Hello people,
I have asus wl-500W router (http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/asus/wl500w). It
is also very similar to wl-500gp.
Some few months ago I updated to 12.09. I can't recall now if it was
backfire or kamikaze before, but I noticed 2 things immediately:
1. Maximum practically achievable
Hello people,
Since I'm trying to locate a kenrel panic happening in AA 12.09, I
thought I'll just rebuild it from source with debuginfo and rerun my
tests. However, git.openwrt.org/12.09/openwrt.git clearly puts me
somewhere in between 12.09 and (the unreleased yet) 12.09.1. On the
other
21.06.2014 14:39, Rafał Miłecki:
What about using tag in svn repo?
svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/tags/attitude_adjustment_12.09/
I tried that, and although version.mk indeed stated 12.09, there is some
discrepancy:
- svn told me that it fetched r41293 this time;
- the router flashed with
21.06.2014 0:23, Rafał Miłecki:
[...]
This time uplink load was even no more than 20 Mbit.
Here is what I got (although it doesn't look very promising to me).
Maybe I should enable some more debugging somewhere?
[ 543.432000] Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]:
[ 543.432000] Cpu 0
[
21.06.2014 0:23, Rafał Miłecki:
On 20 June 2014 22:12, Nikolai Zhubrn-a-zh...@yandex.ru wrote:
There are tons of updates in trunk, this bug can be fixed for a long
time already ;)
Unfortunately it seems no :/
Also, with trunk version, routing speed limit seems to be noticably
lower (~27 Mbit
Hello Chirag,
I think I understand your method, although it is far from being
automatic (which I was hoping for), anyway, I'll probably try it a bit
later if I fail to locate my bug-of-interest otherwise.
Thank you for the detailed explanation. I think it definitely deserves
some place in
Hello all,
this is good news, however bad news is that brcm47xx (generic) target is
still seriously broken, at least on Asus WL-500W. The problem is
absolutely reproducible, and I reported it some time ago, but
unfortunately it attracted very little interest here for some reason.
Don't take
14.07.2014 18:34, Rafał Miłecki:
Please create a ticket with boot log, nvram show and your default
(broken) /etc/config/network.
Done,
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17111
(Note: trac does not seem to know about rc1 yet, therefore I had to mark
it for trunk)
Thank you.
Nikolai
.
14.07.2014 18:42, Rafał Miłecki:
[...]
[ 637.56] Call Trace:
[ 637.56] [80010bb4] show_stack+0x48/0x70
[ 637.57] [80019bd4] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xa8
[ 637.57] [80019c30] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2c/0x38
[ 637.58] [801b27dc] skb_warn_bad_offload+0xc0/0xe8
[ 637.58]
14.07.2014 20:44, Jonas Gorski:
[...]
If I were to speculate wildly, I would guess that B44_RXMAXLEN refers to
the maximum frame length, not the maximum buffer length - and in the
code, it's being fed with the maximum buffer length.
This would allow the hardware to receive slightly oversized
15.07.2014 1:42, Jonas Gorski:
[...]
or
bw32(bp, B44_RXMAXLEN, bp-dev-mtu + ETH_HLEN + 8) ?
This is the right one; mtu (the payload) + ETH_HLEN (14 bytes) + 8
(4 bytes for vlan tag, probably 4 extra bytes for custom header
optionally used by broadcom switches)
Ok, tested this. Unfortunately
15.07.2014 12:04, Nikolai Zhubr:
15.07.2014 1:42, Jonas Gorski:
[...]
or
bw32(bp, B44_RXMAXLEN, bp-dev-mtu + ETH_HLEN + 8) ?
This is the right one; mtu (the payload) + ETH_HLEN (14 bytes) + 8
(4 bytes for vlan tag, probably 4 extra bytes for custom header
optionally used by broadcom switches
15.07.2014 23:26, Nikolai Zhubr:
[...]
And I've performed yet another experiment. If I insert an additional
router (running also openwrt but atheros-based) between this WL-500W and
uplink (with the idea to filter out any strange and bogus incoming
packets) and redo the same test, I get no panic
16.07.2014 0:44, Nikolai Zhubr:
[...]
Here is a slightly different panic, although also involving
netif_receive_skb_core (And this is still with additional openwrt router
inserted before uplink):
[ 900.72] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 0004, epc == 80119aa0
18.07.2014 23:55, Rafał Miłecki:
[...]
I understand you try to make a pressure, but it really doesn't help
and just annoys developers. Please avoid that.
I'm currently hardly working on b43 now, trying to fix a lot of issues
in it. That's pretty important too. Be more patient, we have lifes,
Hi,
09.04.2012 15:45, Jo-Philipp Wich:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/generic.failsafe
Alternatively, fresh installation using the TFTP method using reset
button as described in http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/netgear/wndr3700
should also work
Hi,
19.05.2012 18:10, Brian J. Murrell:
[...]
To do this though, I need a kexec-ing image I can flash to my router to
become my boot loader.
Anyone got one for an ar71xx?
Yes. I sometimes use kexec to chain-boot debian from USB hard disk on
wndr3800. I'm using backfire 10.03.1 slightly
Hi,
11.08.2012 0:13, Paul Fertser:
Hi Felipe,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:39:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35:20PM +0400, Paul Fertser wrote:
I'm using an RT3052F device (DIR-620 SOHO wifi router) with current
OpenWrt trunk and its USB port is handled by the
Hi,
this is translation from russian:
The problem is observed on x86.
At the first test pptp was operable, with the following schematic layout
used:
[ISP] -- LAN2 [tp-link wr1043nd(Backfire 10.03)] LAN1 -- eth0[x86(AA 12.09)]
TP-link wr1043nd was configured as follows:
VLAN 1:
info:
I'm re-sending this (because first try was rejected by mailman).
