now is the time to buy! it's cheap!
True. But it's not going to get any higher either (my own prediction) :)
George
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.
now is the time to buy!
Erm, what drugs are you taking and do you have any left over for me?
usatoday.com doesn't use SSL and that link without SSL isn't on their
site...
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA
Title: RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle
I think you can figure just from the text that this was a hoax. red hat acquiring microsoft? now that would take some serious capitalization.
Jon Baker
-Original Message-
From: Jesse, Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February
Interesting information especially about the HP boxes not being
replaced. Could it be that the HP/Compaq merger go ahead is not the move
that Larry desired? After all the RAC is an Oracle and Compaq wedding.
Looks like the honeymoon is over and the new young kid won for a while.
Maybe now it
Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their
Ah!! But 5 years down the road, Larry's Oracle database may not need any
administration at all. You may just buy the pre-fabricated OraLintel
gadget from him that runs your apps... :-))
Seriously, he me getting in position to fight the IBM Linux Mainframe
running DB2(IBM announced the Linux MF
-- Csillag Zsolt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Initialization error
Could not load home/oracle/OraHome/lib/libcIntsh.so
OCIDLL forced to home/oracle/OraHome/lib/libcIntsh.so
Load library home/oracle/OraHome/lib/libcIntsh.so returned 0
Config error? Notice the lack of a leading '/' on the paths.
--
Walt,
but but but.. I didn't know the answer. I didn't even really understand
the question! PLEASE tell me the answer, please? Pretty please? Pretty
please with whipped cream and TWO maraschino cherries on top?
Rachel
--- Weaver, Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, I sent out a totally
and chocolate obviously !!
-Original Message-
Sent: 09 November 2001 13:31
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Walt,
but but but.. I didn't know the answer. I didn't even really understand
the question! PLEASE tell me the answer, please? Pretty please? Pretty
please with
well duh the answer to EVERYTHING is 42
--- Orr, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK... it's 42! Nice kitty...
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 6:31 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Walt,
but but but.. I didn't know the answer. I didn't even
NOTE.
According to Tony Jambu author of Oracle's New Pricing, Oracle 9i Features and Some
Good Utilities article in the 4qtr 2001 issue of Select. Page 42 (ironic about the
page number)
The answer is 50 not 42 (for those HGTTG fans, you know what I mean).
Just another spin in the galaxy.
Wait...so...you got the SDS stuff goingand it works...but
you can't tell if it's faster?
Aching for results,
etc.
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
(Acually 4X10 is THE answer for us. Walt's on a
pounder, hell bore. report from hades
sounds like an interesting place to work.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Wait...so...you got the SDS stuff goingand it
I still like the bit about the Tower Controller knowing Walt.
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:26 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
pounder, hell bore. report from hades
sounds like an interesting place to work.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 19:50
1) i'm also thinking of installing an Intel Solaris on my PC .
What would U vote for - linux or Intel Solaris ?
depends on the $$$ u're willing to spend
2)
Alright, I sent out a totally innocent question to the list and didn't get a
single suggestion. I'm very disappointed in you people.
So, let me say that I figured it out without your help.
And I ain't saying what I did.
So there. PPPHHT!!!
-- Walt (my RAM disk is working
Yes, many people experienced that before. Oracle 8.0 works on GLIBC 2.0
(there is a compatibility
patch for GLIBC 2.1) and RH 7.1 is a GLIBC 2.2. Can you, please, downgrade
your OS to RH 5.1
or install 8.1.7 or 9i ?
Kindest regards!
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001
You don't have to downgrade anything for 9i to install. Follow the below
steps
1) When you get errors from OUI installer, open another telnet window, and
cd to the Oracle Home
2. Use any editor to modify $ORACLE_HOME/bin/genclntsh file, to remove -z
defs form it. (If you want to be more careful
mailing list. Michael Hesseltein
is doing a terrific job there!
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job
a terrific job there!
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job, I was running Red Hat 6.2 and Oracle
8.1.7
I've not really checked out Suse, you have to buy it versus being able
to get RH for free?
joe
Scott wrote:
I believe that Oracle has decided that when porting to
linux all products will be ported to SuSE and then
perform post release certifications on Redhat. I
believe stability and
Now Caldera is opening up original unix code under GPL (or a modifed version
of that), there will be even more fun in various versions that are available
freely.
Cheers
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot
PostGresSQL has been out for years, and is not RedHat specific, all
distributions have included it.
Do not criticize someone until you walked a mile in their shoes, that way
when you criticize them, you are a mile a way and have their shoes.
Christopher R. Spence
Oracle DBA
Phone: (978)
You can download Suse, but you have over 6,000 files to download. It's all
in a specific directory on there FTP server.
