Dear OPM community,
I would like to simplify the module structure of OPM by moving the content of
opm-polymer
into opm-autodiff. I intend to initially use the exact same paths as before, so
initially after
the move the opm-autodiff module will contain a new opm/polymer directory.
This will bene
> 3. des. 2015 kl. 13.33 skrev Atgeirr Rasmussen :
>
> If no-one objects I intend to do the reorganization early next week.
This has now been done, and all contents of opm-polymer is now in opm-autodiff.
Special thanks to Arne Morten Kvarving who managed to combine the repositorie
Congratulations Jørgen! And thanks for sharing with us.
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
Dear OPM community!
We are considering renaming the dune-cornerpoint module to opm-grid.
After that, we'd like to migrate the grid functionality that currently resides
in opm-core to opm-grid (for example the UnstructuredGrid class and
the cornerpoint grid processing routines).
This is because:
Dear OPM community,
We would like to organize an OPM meeting this year! We propose having a two-day
meeting, where the
first day would be more user-focused and the second day more developer-focused.
Both days would be
open for anyone who would like to participate.
The meeting will be held in Os
Dear OPM community,
This renaming has been delayed a bit, and will happen sometime in the week
starting on February 29 instead.
Atgeirr
> 22. jan. 2016 kl. 14.07 skrev Atgeirr Rasmussen :
>
> Dear OPM community!
>
> We are considering renaming the dune-cornerpoint module to op
Dear OPM community,
Yesterday a new version of Dune was released (2.4.1) and I had some problems
compiling OPM after updating.
However, the fix is simple: delete your build directories (for opm modules
depending on Dune modules, which are
almost all opm modules except opm-common and opm-parser)
Dear Yanhui,
The answer is simply that Flow does not at the moment support 2-phase runs. We
think this is unfortunate, and
it is on our short list of things we want to fix (probably in a month's time).
Meanwhile you have a few possible
workarounds:
1. Add a dummy gas phase to your case (specify
6. apr. 2016 kl. 10.34 skrev Jørgen Kvalsvik
mailto:jo...@statoil.com>>:
Hi,
I'm working on a better way of doing (Eclipse-compatible) output, and need to
grab some info from the simulators.
I have a WellState (and possibly Well* from opm-core) that I want to extract
rates at some perforatio
The repository has now been renamed on github. The old URL will still work for
a long time (half a year I think) so no-one need to do anything right now.
The next step is creating PRs with the required changes. This is underway.
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailin
6. apr. 2016 kl. 11.48 skrev Jørgen Kvalsvik
mailto:jo...@statoil.com>>:
And if I want to support other simulators than Flow? Will all simulators use
WellState as a base *and* be able to offer these values?
No.
We could consider a transformation similar to the one done for the reservoir
stat
Dear OPM community,
We have now completed renaming dune-cornerpoint -> opm-grid. Now the module
name is changed throughout the system.
1. If you have not already done so, you should now rename your github fork (if
you have one) from dune-cornerpoint to opm-grid.
2. You should rename your dune-
> 7. apr. 2016 kl. 11.33 skrev Markus Blatt :
>
> Hi,
>
> is there in easy way to rename the forked version of the repository on
> github?
Yes, go to the "Settings" tab for your fork, and it's the first item on that
page.
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing l
Hi,
As Arne Morten said, the prerequisites must be in place before you build OPM.
However the build order part of the page you refer to was outdated after our
recent
reorganization efforts. I have updated this to show the correct order.
Atgeirr
8. apr. 2016 kl. 00.07 skrev Ibrahem Atef
mailto
Dear OPM community,
The opm-autodiff module contain quite a few simulator programs, including the
Flow family.
Soon there will also be some simulator programs there that are not based on AD
(moved from
opm-core).
This renaming is intended to make that clearer, and make it easier for users to
f
Dear OPM community,
We would like to invite you to participate in the 2016 OPM Meeting on June 1-2
in Oslo! We hope to welcome anybody who
wants to come, please contact Atgeirr Flø Rasmussen or Tor
Harald Sandve
if you want to join. Please tell us as early as possible if you are planning to
c
Dear OPM community,
The first release candidate is ready for the 2016.04 release can be tested!
