Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [yardstick] Client version can't support Newton

the module version that is imported in the code (from neutronclient.v3_0 import client) I have created a wiki collecting this information to align in what we are installing in our Docker image https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/OpenStack+python+clients Feel free to provide feedback. JOSE

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [yardstick] Client version can't support Newton

for that activity. JOSE LAUSUCH Senior Systems Designer Ericsson From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com] Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 16:32 PM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: liyuenan; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [yardstick] Client version

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [yardstick] Client version can't support Newton - solution proposal

sks/Challenges 1. A wise and general architecture is required as more OpenStack upgrades are expected [1] https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient 发件人: Jose Lausuch [mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2016年11月11日 23:43 收件人: Beierl, Mark mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>>

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] one issue for kingbird functest Re: About kingbird OpenStack clients dependency ... RE: OpenStack python Clients in Functest

to the right one? Regards, JOSE LAUSUCH Senior Systems Designer Ericsson From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 4:06 AM To: Jose Lausuch; morgan.richo...@orange.com; cedric.olliv...@orange.com; yaohelan; feng.xiao...@zte.com.cn; Steven Pisarski; Dimitri

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][netready] Gluon integration test strategy

this in the Netready project is also ok, it can be linked. Can I use the name "netready-vping" to create a new entry in our DataBase? Regards, JOSE LAUSUCH Senior Systems Designer Ericsson -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest Addition for Barometer

> > The requirements are basically that you would have to adapt and use the tools > that libraries that the Functest framework provides. Of course we would be > happy to help and guide you through the process. > > I can include this as an agenda topic for our weekly meeting in 2

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

Hi Mark, If you want to post results you need: 1) Project declarated in the DB. Done for Storperf: http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf 2) Declare test cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf: http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

1/projects/storperf Regards, Jose From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 15:11 PM To: RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN Cc: Jose Lausuch; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnf

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Meeting minutes, Nov 23, 2016

Hi, I would recommend following a similar approach to SDNVPN repo: https://git.opnfv.org/sdnvpn/tree/test/functest Where we define a config file testcases.yaml to define test-related parameters, a script run_tests.py that triggers the test cases and a different script for the each test case. O

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Functest healthcheck error log

Hi, We are aware of it and we know the root cause. It's being addressed currently. Thanks for the feedback. Regards, Jose From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of liyuenan Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 19:23 PM To: opn

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SDNVPN test Case fail criteria

+1 to disable (not remove) tests that don't work due to upstream missing functionality. The problem is: how do we show the upstream community that it fails and we would like to use that? +1 to remove release criteria from all the test cases in sdnvpn, which is the same as requiring 100% success

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][apex] New smoke tests in master verify

Original Message- From: morgan.richo...@orange.com [mailto:morgan.richo...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 11:13 AM To: Tim Rozet Cc: Jose Lausuch; OPNFV Tech Discussion; Steven Pisarski Subject: Re: [functest][apex] New smoke tests in master verify Le 13/12/2016 à 02:30, T

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] [all] TestPerf EcoSystem diagram now editable

Hi Yujun, That looks good. It’s a great idea to have diagrams and pictures editable so that we can change it when we see the need. Maybe we should apply the same for the other pictures/graphs. Thanks, Jose From: test-wg-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test-wg-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Keystone error when getting nova client

? Thanks, Jose From: Paraskevopoulos Georgios [mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 15:13 PM To: OPNFV Tech Cc: Jose Lausuch Subject: [functest] Keystone error when getting nova client Hi all, In functest master when I'm trying to run get_nova_client() I'

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Starting to clean-up meetings page on the wiki

Hi Ray, I’ve seen you have created https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Functest which contains the same info as in the main page. Shall I move all the content from https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/Functest+Meeting to that one to avoid pointers to pointers? Thanks, Jose From: opnf

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] [Functest] Fuel10, Newton and v3 testing

Hi, Looking at the latest CI daily jobs for Fuel, Functest fails due to a failure while running the healthcheck test case: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-master/1012/console I have ran Functest on Fuel-10 on a local server and got better results after

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]if the l3vpn feature is completed fully in C release

, Tianhongbo mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Jose and Chris: Could you please help me to check this action item? Best regards hongbo 发件人: Tianhongbo 发送时间: 2017年1月14日 15:32 收件人: Jose Lausuch 抄送: 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' 主题: [dovetail]if the l3vpn feature is completed fu

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]if the l3vpn feature is completed fully in C release

