Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patch to enable building of uuencode applet for busybox

2012-03-19 Thread i iordanov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Conor O'Gorman wrote: > If you are willing to adjust the script, can I suggest you convert it to > lua. It's not a very large script and you can then use the > nixio.bin.b64encode() function. Also you can tidy up the uci access > using the lua uci library. I think

[OpenWrt-Devel] Disk write activity during boot.

2012-03-19 Thread jonsm...@gmail.com
How do you track down who is writing to the disk during boot? I'm getting 26KB of writes onto a drive where I don't want any. I'm using ext3 for root on a SD card. Would I be better off making a jffs/squashfs partition for root and then doing my logging onto a separately mounted partition? -- Jon

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
hadn't seen it. yes, different build dir should work. thanks ..ede On 19.03.2012 15:05, Peter Wagner wrote: > both packaes are build in a sepreate folders > so yes - you can select both packages. > > But you can also building both and testing it ;) > > /Peter > On Monday 19 March 2012 13:24:24

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl (+PATCH, RFC)

2012-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Deloget
Hello, My own two cents. I tried to implement it the VARIANT way, and I ended with (basically) repeating everything twice in the Makefile. See attached for details. If someone knows a better way, or if I messed up this patch, I'm ready to listen to criticism. Another way I tried (and I already

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread Peter Wagner
both packaes are build in a sepreate folders so yes - you can select both packages. But you can also building both and testing it ;) /Peter On Monday 19 March 2012 13:24:24 edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are > selected? don't you end u

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are selected? don't you end up with two packages both containing whatever was build first? ..ede On 19.03.2012 13:18, Peter Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to implement > the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread Peter Wagner
Hi, look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to implement the nossl stuff in one Makefile. Regards, Peter On Monday 19 March 2012 12:05:31 Christiane Ruetten wrote: > Hi Edgar, > > just to be explicit: the idea is to have lighttpd-nossl in the > official repo so I can get

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
Maybe you are lucky and someone steps up. You are probably better of finding the maintainer (if there's one) directly by looking at the revision log or asking in the openwrt irc channel. The mailing list is often slow in this regard. If it all does not happen in time frame you planned in then yo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread Christiane Ruetten
Hi Edgar, just to be explicit: the idea is to have lighttpd-nossl in the official repo so I can get away with distributing a single platform-independent opkg. So I was hoping that the current maintainer could simply add a -nossl build instead of me having to reproduce the complete build effort.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patch to enable building of uuencode applet for busybox

2012-03-19 Thread Conor O'Gorman
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:19 +, Conor O'Gorman wrote: > I thought that the uuencode option on busybox was not exposed, but it is > a config variable. There should be some suitable syntax you can use in > your package makefile to enable it? I am only familiar with the > dependency option, but tha

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote: > Hi, > > would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd > package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost > completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving > almost no headroom for further functionality, and ht

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patch to enable building of uuencode applet for busybox

2012-03-19 Thread Conor O'Gorman
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 19:57 -0400, i iordanov wrote: > Hi Philip, > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Philip Prindeville > wrote: > > Why is voicemail encoding using uuencode and not base64??? > > Well, it can be either. I use uuencode with the "-m" option which > makes it output base64 encodin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] New SQLAlchemy Package for Python

2012-03-19 Thread Park, Woo Jae
New packages for running flexget on Openwrt. found error on previous package. so I am resending file. Signed-off-by: woojae, park --- Index: feeds/packages/lang/pysqlalchemy/Makefile === --- feeds/packages/lang/pysqlalchemy/Makefile

[OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

2012-03-19 Thread Christiane Ruetten
Hi, would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving almost no headroom for further functionality, and https is not always required. I am currently in the process