There are major structural changes compared to the last release:
- opm-autodiff has been renamed opm-simulators
- opm-polymer is no longer an independent module, it is now part of
opm-simulators
- dun
Dear OPM community,
We are pleased to announce the availability of OPM release 2016.04!
This is the first release this year, the previous release was 2015.10. The next
release is expected to be 2016.10. Some features of the release include:
- Further improved general performance for Flow, the f
24. mai 2016 kl. 09.14 skrev Per Arne Slotte
mailto:paslo...@gmail.com>>:
OPM'ers
Having had no major problems with compiling OPM back in january, I am now
trying to upgrade to the latest version.
No problems with the first 6 modules (common, parser, material, core, grid,
output) except that
Dear OPM community,
The program for the OPM meeting is ready, and can be viewed at
http://opm-project.org/?p=664
Please direct any questions to me or Tor Harald Sandve.
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/m
The slides from the recent OPM meeting in Oslo have been uploaded to the OPM
web site:
http://opm-project.org/?page_id=39
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
14. jun. 2016 kl. 03.57 skrev David Ogbe
mailto:do...@aust.edu.ng>>:
Any analytical aquifer models like Carter Tracey or van Everdingen-Hurst in
flow?
No-one have implemented any such models yet. It would be very appreciated.
If you would like to contribute an implementation please ask questi
> 15. jun. 2016 kl. 14.55 skrev David Ogbe :
>
> I am trying to run opm flow simulator to initialize an eclipse data set. The
> error message I get is something like "property elements outside valid
> limits".
> What does this error message mean? Where can I see the property elements and
> t
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your interest in OPM!
The amount of code that goes into building Flow is quite large, and reading it
all is not really a feasible project.
That said, it should not be too hard to find the parts that interest you the
most. The most central class for Flow
is the BlackoilMod
26. aug. 2016 kl. 07.24 skrev Ye Li mailto:yl...@uwyo.edu>>:
Hi, all:
Thanks for creating OPM, such a meaningful project.
I have several years experience with reservoir simulation. I want to read the
code of OPM to learn the "black box" behind the reservoir simulation. However,
I am stuck a
The perfRates() vector contains *reservoir volume* total rates at the
perforations, while the perfPhaseRates() vector contain
*surface volume* rates per phase. So it is not a direct sum.
Atgeirr
26. sep. 2016 kl. 14.10 skrev Jørgen Kvalsvik
mailto:jo...@statoil.com>>:
Hi,
What's the differen
Dear OPM community,
A new release is soon due, and I must ask all contributors who wants a feature
to be included
in the release to submit their pull requests, or at the very least, tell us
about it!
We hope to have the release ready by the end of the month. The release will be
coordinated by
Dear OPM community,
A release candidate is ready for testing. There are binary packages available
for 64-bit Ubuntu 14.04, Ubuntu 16.04 and RHEL 6.
For those building from source, the relevant branch is called release/2016.10
in each repository. There is a single change to the
module structure
Dear OPM community,
We are pleased to announce the availability of OPM release 2016.10!
This is the second release this year, the previous release was 2016.04. The
next release
is expected to be 2017.04.
The release brings major improvements to the output capabilities of Flow, the
fully implic
Hi Bernd,
This is not something we have given very much attention. Basically our
assumption has been
that ensuring the releases are solid is enough. However, as maturity increases
in general,
and people come to rely on the code we should do something more about this.
The only place such informa
Dear Ming,
I am sorry to hear that you will no longer be able to collaborate with us. It
was always
a pleasure to work with you! I appreciated the times we met in person, and
noted your
positive attitude and eagerness to learn.
Good luck with your future endeavors, and I hope perhaps our paths
Dear OPM community,
We have recently made changes to the module structure that affects those who
use the latest sources from github.
1. opm-grid and opm-core
We have moved the remaining grid-related parts out of opm-core and into
opm-grid. So far, all headers still have
the same directory names
Markus,
Thank you for taking the initiative on this, and my apologies for not replying
sooner!
I think the abstract is good, and I'll of course contribute to the content of
the poster.
