Re: [OPM] Issue tracking

On 04/02/2013 10:04 AM, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:40:48AM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: I think we have set up (but not activated) Flyspray on opm-project.org. I am reluctant to start using it, since I feel that github's issue system so far ha

Re: [OPM] Default build type of release

On 04/04/2013 10:19 AM, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, I just had a hard time figuring out, that the release was build in Debug mode on my machine. Is that really the default or am I doing something completely wrong here? Usually I assume that a package is compiled with "-O2 -g" if I do not adjust any

Re: [OPM] Build opm-porsol with opm-core installed somewhere

On 07/25/2013 01:05 PM, Joakim Hove wrote: Hello; A bit naïve -- but anyway: I have done some modifications to opm-core, built and installed the changes[1]. Then I want to build an updated version of opm-porsol which makes use of my updated opm-core. Now I wonder how to tell opm-porsol where

Re: [OPM] OPM build

On 07/25/2013 02:56 PM, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: To give you more details, this is the linker command line I get by running make in verbose mode: Linking CXX executable bin/sim_poly2p_incomp_reorder /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/sim_poly2p_incomp_reorder.dir/link.txt --verbose=1

Re: [OPM] Suggestions for upcoming release 2013.09

On 09/05/2013 01:40 PM, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: 4. For the new modules, some refactoring and documentation work is anticipated. For the existing modules, I do not expect much, other than what has been done in the course of regular development since last release. There is one exception, I thin

[OPM] New maintainer: opm-upscale

Hi there, I have been appointed as the maintainer for the upscaling module. As i don't have the full overview of the entire code base, i would appreciate that people who feel responsible for parts of the module to add themself to the MAINTAINERS file in the root. while i will handle the main

Re: [OPM] New maintainer: opm-upscale

On 23/09/13 13:24, Andreas Lauser wrote: Hi Arne, Congratulations! One question: Do you prefer to rebase PRs prior to merging (i.e., makeing them fully bisectable) or do you to like to keep the fixup patches in the commits of the PRs (for easier reviewing)? bisectability of mainline is the main

Re: [OPM] New maintainer: opm-upscale

On 23/09/13 13:43, Andreas Lauser wrote: Hi All, On Monday 23 September 2013 13:28:40 Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: On 23/09/13 13:24, Andreas Lauser wrote: Congratulations! One question: Do you prefer to rebase PRs prior to merging (i.e., makeing them fully bisectable) or do you to like to

Re: [OPM] New maintainer: opm-upscale

On 24/09/13 00:49, Roland Kaufmann wrote: On 2013-09-23 03:12, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: @rolk can push [build system changes] directly, once they have been reviewed and merged elsewhere But I won't :-) (If anyone is interested in how I did the CMake rollups, they can read a write-

Re: [OPM] New maintainer: opm-upscale

On 24/09/13 10:48, Andreas Lauser wrote: Hi! On Tuesday 24 September 2013 09:35:29 Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: On 24/09/13 00:49, Roland Kaufmann wrote: On 2013-09-23 03:12, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: @rolk can push [build system changes] directly, once they have been reviewed and merged

Re: [OPM] OPM eclipse parser, status and plans

On 07/10/13 11:01, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: >I am certainly open to the possibility that opm-parser should be part of opm-core. To me it seems natural that parsing input files belongs to the core library. I can see that keeping opm-parser and opm-core as separate repositories long term can

Re: [OPM] Buildsystem documentation

On 07/10/13 13:37, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, is there some kind of documentation of the buildsystem? Why I am aking: I want to compile dune-cornerpoint grid with MPI. MPI seems to be found, but HAVE_MPI is not defined during compilation (it is in the CMakeLists.txt though). Unfortunately I canno

Re: [OPM] Umfpack runtime dependendy is problematic

On 10/10/13 08:39, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: next user coming along with the same issue. The third option is to compile umfpack with dependency (libamd.so on AMD systems I believe) statically. This will probably just work without issue for all users, but all system depend on the Approximative

Re: [OPM] Umfpack runtime dependendy is problematic

If you pass -Dumfpack_LIBRARY=/foo/UMFPACK/Lib/libumfpack.a I think it should work as intended; otherwise it is a regular bug issue. That will make our build script slightly more involved, but should work. It will however not work for the next user who wants to kick the tires of OPM (in the

Re: [OPM] Preparation for the 2013.10 release of OPM

On 11/10/13 18:28, Bård Skaflestad wrote: All, I have just created the release branch (release/2013.10) and tagged the first release candidate (release/2013.10/rc1) in preparation of the 2013.10 OPM release in the following modules * opm-core * opm-autodiff * dune-cornerpoi

