Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello, On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: I also had this issue on my sx763 lantiq based board: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9440 With symbol table I got this oops: Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]: ... bla bla bla (to keep it short) ... Call Trace:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread Luka Perkov
Hi, On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for CONFIG_PREEMPT: Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop or embedded

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:39, Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for CONFIG_PREEMPT:     Select

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread edgar . soldin
On 02.09.2011 12:39, Luka Perkov wrote: Hi, On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for CONFIG_PREEMPT: Select this if you are building a kernel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Image command line hack question

2011-09-02 Thread jason duhamell
As promised, here is the official realtek bsp with documentation. http://d01.megashares.com/dl/abc0f5c/rtl819x-sdk-v2%5B1%5D.2.tar.gz Jason On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Florian Fainelli flor...@openwrt.orgwrote: Hello, On Saturday 27 August 2011 15:14:51 Andrew wrote: Hello again, I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Friday 02 September 2011 12:55:08 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:39, Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: Also in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread Luka Perkov
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:32:18PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September 2011 12:55:08 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:39, Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Friday 02 September 2011 15:10:47 Luka Perkov wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:32:18PM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Friday 02 September 2011 12:55:08 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:39, Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

2011-09-02 Thread Otto Solares Cabrera
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote: Please look at the kernel config file above. You will see that CONFIG_PREEMPT should be used on embedded systems... Doesn't CONFIG_PREEMPT will add userspace scheduling overhead which in turn harm kernelspace workloads such as packet