le 7 nov. 2023 à 23:25, Rafał Miłecki a écrit : > > From: Rafał Miłecki > > Allow selecting KERNEL_SLUB_DEBUG and KERNEL_SLUB_DEBUG_ON manually and > provide detailed help for both. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > --- > config/Config-kernel.in | 15 +-- > 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-11-04 Thread Philip Prindeville
lip Prindeville > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2023 11:09 AM > To: Xiaojun Liu > Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform > > LGTM > > >> On Oct 23, 2023, at 8:52 PM, Xiaojun Liu wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-11-04 Thread Philip Prindeville
> On Oct 30, 2023, at 11:17 AM, Paul Spooren wrote: > > Hi, > > We kind of don’t add image just to contain extra drivers. Extra UCI defaults > for eth ordering are fine but please don’t add an extra image if it just > contains 1-2 extra packages, installable via the ImageBuilder or OPKG. >

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-11-03 Thread Michele Bisogno
Hi Matt, > Does the Renesas/RZ U-boot have EFI support enabled ('bootefi' command)? > Could you try an armsr/armv8 image and see if it boots? I've just tried: => fatload mmc 1:1 0x4800 openwrt-armsr-armv8-generic-initramfs-kernel.bin 32223744 bytes read in 2669 ms (11.5 MiB/s) => bootefi 0x4

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-11-03 Thread Michele Bisogno
Torsten, > The question then is: are they similar enough to build from one kernel > source, or will they require different sets of patches? RZ includes different subseries, as of today: RZ/G, RZ/V and some new RZ/T run Linux. Renesas official SW package is based on the CIP Linux, even though the

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-11-03 Thread Torsten Duwe
Hi Michele, On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 09:04:08 +0100 Michele Bisogno wrote: > > is able to handle that at this folder level. Much of the above is > > "legacy" and does not run OpenWRT(?), but they also seem to aim for > > Risc-V. There is a platform called "ramips" and the broadcoms each > > have their

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-11-03 Thread Michele Bisogno
> Renesas offers different architectures in their portfolio[1], I haven't > dug into the OpenWRT build system for this issue yet to tell whether it > is able to handle that at this folder level. Much of the above is > "legacy" and does not run OpenWRT(?), but they also seem to aim for > Risc-V. The

Re: [PATCH v2 firmware-utils] add dlink-sge-image for D-Link devices by SGE

2023-11-02 Thread Paul Spooren
> On Nov 2, 2023, at 20:16, Sebastian Schaper > wrote: > > This tool will encrypt/decrypt factory images requiring the "SHRS" header > e.g. COVR-C1200, COVR-P2500, COVR-X1860, DIR-878, DIR-882, ... > > Encryption is loosely based on a series of blogposts by ricksanchez [1] > and the provided

Re: [PATCH firmware-utils] add dlink-sge-image for D-Link devices by SGE

2023-11-02 Thread Paul Spooren
Hello, > On Jun 23, 2023, at 14:06, Sebastian Schaper > wrote: > > This tool will encrypt/decrypt factory images requiring the "SHRS" header > e.g. COVR-C1200, COVR-P2500, COVR-X1860, DIR-878, DIR-882, ... > > Encryption is loosely based on a series of blogposts by ricksanchez [1] > and the pr

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-11-02 Thread Torsten Duwe
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 21:40:02 +0100 Robert Marko wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Michele Bisogno > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've been a happy OpenWRT user for many years now, always buying > > routers that could allow me to run it easily. Same here :-) [...] > > > > For example, naming

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-11-02 Thread Michele Bisogno
Hi Matt, > Does the Renesas/RZ U-boot have EFI support enabled ('bootefi' command)? > Could you try an armsr/armv8 image and see if it boots? It does support it but I have never tried it. > (You will need to start U-Boot from qspi or sd card and OpenWrt from a USB or > different sd card) > > If

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-11-01 Thread Mathew McBride
Hi Michele, On Mon, Oct 30, 2023, at 8:39 PM, Michele Bisogno wrote: > Hi, > > I've been a happy OpenWRT user for many years now, always buying > routers that could allow me to run it easily. > > I've been working (actually only in my free time as a hobby) on > porting OpenWRT onto this Renesas

