Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-04-10 Thread Joe Clarke
On 4/6/16 15:08, Petr Lapukhov wrote: * How do you propose the populated data to be handled normally? Will the probe destination (i.e., the dest address of the UDP packet) be expected to understand these, or will loopback mode have to be used? The reason I ask is that I'm not sure what happens i

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-04-06 Thread Petr Lapukhov
Thank for the questions! Please see responses inline: > * How do you propose the populated data to be handled normally? Will > the probe destination (i.e., the dest address of the UDP packet) be > expected to understand these, or will loopback mode have to be used? > The reason I ask is that I'

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-04-06 Thread Joe Clarke
On 3/18/16 09:41, Petr Lapukhov wrote: Folks, If possible I would like to request a slot on the agenda to present https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/ This to start work on in-band telemetry format standardization. The technology is still at early stages, and I beli

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-20 Thread Petr Lapukhov
Folks, If possible I would like to request a slot on the agenda to present https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/ This to start work on in-band telemetry format standardization. The technology is still at early stages, and I believe it would be helpful to agree on comm

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-18 Thread Randy Bush
petr, > You are right, the primary use case is data-center network, with its > specific devices: e.g. multiple shared-memory-buffer chips connected > in Clos topology. The typical MTU I've seen so far there is still > 1500, even though enabling jumbo framing is generally not a problem. > However,

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-18 Thread Petr Lapukhov
s, Petr From: Randy Bush [ra...@psg.com] Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 8:30 PM To: Petr Lapukhov Cc: opsawg Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-18 Thread Scott O. Bradner
sorry but our agenda filled up a while back I would suggest sending a note to the mailing list pointing to your ID and asking for review and asking the WG if they think the topic is right for opsawg Scott > On Mar 18, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Petr Lapukhov wrote: > > Folks, > > If possible I would

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-18 Thread Randy Bush
the paragraph i deleted before sending was [ i do have sympathy for the motivation. heck, nick duffield suckered me in the days when at&t had a research lab, but veered left into trajectory sampling and the psamp stuff. ] i missed your stuff; apologies. a cite would be good. i do see

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-18 Thread Melinda Shore
I actually proposed something very much like this about 15 years ago, based on a flexible transport layer that could deal with things like NAT and with both authentication and authorization (I'm always dismayed by proposals that are hand-wavey about security, baffled by ones that don't mention it

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-18 Thread Randy Bush
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lapukhov-dataplane-probe/ given the heavy per-hop payload, do you have estimates on how many hops with an mtu of 512? or is this really meant for use within an operator/datacenter, and maybe one with junbo frames? i do not understand the relationship of t

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-02 Thread joel jaeggli
opsec? On 3/1/16 3:28 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: > Folks, > > We'd like a slot to discuss this I-D: > > Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security" > Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis > Presenter: Fernando Gont > Slot: 20'? > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Fernando > > > > > On 02

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-01 Thread Fernando Gont
Folks, We'd like a slot to discuss this I-D: Title: "On Firewalls in Network Security" Filename: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis Presenter: Fernando Gont Slot: 20'? Thanks! Best regards, Fernando On 02/29/2016 10:17 PM, Zhoutianran wrote: > Greetings WG, > > Our meeting in Buenos Aire

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-01 Thread Eliot Lear
---Original Message- >> From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Zhoutianran >> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:18 AM >> To: opsawg@ietf.org >> Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires >> >> Greetings WG, >> &g

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-03-01 Thread Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
/doc/draft-unbehagen-lldp-spb. Thanks and Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Zhoutianran > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:18 AM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Bu

[OPSAWG] Call for Agenda Items for Buenos Aires

2016-02-29 Thread Zhoutianran
Greetings WG, Our meeting in Buenos Aires is fast approaching. We have requested a slot for the joint OpsAWG / OpsArea meeting. Please send over requests for agenda time. Please remember that we give time to drafts that have already received significant discussion on list. Thanks, Scott, W