Re: [OPSAWG] Declaring something to be a controller in MUD

2019-06-24 Thread M. Ranganathan
Hi Eliot, On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:48 AM Eliot Lear wrote: > Hi everyone, > > A few of us are just trying to put out an initial draft that addresses one > gap in MUD (there are several). In a MUD file one can say that one wants > to access a controller in two ways: either "my-controller”

Re: [OPSAWG] Feedback and operators+implementers input for L3NM draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-00

2019-06-24 Thread Roni Even (A)
Hi, I read the draft and think it is a good direction to have the service delivery model for the l3vpn. I have no strong opinion about whether to use the augmented approach or the prune and extend approach mostly if the redundant parameters form l3sm are optional both direction may work but

Re: [OPSAWG] review of draft-evenwu-opsawg-yang-composed-vpn-03

2019-06-24 Thread Roni Even (A)
Hi, Thanks for the review, as for the question the composed VPN can be l3vpn or l2vpn as mentioned in figure 2 Roni From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of liuc...@chinaunicom.cn Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 10:22 AM To: opsawg Subject: [OPSAWG] review of

[OPSAWG] Declaring something to be a controller in MUD

2019-06-24 Thread Eliot Lear
Hi everyone, A few of us are just trying to put out an initial draft that addresses one gap in MUD (there are several). In a MUD file one can say that one wants to access a controller in two ways: either "my-controller” meaning a controller that services devices of a particular MUD URL or a

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wkumari-opsawg-sdi-04

2019-06-24 Thread Warren Kumari
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:51 AM Qin Wu wrote: > > Interesting, try to understand the key difference between device enroll in > secure environment and device enroll in in secure environment? I'm unsure what you are asking; I'm guessing perhaps you meant "in an insecure environment"? This

[OPSAWG] Comments on L3NM draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-00

2019-06-24 Thread liuc...@chinaunicom.cn
Dear Authors, Thank for writing this draft and I understand the problem described in this draft and believe it is real problem that needs to be solved. I have a few comments on this draft: 1. Section 2, 2nd paragraph The augmentations facilitate the use the resulting model in

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt

2019-06-24 Thread Qin Wu
-邮件原件- 发件人: Tianran Zhou 发送时间: 2019年6月24日 10:35 收件人: Qin Wu ; opsawg@ietf.org 主题: RE: I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt > -Original Message- > From: Qin Wu > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 11:47 AM > To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org > Subject:

[OPSAWG] FW: IETF 105 Preliminary Agenda

2019-06-24 Thread Tianran Zhou
Hi WG, The preliminary agenda for IETF105 is published. The OPSAWG meeting is scheduled on WEDNESDAY, July 24, 2019, 1000-1200 Morning Session I. Please consider to submit your topic request for the time slot. We usually only have limited time for each topic. To efficiently use the time,