Re: [OPM] Preparation for the 2013.10 release of OPM

On 14/10/13 17:19, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: On 11/10/13 18:28, Bård Skaflestad wrote: All, I have just created the release branch (release/2013.10) and tagged the first release candidate (release/2013.10/rc1) in preparation of the 2013.10 OPM release in the following modules * opm

Re: [OPM] Boost versions

jumping hoops to support software that is more than 3 years old is counter productive. if it's avail for the most ancient of oses in widespread use i vote kill. ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [OPM] issue with compiling opm-core

On 23/06/14 09:06, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: I think we all agree that OPM is (and in my opinions should remain) more on libraries and core functionality, and less on end user applications. I hope we can cater to both, and today we really do. I believe Resinsight and the upscaling codes are

Re: [OPM] issue with compiling opm-core

hi paolo, if you refetch opm-core we have now added a cmake build system for the tutorials. it's independent of the main build system, so you have to do the make install cycle on opm-core with dependencies. you can then just cmake up opm-core/tutorials, build and play. cheers arnem ___

Re: [OPM] issue with compiling opm-core

On 24/06/14 17:41, Paolo Orsini wrote: Thanks for sll your help, Adding explicitly the path to the libraries as suggested by Andreas I was able to compile tutorial 1 externally. This the build command I used g++ -std=c++11 -o mytest tutorial1.cpp /home/paolo/OPM/opm-core/build/lib/libopmcor

Re: [OPM] issue with compiling opm-core

On 26/06/14 14:55, Paolo Orsini wrote: Hi Arne, I looked at and tested the CmakeList you added in the tutorial folder of opm-core. It looks a great example on how to call the opm library from external software. The only limitation seems that one still needs to copy the config.h file to th

Re: [OPM] issue with compiling opm-core

On 26/06/14 15:39, Paolo Orsini wrote: Sorry for the half finished email I was using a tutorial1.cpp which was outdated, a flag was added to skip the include config.h I suppose I extend the CmakeList you written for opm-core to add opm-parser ..., I mean I can use: find_package(opm-par

Re: [OPM] issue with compiling opm-core

On 27/06/14 10:20, Andreas Lauser wrote: Hi Paolo, On Friday 27 June 2014 09:11:28 Paolo Orsini wrote: If this is the case, wouldn't it make sense to copy the config.h to the system include folder during the installation? not really. That's because external projects may need their own configur

Re: [OPM] FW: Boost.Regex and libstc++ debug mode

On 08/07/14 10:46, Andreas Lauser wrote: Hi, On Tuesday 08 July 2014 09:57:42 Roland Kaufmann wrote: On 2014-07-07 16:24, Joakim Hove wrote: libstdc++ comes in a DEBUG version which is linked in when –DGLIBCXX_DEBUG is used. On 2014-07-07 16:33, Andreas Lauser wrote: as a work-around for new

Re: [OPM] Making OPM modular: support for more linear solvers

On 28/10/14 13:19, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: hi, my .02c; However, I am afraid that it may end up as "Yet Another Sparse Matrix" and only add to any complexity or confusion there already is. Abandoning the Eigen SparseMatrix for opm-autodiff will require a substantial effort, that I do not th

Re: [OPM] Support for more linear solvers: status

On 14/11/14 15:33, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: I have an update and a few questions regarding my project. For introduciton and details, please see http://www.opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/2014-October/000664.html This will be another wall-of-text, but please bear with me. Ok, so I have more or les

Re: [OPM] Support for more linear solvers: status

did you knoll? does istl start out with knoll as well? I'm afraid I don't know what knoll is, so I wouldn't know. sorry for being cryptic, figured you'd run into it by now :) http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/KSP/KSPSetInitialGuessKnoll.html - it's one way of obta

Re: [OPM] Support for more linear solvers: status

On 18/11/14 15:32, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi Jørgen, - Initial guess. (I think OPM uses zeros for this always.) i checked the code. it calls KSPSetInitialGuessNonzero - enabling a nonzero initial guess. which means whatever random trash is stored in t.solution on entry is used. unlikely what is w

[OPM] release candidate packages in PPA

elog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +opm-core (2015.04-rc1-2~precise) precise; urgency=medium + + * Release new version + + -- Arne Morten Kvarving Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:36:51 +0200 + opm-core (2013.10-2~precise) precise; urgency=low * New release diff --git a/CMakeLists_files.cmake b/CMakeLists_files.cma

