think it is not had to
implement. I will add them in another patches. We can improve this page step by
step.
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
发送时间: 2018年4月26日 11:53
收件人: Chenjiankun (JackChan)
抄送: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; tro...@redhat.com; Brattain, Ross B
Hi Ameed,
Can you try to add OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_NAME in your openrc?
In my environment, OS_PROJECT_DOMAIN_NAME=Default works for me.
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 Ameed Ashour
发送时间: 2018年5月2日 15:25
收件人:
: chenjiankun
发送时间: 2018年1月22日 17:02
收件人: 'David McBride'
抄送: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; tro...@redhat.com; Brattain, Ross B; Rao, Sridhar;
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN; mark.bei...@dell.com; Yuyang (Gabriel); ALFRED C
'MORTON ' (acmor...@att.com); emma.l.fo...@intel.com; Liyin (Ace); Wangwulin
(Linda
Hi,
It seems you install yardstick without docker, right? (Install yardstick using
docker will have this issue. )
If you install yardstick only once, you can:
vim yardstick/common/constants.py
change API_PORT to another port.
uwsgi –I /etc/yardstick/yardstick.ini
Hi,
I have updated the reporting page for Fraser on the server. See:
http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/index.html
(Functest, Yardstick, Qtip is ready now, Storperf and Vsperf seems not
follow the OPNFV Release)
(Also the Fraser Icon need to be
Hi
If you install without docker, the port should be 5000.
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 Ameed Ashour
发送时间: 2018年3月12日 20:28
收件人: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
主题: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick]
Hi
Hi Ameed,
I am sorry I don’t get your requirement clearly. What the “protect that with
credentials” mean?
Can you give a example to illustrate your requirement in detail?
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 Ameed
Hi Julien,
Sorry for missing the email you have cc to me and the meeting.
Can you update the relevant information here then?
Thanks in advance. ☺
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: Julien [mailto:julien...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2018年1月27日 23:42
收件人: David McBride
抄送: chenjiankun; SerenaFeng(zte); Serena Feng
. If so, it would be easy to get health result
then. For now we can combine the connection_check/api_check/_snaps_health_check
result to get a total status.
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: SerenaFeng(zte) [mailto:serena.feng.711+...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2018年1月29日 14:40
收件人: Julien
抄送: David McBride; chenjiankun
there
will be no such problems.
For the healthcheck column, I totally agree with you. But maybe it will depend
on functest to upload test result independently.
What’s your opinions? @David, @Serena
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: SerenaFeng(zte) [mailto:serena.feng.711+...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2018年1月22日 18:08
收件人: chenjiankun
抄送
satisfied your requirements?
BRs,
Jack Chan
发件人: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
发送时间: 2018年1月20日 3:07
收件人: chenjiankun
抄送: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; tro...@redhat.com; Brattain, Ross B; Rao, Sridhar;
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN; mark.bei...@dell.com; Yuyang (Gabriel); ALFRED C
'MORTON ' (acmor
Hi,
As we discussed last test working group weekly meeting, we want to do test
resources aggregation.
We plan to offer a new friendly web portal which contain all existing test
resource and more functions.
I have a broad classification as bellow:
1. Data analysis
a)
, if you have any suggestions, do not hesitate to comment(Patch or Email,
both OK☺)
BR,
Jack Chan
发件人: Rao, Sridhar [mailto:sridhar@spirent.com]
发送时间: 2017年11月10日 14:43
收件人: chenjiankun
抄送: Cooper, Trevor <trevor.coo...@intel.com> (trevor.coo...@intel.com); Mars
Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/
Hi David,
As discussed last night, we all agree that adding timestamps in reporting page.
So in order to clarify your need better, can you repeat your demand?
Once we come to a conclusion, I will try to do it ASAP.
BTW, since you are a very important user to reporting page, your suggestion
data, we still need more days to see the trend.
BR,
Jack Chan
发件人: Alexandru Avadanii [mailto:alexandru.avada...@enea.com]
发送时间: 2017年10月13日 3:42
收件人: David McBride; chenjiankun
抄送: opnfv-project-leads; TSC OPNFV; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; Michail Polenchuk
主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][euphrates
change the field in DB.
So now it should show the right result.
BR,
Jack Chan
发件人: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
发送时间: 2017年10月13日 0:01
收件人: chenjiankun
抄送: opnfv-project-leads; TSC OPNFV; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; Alexandru Avadanii;
Michail Polenchuk
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss
Hi David,
Fuel x86 and Fuel arrch64 page are available now.
See:
1.
http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/euphrates/yardstick/status-f...@x86.html
2.
http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/euphrates/yardstick/status-f...@aarch64.html
BR,
Jack Chan
发件人:
); mark.bei...@emc.com; Cooper, Trevor;
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Yuyang (Gabriel); jalaus...@suse.com; chenjiankun;
test...@lists.opnfv.org
抄送: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
主题: [OPNFV] [testing group] landing page: score and trust indicator
Hi
we initiated the landing page some time ago:
http
: 2017年8月24日 16:48
收件人: chenjiankun; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
主题: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] yardstick env prepare - chroot error
Hi Jack,
Thanks for the reply. I see below images in /home/opnfv/images directory. I am
compiling for arm pod. Please suggest.
root@57db44f0c4b5:/home
Hi,
It seems there are something wrong when you build yardstick-image.
Maybe you can download yardstick-image directly:
cd /home/opnfv/images
wget http://artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/images/yardstick-image.img
Then execute yardstick env prepare again.
Hope that would work for
Hi,
We wait for a certain times when prepare env. It is the reason why you got a
timeout error.
Since there is asynchronous thread run in backend, so even it is timeout, the
task start run.
So you can use the follow command to check if yardstick-image, cirros-0.3.5
exists:
openstack
Hi jiaxuan,
We assuming that there is a CI POD(as SUT), so that we can run this test case
the way as CI do. And then upload the test result to the database.
Regards,
Jack Chan
发件人: 贾玄 [mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月18日 15:18
收件人: chenjiankun; dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
抄送
Hi All,
After this patch(https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/36537/) merged, we are
very glad to have the first test case in yardstick for kubernetes: ping_k8s.
With the help of @Ruijing(thanks Ruijing:) as well as OpenRetriever team), now
we have a basic kubernetes context, we have the basic
Chan
发件人: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
发送时间: 2017年3月14日 19:20
收件人: chenjiankun; Tallgren, Tapio;
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick run-time issue
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 10:46
/resources/files/.
Regards,
Jack Chan
From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 7:34 PM
To: chenjiankun; Tallgren, Tapio; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [yardstick] Yardstick run-time issue
Hi,
I solved all the issues
you tell me the version of the devstack and what openstack version you’re
deploying. I would deploy one locally and then try to figure it out.
Regards,
Jack Chan
From: Marco Varlese [mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 6:29 PM
To: Tallgren, Tapio; chenjiankun; opnfv-tech
Hi Marco,
What's the latest status of this issue?
Does my solution be OK for you?
I'm looking forward to your reply.
Regards,
Jack Chan
From: chenjiankun
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 5:25 PM
To: 'Marco Varlese'
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss
Hi Marco,
I am Jack from yardstick team.
I haven't experienced this issue before. But it seems there are some errors
with the cirros image.
I think you can try to run ping test case in the follow steps:
1. docker run -itd --privileged --name yardstick opnfv/yardstick:latest
2.
; rexlee8...@gmail.com; chenjiankun
抄送: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
主题: [OPNFV] testing meeting APAC slot
Hi
the next weekly meeting APAC slot is not clear. We indicate 2 dates in the
wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf
According to the calendar it is on the 9th
29 matches
Mail list logo
