Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-14 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
Hi Adam, Thanks again for your updates. Responses inline. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > Responses inline; some text elided. > > On 2/9/18 8:22 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: >> >> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> §2

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-14 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > On 2/9/18 4:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com] >>> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM >>> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) >>> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsa

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-13 Thread Adam Roach
On 2/9/18 4:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-effect-encr...@ietf.or

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-13 Thread Adam Roach
Al -- Response inline, some text elided. On 2/9/18 11:21 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: Adam, please see two further suggestions, in-line: -Original Message- From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com] §2.2.7: A goal is protecting end-user data -- b

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-13 Thread Adam Roach
Responses inline; some text elided. On 2/9/18 8:22 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: --- §2.1.2 -- I am surprised that there is so much discussion of fields that are not generally encrypted in practice (e.g., RTP headers, TCP

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-09 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM >> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) >> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul >> Hoffman; draf

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-09 Thread MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> -Original Message- > From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com] > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul > Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-effect-encr...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objec

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-09 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
I just posted a new version based on the discussion prior to this and will update according to any follow ups from this or other edits. The update only includes the comments responded to so far, more to come. Thank you, Kathleen Sent from my mobile device > On Feb 9, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Adam R

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-09 Thread MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Adam, please see two further suggestions, in-line: > -Original Message- > From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 9:22 AM > To: Adam Roach > Cc: The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul Hoffman; draft-mm-wg- > effect-encr...

Re: [OPSAWG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: (with COMMENT)

2018-02-09 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
Hi Adam, Thanks for the additional comments. We'll discuss in line and make updates as appropriate. On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the sub