Re: [OPM] New Ubuntu packages ready for testing

On 23/04/15 09:30, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 07:12:01AM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: The 2015.04 release looks like it will be finished very soon! This so cool. Thanks to OPM there are now up to date DUNE packages for Ubuntu LTS 12.04. The most significant changes s

Re: [OPM] Iterative solvers for autodiff

On 20/05/15 14:02, Markus Blatt wrote: Like I said I am biased as a DUNE developer (parallel iterative solvers). But if you do not want to use DUNE, then I would rather recommend PETSc, Trilinos or you will find others that might be more suitable from Jack Dongarra's list http://www.netlib.org/ut

Re: [OPM] Refactoring of the fully implicit solver class

On 22/05/15 15:43, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: On 05/22/2015 01:09 PM, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote: Dear OPM community, We have been considering how to best refactor the (huge) class FullyImplicitBlackoilSolver in such a manner that it can be more easily be extended with new options and functionality

[Opm] New Modules

. - *.g2 Spline geometries We hope to improve the documentation situation soon. If you are interested in trying this out but get stuck at something, don't hesitate to ask me for help. On behalf of the IFEM authors, sincerly Arne Morten Kvarving

Re: [Opm] Compiling source

Hi there, it is hard to give more detailed instructions than those available. Did you follow the prerequisites link on top of the page? It explains how to get and build all dependencies, including ert. Arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org ht

[Opm] jenkins downtime

hi, i will have to take jenkins down for a while at the end of the day (1630-ish CET). i need to build trilinos (for zoltan) and memory is exhausted with jobs running in parallel. hopefully the downtime won't last long. arnem ___ Opm mailing list

Re: [Opm] jenkins downtime

On 27. juni 2016 15:05, Bård Skaflestad wrote: Just out of curiosity: If there are any builds running at that time, will they be allowed to complete or terminated? running jobs will be completed. (sorry for the dupe bård, i forgot to reply to the list..) _

Re: [Opm] jenkins downtime

jenkins is back. all previously queued builds are now executing. arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Travis trouble

On 14. nov. 2016 16:01, Joakim Hove wrote: Hello, at the moment all Travis builds fail due to timeout. According to google Travis has a 50 minutes time limit, it is my impression that they have "suddenly?" started to enforce that limit. as a short-term fix i suggest not passing -DBUILD_TEST

Re: [Opm] Are build tests supposed to work again?

CI is back in working order. on jenkins PR's are always built merged into the master of the repo, so as long as they merge fine, you do not have to update. Fra: Opm på vegne av Markus Blatt Sendt: 3. april 2017 13:44:37 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] Ar

Re: [Opm] The 2017.04 release branches have been created

es. For this reason, Arne Morten Kvarving is the person in charge of them. That said, maintainers are responsible to apply all bugfixes from the master branch to the release branch and vice versa until the final version have been made; i.e., if maintainers decide to merge disruptive changes to master,

[Opm] ResInsight available in ppa

ResInsight 2016.11 is now available in the opm ppa. It's basically packaged straight out of the resinsight sources, with some minor patchery to properly treat the internal libraries as such (static links so the unix linker doesn't get confused) as well as necessary changes to the packaging fil

[Opm] jenkins downtime

hi, seems there is not a lot of activity, but in any case: i will have to shut jenkins down for upgrades (dune 2.4.1). i do not anticipate a long downtime. this will take place at 14:30 cet. please do not flood it with jobs as i will have to wait for those to finish before the shutdown commen

Re: [Opm] jenkins downtime

s. arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: 10. juli 2017 13:54:32 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] jenkins downtime hi, seems there is not a lot of activity, but in any case: i will have to shut jenkins down for upgrades (dune 2.4.1). i do not anticipate a lon

[Opm] nightly ubuntu packages

hi, nightly packages for ubuntu xenial is now operational. note that they temporarily run against my fork of libecl while waiting for my PRs to be processed. install the apt repo using 1) install key: wget http://opm-project.org/package/nightly-xenial/repokey.gpg | sudo apt-key add - 2) a

[Opm] CI system downtime

hi, at 16:00 CET today i will take down jenkins and to do a debian distribution update. depending on how grumpy mr murphy is, it will be down anywhere from 3h to 3 days. hopefully closer to the first. arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org h

Re: [Opm] CI system downtime

_________ Fra: Opm på vegne av Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: 29. september 2017 10:25:01 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] CI system downtime hi, at 16:00 CET today i will take down jenkins and to do a debian distribution update. depending on how grumpy mr murphy is, it wi

