Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Jean,
I think “model (Section 2 of [RFC8309]) or the network model (Section 2.1 of
[RFC8309])” should be “model (Section 2 of [RFC8309]) or the network model
(Section 2.1 of [RFC8969])
Cheers,
Med
Claise
Cc: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Thanks Benoit for the clarifications.
I would urge the authors to add some clarification text around these as they
see fit. Thanks again for taking my comments
Thanks Benoit for the clarifications.
I would urge the authors to add some clarification text around these as
they see fit. Thanks again for taking my comments into consideration.
Regards,
Dhruv
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 6:51 PM Benoit Claise
wrote:
> Hi Dhruv,
>
> Thanks for your review.
> See
Hi Dhruv,
Thanks for your review.
See inline
On 6/26/2022 4:03 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
Hi WG,
I think this work is very useful. I have some comments -
Minor
- We need a reference or some discussion of what we mean by "intent"
before we jump into SAIN in the Introduction.
We could reuse the
) ; Tianran Zhou
; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi Bo,
Thanks a lot for your comments. I addressed them in the current version:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-06.
For point 1
longed to, is it part of SAIN agent?
Thanks,
Bo
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 6:00 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi WG,
This m
: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 6:00 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi WG,
This mail we start a two weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg
Hi WG,
I think this work is very useful. I have some comments -
Minor
- We need a reference or some discussion of what we mean by "intent" before
we jump into SAIN in the Introduction.
- The statement "Such approaches are mainly suited for greenfield
deployments" about intent is not clear to me.
-architecture-03
Hi OPSAWG,
I support the progress of this document.
Thank you!
Best,
Fan
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 6:00 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-s
t part of SAIN agent?
Thanks,
Bo
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 6:00 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi WG,
This mail we start a two weeks working group las
Hi OPSAWG,
I support the progress of this document.
Thank you!
Best,
Fan
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 6:00 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi WG
; Tianran Zhou
; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi Jean,
The changes are great. I like how you updated Section 3.2, in particular.
I have one last comment: the document uses “Network service YANG modules”,
“service model”, and “network
; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi Med,
Thanks for the follow-up. Here is the diff
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-05.
See below for the answers.
Best,
Jean
* If you want
ean.quilb...@huawei.com>>
Envoyé : mercredi 22 juin 2022 12:16
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>>; Tianran
Zhou
mailto:zhoutianran=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org>>;
opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Objet : RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-serv
:
[OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Date:
Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:59:39 +
From:
Tianran Zhou
<mailto:zhoutianran=40huawei@dmarc.ietf.org>
To:
opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Hi WG,
This mail we start a two w
assurance/a subservice also defines its
assurance
Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
De : Jean Quilbeuf
Envoyé : mercredi 22 juin 2022 12:16
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; Tianran Zhou
; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi Med,
thanks again for
ur comments on the
companion -yang draft as well.
Thanks again,
Jean
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Sent: Monday 20 June 2022 15:12
To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-a
consider adding a note in the
introduction about SAIN applicability scope. Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
De : Benoit Claise
Envoyé : mardi 21 juin 2022 22:54
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; Tianran Zhou
; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture
022 12:00
*À :* opsawg@ietf.org
*Objet :* [OPSAWG] WGLC for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi WG,
This mail we start a two weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-ass
:00
À : opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : [OPSAWG] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03
Hi WG,
This mail we start a two weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance
Hi WG,
This mail we start a two weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture/
Please send over your comments before June 22.
Please also indicate if you think this document
21 matches
Mail list logo