Best,
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm
Hi Bob,
I can reproduce your error (with SPE1CASE2.DATA). Interestingly the
region-based report looks correct:
Field:
===
: Field
Hi again,
The problem has been identified, and fixed in opm-simulators#987:
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/pull/987
If you are building from source, it should be sufficient to pull/update from
github and recompile.
Thanks to André for fixing!
Atgeirr
___
Dear OPM community,
A new tutorial has been made available, explaining how to run the Norne
benchmark case with Flow:
http://opm-project.org/?page_id=780
If you have feedback on the tutorial, in particular if there are errors or
unclear parts, please tell us!
Atgeirr Flø Rasmussen
__
> 22. des. 2016 kl. 22.39 skrev Markus Blatt :
>
> Hi,
>
> and here comes the first Christmas present:
>
> The poster has already been accepted.
Great!
A merry Christmas to you all!
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-proj
Dear OPM community,
I thought I should let you know that we have just changed the default output
directory for the Flow family of simulators.
Instead of by default writing to the current directory, it now writes to the
directory containing the data deck. If you have scripts depending on this yo
Dear OPM community,
I am posting this on behalf of the MSO4SC project, in which we are
participating, as seen in the recent news item on the OPM web page,
http://opm-project.org/?p=897
Atgeirr Flø Rasmussen, SINTEF Digital
+++
Dear Sir or Madam,
Let me introduc
28. jun. 2017 kl. 09.32 skrev Alf Birger Rustad
mailto:a...@statoil.com>>:
Hi Joakim,
There is currently no library, we have basically viewed ourselves as
downstream. Still, the code that makes up the application flow is modular. We
have gone through great lengths to make the various parts re
Dear OPM community,
This year we plan to organize an OPM meeting in mid-October in Bergen.
Preliminary dates are Wednesday 18th to Thursday 19th of October. Please feel
free to suggest alternative dates if these doesn't fit. We will send out more
information on program and venue in August.
Do
ditions and well controls settings to
implement gradient-based optimization methods. I am not sure if these are
readily available and not interfaced or if I have to figure out how to build
them.
- Joakim
2017-06-28 4:56 GMT-03:00 Atgeirr Rasmussen
mailto:atgeirr.rasmus...@sintef.no>>:
Hello Andres!
I checked-out on 63b7cf6febf3f41e59b8803c06994e12a550c46a (which is earlier
than the one above), and continued with a successful installation.
Good to hear!
I realized that you are pushing new commits every few hours to the master
branch of all the opm-modules. I guess these a
Hi,
Thank you for persevering, and sharing your experience so that we can improve
our instructions!
2. aug. 2017 kl. 23.07 skrev Andres Codas Duarte
mailto:andresco...@br.ibm.com>>:
Hi,
I finally managed to install flow and successfully tested it with
SPE1CASE1.DATA . Thank you very much
Dear Kang,
If you follow the instructions for Mac OS X on this page:
http://opm-project.org/?page_id=239
you should be able to build with MPI, although it has not been tested with the
latest version of macOS. However, you will then only get a very basic
partitioning scheme. To get a good parti
en:
https://www.scandichotels.no/hotell/norge/bergen/scandic-ornen
Please send an email to
tor.harald.san...@iris.no<mailto:tor.harald.san...@iris.no> for a registration
code. Unfortunately you will have to pay for your stay at the hotel yourself.
Kind regards
Atgeirr Rasmussen and
Dear OPM community,
I am posting this on behalf of the MSO4SC project, in which we are
participating, as seen in the recent news item on the OPM web page,
http://opm-project.org/?p=897
This invitation was posted earlier this summer, I am repeating it as some may
not have had the time or oppo
15. sep. 2017 kl. 13.44 skrev Markus Blatt
mailto:mar...@dr-blatt.de>>:
Hi,
does anyone really pass MODULE_ROOT (OPM_CORE_ROOT, OPM_MATERIAL_ROOT,
etc.) to CMake to tell it where the modules are located?