Re: [Opm] Prerequisites for building OPM page ( http://opm-project.org/?page_id=239 )

neither. libblas-c-dev is gone in newer ubuntus, it's enough with libblas-dev. liblas-c-dev is something completely different. Fra: Opm på vegne av Rodrigo Piccinini Sendt: 10. oktober 2017 12:10:19 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] Prerequisites for buildin

[Opm] 2017.10 rc1

Packages for ubuntu xenial (16.04 ) are now available in the testing PPA. Branches and tags have been published. Have a small backport PR for opm-material (packaging files), will get to that tmrw. arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http:

Re: [Opm] nightly ubuntu packages

nightlies for debian stretch has been added. same story as for xenial, just replace xenial with stretch. currently there is no docker support, i will look into that eventually. Fra: Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: 27. september 2017 08:36:01 Til: opm@opm-project.org

Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl

outdated instructions. replace python-ert.ecl with python-ecl Fra: Opm på vegne av Чащин Артём Sendt: 23. november 2017 16:55:22 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl Hello, I've installed Opm on Ubuntu 16.04 from a binary

[Opm] jenkins downtime

hi, jenkins will be taken down at 12 cet for upgrades. shouldn't take too long. arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] jenkins downtime

pull request builders. ie. we have higher throughput and higher responsiveness for the PR builder. yell if anything breaks. Fra: Opm på vegne av Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: 15. desember 2017 10:06:50 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] jenkins downtime hi

Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl

nstallation does not conflict with the packaged version Joakim From: Opm on behalf of Alf Birger Rustad Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 6:23 PM To: Чащин Артём; Arne Morten Kvarving; opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.e

Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl

m@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl On 22. Dec. 2017 at 09:33, Carl Fredrik Berg wrote: >> I can't install python-ecl again, and get the following >> error messages: >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: On 22. Dec. 2017 at 11:14

Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl

hi, ert is not part of libecl. i/opm don't deal with ert any longer, only libecl. you will have to ask over there. arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av c berg Sendt: 2. januar 2018 09:38:01 Til: Arne Morten Kvarving; Roland Kaufmann; opm@opm-project.org Emn

[Opm] jenkins down time

the jenkins server will be taken down for maintenance around 1CET today. we do not expect a long down-time. arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Fwd: (no subject)

it's not as simple,.you need several packages only provided in the opm repos for things which are either outdated or not provided by base or epel. we are making a new release these days, i will update the rhel packages to build with mpi. at least for rhel7, i have a feeling rhel6 might want to

Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

hi, currently the rpm's are not mpi enabled. this will change in the upcoming 2018.04 release. it's a bit involved building on rhel, as you need some packages not in base or epel. in particular, you need to trilinos (or rather, just zoltan which is part of trilinos) to get efficient mpi supp

Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

...@gmail.com på vegne av sindimo Sendt: 4. mai 2018 11:15:36 Til: Arne Morten Kvarving; opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support Hi Arne, Thank you for your clarification, I really appreciate it. I have updated to the latest OPM release of

Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

hi, i suspect you have not enabled the epel repo (extra packages for enterprise linux). epel is required. arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av sindimo Sendt: mandag 7. mai 2018 01.56.37 Til: Alf Birger Rustad; Arne Morten Kvarving; opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm

Re: [Opm] OPM on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver)

hi, rushed packages for bionic has been rolled out today. i had to take some shortcuts as mpi is misbehaving on the bionic pbuilder and i really do not have time to look into that right now. thus, i had to disable the execution of tests. i'm really supposed to be working on something else, so

Re: [Opm] MPI Parallel OPM Flow - SPE 10 Model 2 Hangs

Alternatively you can try the nightly redhat rpms yum-config-manager --add-repo https://www.opm-projet.org/package/opm-nightly.repo note; do not register the main repo, only the nightly repo. They cannot both be registered (well, they can but it will be ickier to be sure you get the correct pa

[Opm] jenkins

hi, jenkins is currently down. there were some issues so we had to rollback to an older snapshot and the rollback is taking its time. arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] jenkins

it after the rollback. please keep an eye out for any weird behavior in the coming days (so will i but i can't be on the alert all the time). arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: onsdag 20. mars 2019 14.33 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne:

[Opm] 2019.04 release plan

Dear OPM community; we are now getting very close to a 2019.04 release. Among the core developers there are no well known blockers for the release, and the plan is create release branches (i..e feature freeze) on Wednesday 10nd of April, with the first release candidates shortly thereafter. If

