Thanks Med.
Reza
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 3:41 PM
To: Rokui, Reza , Joe Clarke (jclarke) ,
opsawg@ietf.org , Wubo (lana) , Richard
Roberts , Oscar González de Dios
, samier.barguil_gira...@nokia.com
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: shepherd review for
Hi Reza,
Thank you for the review.
We don’t provide the full structure but snippets per the guidance in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-11#name-tree-diagrams.
We provided the following in Section 4:
==
The full tree diagram of the module can be generated
Thanks Med.
One more question.
9. Based on the shepherd's review of the document, is it their opinion that this
document is needed, clearly written, complete, correctly designed, and ready
to be handed off to the responsible Area Director?
[Reza] The document is well-written. Having said
Med, Joe,
- Reduced-size encoding per RFC7011 does not apply, unless you are
restricting them to 64, 32, 16, and 8.
[Med] There is no such restriction because of this part in the base spec:
This behavior is indicated by the Exporter by specifying a size in
the Template
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-11.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working
Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF.
Title: A Network YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Richard Roberts
Hi Med,
Looks good now. From my perspective, no further changes are required.
Cheers,
Krzysztof
On May 15, 2024, at 17:08, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Krzysztof,
Thank you for the review.
Can you please check and let us know if any
Tero,
We could potentially ask the RFC-editors to do this task?
Or maybe they do it automatically?
Regards, Benoit
On 5/14/2024 4:31 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com writes:
In section 8.3 change
This type MUST be encoded per
Hi Krzysztof,
Thank you for the review.
Can you please check and let us know if any further change is needed:
Resending to the WG list
> On May 2, 2024, at 11:26, Krzysztof Szarkowicz
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I have been asked to do the shepherd's review for
> draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit document, with the intended traget
> status "Standards Track". "Standards Track" is the
We would like to thank the WG (and TEAS) for the reviews and comments during WG
LC. LC has concluded, and comments have been addressed (today) for issues
raised.
We are still pending a couple of shepherd write-ups, but once we get them we
can move these drafts forward to the IESG.
Joe
From:
Hi Joe,
Thank you for the follow-up.
A candidate version can be seen at: Diff: draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix.txt
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