I do. This is from my CMake options file (that I use by "cmake -C options.cmake
" for ea
Dear OPM community,
In order to better support using Flow as a component, and gain some
"scriptability", we propose to refactor the relationship between the
EclipseState and Schedule classes of opm-parser. Currently the EclipseState
owns the Schedule. We propose to make the Schedule class indep
30. sep. 2017 kl. 00.14 skrev Arne Morten Kvarving
mailto:arne.morten.kvarv...@sintef.no>>:
murphy was surprisingly kind.
ci systems now run on debian 9.1,
Thanks a lot Arne Morten!
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-proje
Dear OPM community,
A reference manual has been created for OPM Flow, the fully implicit reservoir
simulator program. The manual describes the structure and keywords of the input
deck format, how to run Flow, and its command line parameters. We hope that it
will be useful!
The manual can be fo
Hi Rodrigo,
Thanks for your kind words!
The problem you describe looks interesting, and I hope that we can help you
towards a solution.
First I must admit that I have very limited experience with solving eigenvalue
problems numerically
(I have not done that in 20 years…) which limits how useful
Dear OPM community,
We have created an update for the 2017.10 release. It fixes a few bugs in Flow
that could affect simulation results slightly and also lead to very bad
performance when running Flow in parallel using MPI. The effect was most
pronounced when running with more than 4 MPI proces
Hi all,
I am afraid that tutorial needs to be updated.
About updating the tutorial: the "python-ert.ecl" should be replaced with
"python-ecl", that has been changed on the website.
Are there other changes that need to be done to make it work? Artyom, I think
your errors look a little like pr
Hi,
I have tried to reproduce your problem with a clean Ubuntu 16.04 VM, but all
installation steps succeed for me. Unfortunately, I do not know the packaging
system well enough to know what could possibly go wrong. You will therefore
probably have to wait until after New Year before we can he
Dear OPM community,
As part of ongoing work to simplify and reorganize the module structure, the
opm-core module has now been removed. Most of the classes and functions have
been moved to opm-simulators, with a few exceptions.
Build instructions have been updated.
Atgeirr
__
Dear OPM community,
In preparation for the upcoming 2018.04 release, we have simplified the module
structure, going from nine to six main modules. For more information, consult
the module page:
https://opm-project.org/?page_id=274
Build instructions have been updated accordingly.
Atgeirr
Dear Mr. Abdelmoumen,
I recommend that you try running OPM Flow on HPC systems using the Singularity
container system. You should ask your HPC maintainer if Singularity is
supported. If not, Docker containers are also available, but will probably not
be able to exploit the special hardware typ
.researchgate.net/profile/Abdelmoumen_Bacetti2>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Atgeirr Rasmussen
mailto:atgeirr.rasmus...@sintef.no>> wrote:
Dear Mr. Abdelmoumen,
I recommend that you try running OPM Flow on HPC systems using the Singularity
container system. You should ask your HPC maintaine
Dear OPM community,
Binary packages for redhat are now available with mpi support using openmpi.
They are built according to redhat standards, i.e., there are separate packages
with the mpi support.
To install the serial 'flow', you do as usual: "yum install opm-simulators-bin".
To install the
Hello,
Thanks for the tutorial Carl Fredrik, I linked to it from the installation page
on opm-project.org, I hope that is OK!
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av c berg
Sendt: tysdag 29. mai 2018 19:42
Til: Arne Morten Kvarving; opm@opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm
Dear Mr. Salem,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I have updated the repository at
Dockerhub, and it should now be possible to refer to the "2018.04" version
explicitly, also the "latest" tag now points to that version.
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av
Hi Manoel,
I am not aware of any such software that is free or open source, unfortunately.
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av Manoel Farias
Sendt: fredag 19. oktober 2018 21:10
Til: opm@opm-project.org
Emne: [Opm] Multiphase flow Tables App
Hi,
Does anybody know
Hi Alan,
TNO has also implemented Fetkovich aquifers. I am not aware of any
further plans regarding numerical or analytical aquifers, perhaps somebody
from TNO (Wessel, Rohith, Frank or Kelvin) can comment on this?
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av Alan King
Se
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
Hello Andy,
I am not aware of anyone using OPM Flow on unconventional fields, but for all I
know there could be someone using it for that.
What features do you think would be the most important for such usage?