On the other hand, for RH you can just download a few ISO files and burn
them into CDs. Easy.
I believe that Suse Personal, with CD and manuals, is 30 bucks. I am
assuming
Yeah, the other thing, 6000 files which consist of 500Mb is about 10x slower
to download than 1 file which is 600Mb
The TCP protocol, ramps, which means, it gets up to speed within the first
few seconds of delivery, when your downloading many small files, your
bandwidth is cut down by 10 fold if
6000 files, what a pita, guess i'll stay with hacking rh to run oracle
:)
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/22/01 10:16AM You
can download Suse, but you have over 6,000 files to download. It's
allin a specific directory on there FTP server.On the other hand,
for RH you can just download a few ISO
Joe,
It's cheap. $60-70 for the pro version.
Even though I've been a long time RH user, I prefer SuSE
simply for the documentation and admin utils.
Jared
On Wednesday 22 August 2001 04:50, Joe Testa wrote:
I've not really checked out Suse, you have to buy it versus being able
to get RH
and its only 2.3K :)
guess i'm spoiled being able to grab darn near anything that oracle has
from technet.
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/22/01 11:00AM
True, but now RedHat pushes it as the 'Red Hat
Database'...http://www.redhat.com/products/software/database/Christopher
Spence wrote:
Title: RE: linux Oracle -- best combination
Have you tried an index hint on the first query yet?
Have you tried NVL(cmm_id,101) = 101,
NVL(cust_id,101) = 101
NVL(Friendly_session_id,100) = 100
loc_to_utc(NVL(creation_date,21-jun-2001')) between your dates?
-Original Message
granted $60 is not much but its A LOT more than free :)
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/22/01 11:56AM
Joe,It's cheap. $60-70 for the pro
version.Even though I've been a long time RH user, I prefer
SuSEsimply for the documentation and admin utils.JaredOn
Wednesday 22 August 2001 04:50, Joe Testa
We're trying to re-write some SQL such that the index on columns in the
where clause is used.Logically ,the query is as below .But this query does
not use the Index .However ,if we re-write it as below(see 2nd query) - the
index is used :but the query returns incorrect results .Can you suggest
In a previous job, I was running Red Hat 6.2 and Oracle 8.1.7. This was
quite stable. Keep in mind that we were not supporting hundreds of users.
I prefer SuSE because of the docs so I was pleased to see them become the
'lead' platform for Oracle on Linux. Still, I have not had a chance to
of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job, I was running Red Hat 6.2 and Oracle
8.1.7. This was
quite stable. Keep in mind that we were not supporting
hundreds of users.
I prefer SuSE because of the docs so I was pleased to see
them become
mailing list. Michael Hesseltein
is doing a terrific job there!
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: linux Oracle -- best combination
In a previous job, I
Lisa and others,
About a year ago, I was working for a company as a Linux systems
engineer (Read as: Tech guy doing sales support). Most of our customers
wanted Linux systems, and it was my responsibility to provide them the
correct combination of Linux and hardware to meet their needs.
I would be curious to see these tests going forward, seeing as RedHat
support is difficult to do with 9i and such. And suse now being Oracle's
perfered linux. I wonder if these results have changed. I never really
played with Oracle on Linux, but if I ever had to, I would be curious.
Do not
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Red Hat Oracle's preferred Linux
distribution, right up until the time they announced the availability of the Red
Hat Database (PostgreSQL)?
Brian
Christopher Spence wrote:
I would be curious to see these tests going forward, seeing as RedHat
support is
I believe that Oracle has decided that when porting to
linux all products will be ported to SuSE and then
perform post release certifications on Redhat. I
believe stability and support of multiple Linux
distributions was a factor in this decision. I run
both Redhat and SuSE and I actually perfer
Nope!
-Original Message-From: Saravana Kumar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday,
August 20, 2001 10:46 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: linux
Hi Friends,
I have small clarification to be made.
Can oracle for linux
software be intalled on
FreeBSD and OpenBSD are not supported by Oracle.
-Original Message-From:
Saravana Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Monday, August 20, 2001 10:46 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: linux
Hi Friends,
I have small clarification to be made.
There has been some success with 8.0.5 on FreeBSD,
but little to none with 8i.
-Joe
--- Saravana Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Friends,
I have small clarification to be made.
Can oracle for linux software be intalled on FREE BSD.
Thanks in advance
Saravana
Hi,
I've heard on a OpenBSD mailinglist about such thing. Seems that they've made
it after some adjustments. Go to the FreeBSD mailinglists for these questions.
oli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Friends,
I have small clarification to be made.
Can oracle for linux
Having used RedHat, Slackware, Mandrake, SuSE and others, my
vote goes for SuSE.
Excellent distribution, good installation and admin utilities, certified
for Oracle also.
