Hi,
> > I used the same as with other ubnt-wa devices. I'm not really up to date
> > on this metadata thing. Do we normally not include it in factory images?
Indeed, but you've added following extra line to your device:
IMAGE/factory.bin := $$(IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin) | mkubntimage-split
Which
Stijn Tintel [2019-12-03 14:03:16]:
> I've addressed this and added the MAC label in my staging tree:
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/stintel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/lbe-5ac-gen2
Note, that this commit:
ath79: move IMAGE/factory.bin to Device/ubnt-wa
should be probably:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stijn Tintel [mailto:st...@linux-ipv6.be]
> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 01:16
> To: m...@adrianschmutzler.de; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: pozega.tomis...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti LiteBeam
>
Adrian Schmutzler [2019-12-03 13:17:04]:
> Other ubnt-wa do this, too, they just do not define it in parent node:
Ok, I've checked only the parent node.
> So, the question is whether it would make sense to remove the line for all
> the other ubnt-wa devices, too, then.
I would remove it, it
i just checked mac addresses in the first image i built for this
device (r10011) and they are correct:
eth 18:E8:29:_device_specific
wlan5g 18:E8:29:_device_specific
wlan2g 1A:E8:29:_device_specific
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On 3/12/2019 14:31, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Adrian Schmutzler [2019-12-03 13:17:04]:
>
>> Other ubnt-wa do this, too, they just do not define it in parent node:
> Ok, I've checked only the parent node.
>
>> So, the question is whether it would make sense to remove the line for all
>> the other
> >> + IMAGE/factory.bin := $$(IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin) | mkubntimage-split
> > Can we reuse the IMAGE/factory.bin from Device/ubnt here? The only thing
> missing compared to your line is append-metadata ...
>
> I used the same as with other ubnt-wa devices. I'm not really up to date
> on this
On 3/12/2019 13:54, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
+ IMAGE/factory.bin := $$(IMAGE/sysupgrade.bin) | mkubntimage-split
>>> Can we reuse the IMAGE/factory.bin from Device/ubnt here? The only thing
>> missing compared to your line is append-metadata ...
>>
>> I used the same as with other ubnt-wa
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of Petr Štetiar
> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 13:10
> To: Adrian Schmutzler
> Cc: 'Stijn Tintel' ; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org;
> pozega.tomis...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re:
Joe Ayers [2019-11-28 18:40:23]:
Hi,
I'm not able to reproduce it on TP-Link Archer C7 v5.
> Attempting to use the hAP ac lite model RB952Ui-5ac2nD with the 5GHz
> radio0 802.11ac seems to be unstable and consume available memory.
> This is only enabling radio0 with no other changes and
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 01:54, Rosen Penev wrote:
>
> A const char * variable is being passed as a format string. Unfortunately,
> this is not correct.
>
> A constant expression needs to be passed so that GCC can determine the
> types of the format properly.
>
> Also fixed a different warning that
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
СОВЕТСКИЕ МУЛЬТФИЛЬМЫ
Большая
LGTM. (Haven't checked the network setup.) :-)
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: Stijn Tintel [mailto:st...@linux-ipv6.be]
> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 13:33
> To: Petr Štetiar ; Adrian Schmutzler
>
> Cc: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; pozega.tomis...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> ok, so you claim my SoB means that *I* confirmed that my change is
> compatible to the netifd's license. I didn't do that though.
>
> Even if it was me who added that line I doubt is has any relevance for
> netifd because
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 16:29, Hans Dedecker wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Hans,
> >
> > On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans
Hello Hans,
On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Uwe Kleine-König
>>> wrote:
When for example a /60 is assigned to a network the last 4
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> Hello Hans,
>
> On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> >>>
On 03/12/19 15:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Hans,
On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:11 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
When for example a /60 is assigned
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:56:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On 12/3/19 4:28 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Hans,
> >>
> >> On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe
On 12/3/19 4:28 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:59 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Hans,
>>
>> On 12/3/19 8:50 AM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:29 PM Uwe Kleine-König
>>> wrote:
On 11/29/19 8:50 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote:
> On Wed,
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts
b/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts
index 7dcff46917..bcc1e2c27b 100644
---
Merged into my staging tree.
Thank you!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
The button events "pressed" and "released" were switched. Tested with v18.06.4.
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts
Still, now commit description and title mentions 'led' though this
is a key and not an LED.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:33:13PM +0100, Moritz Warning wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
> ---
> target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Moritz Warning [2019-12-03 22:02:32]:
Missing commit description, led -> button in the commit subject.
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
> ---
> target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
Signed-off-by: Moritz Warning
---
target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts
b/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7620n_ravpower_wd03.dts
index 7dcff46917..bcc1e2c27b 100644
---
26 matches
Mail list logo