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av Andrei Austin
Sendt
Hi,
I just run the provided deck (but without the "extra line" in GCONINJE) to see
if I could reproduce your problem,
but I am not sure what to look for. What are the pressure values you expect for
the (0.9, 1.0, 1.1) cases?
In any case, I get different behaviour from the simulator from repeate
Dear all,
In preparation for the upcoming 2019.10 release, the module "ewoms" has been
renamed "opm-models". The repository on github has been renamed, but the old
name will continue to work for some time.
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.
Hi all,
I agree that we should do this (unless other disadvantages come to light).
I'd say that the loss of Ubuntu 18.04 LTS as a supported target is less of
a problem than it appears, since that version provides a faulty MPI
implementation so we cannot provide MPI packages for it anyway.
Are Du
Thanks a lot for your hard work with the release Markus!
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av Joakim Hove
Sendt: tysdag 19. november 2019 12:16
Til: opm@opm-project.org
Emne: Re: [Opm] OPM Release 2019.10 is out
Big thanks to Markus for the herostratic effort of getti
Hello Patricia,
Did you successfully install an Ubuntu VM? Verify by starting the VM (using
"vagrant ssh" if you used vagrant to create it) and running the "uname -a"
command, on my computer I get the output
Linux ubuntu-cosmic 4.18.0-17-generic #18-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 13 14:34:40 UTC
2019 x86_
Hi all,
The latest release is now available on Dockerhub. Container size is 184 MB.
Thanks to Andres for the reminder!
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
The web site was stating that 18.10 was supported with binary packages, which
is not true for the latest release for the reason stated by Arne Morten. The
information on the web site has been corrected. I am sorry for any confusion
this caused!
Atgeirr
Frå: Op
Hi Ogi,
The application "ecl_summary" is from the libecl library, which is no longer a
prerequisite for OPM Flow (since the latest release). You can still install
libecl and get the application, or use the new "summary" application suggested
by Torbjørn.
Atgeirr
___
Hi!
I support increasing the Dune dependency to 2.6.
With a minimum GCC version of 8.3 we can adopt C++17 and drop several boost
libraries, but not yet all.
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av Alf Birger Rustad
Sendt: tysdag 28. januar 2020 09:13
Til: opm@opm-projec
Despite what I initially wrote (that I want to increase the requirements), if
we turn away potential users by this, that would be a good reason to NOT bump
the requirements.
Arne Morten's message implies that we can still provide binary packages for new
releases (i.e. 2020.04 and 2020.10 etc.)
Dear OPM community,
At the recent OPM meeting, it was decided to require newer versions of some
libraries and compilers for building OPM Flow going forward. The new
requirements are:
- C++ compiler with C++17 support (gcc minimum version 7).
- Dune version 2.6 or newer.
These requirements ar
Hi Yogi,
Lots of things have changed in Flow for the initialization in parallel
recently. Could you try to check out the previous release (2019.10) and check
if you see the same problems?
Atgeirr
Frå: Opm på vegne av Markus Blatt
Sendt: onsdag 11. mars 2020 1
Dear all,
I would just say thank you to Joakim for his effort in managing the release!
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
Alf,
My initial thoughts on the issues you raise are:
1. (Post-processor compatibility.) A new format could be implemented in both
OPM Flow and Resinsight, making it useful rather quickly.
2. (Write only at end of run.) I assume this can be resolved by wasting a
little space: initially a
Hi Antoine,
For OPM Flow, the computational mesh is always generated based on the DATA
file. We support both simple cartesian grids as you have observed, and more
complex corner-point grids. There is a very brief explanation on page 277 of
the OPM Flow reference manual (2020.04 version). (See t
Hi Antoine!
Our partitioning scheme starts with the whole graph on a single process, so
indeed this would be a "bad" starting partition. The partitioning we end up
with does not seem any worse though, although for very large process counts,
this could become a bottleneck.
I am a little confuse
.
- Could you explain in more details how to export the grid to OPM (using NNC)
from MRST please?
- Where should I look in the OPM code to implement the reading of an external
mesh? In opm-grid?
Thank you in advance.