Jared
On Friday 17 August 2001 05:23, Rao, UmaSankara S (CAP) wrote:
Hi Gurus,
Can u please tell me the most stable
Uma:
From what I've seen and used myself, SuSE seem to be officially endorsed distro. I've
heard of people installing on RedHat, but I've also heard (especially concerning 9i)
that it is a pain in the a__ to get working--if at all.
Jon Walthour
From: Rao, UmaSankara S (CAP) [EMAIL
If you need 24/7/365 server, install on kernel 2.2.
Jan Pruner
Dne pá 17. srpen 2001 14:23 jste napsal(a):
Hi Gurus,
Can u please tell me the most stable version of Linux on which I can
install Oracle 8i?
Thanks in advance
Uma
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
We're running two production 8.1.7 databases on Red Hat 6.2 here, will be
bringing up a couple more in a few weeks. It's very stable, although there
are a few annoying Oracle bugs peculiar to Linux that we've had to work
around.
We also have quite a few test databases running on Red Hat. Again,
other mailing lists
ORACLE-LINUX-L its at fatcity
SuSE-Oracle e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Micheal Hasenstein of SuSE Linux mentioned on the SuSE-Oracle list
Even the very latest 2.4 kernel is not as stable as 2.2.19.SuSE.
So I'd recommend SuSE 7.1 with a 2.2.19 kernel for Oracle 8.1.7 and
its a pain to get working(ok so it took some tweaking of the OS, some
compat libs, etc) but if you want hopefully plug and pray use windoze :)
forcing the square peg in a round hole is part of the fun.
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17/01 09:16AM
Uma:From what I've seen and used myself, SuSE
you talking about 9i for linux, yea i got it.
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/17/01 10:06AM
RRRGGGHHH
!!
Has anyone
successfully downloaded this from technet.
About to jump off
the roof.
Lee
The information contained in this
communication isconfidential, is intended only for
Title: Message
Yes, use a download manager such as getright otherwise you
never will.
"Walking on water and developing software from a
specification are easy if both are frozen."
Christopher R. Spence Oracle DBA Fuelspot
-Original Message-From: Robertson Lee -
lerobe
RRRGGGHHH !!
Has anyone successfully downloaded this from technet.
About to jump off the roof.
Lee
Yes, after at least 4 or 5 attempts each time ... I have downloaded both 8.1.7
and 9i from Linux and Netscape 4.7 (ADSL connection, 50 to 60 K/s usually). If
you
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 06:06:18AM -0800, Robertson Lee - lerobe wrote:
RRRGGGHHH !!
Has anyone successfully downloaded this from technet.
About to jump off the roof.
when you do, can I have your cds?
===
Ray
Title: RE: Linux Download and ADSL
I think ADSL is just a dream for most people who live in the UK. My local telephone exchange is modern but I cannot have ADSL because I live about 2.5 miles away and the signal will not be strong enough. Cabling will not happen for me so fast downloads
UK telecomms is in a hell of state.
For most of us the best option is a fast connection at work and a CD writer.
Cheers,
Mike
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858)
My ARSE :o)
-Original Message-
Sent: 17 July 2001 15:57
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
UK telecomms is in a hell of state.
For most of us the best option is a fast connection at work and a CD writer.
Cheers,
Mike
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
LOL me too!! We have tried to get ADSL in our area - Worcester, UK - and
have been told by BT that they have No plans to install it in our
exchange! Now, Worcester is a City, and I've heard of cases around the
country where smaller TOWNS can get hold of ADSL!!!
I'm not even going to consider
I have a cable modem (Telewest) and have no problems at all brilliant!!
Downloaded Developer 6i for Linux from technet in about 2hrs
I suppose I'm quite lucky... its only £25 a month as well :o)
ISDN / ADSL .. BT MY A-R-S-E! ;o)
I'd rather read the Sunday Times whilst going
What about Cable Modems ? any such service?
Mark Leith wrote:
LOL me too!! We have tried to get ADSL in our area - Worcester, UK - and
have been told by BT that they have No plans to install it in our
exchange! Now, Worcester is a City, and I've heard of cases around the
country where
Cable? Worcester? MR A-R-S-E! ;o)
-Original Message-
John (NESL-IT)
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 06:26
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I have a cable modem (Telewest) and have no problems at all brilliant!!
Downloaded Developer 6i for Linux from technet in about 2hrs
I
I got it, without getright
From: Christopher Spence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Linux Download
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:41:37 -0800
Yes, use a download manager such as getright otherwise you never
Hi
. profile and its associates for the other shells need only be read only
for the user. It is common behavior on a production server to have the
majority of users profiles linked to a central profile file so it is only
editable by the System Admin. This keeps a potential security hole at
hi,
In linux it is bash shell and you have to change you bash_profile of oracle and
not the .profile file. check that out
Csillag Zsolt wrote:
Hi,
Since I'd like to install Oracle for Linux, I need to change the profile for
user 'oracle'.
