Hi Adam,
Thanks again for your updates. Responses inline.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> Responses inline; some text elided.
>
> On 2/9/18 8:22 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> §2
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 2/9/18 4:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM
>>> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
>>> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsa
On 2/9/18 4:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul
Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-effect-encr...@ietf.or
Al --
Response inline, some text elided.
On 2/9/18 11:21 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
Adam, please see two further suggestions, in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
§2.2.7:
A goal is protecting end-user
data -- b
Responses inline; some text elided.
On 2/9/18 8:22 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
---
§2.1.2 -- I am surprised that there is so much discussion of fields that are
not generally encrypted in practice (e.g., RTP headers, TCP
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:31 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM
>> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
>> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul
>> Hoffman; draf
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Roach [mailto:a...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:34 PM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty; The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul
> Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-effect-encr...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objec
I just posted a new version based on the discussion prior to this and will
update according to any follow ups from this or other edits. The update only
includes the comments responded to so far, more to come.
Thank you,
Kathleen
Sent from my mobile device
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Adam R
Adam, please see two further suggestions, in-line:
> -Original Message-
> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 9:22 AM
> To: Adam Roach
> Cc: The IESG; opsawg@ietf.org; Warren Kumari; Paul Hoffman; draft-mm-wg-
> effect-encr...
Hi Adam,
Thanks for the additional comments. We'll discuss in line and make
updates as appropriate.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the sub
10 matches
Mail list logo