Best,
Antoine
> On Sep 30, 2020, at 02:45, Atgeirr Rasmussen
>
Hi Antoine,
The trick you used does not tell OPM in any way that the grid is tetrahedral or
hexahedral, it just provides the necessary data as a soup of volumes and
connections, and not as a proper grid. The VTK output assumes that we have a
proper grid.
Did the simulation produce expected res
ALUGrid class. Do you make any use
of this class in OPM?
Thanks.
Best,
Antoine
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 07:37, Atgeirr Rasmussen <mailto:atgeirr.rasmus...@sintef.no>> wrote:
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> The trick you used does not tell OPM in any way that the grid is tetrahedral
&
Dear OPM community,
The current implementation of OPM Flow performs all I/O operations
sequentially, also for parallel runs. While this works well for now, it has the
potential to become a bottleneck for running large cases in parallel. In the
ACROSS project (see https://www.acrossproject.eu fo
Hi all,
I will try to answer the questions to the best of my knowledge. I will also ask
someone from INRIA to joint this list, to be able to answer directly.
> Nice to hear that there is some work on the output layer. I just have some
> questions.
> Can you please tell us what open source lic
Hi all,
I agree with Joakim that it is a good idea to add DEBUGF, and think that
suggestion should be followed through. Some comments:
- I think that the default configuration should print something useful.
- It should also be possible to turn off and on via the command line. The full
flexibil
Dear all,
The next OPM release, 2021.10, is coming soon! Here is a preliminary timeline
for the release process:
- Feature freeze: Thursday October 14. Release branches will be created at
this point.
- First release candidate: Monday October 18.
- Final release: Monday November 1.
Developer
Dear all,
The release branches will be created this afternoon. Features should be merged
before that if you want it to be part of the release. Jenkins usually gets very
busy on days like this, so get your PRs in early!
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm
Dear all,
The release branches have been created, and a feature freeze is in effect for
them. Bugfixes may still be included in the release, but no more new features.
The master branch is open to new features as normal.
We hope to have a release candidate ready on Monday.
Atgeirr
_
Dear all,
The first release candidate for OPM release 2021.10 is now available for
testing.
It is available as binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 18.04 and 20.04.
To test
the binary packages, follow the normal installation instructions at the OPM
website,
https://opm-project.org/?page_id
Dear OPM community,
It is time to create the next OPM release, we intend to follow this schedule,
all days in October:
Monday 17: Final merges to master before branching, freeze the master branch.
Wednesday 19: Create release branches, unfreeze the master branch.
Monday 24: First release candida
Hi,
Circling back to Arne Morten's point, that we would have to backport Dune and
put it in our own ppa to use the newer Dune releases, how much work would that
be? And if we did that, could/should we skip straight to Dune 2.8 or even 2.9?
If we set as a goal to:
- Use and require as new Dune
manager this time?
Cheers,
Markus
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:48:49PM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
> Dear OPM community,
>
> It is time to create the next OPM release, we intend to follow this schedule,
> all days in October:
>
> Monday 17: Final merges to master before bra
Dear all,
The rc1 release candidate for the upcoming release is ready for testing!
You can check out the release candidate from the github repos using the tag
release/2022.10/rc1
or use binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 20.04 and 22.04.
To test the binary packages, follow the norm
Dear all,
The rc2 release candidate for the upcoming release is ready for testing!
You can check out the release candidate from the github repos using the tag
release/2022.10/rc2
or use binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 20.04 and 22.04.
To test the binary packages, follow the norm
Dear OPM community,
It is my pleasure to announce that the binary packages for the 2022.10 OPM
release are now available for RHEL 7 and 8, as well as for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
(code name Jammy Jellyfish) and 20.04 LTS (code name Focal Fossa). The Ubuntu
packages may be downloaded from the OPM Projec
Dear OPM community,
Tomorrow, Friday December 9 2022, at 12 CET, we will merge the following PR:
https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/pull/3234
as well as companion PRs in opm-models and opm-simulators.
From that point, the opm-material repository will be deprecated, and all its
code will be moved
Dear OPM community,
The opm-material module has now been merged into opm-common, as discussed
yesterday.
Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
101 - 200 of 202 matches
Mail list logo