I edited the .profile file located in
Also, make sure the .profile is executable. It isn't by default
usually. Also make sure the oracle account is setup to use a shell
that the .profile actually applies to. For example, ksh (my personal
favoriate). C shell uses the .login.
-Original Message-
Sent: Saturday, June 30,
Kimberly,
Since .profile is of little use unless sourced,
why make it executable?
Maybe I missed something here, but I've never used
an executable .profile.
Jared
On Sunday 01 July 2001 11:15, Kimberly Smith wrote:
Also, make sure the .profile is executable. It isn't by default
usually.
On June 30, 2001 01:30 pm, Csillag Zsolt wrote:
Hi,
Since I'd like to install Oracle for Linux, I need to change the
profile for user 'oracle'.
I edited the .profile file located in /home/oracle folder but it
seems to me that this isn't the file that Linux loads at startup.
Take a look at
What shell are you using? Different shell uses different startup filename.
If you are using bash, then it's .bashrc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/01 12:30PM
Hi,
Since I'd like to install Oracle for Linux, I need to change the profile for
user 'oracle'.
I edited the .profile file located in
also, try man bash (or whatever your shell is). It will explain what
files are sourced under which circumstances.
george
On Saturday, June 30, 2001, at 01:20 PM, Gregory Conron wrote:
On June 30, 2001 01:30 pm, Csillag Zsolt wrote:
Hi,
Since I'd like to install Oracle for Linux, I need
I have installed 8.1.5, 8.1.6, and 8.1.7 w OPS. Perhaps you can try to
install use the 8.1.7 w. OPS.
Richard
-Original Message-
Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
8.1.7 R3 Enterprise Edition. No OPS
At 08:20 AM 4/3/01 -0800, you
I'll be installing Suse 7.1 with Oracle this week.
I'll let ya'll know how it goes.
Jared
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Ron Rogers wrote:
List,
I am playing with the idea of loading my PC with Linux and Oracle for test
purposes( We have to migrate from Novell in the near future). What have you
I am running Caldera Linux 2.5 (?) and Oracle 8.1.7 rel 2. Installed
cleanly. Runs flawlessly.
This is a personal sandbox not production.
Pete Barnett
Oracle Database Administrator
Regence BlueCross BlueShield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be
At 01:52 PM 4/2/01 -0800, you wrote:
I've found RH6.2 and Oracle 8.1.7.0.1 to be pretty compatible. Don't know
about the other Linux distributions.
That's interesting. I have an 8.1.6 and 8.1.7 installation cd, and RH6.2 .
Tried installing 8.1.7, and it died with the "800%cpu" thing. 8.1.6
I used the Oracle 8.1.7 with OPS linux version. Were your version just
8.1.7 or 8.1.7 with OPS?
Richard
-Original Message-
Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
At 01:52 PM 4/2/01 -0800, you wrote:
I've found RH6.2 and Oracle 8.1.7.0.1
8.1.7 R3 Enterprise Edition. No OPS
At 08:20 AM 4/3/01 -0800, you wrote:
I used the Oracle 8.1.7 with OPS linux version. Were your version just
8.1.7 or 8.1.7 with OPS?
Richard
-Original Message-
Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Richard,
What was your experience (good/bad) with Oracle Parallel Server on linux?
What kind of hardware did you use? Which linux os version?
TIA,
Gerardo
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I used the Oracle 8.1.7 with
I've found RH6.2 and Oracle 8.1.7.0.1 to be pretty compatible. Don't know
about the other Linux distributions.
Richard
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 4:16 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
List,
I am playing with the idea of loading my PC with Linux and
OEM for linux is available in the 8.1.7 download from technet. Another good
place to look is http://www.orasoft.org. Matthew has written a fairly good
sql worksheet. They both work off the idea of a sql window and output
window. Both give you command history, scrollable output, export of
Let me rephrase OEM is "free" in accordance with the license restrictions in
the development download. Orasoft is GPL for the downloadable version.
On Monday 26 March 2001 15:31, you wrote:
OEM for linux is available in the 8.1.7 download from technet. Another
good place to look is
OEM will do just fine. It's available on 8.1.7
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi,
I have a user who works on Linux and wants a SQL interface other than
command line sqlplus. Since I don't use Linux, I checked my
Hi Steve,
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. As I said, they are not busy
machines so I hadn't noticed any paging activity at all.
Two more kernels, 2.2.17 and a 2.4 are in my test area so
I guess I should upgrade once again sigh..
I would like to jump
101 - 179 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