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-10-31 Thread Michele Bisogno
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 10:06, Robert Marko wrote: > > To me, the most sense would be to provide one or 2 boards as part of the > initial > target but with multiple boot options supported so later boards can be > easily added. > > Personally, GH PR-s are rather good for adding new stuff as it make

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-10-31 Thread Robert Marko
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 09:56, Michele Bisogno wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > thanks for the encouragement. > I'll go for plain "renesas" then. > > I am a bit hesitating on when / how to submit patches. > At the moment the image generated is for the sd card (similar to > Raspberry Pi) and for a single d

Re: [PATCH] Deactivate _FORTIFY_SOURCE in jitterentropy-base.c

2023-10-31 Thread Jonas Gorski
Hi, On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 23:11, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > This fixes compilation with glibc. > > _FORTIFY_SOURCE only works with compiler optimizations activated. > We have to deactivate it when we set -O0. > > This fixes the following error message with glibc: > error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURC

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-10-31 Thread Michele Bisogno
Hi Robert, thanks for the encouragement. I'll go for plain "renesas" then. I am a bit hesitating on when / how to submit patches. At the moment the image generated is for the sd card (similar to Raspberry Pi) and for a single device (RZ/G2L) However I am planning to support more boot memories (de

RE: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-10-31 Thread Xiaojun Liu
Hi, Thank you for your guide! I will resubmit it. -Original Message- From: Paul Spooren Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 1:18 AM To: Xiaojun Liu Cc: Philip Prindeville ; openwrt-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform Hi, We kind of don’t add image

Re: Adding a new platform: renesas rz

2023-10-30 Thread Robert Marko
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Michele Bisogno wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been a happy OpenWRT user for many years now, always buying > routers that could allow me to run it easily. Hi, nice to hear this. > > I've been working (actually only in my free time as a hobby) on > porting OpenWRT onto this

Re: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-10-30 Thread Paul Spooren
Hi, We kind of don’t add image just to contain extra drivers. Extra UCI defaults for eth ordering are fine but please don’t add an extra image if it just contains 1-2 extra packages, installable via the ImageBuilder or OPKG. > >> On Oct 23, 2023, at 8:52 PM, Xiaojun Liu wrote: >> >> Add new

RE: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-10-29 Thread Xiaojun Liu
Hi Philip, Thank you! Do you know when it will be merged to Openwrt main thread ? -Original Message- From: Philip Prindeville Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2023 11:09 AM To: Xiaojun Liu Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-28 Thread Elliott Mitchell
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 07:25:38AM +0200, Stijn Tintel wrote: > On 24/10/2023 15:25, Christian Marangi wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > >> Christian Marangi writes: > >> > >>> Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might > >>> be

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-28 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 24/10/2023 15:25, Christian Marangi wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: Christian Marangi writes: Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might be THE solution to our specific problem. Wonder if someone can test it on a sample repos

Re: packages repos: libpcre

2023-10-28 Thread Stijn Tintel
On 28/10/2023 20:03, Paul D wrote: Hi, maybe some housekeeping process is nececssary, but I got this immediately after I did the usually recommended checkout procedures, and have been even after a git pull, every time I run make. The prce package was moved from the base repo to the packages,

Re: CI/CD failures on non-x86 platforms

2023-10-28 Thread Andrey Jr. Melnikov
Philip Prindeville wrote: > Thought I sent this earlier but I see no trace of it, so here goes again. > Here it is again with the link to the build and the extracted logs from one > of the failing builds: > https://github.com/openwrt/packages/actions/runs/6629645917/job/18009391257?pr=22359 >

Re: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-10-27 Thread Philip Prindeville
LGTM > On Oct 23, 2023, at 8:52 PM, Xiaojun Liu wrote: > > Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform > Device name:Cordoba Edge Platform > hardware specifications: CPU - Intel Atom C3000 > WiFi - mt7915e > > Signed-off-by: Xiaojun Liu mailto:xiaojun@silicom.co.il >

Re: CI/CD failures on non-x86 platforms

2023-10-27 Thread Philip Prindeville
Thought I sent this earlier but I see no trace of it, so here goes again. Here it is again with the link to the build and the extracted logs from one of the failing builds: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/actions/runs/6629645917/job/18009391257?pr=22359 CFLAGS="-Os -pipe -mcpu=8548 -fno-cal