Original Message
Subject: Driver(s) for Synopsys' DesignWare USB OTG
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:30:10 +0400
From: Nikolai Zhubr n-a-zh...@yandex.ru
To: linux-...@vger.kernel.org, openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hello Piter,
08.01.2012 7:12, you wrote:
2012/1/8 Nikolai Zhubrn-a-zh...@yandex.ru:
Hello developers,
I'm trying to find/combine/fix a driver for Synopsys' DesignWare USB
controller. This thing is USB 2.0 host/slave/otg capable and is used in
various SoCs including Amlogic 8726M, Ralink
Hello Peter,
09.01.2012 6:12, Peter Chen:
I am not sure we can combine all Synopsys USB drivers to single file, but we
Synopsys driver which I examine consists of 16 files (each of 2
versions), 200k lines total. I've already perpared some few smaller
files for version merging. So probably it
Hello Leo,
09.01.2012 9:17, Leo Li:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Nikolai Zhubrn-a-zh...@yandex.ru wrote:
2012/1/8 Nikolai Zhubrn-a-zh...@yandex.ru:
Hello developers,
I'm trying to find/combine/fix a driver for Synopsys' DesignWare USB
controller. This thing is USB 2.0 host/slave/otg
Hello people,
The attached trivial patch updates slave-mode parts in dwc otg usb
driver for ramips target. It doesn't touch anything host-mode. The first
2 fragments correct an error in passing argument, this is immediately
clear from comparing with (already correct) calls to
on a MIPS big endian processor, using host
mode.
Thanks,
Conor O'Gorman
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 16:56 +0400, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
Hello Piter,
08.01.2012 7:12, you wrote:
2012/1/8 Nikolai Zhubrn-a-zh...@yandex.ru:
Hello developers,
I'm trying to find/combine/fix a driver for Synopsys
Hello Alexander,
20.01.2012 13:01, Alexander Gordeev:
[trim]
IMO a separate repository (or adoption into staging) would be better
because there are too many interested parties and also the main dwc-otg
development happens not in openwrt.
Where does it happen?
I've actually got a feeling
Hello Conor,
20.01.2012 14:09, Conor O'Gorman:
I would suggest gathering all the available versions into a repository.
Not merged, just gathered together, organised by version and source.
That would be a step towards comparing versions, and also gaining the
attention of the relevant people.
20.01.2012 17:10, Alexander Gordeev:
[...]
However, there were at least several attempts to push dwc-otg to
mainline through linuxppc-dev list. This is what I meant.
Ah, ok. AFAICS the thing on linuxppc-dev failed totally, and I can see
good reasons why. (It was based on an outdated version,
Hello Paul and Alan,
21.01.2012 1:17, Paul Zimmerman:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
This is a serious problem. The gadget API does not specify whether
usb_ep_enable and usb_ep_disable should be able to run in interrupt
context. Consequently we end up with UDC drivers like your DWC
Hello,
22.01.2012 1:40, I wrote:
[...]
if matters). Without that, controller starts raising IN Token Received
with EP mismatch instead of normal Transfer complete bit. If I
understand it correctly, this means that Tx FIFO happened to be filled
in some particular order that controller disliked
Hello people,
I'd like to hear some advice before I waste yet more time on this.
Because my knowledge of USB concepts is close to nonexistent, I'll just
present the situation as I see it currently with just all details I have.
As I understand it, the problem with this thing in device mode is
Hi,
24.01.2012 19:12, Loh Tien Hock:
Hi Nikolai.
I tried the patch with g_serial. it needed some fix I have in my company's
repository for slave mode. Dma mode works correctly.
Wow, this puzzles me somewhat. I'll definitely try to test it and report
back.
Thank you.
Nikolai
[trim]
Hello Alan,
24.01.2012 19:45, Alan Stern:
[trim]
Does this mean that the hardware has only one FIFO? Or only one for
each direction? That's a pretty limited design.
Well EPs do have separate FIFOs, at least that's how the driver see it,
but it looks like they are somehow not fully
09.02.2012 3:48, Jonathan McCrohan:
Hi,
Does the OpenWrt project have any alternate versions of the logo [1]? It
would be nice to have a small version logo that could be turned into a
favicon for both the website itself, and for LuCI.
...and also even to stick it on our favourite devices
Hello all,
I'm running both openwrt and debian on a mips-based wndr3800 netgear
router/ap and I'm using kexec to arrange kind of dual-boot in a safe and
comfortable manner.
Now, I've found that the following is critical for kexec to actually work:
--- arch/mips/kernel/machine_kexec.c.orig
21.02.2012 18:48, Peter Naulls:
[...]
- kexec_start_address = image-start;
+ kexec_start_address = (unsigned long) phys_to_virt(image-start);
kexec_indirection_page =
(unsigned long) phys_to_virt(image-head PAGE_MASK);
Right. The kernel I'm using has this. But if you look back a bit through
Hi people,
First off, I'd note that button hotplug driver is a really great thing -
lots of thanks to its creators!
As I sometimes use openwrt kernel with debian userspace, I've found that
stock button_hotplug has no effect on debian. Even udevadm monitor shows
nothing. Now, because
24.02.2012 20:25, Christian Gagneraud:
Hi there,
I'm currently trying to add a new device (based on a ATSAM9G20), and
during development I would like to boot it on a NFS root.
Unfortunately I noticed that a couple of firstboot/preinit/init scripts
are messing up with either the rootfs and/or
38 matches
Mail list logo
