On 4/6/16 15:08, Petr Lapukhov wrote:
* How do you propose the populated data to be handled normally? Will
the probe destination (i.e., the dest address of the UDP packet) be
expected to understand these, or will loopback mode have to be used?
The reason I ask is that I'm not sure what happens i
Thank for the questions!
Please see responses inline:
> * How do you propose the populated data to be handled normally? Will
> the probe destination (i.e., the dest address of the UDP packet) be
> expected to understand these, or will loopback mode have to be used?
> The reason I ask is that I'
On 3/18/16 09:41, Petr Lapukhov wrote:
Folks,
If possible I would like to request a slot on the agenda to present
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/
This to start work on in-band telemetry format standardization. The
technology is still at early stages, and I beli
Folks,
If possible I would like to request a slot on the agenda to present
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/
This to start work on in-band telemetry format standardization. The technology
is still at early stages, and I believe it would be helpful to agree on comm
petr,
> You are right, the primary use case is data-center network, with its
> specific devices: e.g. multiple shared-memory-buffer chips connected
> in Clos topology. The typical MTU I've seen so far there is still
> 1500, even though enabling jumbo framing is generally not a problem.
> However,
s,
Petr
From: Randy Bush [ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 8:30 PM
To: Petr Lapukhov
Cc: opsawg
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_
sorry but our agenda filled up a while back
I would suggest sending a note to the mailing list pointing to your ID and
asking for review and
asking the WG if they think the topic is right for opsawg
Scott
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Petr Lapukhov wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> If possible I would
the paragraph i deleted before sending was
[ i do have sympathy for the motivation. heck, nick duffield suckered
me in the days when at&t had a research lab, but veered left into
trajectory sampling and the psamp stuff. ]
i missed your stuff; apologies. a cite would be good.
i do see
I actually proposed something very much like this about 15 years
ago, based on a flexible transport layer that could deal with things
like NAT and with both authentication and authorization (I'm always
dismayed by proposals that are hand-wavey about security, baffled by
ones that don't mention it
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/
given the heavy per-hop payload, do you have estimates on how many hops
with an mtu of 512? or is this really meant for use within an
operator/datacenter, and maybe one with junbo frames?
i do not understand the relationship of t
opsec?
On 3/1/16 3:28 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We'd like a slot to discuss this I-D:
>
> Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security"
> Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis
> Presenter: Fernando Gont
> Slot: 20'?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> On 02
Folks,
We'd like a slot to discuss this I-D:
Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security"
Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis
Presenter: Fernando Gont
Slot: 20'?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Fernando
On 02/29/2016 10:17 PM, Zhoutianran wrote:
> Greetings WG,
>
> Our meeting in Buenos Aire
---Original Message-
>> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Zhoutianran
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:18 AM
>> To: opsawg@ietf.org
>> Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires
>>
>> Greetings WG,
>>
&g
/doc/draft-unbehagen-lldp-spb.
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Zhoutianran
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:18 AM
> To: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Bu
Greetings WG,
Our meeting in Buenos Aires is fast approaching. We have requested a slot for
the joint OpsAWG / OpsArea meeting.
Please send over requests for agenda time.
Please remember that we give time to drafts that have already received
significant discussion on list.
Thanks,
Scott, W
15 matches
Mail list logo