Me neither. If that were the case, that feature Was tested only in Fuel during Colorado. Let's follow up on Friday. - Jose - -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Price Sent:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

have or a specific and different tool to install a certain feature? Adding Tim, who is the SDNVPN PTL. Thanks, Jose From: Tianhongbo [mailto:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 01:46 AM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' Subject: [dovetail]L3VPN for do

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

about how the tests were behaving when releasing Colorado. Regards, Jose From: Christopher Price Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 14:17 PM To: Jose Lausuch; Tianhongbo; Tim Irnich Cc: 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area Hi Jose,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Juan, please ping me in IRC and I'll do it for you. - Jose - -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Buil Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 18:49 PM To: Juan Vidal ALLENDE; opnfv-tech-disc

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SDNVPN]{Fuel] Fuel virtual install

Hi Bryan, To deploy virtual FUEL, I use this every time I have a fresh Ubuntu installation : sudo apt-get install -y\ python-pip\ python-dev\ libffi-dev\ libssl-dev\ sshfs\ fuseiso\ isoinfo\ genisoimage\ sshpass\ sudo pip install --upgrade pip sudo pip install pyyaml sudo pip install

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][apex] functest container not updating

Sent: Feb 3, 2017 17:22 To: Jose Lausuch; morgan richomme Cc: OPNFV Tech Discussion Subject: [functest][apex] functest container not updating Hi Jose, Morgan, I see in https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-apex-apex-daily-master-suite-master/3/console that the patch to fix glance is not there, b

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][apex] functest container not updating

That is expected. Functest job always pulls the image first: https://git.opnfv.org/releng/tree/jjb/functest/set-functest-env.sh#n75 -Jose- From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 18:11 PM To: morgan.richo...@orange.com Cc: Tim Rozet; Jose Lausuch; OPNFV

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][apex] functest container not updating

merged -Original Message- From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 19:55 PM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: Mark Beierl; morgan richomme; OPNFV Tech Discussion Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][apex] functest container not updating OK it looks like we

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest ODL-SFC

Hi, The SFC test case was only supported by Fuel installer in the Colorado Release. +Manuel and Georgios who can give you more details about it. -Jose- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of KA PDE Sent: Monday, Februar

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Collecting current issues

Hi, Currently there is a bigger problem which happens in CI: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-master/1112/console The instances can’t get an IP from the dhcp agent. Adding Michail, who together with me has seen that issue before on fuel and sometimes wa

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Announce] OPNFV E-release naming

Evans (Australia) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evans_River_(New_South_Wales) Not so many rivers in Africa starting with E… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rivers_of_Africa From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of R

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] vnf test case failed

JIRA created : https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-734 Valentin is working on it. Thanks, Jose From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of liyuenan Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 09:25 AM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.o

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Collecting current issues

+Manuel, George From: Michael Polenchuk [mailto:mpolenc...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 13:58 PM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: Juan Vidal ALLENDE; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [SFC] Collecting current issues I've got only the following flows on the compute node

[opnfv-tech-discuss] MS6 Functest

://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/27247/ Thanks, JOSE LAUSUCH Senior Systems Designer Ericsson | Germany jose.laus...@ericsson.com<mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com> ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/m

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest-suite job returns always 0

Hi, The reason why Functest-suite job is giving false positives in CI is because of the Functest CLI. This job is mainly used by verify gates and other 3rd party jobs like ODL-Netvirt, ODL-CSIT, and will be more often used. This only happens with the 'suite' job and not with 'daily' jobs, since

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 2/24

22, 2017 05:42 AM To: Christopher Price; 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' Cc: Jose Lausuch Subject: 答复: [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 2/24 Hi Chris: Ok, I will put these as the first point on the agenda. Yes, that is true that before the dovetail wok, we need to get the clear strategy fr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest]multisite test executed, but test cases not being execeuted

It looks like the function that configures tempest for multisite is wrong since it doesn't run any test at all. Juha, can you please have a quick look? From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of joehuang Sent: Thursday, Feb

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] [Danube] [Documentation] Organization of testing section

.@gmail.com>>; mark.bei...@emc.com<mailto:mark.bei...@emc.com>; Jose Lausuch mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com>>; Cooper, Trevor mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>>; Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; Gaoliang (D) mailto:jean.gaoli...@huawei.com>&g

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Functest weekly sync meeting

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=Jose Lausuch;SENT-BY="MAILTO:bob.monk...@arm.com":MAILTO:jose.la us...@ericsson.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALS

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] K8 scenario testing on Joid

[mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 19:59 PM To: Narinder Gupta; Fatih Degirmenci Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; Heather Kirksey; Tapio Tallgren; Morgan Richomme (morgan.richo...@orange.com); Gaoliang (kubi); Jose Lausuch; Raymond Paik Subject: [release][danube] K8 scenario testing

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] K8 scenario testing on Joid

...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 06:40 AM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: David McBride; Narinder Gupta; Fatih Degirmenci; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; Tapio Tallgren; Morgan Richomme (morgan.richo...@orange.com); Gaoliang (kubi); Raymond Paik Subject: Re: [release][danube] K8 scenario testing on Joid

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Tagging and docker build completed for Danube.1.0

Hi, Functest repo ready with tags: danube.1.0 : https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=functest.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/danube.1.0 danube.1.RC1: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/gitweb?p=functest.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/danube.1.RC1 Docker image built with tag "danube.1.0" https://

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Tagging and docker build completed for Danube.1.0

can trigger the build for you. [cid:image001.png@01D2AA58.4D0DA6F0] From: Yujun Zhang (ZTE) [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 17:22 PM To: Jose Lausuch; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Tagging and docker build completed for Danube.1.0

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Tagging and docker build completed for Danube.1.0

Yes, sorry about that. I forgot we already use the branch name for that field by default. Thanks Kubi for pointing that out. Jose From: Gaoliang (kubi) [mailto:jean.gaoli...@huawei.com] Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2017 03:22 AM To: Yujun Zhang; Jose Lausuch; Soni, Anand Kumar via opnfv-tech

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Security Scanning

Hi Luke, We should of course keep your test case and if you had time or anyone who wants to take it, we could try to make it run on other installers as well. We have now an abstraction layer to connect to the deployed nodes regardless of the installer, we could probably adapt the code to use it

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Pharos] Bandwidth expectations for OPNFV Pharos labs

Hi Bryan, I'm afraid we don't have those numbers. As far as Functest is concerned, it only needs to download the latest Docker image before running the container (<1GB) and when it's running the test cases, it doesn't need to pull many things from the internet, maybe a small image or some packa

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"

Hi, The Functest team is going to work on providing OpenID authentication to the TEST API and also the functionality of uploading a json file using the API with results to be pushed to the DB. We commit to have it ready 1-2 weeks before the OPNFV summit. We would like to implement this function

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Danube][Functest][Apex][Nosdn-nofeature-ha] Functest docker fails

Hi Tuan, Are you using latest tag of the docker image? We are currently working on refactoring some code at the moment, so we can take action to solve that. Could you provide more console logs? In the meantime, you can use danube.1.0 instead of latest. Thanks, Jose From: opnfv-tech-discuss-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Danube][Functest][Apex][Nosdn-nofeature-ha] Functest docker fails

Hi, +Juha (Nokia) Sure, please provide that info and make sure you have connectivity from the jumphost to the admin (api) network of your Apex deployment. Thanks, Jose From: lương hữu tuấn Sent: May 7, 2017 15:20 To: Jose Lausuch Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [Danube][Functest][Apex][Nosdn-nofeature-ha] Functest docker fails

, 2017 06:28 AM To: wangwulin Cc: Jose Lausuch; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Danube][Functest][Apex][Nosdn-nofeature-ha] Functest docker fails Hi Wang, Thank you for instruction. It works now for me after deleting the creds file. Could you provide more

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] Milestone 2 - test case documentation - May 22

Hi, Due to some major changes in Functest, we have DISABLED ALL the test cases belonging to FEATURE projects in MASTER jobs for the moment. Only Functest smoke test cases are running in CI (for now). The reasoning behind is: - Functest team is working hard to make the framework more r

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] Glance images from feature projects

Hi, This is addressed to all the feature projects that integrate tests in Functest. The team is working on a mechanism to pre-download the needed images for all the test cases instead of downloading them while running the tests. This may potentially speed up the testing process and could help r

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][doctor][releng] how to run experimental jobs

ota Mibu [mailto:r-m...@cq.jp.nec.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 13:46 PM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [functest][doctor][releng] how to run experimental jobs Hi Jose and Functest team, I'm wondering how we can run experimental jobs with functest in OPNFV CI pi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfv-tech-discuss Digest, Vol 34, Issue 11

ange.com>) 3. Details for Summit registration etc (SULLIVAN, BRYAN L) ------ Message: 1 Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 17:41:10 +0200 From: Manuel Buil mailto:mb...@suse.com>> To: Igor Jochem Sanz mailto:s...@gta.ufrj.br>>, Jo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfv-tech-discuss Digest, Vol 34, Issue 11

: Flags [.], ack 4089, win 305, options [nop,nop,TS val 37907496 ecr 952286397], length 0 Thanks for your support, Leopoldo Mauricio On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Jose Lausuch mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi Leopoldo, The SFC test case needs to access the deployment

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] functest in master (euphrates milestone 3.1)

That is great! Milestone passed successfully :) /Jose -Original Message- From: Steven Pisarski [mailto:s.pisar...@cablelabs.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 20:20 PM To: Tim Rozet; Raymond Paik; David McBride Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV; Jose Lausuch; ollivier cedric Subject: Re: functest

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

+1 No need for an additional repo, the logic can be in Releng.. Functest will probably move to different containers some time soon, so that is something we could also leverage. -Jose- On 23 Jun 2017, at 18:39, Julien mailto:julien...@gmail.com>> wrote: Agree, If StorPerf can list some rules

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Status of Functest / Apex

/tempest/tempest.log [2] https://git.opnfv.org/functest/plain/functest/opnfv_tests/openstack/tempest/custom_tests/blacklist.txt From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2017 01:21 AM To: Daniel Radez ; Jose Lausuch ; Tim Rozet Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] sdnvpn test cases with dovetail.cvp.0.1.0 throw an error

Srikanth, You should set INSTALLER_TYPE=apex and also set INSTALLER_IP to the undercloud VM. You also need to set the DEPLOY_SCENARIO to the corresponding scenario you are deploying. If it’s a bgpvpn deployment, you can set it to os-odl_l2-bgpvpn-ha. That is at least from Functest side, not su

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

: Julien ; Fatih Degirmenci ; Jose Lausuch Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project Ideas: * Change the DOCKERFILE parameter in releng jjb so that it can accept a comma delimited list of Dockerfile names and paths. Problem with this, of course, is how do I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

, but that logic can be done in the docker script. /Jose From: Chigang (Justin) [mailto:chig...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 09:02 AM To: Yujun Zhang (ZTE) ; Jose Lausuch ; Beierl, Mark ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

mailto:jason.jiax...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 Using build service from docker-hub On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Yujun Zhang (ZTE) mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com>> wrote: Does anybody consider using the build service from docker-hub[1] ? It supports multiple Dockerfile from same rep

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

More inline From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) [mailto:ahot...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 16:40 PM To: Jose Lausuch ; Fatih Degirmenci ; Beierl, Mark Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project Inline… From: Jose

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

Hi, Is there time to discuss this during the next infra wg meeting on Monday? Although the test projects are the main ones using docker containers, we are talking about versioning here, which I believe is topic the Infra team should address. I also would like to add to the agenda: - decisio

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

Hi Pavan, It seems your installer is not supported by the script fetch_os_creds.sh In that case, you need to provide the openstack RC file from your deployment manually to the container, or just copy the content to /home/opnfv/functest/conf/openstack.creds Let me know if it still fails that w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

ritten) format. OpenStack > uses etherpads or text files that are reviewed through gerrit. > > Thanks > > Alec > > > On 7/12/17, 11:35 PM, "Jose Lausuch" wrote: > >Hi, > >Is there time to discuss this during the next infra wg mee

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

i Jose, I added the following route on Junper host and connectivity worked, so the SFC test environment was successfully prepared. sudo route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.26.48.23 Thanks for your help. Pavan On 13-Jul-2017, at 7:06 PM, Jose Lausuch mailto:jose.laus...@ericss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

/releng/modules/opnfv/deployment/manager.py", line 184, in run_cmd _, stdout, stderr = (self.ssh_client.exec_command(cmd)) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute ‘exec_command' Does anyone know fix for this? Pavan On 14-Jul-2017, at 12:56 PM, Jose Lausuch mai

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

July 14, 2017 14:28 PM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: Manuel Buil ; andres.sanchez.ra...@estudiant.upc.edu; OPNFV-TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project Hi Jose, 1. I have attached functest.log. 2. Docker image: Docker version 17.04.0-ce, build 4845c56 3. Installer: Fuel, ve

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] SFC Project

t;docker-entrypoint..." 2 months agoUp 8 days 0.0.0.0:6379->6379/tcp autolytiks_redis_1 Please let me know if you need any other information. Pavan On 14-Jul-2017, at 6:09 PM, Jose Lausuch mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Pavan, I don’

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

Hi Alec, Sounds good. We can talk about that during the meeting. Thanks for proposing it. Jose -Original Message- From: Alec Hothan (ahothan) [mailto:ahot...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 16:53 PM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: Morgan Richomme ; Mark Beierl ; opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Docker builds on Dockerhub account

Hi, Following up on the discussion about how to build our Docker images, I started a trial with Trevor Bramwell with automated builds on Dockerhub for some of the new Functest Docker images: https://hub.docker.com/r/opnfv/functest-core/builds/ https://hub.docker.com/r/opnfv/functest-smoke/buil

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Jenkins servers Docker versions?

Hi Mark, Please create a JIRA ticket and assign it to Dianfeng Du. Thank you, Jose On 26 Jul 2017, at 03:46, Beierl, Mark mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>> wrote: Hello, The latest storperf-master docker build is failing [1] on ericsson-build3 as it is unable to parse the FROM source AS label s

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][openretriever] OpenRetriever wants to know how k8s e2e test integrated with functest

wish, but the topic is still open. I think there is a python module for kubernetes, so the idea would be to start writing tests in python using Functest framework using that client. Thanks, Jose From: 贾玄 [mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 13:52 PM To: Jose Lausuch

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][openretriever] OpenRetriever wants to know how k8s e2e test integrated with functest

Hi, We haven’t thought about test cases yet, that is the task that the intern should be looking at. + Morgan (Functest) and Nadinder (Joid). Regards, Jose From: 贾玄 [mailto:jiax...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 08:08 AM To: Jose Lausuch Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [announce] Opening nominations for Committers-at-Large TSC & Committer Board elections

...@suse.com>> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to nominate Jose Lausuch for the Committers-at-Large TSC board. > Jose has done a great job as Functest PTL for Danube and Euphrates. He > got a developer award in Beijing and has server as a mentor for the > internship program.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest return value and color on Jenkins

Hi, You might have noticed recently that Functest is reporting BLUE even though some test cases fail, e.g. [1]. This is due to the new way of running Functest using different Docker images based on Alpine: 1. healthcheck connection_check, api_check, snaps_healthcheck... 2. smoke

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

+1 What about using tag "release-x.y.z" instead of "opnfv-x.y.z" since the name “opnfv” is already included in the image name? e.g. opnfv/functest:release-5.0.0 This way we differentiate between an official OPNFV release artifact from a none released. - Jose - > On 27 Sep 2017, at 20:00, R

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [release][euphrates] Euphrates status

Hi David, You can now update that table for Functest column on Compass [1] and Fuel-ARM [2]. They have been reporting results in the past day or 2, so therefore there is no history yet to plot a trend in the graphs. Regards, Jose [1]: http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/euphrates/functest/

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] proposal to eliminate one of the two point releases for Euphrates

+1 Regards, Jose > On 04 Oct 2017, at 20:46, Beierl, Mark wrote: > > +1 > > Regards, > Mark > > Mark Beierl > SW System Sr Principal Engineer > Dell EMC | Office of the CTO > mobile +1 613 314 8106 > mark.bei...@dell.com >> On Oct 4, 2017, at 14:44, David Mc

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Alpine for arch

Maybe late for 5.0, but not late for Euphrates 5.1. Can we collect a list the requirements we need from Releng in this wiki [1]? It will facilitate the support and I will help to speed it up. Otherwise, nothing will happen as people don’t know what we need. [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fu

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

Hi, With regards to Functest, you can run it on any OpenStack deployment as long as you provide a proper RC file and meet the requirements on the jumphost (docker, connectivity to the deployment, …). However, in some cases, some test cases from feature projects require SSH access to the deploy

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

; logs if used for certification? (limited use, of course) > … > > Cheers > Georg > > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> > [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-di

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

--+ > > 发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> > [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] 代表 Srikanth Vavilapalli > 发送时间: 2017年10月12日 9:03 >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

You’ll > remember the gather_logs function Niko implemented for the bgpvpn tests – > that is one example. Can that effectively be handled if we separate things as > you suggest? > > Regards, Tim > > > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > [mailto:opnfv-tec

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Doctor][Functest] about doctor verify job using 'functest-suite-builder'

Hi, There was a problem with functest-suite and exporting the environment variables in the shell scripts we were running within the jenkins builders. This patch should fix that issue: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/45301/ and this one should fi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

and option for disabling the > gathering logs…etc. > > Thanks > Srikanth > > > > From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org > [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jose Lausuch > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 4:28 AM >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

ng on a way to secure the log in details. See patch > https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/44389/ > <https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/44389/> > > On 10/13/2017 12:15 AM, Jose Lausuch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When it comes to log collection, I strongly believe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] [sdnvpn] Proposal for removing installer dependent information in the test tools

s rather than > throwing exception if the INSTALLER_TYPE is set to anything else other than > “apex” and “fuel”. So this is kind of disabling the sdnvpn LOG collection in > other installer types. > > Plz let me know any comments or inputs… > > Thanks > Srikanth &g

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][euphrates] recommended list of scenarios for release in Euphrates 5.0

Hi, I just want to raise a concern the Functest team has been discussing this morning. This list is maybe good from a deployment prospective, but it seems we are lowering the bar the older OPNFV gets… I remember in the Arno and Brahmaputra days the release criteria was to pass Functest/Yardsti

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

Done for Functest. Regards, Jose > On 20 Oct 2017, at 21:54, Narinder Gupta wrote: > > done for joid. > > Thanks and Regards, > Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com > > Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta [irc.f

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

Hi Brandon, Please add Functest Docker Parser and Functest Docker Arm in the Functest column. Thanks, Jose > On 25 Oct 2017, at 14:16, Fatih Degirmenci > wrote: > > Hi, > > XCI links are pointin

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

Sorry, wrong link for Functest Arm docker, please use this one: https://hub.docker.com/r/opnfv/functest_aarch64/ <https://hub.docker.com/r/opnfv/functest_aarch64/> Jose > On 25 Oct 2017, at 14:23, Jose Lausuch wrote: > > Hi Brandon, > > Please add Functest Do

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

Brandon, shall we use links for git repositories? e.g. for Fuel, a link to the git repository instead of the command “git clone https://git.opnfv.org/fuel ” … It is no very consistent with the docker images, as they can be also pulled using a command “docker pull op

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] PTL transfer

Hi, It has already been 2 releases being PTL of Functest, and it is time for me to transfer the role to other team members. It has been an honour holding this position trying to drive things in the right direction and I am very proud of the team and what we are achieving. This is not a goodbye

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] PTL transfer

t; > > > From: Kosonen, Juha (Nokia - FI/Espoo) [mailto:juha.koso...@nokia.com > <mailto:juha.koso...@nokia.com>] > Sent: 2017年11月14日 14:39 > To: Tikkanen, Viktor (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <mailto:viktor.tikka...@nokia.com>>; Valentin Boucher > mailto:valentin.bo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] Committer list per Releng repository

+1 Jose > On 08 Dec 2017, at 01:01, Fatih Degirmenci > wrote: > > Hi Releng Committers, > > During OPNFV Plugfest, we had conversations around having committer list per > Releng repository/Gerrit Project. > > The reason behind this is that, Releng project currently has 5 different >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SDNVPN] Standing down as SDNVPN PTL

+1 > On 26 Jan 2018, at 16:57, Prem sankar G wrote: > > +1 > > From: Tim Irnich > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 1:14 AM > To: Periyasamy Palanisamy ; Thomas > Sounapoglou ; Prem sankar G > ; MORIN Thomas IMT/OLN (thomas.mo...@orange.com) > ; Nikolas He

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [RELENG] Vote to make Trevor a submitter on releng.

+1 -Original Message- From: Aric Gardner [mailto:agard...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 20:05 PM To: OPNFV Tech Cc: Fatih Degirmenci; Jose Lausuch; Meimei; RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN; Ryota Mibu; Tim Rozet Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [RELENG] Vote to make Trevor a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Do all OPNFV installers create an external net/subnet?

Hi Bryan, Yes, the 4 installers deploy an external network by default, we requested that already in Arno for Functest. We have a "utils" function that returns you the name of the external network, but it is written in Python and we can use it and pass the network name as a parameter when callin

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest feedback in Jenkins

ttps://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-master/260/console The exit status is -1 because there was >0 failures in Tempest-smoke, and the success criteria for Tempest-smoke is 100%. This strictness has been changed like this after some feedback collected from the community, in par

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Tempest] Current status for each installer

Hi, Please find attached a brief report of the Tempest test cases that are failing for each installer. I hope this helps as a feedback to the installer and feature owners to improve the quality of the deployments and reach the release date without errors. Now it's the time to solve as many bugs

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Shout out: Julien Zhang

+1 -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of DENG Hui Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:09 AM To: morgan.richo...@orange.com; 'Jack Morgan'; 'opnfv-tech-discuss' Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss]

  1   2   >