Re: [Opm] 2019.04 release plan

Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: onsdag 27. mars 2019 08.56 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] 2019.04 release plan Dear OPM community; we are now getting very close to a 2019.04 release. Among the core developers there are no well known blockers for the release, and the plan is create release

Re: [Opm] 2019.04 release plan

release 2019.04 rc2 (what I hope to be the final) is available in the testing ppa. Fra: Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: onsdag 27. mars 2019 08.56 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: 2019.04 release plan Dear OPM community; we are now getting very close to a 2019.04

Re: [Opm] 2019.04 release plan

release 2019.04 rc3 is available in the testing ppa. ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] 2019.04 release plan

. Fra: Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: mandag 29. april 2019 12.08 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: Sv: 2019.04 release plan release 2019.04 rc2 (what I hope to be the final) is available in the testing ppa. Fra: Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: onsdag 27. mars 2019 08.56

[Opm] jenkins is down

see topic. ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] jenkins is down

jenkins is back up. as a backup had to be restored, please permit some time for normality to be restored. Fra: Opm på vegne av Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: mandag 13. mai 2019 09.01 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] jenkins is down see topic

[Opm] jenkins - reboot

Hi community, as you probably have noticed, the jenkins instance has been less than stable in the last month or so. The reason for this was malware infestation forcing me to update jenkins to a newer version (to try) to close the security holes. This again lead to issues - updating from 1.6 to

Re: [Opm] Minimum version of dependencies after new release

the current debian stable (buster) has 2.6. for the previous (stretch) i had to backport for jenkins. i have also successfully fixed the ubuntu 18.04 mpi packages. it's a pretty simple fix - remove a flag from the configuration. i'll ask you to test these in the testing ppa during the release. o

Re: [Opm] First candidate for release 2019.10 is out

rc1 packages are available in the testing ppa for ubuntu xenial and ubuntu bionic. so yeah, ubuntu xenial works just fine. this includes a fixed openmpi for bionic. rhel6 and rhel7 both trip over boost issues. not sure how to resolve those yet. Fra: Opm på vegne

Re: [Opm] First candidate for release 2019.10 is out

av Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: fredag 25. oktober 2019 12:07 Til: opm@opm-project.org ; Markus Blatt Emne: Re: [Opm] First candidate for release 2019.10 is out rc1 packages are available in the testing ppa for ubuntu xenial and ubuntu bionic. so yeah, ubuntu xenial works just fine. this

Re: [Opm] third candidate for release 2019.10 is out

i have tested the xenial and bionic packages in serial and parallel for the usual suspects (norne, model2, a selection of the opm-tests decks). all good, in the sense that the simulations all finished and had only minor iteration history differences. Fra: Opm på

Re: [Opm] 4th candidate for 2019.10 release

rc4 builds are now in testing ppa for xenial and bionic (done building, might take 30 mins before they published). Fra: Opm på vegne av Markus Blatt Sendt: tirsdag 12. november 2019 15:36 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] 4th candidate for 2019.10 release H

Re: [Opm] Can't find opm-simulators on Ubuntu 18.10

Even if I wanted to supply packages for 18.10, launchpad would not let me. It is out of support and new uploads for cosmic is not accepted. arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited

Personally I don't think Boost.Test is worth replacing, but getting rid of filesystem and regex is certainly worthwhile. As for dune, the ppa provides 2.6 for 18.04 and 16.04 already so it does not have a big impact for ubuntu builds. Fra: Opm på vegne av Bård S

Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited

hi, yes, following my 'normal' schedule I drop after 4 years. Thus, 16.04 would not be published for opm release 20.04, only 18.04 and 20.04. My point was that even if people would want to stick to 16.04, we would still provide Dune packages for them. Fra: Opm

[Opm] jenkins downtime

Hi, at 0800 cet today, I will take down Jenkins for a system upgrade. Hopefully it won't be too long before it is up again. Arnem ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] jenkins downtime

Jenkins is back, running Debian buster now. This means, among lots of other changes, that we are now at gcc 8. Keep an eye out for weirdness, and give me a holler. arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av Arne Morten Kvarving Sendt: mandag 10. februar 2020 07:44 Til: opm

Re: [Opm] Compiling OPM

Hi there, nobody can help you based on the lack of information you provide. At the very least show the error message. How did you install the dependencies? What is your distribution? What version of OPM are you trying to build? How did you install suitesparse? F

