Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

2018-04-10 Thread Scott Bradner
wfm thanks Scott > On Apr 10, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > Thanks for your review. Please see below. > > > On 10.04.18 15:03, Scott Bradner wrote: >> Reviewer: Scott Bradner >> Review result: Has Nits >> >> I did an OPS-DIR review of Manufacturer Usage Descriptio

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

2018-04-10 Thread Eliot Lear
Hi Scott, Thanks for your review.  Please see below. On 10.04.18 15:03, Scott Bradner wrote: > Reviewer: Scott Bradner > Review result: Has Nits > > I did an OPS-DIR review of Manufacturer Usage Description Specification < > draft-ietf-opsawg-mud > The specification is well written and clear (I

[OPSAWG] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-20

2018-04-10 Thread Scott Bradner
Reviewer: Scott Bradner Review result: Has Nits I did an OPS-DIR review of Manufacturer Usage Description Specification < draft-ietf-opsawg-mud > The specification is well written and clear (I also agree with Robert Spark's nits). One suggestion about document organization: I would either move th