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-26 Thread Elliott Mitchell
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Christian Marangi writes: > > > Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might be > > THE solution to our specific problem. Wonder if someone can test it on a > > sample repository. > > > > [1] https://devblog

Re: SBOM Tool for OpenWRT to feed Dependency Track

2023-10-26 Thread Petr Štetiar
Pfendtner Steffen [2022-10-18 14:38:56]: Hi, > We decided to publish our internal fork of the Timesys SBOM Tool we found on > github. You find our version at: https://github.com/ads-tec/sbom-openwrt thanks for sharing! BTW I took that output and drafted first version[1] by extending current im

Re: Comfast CF-E110n

2023-10-25 Thread Bill Moffitt
Roger- Good idea. I think I may have been running firmware for a different device (E-320N, probably - it appears to have been the base design for several of their products). I was hoping you (or someone) could look at the log and say, "Hey, I know what that is..." Worth a shot... Next step - pu

Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:31 AM Christian Marangi wrote: > Hi, I merged this series on main. Thanks Christian! (I hope it doesn't explode...) > I hope to have followup for the firmware (hoping it will ever be > accepted upstream) Yeah I am working on that. > and for the hotplug script for th

Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-25 Thread Christian Marangi
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 08:43:02AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > XP4xx was deleted because of lack of maintenance in 2020. > > In the years since, the upstream Linux support for IXP4xx has > been rewritten from scratch. It is now pretty well supported > using device tree and modern subsystems that

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-24 Thread Elliott Mitchell
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:25:06PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > Christian Marangi writes: > > > > > Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might > > > be > > > THE solution to our specific problem. W

Re: Comfast CF-E110n

2023-10-24 Thread Roger Pueyo Centelles | Guifi.net via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi, Bill, I have a couple of the

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] ixp4xx: Resurrect IXP4xx support using device tree

2023-10-24 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
W dniu 23.10.2023 o 08:43, Linus Walleij pisze: > This resurrects the support for IXP4xx using device tree > rather than the old (deleted) board files. The final pieces > of IXP4xx board files were deleted in Linux v5.19. > > Ext4 root filesystems on CF and USB are supported by the > default confi

Re: CI/CD failures on non-x86 platforms

2023-10-24 Thread Robert Marko
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 17:46, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm seeing the following: > > https://github.com/openwrt/packages/actions/runs/6621741418/job/17986176198?pr=22362 > > Specifically: > > mips-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -shared -o libcligen.so.6.4 cligen_object.o > cligen_callback.o

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-24 Thread Christian Marangi
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 02:21:35PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Christian Marangi writes: > > > Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might be > > THE solution to our specific problem. Wonder if someone can test it on a > > sample repository. > > > > [1] https://devblog

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-24 Thread Bjørn Mork
Christian Marangi writes: > Anyway I have also found this [1]... if it does actually works, it might be > THE solution to our specific problem. Wonder if someone can test it on a > sample repository. > > [1] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20190919-00/?p=102904 Nice! Seems to work.

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-24 Thread Christian Marangi
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 01:40:22PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Ack on the broken history problem. > > I don't think it's necessary to keep two separate histories though. The > main issue is the periodical removal of files keeping parts of history, > resulting in an increasing number of file names

Re: A Method of Breaking Git

2023-10-24 Thread Bjørn Mork
Ack on the broken history problem. I don't think it's necessary to keep two separate histories though. The main issue is the periodical removal of files keeping parts of history, resulting in an increasing number of file names to follow for the complete history. Doing git mv config-5.15 config

RE: Subject: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-10-23 Thread Xiaojun Liu
Thanks for your reminding! I will update my patch to fix these issues. -Original Message- From: Philip Prindeville Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 1:05 PM To: Xiaojun Liu Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

Re: Subject: [PATCH] x86 64: Add new device Cordoba Edge Platform

2023-10-22 Thread Philip Prindeville
Doesn't this just have ixgbe and igc NIC's? And the mt7915e of course. Don't think we need the amd-xgbe, bnx2, e1000e, e1000, r8169, tg3 drivers. The BIOS we've been using has some odd enumeration of the PCI bus, so you might want to include a patch for target/linux/x86/base-files/etc/board.d/0

Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add support for rtw88_8822bu

2023-10-22 Thread Alexis Lothoré via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hello Hauke, On 10/22/23 17:53, H

Re: [PATCH libubox] jshn: Do not perform double key normalisation

2023-10-22 Thread Sander Vanheule
Cc Felix's correct address. Sorry for the noise! Best, Sander On Sun, 2023-10-22 at 17:51 +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote: > jshn stores a JSON file in the shell environment using a set of > variable, using the key to an object in the shell variable name. This > restricts the allowed character set t

Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add support for rtw88_8822bu

2023-10-22 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 10/22/23 12:31, Alexis Lothoré wrote: From: Alexis Lothoré Kernel 6.1 has introduced support for RTW8822BU network adapter, which is an USB variant of the rtw8822b 802.11ac chipset family. Build and install the corresponding module in the rtw88 package Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré --- Th

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:52 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:32 PM Christian Marangi > > wrote: > > > > > Yes! Would be ideal then we can just bump the linux-firmware package and > > > reference it there.

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:32 PM Christian Marangi > wrote: > > > Yes! Would be ideal then we can just bump the linux-firmware package and > > reference it there. > > OK I'll try this. > > > What would happen to the additional sou

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:32 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > Yes! Would be ideal then we can just bump the linux-firmware package and > reference it there. OK I'll try this. > What would happen to the additional source tho? Would it be included in > the submitted fw? Yes there are several things

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:26:30PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:33 PM Christian Marangi > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start > > > applying these patches, apart

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:33 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start > > applying these patches, apart from patch 10/10 where we might > > want to do something different? > > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start > applying these patches, apart from patch 10/10 where we might > want to do something different? > I started to merge the first trivial patch that just adds packages and

Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] firmware: Resurrect the ixp4xx microcode package

2023-10-20 Thread Christian Marangi
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > The firmware package for the IXP4xx microcode was deleted but > the source files are still in the file cache so we can easily > resurrect it. > > The firmware either supports ethernet (the most common) or > WAN (less common), image t

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-20 Thread Linus Walleij
If there is some rough consensus on this, could someone start applying these patches, apart from patch 10/10 where we might want to do something different? If no-one is willing to shepherd IXP4xx I am willing to do commits but that requires commit access, and I don't think I can self-nominate for

Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

2023-10-16 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Em 16/10/2023 04:32, Bjørn Mork e

Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

2023-10-16 Thread Leon Busch-George
Hi, that was my mistake - sorry! Thanks for finding and fixing it :-) I keep accidentally tapping the R key when jumping over words (E) for some reason. "Purging the r's" is something I do quite regularly. But a 't'? :-D Regarding the detection of such mistakes: To retain alphabetical ordering,

Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

2023-10-16 Thread Bjørn Mork
Christian Marangi writes: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 09:59:57PM +0200, Paul D wrote: >> On 2023-10-15 19:41, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> >> > And it would be great if we could have some automated check >> > to help us spot these kinds of unrelated and unexpected >> > changes. I don't think the regular re

Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

2023-10-15 Thread edgar . soldin
On 15.10.2023 21:59, Paul D wrote: This needs to be applied to 23.05 and master ASAP.  It is already bricking devices. how about quickly removing the erroneous image from https://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/23.05.0/ plus adding a prominent red NOTE on https://openwrt.org/toh/zyxel/nr7101

Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

2023-10-15 Thread Christian Marangi
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 09:59:57PM +0200, Paul D wrote: > On 2023-10-15 19:41, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > A typo snuck in with the addition of Cudy M1800, changing > > "nr7101" to "nt7101". The result is a default network config > > for NR7101 without the only ethernet interface on the NR7101, > > there

Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

2023-10-15 Thread Paul D
While I second the urgency of this, I venture the question of how one might otherwise catch these things, but for sharp eyes. There is an attention deficit with respect to the volume of patches and PRs that come in. On 2023-10-15 19:41, Bjørn Mork wrote: A typo snuck in with the addition of

Re: OpenWrt 23.05.0 - First stable release

2023-10-13 Thread Nicholas Smith
Congratulations on an epic release All the best, Nicholas All the best, Nicholas Nicholas Smith NB Embedded Pty Ltd nicho...@nbembedded.com ABN: 54 663 236 940 https://nbembedded.com On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 19:26, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > Hi, > > The OpenWrt community is proud to announce t

Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] ixp4xx: Add hdparm script

2023-10-13 Thread Andrey Jr. Melnikov
Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:28 AM Andrey Jr. Melnikov > wrote: > > Linus Walleij wrote: > > > This script will make sure to spin down harddrives on IXP4xx > > > NAS devices such as the NSLU2 and siblings after 1 minute > > > of inactivity. > > > > Why not use hotplug event

Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] ixp4xx: Add hdparm script

2023-10-13 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:28 AM Andrey Jr. Melnikov wrote: > Linus Walleij wrote: > > This script will make sure to spin down harddrives on IXP4xx > > NAS devices such as the NSLU2 and siblings after 1 minute > > of inactivity. > > Why not use hotplug events? Could be a good idea! Do you have

Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] ixp4xx: Add hdparm script

2023-10-12 Thread Andrey Jr. Melnikov
Linus Walleij wrote: > This script will make sure to spin down harddrives on IXP4xx > NAS devices such as the NSLU2 and siblings after 1 minute > of inactivity. Why not use hotplug events? > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > target/linux/ixp4xx/base-files/etc/board.d/03_hdparm | 14

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath79: correct switch PHYs for GMAC0 in ar934x

2023-10-12 Thread Randy Li via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hello On 2023/10/12 13:59, Chuan

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] kernel: netdevices: Package AMD PHY

2023-10-12 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:43, Linus Walleij wrote: > > This adds a package for the AMD and Altima PHY, found in some > odd devices. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- LGTM, Reviewed-by: Robert Marko > package/kernel/linux/modules/netdevices.mk | 16 > 1 file changed, 16 i

Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] kernel: Add kmod-rtc-x1205

2023-10-12 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:43, Linus Walleij wrote: > > To support the IXP42x platforms we need a kernel module > for the X1205 RTC so we can load it as an optional module. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > ChangeLog v1->v3: > - Use autoprobe, exclude from preinit. LGTM, Reviewed-by: Rober

Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] kernel: Add kmod-rtc-r7301

2023-10-12 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:43, Linus Walleij wrote: > > To support the IXP42x platforms we need a kernel module > for the Epson R7301 RTC so we can load it as an optional > module. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > ChangeLog v1->v3: > - Use AutoProbe, drop preinit hook. LGTM, Reviewed-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath79: correct switch PHYs for GMAC0 in ar934x

2023-10-11 Thread Chuanhong Guo
Hi! On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 5:02 AM Randy Li via openwrt-devel wrote: > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ath79: correct switch PHYs for GMAC0 in ar934x > According to Ethernet Subsystem section of Functional Description > chapter of the datasheet, when GMAC0 connects to the internal > switch, it is MDC/MDIO

Re: packet captures of sony's new 80Mbit service?

2023-10-11 Thread Sridhar via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Idiots > On Oct 11, 2023, at 7:5

Re: packet captures of sony's new 80Mbit service?

2023-10-11 Thread Greg Oliver
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 5:21 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > On Oct 11, 2023, at 21:05, Mark Thurston wrote: > > > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:04:41 +0100 Dave Taht wrote --- > >> Anyone got a ps4 or ps5 and can take a packet capture at their router? > >> Dying to know if it

Re: packet captures of sony's new 80Mbit service?

2023-10-11 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Mark, > On Oct 11, 2023, at 21:05, Mark Thurston wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:04:41 +0100 Dave Taht wrote --- >> Anyone got a ps4 or ps5 and can take a packet capture at their router? >> Dying to know if it is cubic or bbr in particular >> > > Sorry if this is a silly comment

Re: packet captures of sony's new 80Mbit service?

2023-10-11 Thread Mark Thurston
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 18:04:41 +0100 Dave Taht wrote --- > Anyone got a ps4 or ps5 and can take a packet capture at their router? > Dying to know if it is cubic or bbr in particular > Sorry if this is a silly comment but will all traffic not be encrypted? Unless you've changed the certs

Re: packet captures of sony's new 80Mbit service?