Re: [Opm] Compiling OPM

did you rebuild dune after installing umfpack ? Fra: Opm på vegne av Lezin Galibert Sendt: onsdag 12. februar 2020 14:34 Til: Arne Morten Kvarving ; opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] Compiling OPM Thank you for your swift reply. The error occurs in the opm

Re: [Opm] Compiling OPM

Kvarving ; opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] Compiling OPM I finished rebuilding everything and I am still getting the same error. Also, to be more accurate, I am on the branch release/2019.10 of opm- common, grid and upscaling. On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 13:37 +, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote: >

Re: [Opm] Problem installing OPM binaries

I did update the packages to fix this issue a few days before you posted. So you had a stale package manager cache, was all, hence the request to re-run update. It works now, so good. Fra: Opm på vegne av Stephen, Karl D Sendt: mandag 24. februar 2020 16:03 Til

Re: [Opm] Release 2020.04

2020.04-rc2 is now available for ubuntu bionic in the testing ppa. arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av Joakim Hove Sendt: tirsdag 21. april 2020 08:16 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] Release 2020.04 Hello; this is just a friendly reminder that the release proces

Re: [Opm] File formats

I've used HDF5 for 15+ years and it has never failed me. Parallel output support, compression support, slicing support, good tooling for all relevant languages (C/C++/Fortran), support in matlab, octave, python, command line. It being old is an advantage, not a disadvantage as I see it.

Re: [Opm] RHEL / Centos 8

Hi evan, opm/flow and ResInsight RPMs have been available in the repository since release 2019.10, so the official policy is that it's already done 🙂 arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av Evan Egenolf Sendt: torsdag 9. juli 2020 01:51 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm

Re: [Opm] OPM for Ubuntu 20.1

Hi, sorry but binary packages are only provided for LTS releases. You have to build from source. Arnem From: Opm on behalf of Ahmed Saied Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 9:30:42 PM To: Opm@opm-project.org Subject: [Opm] OPM for Ubuntu 20.1 Dear All, I

Re: [Opm] Library dependency in building OPM

Problem is likely missing openblas-devel. Do you have /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.x.y? From: Opm on behalf of Markus Blatt Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 8:59:57 AM To: LEI TING Cc: opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re: [Opm] Library dependency in building OPM Hi, O

[Opm] CI server downtime

I will take the jenkins server down for an os update oct 27 early morning (around 6 CEST) unless there are pressing reasons not to do this at this time (ie you are free to object). If all goes well it should be back up again before normal working hours, but I'm not naive enough to think that all

Re: [Opm] Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10?

gcc9 compiles opm just fine. we have usually supported the last two ubuntu LTS versions, so this would break with prior practices. if we go this route i will have to backport dune in our ppa. arnem Fra: Opm på vegne av Markus Blatt Sendt: fredag 30. september

Re: [Opm] Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10?

s Blatt Sendt: fredag 30. september 2022 18:54 Til: Arne Morten Kvarving ; opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10? Hey, I am pretty sure that I saw breaking changes since April. Maybe these are only there for optional dependencies like dune-alugrid or dune-

[Opm] Release 2023.04

candidate ready for testing. The release will then follow shortly after testing, if all is well. If not, we may have further release candidates. All developers, please mark all PRs you would like to see merged before the release with the "Release 2023.04" milestone. Arne Morte

[Opm] 2023.04-rc1

Dear all, The rc1 release candidate for the upcoming release is ready for testing! You can check out the release candidate from the github repos using the tag   release/2023.04/rc1 or use binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 20.04 and 22.04. To test the binary packages, follow the norm

[Opm] 2023.04-rc2

Dear all, The rc2 release candidate for the upcoming release is ready for testing! You can check out the release candidate from the github repos using the tag   release/2023.04/rc2 or use binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 20.04 and 22.04. To test the binary packages, follow the norm

Re: [Opm] 2023.04-rc2

på vegne av Markus Blatt Sendt: fredag 28. april 2023 09:00 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] 2023.04-rc2 Hi, Am Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 06:24:11AM + schrieb Arne Morten Kvarving: > >The rc2 release candidate for the upcoming release is ready for testing! > Very good, thanks

[Opm] New release 2023.04

Best Regards, Arne Morten Kvarving, SINTEF Release manager for 2023.04 ___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Problem installing OPM Flow- not latest

Hi, the opm packages are not available for arm, only amd64. So you cannot run on ampere nodes. As for it installing 2021.10, that's the version available in ubuntu (inherited from its debian base). To install the newer version you need to add the opm ppa repository. ___

  1   2   >