On 21/04/2014 07:06, Ben Mulvihill wrote:
Hi John,
May I take up your offer of a hand with overlayfs on top of ubi? I
have in fact managed to get a working overlay + ubi image, and also
a ubifs image. But I still have a few questions:
- Am I right in thinking that there is no way to
On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB flash,
100mbit IP175E switch and dual-band 802.11n wireless.
Notes: - I couldn't get the switch to be recognized without
building it into the kernel, rather than as a module. Since the
On 21 April 2014 11:05, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB flash,
100mbit IP175E switch and dual-band 802.11n wireless.
Notes: - I couldn't get the switch to be recognized without
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 09:29 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
On 21/04/2014 07:06, Ben Mulvihill wrote:
Hi John,
May I take up your offer of a hand with overlayfs on top of ubi? I
have in fact managed to get a working overlay + ubi image, and also
a ubifs image. But I still have a few
On 21/04/2014 10:36, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 21 April 2014 11:05, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB
flash, 100mbit IP175E switch and dual-band 802.11n wireless.
Notes: - I
On 21 April 2014 11:45, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/04/2014 10:36, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 21 April 2014 11:05, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB
flash, 100mbit IP175E
On 21/04/2014 10:58, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
The target was ramips, rt2880 and rt305x subtargets at least. I'm
not sure how rtl8366xx differs from ip175e but both realtek switch
and smi parts are under drivers/net/phy/. I remember when I
submitted a patch to exclude realtek switch from target
On 21 April 2014 12:55, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/04/2014 10:58, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
The target was ramips, rt2880 and rt305x subtargets at least. I'm
not sure how rtl8366xx differs from ip175e but both realtek switch
and smi parts are under drivers/net/phy/. I remember
On 21/04/2014 12:16, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 21 April 2014 12:55, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/04/2014 10:58, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
The target was ramips, rt2880 and rt305x subtargets at least.
I'm not sure how rtl8366xx differs from ip175e but both realtek
switch and smi
Hi Roman,
the etehrnet driver needs the phy driver to be present when the
of_phy_connect() is called. to my knowledge there is no mechanism
for defeered phy attach logic.
i just verified to be 100% and i am correct on this. obviously the phy
driver need to be loaded prior to the network
* John Crispin (j...@phrozen.org) wrote:
- GPIOs 8 and 13 (WPS LEDs) do not work. The fix is to turn off bit
6 in the RT2880 SYSTEM_CONFIG register. Not sure where this should
go--I put together a quick hack that does this in the rt2880 GPIO
driver and triggered from the DT node. This
Generates webflash-compatible images for a few RT2880 routers based
on Gemtek OEM boards.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite lei...@staticky.com
---
tools/firmware-utils/Makefile | 1 +
tools/firmware-utils/src/mkheader_gemtek.c | 211 +
2 files changed, 212
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite lei...@staticky.com
---
target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile
b/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile
index bf9ccc1..26386bf 100644
---
On 21 April 2014 14:17, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
Hi Roman,
the etehrnet driver needs the phy driver to be present when the
of_phy_connect() is called. to my knowledge there is no mechanism
for defeered phy attach logic.
i just verified to be 100% and i am correct on this.
On 21/04/2014 17:57, Claudio Leite wrote:
Generates webflash-compatible images for a few RT2880 routers
based on Gemtek OEM boards.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite lei...@staticky.com
is there a difference between these 2 patches and the 3/3 that was
posted earlier ? i already have the 3/3 in
The 7Links PX-4885-675 is a small battery-powered wireless router.
It is based on a RT5350F WiSoC and features one ethernet port and one
USB port. It is a Hame MPR-A1 clone, except it has different GPIOs,
a different battery and more RAM (32 MB).
This patch adds a profile for this board, the
Hi,
On 21/04/2014 19:19, Hugo Grostabussiat wrote:
The 7Links PX-4885-675 is a small battery-powered wireless router.
It is based on a RT5350F WiSoC and features one ethernet port and
one USB port. It is a Hame MPR-A1 clone, except it has different
GPIOs, a different battery and more RAM
I have never used the version part of this file actually, I use it
solely to set the source path to a local tree.
Same here. We actually used it to interface OpenWrt with SCM which are not
supported natively by OpenWrt like P4.
Right, that is a valid usecase, but
BT Home Hub 2B: use overlayfs on top of ubi.
Signed-off-by: Ben Mulvihill ben.mulvih...@gmail.com
---
target/linux/lantiq/dts/BTHOMEHUBV2B.dts | 14 +++---
target/linux/lantiq/xway/config-default | 17 +
target/linux/lantiq/xway/profiles/bt.mk |4
Hi John,
* John Crispin (j...@phrozen.org) wrote:
is there a difference between these 2 patches and the 3/3 that was
posted earlier ? i already have the 3/3 in my local queue, wanna make
sure i push the correct patch ...
No difference in the code. I just figured it made more sense to
Le 21/04/2014 19:30, John Crispin a écrit :
patch looks good ... but ... 7links-px-4885-675 is awfully long. can
we use px4885 instead ?
This is long indeed.
I'll send another patch with the names changed.
I'll also correct a mistake I made in uci-defaults/01_leds.
Regards.
Or is Atheros chips the only offering.
Thanks,
John Clark.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
The 7Links PX-4885 is a small battery-powered wireless router.
It is based on a RT5350F WiSoC and features one ethernet port and one
USB port. It is a Hame MPR-A1 clone, except it has different GPIOs,
a different battery and more RAM (32 MB).
This patch adds a profile for this board, the
23 matches
Mail list logo