2023-10-11 Thread Christian Marangi (Ansuel)
> > Anyone got a ps4 or ps5 and can take a packet capture at their router? > Dying to know if it is cubic or bbr in particular > > https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/23/10/05/154219/sonys-high-bitrate-movie-service-is-now-available-on-ps5-and-ps4 > 80 mbps oh boy... the dream for correct str

Re: [PATCH uqmi 3/3] wds: allow profile reconfiguration

2023-10-11 Thread David Bauer
Hi Henrik, On 10/11/23 09:52, Henrik Ginstmark wrote: Hi I have a similar patch for APN profile commands, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/patch/20220905200751.998416-1-hen...@ginstmark.se/ I included commands for --get-default-profile-number --get-profile-settings --create-profile

Re: [PATCH uqmi 3/3] wds: allow profile reconfiguration

2023-10-11 Thread Henrik Ginstmark
Hi I have a similar patch for APN profile commands, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/patch/20220905200751.998416-1-hen...@ginstmark.se/ I included commands for --get-default-profile-number --get-profile-settings --create-profile --modify-profile /Henrik Den tis 10 okt. 2023 kl 16:0

Re: [PATCH] build: explicitly specify Makefile generator

2023-10-09 Thread Rosen Penev
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 6:05 AM Eicke Herbertz wrote: > > > > > Where does that CMAKE_GENERATOR environment variable come from? Would > > it make sense to undefine it instead? > > > > Regards, > > Jonas > > Well, from the environment of my development machine. > I have it set to Ninja for a long ti

Re: [PATCH] build: explicitly specify Makefile generator

2023-10-09 Thread Eicke Herbertz
Where does that CMAKE_GENERATOR environment variable come from? Would it make sense to undefine it instead? Regards, Jonas Well, from the environment of my development machine. I have it set to Ninja for a long time on this system. Do you mean undefining it manually or as part of the build pr

Re: Device Support Inquiry

2023-10-09 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:41 AM Nagumalla Venkata Uday Bhaskar wrote: > Thank you for your response. I appreciate your guidance. I am interested > in working on this and would like to get started. However, I'm not very > experienced with hardware hacking, so I could use some more specific > inst

Re: [PATCH] build: explicitly specify Makefile generator

2023-10-09 Thread Jonas Gorski
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 18:56, wrote: > > From: Eicke Herbertz > > When CMAKE_GENERATOR environment variable is defined, CMake will use the > specified generator by default instead of "Unix Makefiles". > This breaks the build of packages setting PKG_USE_NINJA to 0, like > package/kernel/mt76. Wher

Re: Device Support Inquiry

2023-10-09 Thread Nagumalla Venkata Uday Bhaskar via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi Linus, Thank you for your res

Re: Device Support Inquiry

2023-10-06 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:18 AM Nagumalla Venkata Uday Bhaskar via openwrt-devel wrote: > Hardware Specifications:: SOC - RTL9310, CPU - 1000MHz, LX - 200MHz, DDR That SoC is technically supported but definitely not that device, would have been in this file: target/linux/realtek/image/rtl931x.mk

Re: Device Support Inquiry

2023-10-05 Thread Nagumalla Venkata Uday Bhaskar via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- ++ Contact Team. On 06/10/23 11

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-04 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
W dniu 4.10.2023 o 19:11, Jonas Gorski pisze: > Hi, > > On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: >> >> XP4xx was deleted because of lack of maintenance in 2020. >> >> In the years since, the upstream Linux support for IXP4xx has >> been rewritten from scratch. It is now pretty well sup

Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] ixp4xx: Resurrect IXP4xx support using device tree

2023-10-04 Thread Tomasz Maciej Nowak
Hi, some comments inline. W dniu 28.09.2023 o 15:28, Linus Walleij pisze: > This resurrects the support for IXP4xx using device tree > rather than the old (deleted) board files. The final pieces > of IXP4xx board files were deleted in Linux v5.19. > > Ext4 root filesystems on CF and USB are suppo

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Resurrect OpenWrt IXP4xx support

2023-10-04 Thread Jonas Gorski
Hi, On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: > > XP4xx was deleted because of lack of maintenance in 2020. > > In the years since, the upstream Linux support for IXP4xx has > been rewritten from scratch. It is now pretty well supported > using device tree and modern subsystems that did

