[opnfv-tech-discuss] [TestResults DB] Cannot create pod in testresults db

Hello, everyone. I'm trying to create a pod entry for flex-pod2 in the testresults db using the swagger API. I'm logged in, but the post is returning HTTPError: HTTP 401: TestAPI id is not provided. Here is the payload: { "role": "", "name": "flex-pod2", "details": "5 bare

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

No, “blocking innovation” was simply related to a possible inability to change our internal methods (timethis()) which are out of our Framework. You highlighted a real problem: we need to remove obsolete utils which don’t meet our criteria and may be possibly reused by others. Cleaning our tree

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Hi Georg, I think your proposal could be a good solution!! Having an API which guarantees us some stability will surely solve the problems I described. I am not sure if this will be too much effort for the testing frameworks though and how the API model could be developed. Regards, Manuel On

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Hi Cedric, I probably expressed myself wrongly since you understood that I intent to block innovation and host SFC functions in functest but that is not my intention. My objective with this mail is to check if there exists (perhaps not), an efficient way for testing frameworks to communicate in

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Yes, the “issue” is simply related that we all leverage on git master instead of released packages (see OpenStack Requirements’ upper-constraints) during the development cycle. More, this case is a little bit more complex as this function shouldn’t be considered as part of our framework and we

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Hi all, In the context of this discussion I am wondering if one of the official goals of Functest is to provide common functionality to support developers in OPNFV to write functional tests? That was my understanding, but I might be wrong. In any case, the Functest team along with the broader

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Hello Manuel, In case of Functest, we are simply improving our code that why we are removing uncovered obsolete (and unused internally) functions. As we take care of pylint output and coverage, we should stop maintaining modules/functions which are out of our standards and unused by Functest.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Manuel, Apart from the basic issue you are facing being dependency on test frameworks (which can be a convenient tool, until they change out from under you without notice), the basic problem OPNFV faces here is that it needs to, and easily can, provide such notice automatically. For example,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Nomination of PTL promotion for:

+1 On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:37 AM, Wenjing Chu wrote: > +1 for Georg. > > > > Wenjing > > > > > > *From:* Tianhongbo > *Sent:* Thursday, February 01, 2018 3:14 AM > *To:* Wenjing Chu ; Tianhongbo < > hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>; Dave Neary

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Could ways of working with testing frameworks be improved when working with master?

Hi, As you know, the SFC project is currently testing openstack master, that means we need to use functest master in order to consume the lastest patches in the projects we use. Unfortunately, in the last weeks, we wasted quite some time trying to understand why suddenly the tests were not able

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovn4nfv] Request for PODs

Hi POD teams - Please help me find vPODs with APEX for development and testing. / Trinath Somanchi, NXP SDN/NFV Team. From: Trinath Somanchi Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 12:04 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [ovn4nfv] Request for PODs Hi- For project OVN4NFV, to test