On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 11:12:15 PM UTC+1, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>
> Hi Lijun,
>
> yes, this should be handled better, could you please open an Issue about
> it.
>
==> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-1152 created (because we're also
seeing this)
> If you don't have an
[I replied 1h ago and now it shows "This message has been deleted." ?! How
weird; re-posting something similarly worded:]
On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 2:14:17 PM UTC+1, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
Breaking changes are fine, as long as we bump the major version for this.
>
OK, cool; so we
On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 2:14:17 PM UTC+1, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>
> Breaking changes are fine, as long as we bump the major version for this.
>
OK cool, so I could raise a PR which proposes this removal and, in the same
PR, I bump the current 1.2.2-SNAPSHOT in all Pax JDBC master