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] boot/apex: Restore the APEX boot loader

2023-10-04 Thread Jonas Gorski
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 14:51, Robert Marko wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > This is a partial revert of the deletion of the IXP4xx > > target: we restore the APEX boot loader so we can use it > > for the NSLU2 and related targets. > > > > The APEX upstream is

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] Delete arm-magic script

2023-10-04 Thread Christian Marangi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 03:28:31PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > This script was used to modify the wrong machine type passed > from the boot loader to the kernel. The device tree kernels > does not use the machine type so this script is no longer > needed. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Can y

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] ixp4xx: Add a ixp4xx hardware crypto kernel module

2023-10-04 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: > > The IXP4xx crypto module must be loaded after the rootfs is > up as it depends on loading some NPE microcode from the file > system. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > package/kernel/linux/modules/crypto.mk | 13 + > targe

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] boot/apex: Restore the APEX boot loader

2023-10-04 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: > > This is a partial revert of the deletion of the IXP4xx > target: we restore the APEX boot loader so we can use it > for the NSLU2 and related targets. > > The APEX upstream is as dead as it gets so I have applied > OpenWrts old patches on top

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] kernel: Add kmod-rtc-r7301

2023-10-04 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: > > To support the IXP42x platforms we need a kernel module > for the Epson R7301 RTC so we can load it as an optional > module. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk | 15 +++ > 1 file chang

Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] kernel: Add kmod-rtc-x1205

2023-10-04 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: > > To support the IXP42x platforms we need a kernel module > for the X1205 RTC so we can load it as an optional module. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > package/kernel/linux/modules/other.mk | 16 > 1 file changed, 16

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] kernel: netdevices: Package AMD PHY

2023-10-04 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 15:29, Linus Walleij wrote: > > This adds a package for the AMD and Altima PHY, found in some > odd devices. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > package/kernel/linux/modules/netdevices.mk | 16 > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/pack

Re: [PATCH v2] bmips: bcm6368-enetsw: Bump max MTU

2023-10-02 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 12:25 AM Linus Walleij wrote: > Test with ping from host: > > PING 192.168.1.220 (192.168.1.220) 1472(1500) bytes of data. > 1480 bytes from 192.168.1.220: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.723 ms > 1480 bytes from 192.168.1.220: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.562 ms > 1480 bytes from 192

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mac80211: compile kconf with host gcc

2023-10-02 Thread Zeyu Dong
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 1:52 PM Christian Marangi wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 09:26:48PM -0400, Zeyu Dong wrote: > > Fix the building issue setting CC to KERNEL_CC in kernel.mk. The > > kernel backports by default uses CC to compile kconf. A new patch is > > added to mac80211 to compile kcon

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mac80211: compile kconf with host gcc

2023-10-02 Thread Christian Marangi
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 09:26:48PM -0400, Zeyu Dong wrote: > Fix the building issue setting CC to KERNEL_CC in kernel.mk. The > kernel backports by default uses CC to compile kconf. A new patch is > added to mac80211 to compile kconf with host gcc. > > Signed-off-by: Zeyu Dong Can you run this u

Re: [PATCH] bmips: bcm6368-enetsw: Bump max MTU to 1536

2023-10-01 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 10:55 PM Jonas Gorski wrote: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 at 22:40, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > The max MTU for this ethernet switch is 1536 bytes, not 1510 as it is > > The maximum *frame* size accepted is 1536 bytes, not MTU. A difference > of 14 bytes. Darn. I sent a new versi

Re: [PATCH] bmips: bcm6368-enetsw: Bump max MTU to 1536

2023-10-01 Thread Jonas Gorski
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 at 22:40, Linus Walleij wrote: > > The max MTU for this ethernet switch is 1536 bytes, not 1510 as it is The maximum *frame* size accepted is 1536 bytes, not MTU. A difference of 14 bytes. > right now. The available overhead is needed when using the DSA switch with > a cascade

Re: [PATCH] bcm53xx: Unconditionally build U-Boot for DIR-890L

2023-09-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 6:33 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > Building the DIR-890L image requires U-Boot to be built > so list it as a device package. > > Reported-by: Arınç ÜNAL > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Scratch this, Rani has made a proper solution to the problem, see: https://github.com/openw

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >